The Co-production of Scale and Power: The Case of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment and the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services

References

• Beck, S., Borie, M., Esguerra, A., Chilvers, J., Heubach, K., Hulme, M., … Görg, C. (2014). Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA—Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23(2), 80–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, S., & Forsyth, T. (2014). Democratizing global environmental assessments: The IPCC and adaptation. In S. Hilgartner, C. A. Miller, & R. Hagendijk (Eds.), Science and democracy. Making knowledge and making power in the biosciences and beyond. London: Routledge (accepted for publication).
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 489–500. doi: 10.1017/S037689291000072X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U., Görg, C., Hirsch, J., & Wissen, M. (2008). Conflicts in environmental regulation and the internationalization of the state: Contested terrains. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., Görg, C., & Wissen, M. (2011). Second-order condensations of societal power relations. Environmental politics and the internationalisation of the state from a neo-poulantzian perspective. Antipode, 43(1), 149–175. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2010.00815.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N. (2001). The limits to scale? Methodological reflections on scalar structuration. Progress in Human Geography, 25(4), 591–614. doi: 10.1191/030913201682688959
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., et al. (2003). State/space: A reader. Malden: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., & Keil, R. (Eds.). (2006). The global cities reader. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, J. P. (2006). What counts as local knowledge in global environmental assessments and conventions? In W. Reid, F. Berkes, T. Wilbanks, & D. Capistrano (Eds.), Bridging scales and knowledge systems: Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment (pp. 129–144). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. C., & Purcell, M. (2005). There's nothing inherent about scale: Political ecology, the local trap, and the politics of development in the Brazilian Amazon. Geoforum, 36, 607–624. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2005). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Political Geography, 24(8), 875–902. doi: 10.1016/j.polgeo.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, S. R., DeFries, R., Dietz, T., Mooney, H. A., Polasky, S., Reid, W. V., & Scholes, R. J. (2006). ECOLOGY: Enhanced: Millennium ecosystem assessment: Research needs. Science, 314, 257–258. doi: 10.1126/science.1131946
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIVERSITAS. (2005). Oaxaca declaration on biodiversity—DIVERSITAS. Retrieved from http://www.diversitas-international.org/activities/open-science-conferences/osc1–1/oaxaca-declaration
   Google Scholar
• Filer, C. (2009). A bridge too far: The knowledge problem in the millennium assessment. In J. Carrier & P. West (Eds.), Virtualism, governance and practice: Vision and execution in environmental conservation (pp. 84–111). New York: Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M. (2005). Imperial nature: The World Bank and struggles for social justice in the age of globalization. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, M., Nadasdy, N., & Turner, M. (Eds.). (2010). Knowing nature. Chicago, IL: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Görg, C., & Rauschmeyer, F. (2009). Multi-level-governance and the politics of scale—the challenge of the millennium ecosystem assessment. In G. Kütting & R. Lipschutz (Eds.), Environmental governance, power and knowledge in a local-global world (pp. 81–99). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Görg, C., et al. (2007). International science-policy interfaces for biodiversity governance—needs, challenges, experiences a contribution to the IMoSEB consultative process. Leipzig: UFZ.
   Google Scholar
• Granjou, C., et al. (2013). Assessing nature? The genesis of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Science Technology & Society, 18(1), 9–27. doi: 10.1177/0971721813484232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guston, D. (2001). Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science: An introduction. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 26(4), 399–408. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P. M. (1992). Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination. International Organization, 46(1), 1–35. doi: 10.1017/S0020818300001442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). Performing governance through networks. European Political Science, 4(3), 340–347. doi: 10.1057/palgrave.eps.2210034
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. (2003). The state's new clothes: NGOs and the internationalisation of states. Rethinking Marxism, 15(2), 237–262. doi: 10.1080/0893569032000151224
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M., Mahony, M., Beck, S., Gorg, C., Hansjurgens, B., Hauck, J., … van der Sluijs, J. P. (2011). Science-policy interface: Beyond assessments. Science, 333(6043), 697–698. doi: 10.1126/science.333.6043.697
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IISD. (2012). IPBES-2 summary and analysis, 16–21 April 2012, Panama City, Panama. 16 (104). Retrieved from http://www.iisd.ca/vol16/enb16104e.html
   Google Scholar
• IISD. (2013). Summary of the second session of the Plenary of the IPBES. 9–14 December 2013, Antalya, Turkey. 31 (13). Retrieved from http://www.iisd.ca/vol31/enb3113e.html.
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. (2012). IPBES/1/INF/11—guidance document on the nomination and selection process for officers of the bureau and members of the multidisciplinary expert panel of the intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Retrieved from http://www.ipbes.net/plenary/ipbes-1
   Google Scholar
• IPBES. (2013). IPBES/1/L1: Draft report of the meeting. Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES)—Bonn. Retrieved from http://www.ipbes.net/bonn
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1987). Contested boundaries in policy-relevant science. Social Studies of Science, 17, 195–230. doi: 10.1177/030631287017002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1990). The fifth branch: Science advisors as policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: the co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2012). Science and public reason. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessop, B. (2002). The future of the capitalist state. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Larigauderie, A., & Mooney, H. A. (2010). The intergovernmental science-policy platform on biodiversity and ecosystem services: Moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2(1), 9–14. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M., Sumner, A., & Waldman, L. (2008). Discourses, dynamics and disquiet: Multiple knowledges in science, society and development. Journal of International Development, 20(6), 727–738. doi: 10.1002/jid.1492
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R., & Sundqvist, G. (Eds.). (2011). Governing the air: The dynamics of science, policy, and citizen interaction. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loreau, M., Oteng-Yeboah, A., Arroyo, M. T. K., Babin, D., Barbault, R., Donoghue, M., … Watson, R. T. (2006). Diversity without representation. Nature, 442(7100), 245–246. doi: 10.1038/442245a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MA. (2003). Ecosystems and human well-being: A framework for assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• MA. (2005a). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis report of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• MA. (2005b). Our planet—summary for decision makers. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• MA. (2005c). Ecosystems and human well-being: Multiscale assessments. Findings of the sub-global assessments working group of the millennium ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mahony, M. (2013). Boundary spaces: Science, politics and the epistemic geographies of climate change in Copenhagen. Geoforum, 49, 29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2013.05.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martello, M. L., & Jasanoff, S. (2004). Introduction: Globalization and environmental governance. In S. Jasanoff & M. L. Martello (Eds.), Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance (pp. 1–29). Cambridge: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26(4), 478–500. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C., & Erickson, P. H. (2006). The politics of bridging scales and epistemologies: Science and democracy in global environmental governance. In W. Reid, F. Berkes, T. Wilbanks, & D. Capistrano (Eds.), Bridging scales and knowledge systems: Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment (pp. 297–314). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., & Newig, J. (2010). Multi-level water governance and problems of scale setting the stage for a broader debate. Environmental Management, 46, 1–6. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9531-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powell, R. C. (2007). Geographies of science: Histories, localities, practices, futures. Progress in Human Geography, 31(3), 309–329. doi: 10.1177/0309132507077081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. V. (2002). Millennium ecosystem assessment. Newsletter, April.
   Google Scholar
• Reid, W. V. (2004). Bridging the science–policy divide. PLoS Biol, 2(2), 169–171. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0020027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid, W. V., et al. (2006). Bridging scales and knowledge systems. Concepts and applications in ecosystem assessment. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sassen, S. (1994). Cities in world economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scholes, R., et al. (2013). Multi-scale and cross-scale assessments of social–ecological systems and their ecosystem services. Terrestrial systems, 5(1), 16–25.
   Google Scholar
• Scoones, I. (2009). The politics of global assessments: The case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(3), 547–571. doi: 10.1080/03066150903155008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (1997). Neither global nor local. ‘Glocalization’ and the politics of scale. In K. Cox (Eds.), Spaces of globalization. Reasserting the power of the local (pp. 137–166). New York, NY: Guilford/Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Place, nature and the question of scale: Interrogating the production of nature. Materialien der interdisziplinären Arbeitsgruppen IAG Globaler Wandel—Regionale Entwicklung. Diskussionspapier Nr. 5, Berlin: Berlin-Brandenburgische Akademie der Wissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Bloomfield, B., Hulme, M., Vogel, J., & Wynne, B. (2012). Conservation policy: Listen to the voices of experience. Nature, 488(7412), 454–455. doi: 10.1038/488454a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissen, M. (2011). Gesellschaftliche Naturverhältnisse in der Internationalisierung des Staates. Konflikte um die Räumlichkeit staatlicher Politik und die Kontrolle natürlicher Ressourcen. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.
   Google Scholar