Is Learning without teaching possible? The productive tension between network governance and reflexivity

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: a conceptual framework between the old and new policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37, 339–356. doi: 10.1007/s11077-005-0156-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M., & Coleman, W. (1989). Strong states and weak states: Sectoral policy networks in advanced capitalist economies. British Journal of Political Science, 19, 47–67. doi: 10.1017/S0007123400005317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., & Rotmans, J. (2009). Power in transition: An interdisciplinary framework to study power in relation to structural change. European Journal of Social Theory, 12, 543–569. doi: 10.1177/1368431009349830
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Backstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (2010). Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Bonss, W., & Lau, C. (2003). The theory of reflexive modernization: Problematic, hypotheses and research programme. Theory, Culture & Society, 20, 1–33. doi: 10.1177/0263276403020002001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lasch, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization. Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Blanco, I., Lowndes, V., & Pratchett, L. (2011). Policy networks and governance networks: Towards greater conceptual clarity. Political Studies Review, 9, 297–308. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2011.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borgatti, S. P. (2005). Centrality and network flow. Social Networks, 27, 55–71. doi: 10.1016/j.socnet.2004.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bueren, E., Klijn, E.-H., & Joop, F. M. K. (2003). Dealing with wicked problems in networks: Analyzing an environmental debate from a network perspective. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 13, 193–212. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mug017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burris, S., Drahos, P., & Shearing, C. (2005). Nodal governance. Australian Journal of Legal, Philosophy, 30, 30–58.
   Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1980). Models of network structure. Annual Review of Sociology, 6, 79–141. doi: 10.1146/annurev.so.06.080180.000455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burt, R. S. (1992). Structural holes: The structure of competition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, D., Esterling, K., & Lazer, D. (1998). The strength of weak ties in lobbying networks: Evidence from health-care politics in the United States. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10, 417–444. doi: 10.1177/0951692898010004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, W. K., & Carson, C. (2003). Forging a new hegemony? The role of transnational policy groups in the network and discourses of global corporate governance. Journal of World-Systems Research, 9, 67–102. doi: 10.5195/JWSR.2003.257
   Google Scholar
• Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), S95–S120. doi: 10.1086/228943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coleman, W. D., & Skogstad, G. (1990). Policy communities and public policies in Canada. Toronto: Copp Clark.
   Google Scholar
• Collingridge, D., & Reeve, C. (1986). Science speaks to power: The role of experts in policymaking. London: Frances Pinter.
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S., & Cooper, R. (2003). Experimental studies of cooperation, trust and social exchange. In E. Ostrom & J. Walker (Eds.), Trust and reciprocity (pp. 209–244). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C., & Radaelli, C. (2013). Systematizing policy learning: From monoliths to dimensions. Political Studies, 61, 599–619. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2012.00982.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eaton, E. (2013). Growing resistance: Canadian farmers and the politics of genetically modified wheat. Winnipeg: University of Manitoba Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elzen, B., Geels, F. W., & Green, K. (2004). Systems innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence, and policy. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Fawcett, P., & Daugbjerg, C. (2012). Explaining governance outcomes: Epistemology, network governance and policy network analysis. Political Studies Review, 10, 195–207. doi: 10.1111/j.1478-9302.2012.00257.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H. (2010). Policy-learning and environmental policy integration in the common agricultural policy, 1973–2003. Public Administration, 88(2), 296–314. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239. doi: 10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1991). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gieryn, T. F. (1983). Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: Strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48, 781–795. doi: 10.2307/2095325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gittell, R., & Vidal, A. (1998). Community organizing: Building social capital as a development strategy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78, 1360–1380. doi: 10.1086/225469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions in sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2003). Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sciences, 36, 175–195. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834510939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, N., & Wood, J. (2008). Governing beyond command and control: A responsive and nodal approach to child protection. Sociology of Crime Law and Deviance, 10, 327–344. doi: 10.1016/S1521-6136(07)00215-1
   Google Scholar
• Heinz, J., Laumann, E., Nelson, R., & Salisbury, R. (1993). The hollow core: Private interests in national policymaking. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2006). Grounding reflexive governance in practice and context: Some democratic considerations. In J. Voss, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 5–7). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualising reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9, 333–350. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Heritier, A., & Lehmkuhl, D. (2008). Introduction: The shadow of hierarchy and new modes of governance. Journal of Public Policy, 28, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Hindmoor, A. (1998). The importance of being trusted: Transaction costs and policy network theory. Public Administration, 76, 25–43. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2002). Do networks matter? Linking policy network structure to policy outcomes: Evidence from four Canadian policy sectors 1990–2000. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 25, 235–267.
   Google Scholar
• Jack, S. L., Dodd, S. D., & Anderson, A. R. (2004). Social structures and entrepreneurial networks: The strength of strong ties. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 5, 107–120. doi: 10.5367/000000004773863264
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1997). Compelling knowledge in public decisions. In L. Brooks & S. VanDeever (Eds.), Saving the seas: Values, scientists and international governance (pp. 229–252). College Park, MD: Maryland Sea Grant.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2006). Transition management: A reflexive governance approach. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 103–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, F., & Smith, A. (2008). Restructuring energy systems for sustainability? Energy transition policy in the Netherlands. Energy Policy, 36, 4093–4103. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, G. (1996). Regulating Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marcoux, J.-M., & Letourneau, L. (2013). A distorted regulatory landscape: Genetically modified wheat and the influence of non-safety issues in Canada. Science and Public Policy. doi:10.1093/scipol/sct003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLain, R. J., & Lee, R. G. (1996). Adaptive management: Promises and pitfalls. Environmental Management, 20, 437–448. doi: 10.1007/BF01474647
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt, K., & Pal, L. A. (2011). Modernizing government: Mapping global public policy networks. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 24, 439–467. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2011.01532.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 9, 299–314. doi: 10.1080/15239080701631544
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Sustainability Transitions, 1, 70–75. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., & Hellin, M. (2010). Policy making in the indeterminate world of energy transitions: Carbon capture and storage as energy transition or enhanced carbon ‘lock in’. In G. Toner, L. Pal, & M. Prince (Eds.), Policy: From ideas to implementation (pp. 232–256). Montreal: McGill Queens University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Monge, P. R., & Contractor, N. (2003). Theories of communication networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Montpetit, E. (2005). A policy network explanation of biotechnology policy differences between the United States and Canada. Journal of Public Policy, 25, 339–356. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X05000358
   Google Scholar
• Montpetit, E. (2007). Policy design for legitimacy: Knowledge, citizens, time and inclusion in the United Kingdom's biotechnology sector. Public Administration, 39, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Montpetit, E., & Rouillard, C. (2008). Culture and the democratization of risk management: The widening biotechnology gap between Canada and France. Administration and Society, 39, 907–930. doi: 10.1177/0095399707307310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore, E. (2000, April). Food safety, labeling, and the role of science: Regulating genetically-engineered food crops in Canada and the United States. Paper presented at the meeting of the ECPR Joint Sessions Workshop on The Politics of Food, Copenhagen.
   Google Scholar
• Moore, E. (2007). The new agriculture: Genetically-engineered food in Canada. Policy and Society, 26, 31–48. doi: 10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70099-1
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, R. E. (1989). The strength of strong ties: Social networks and intergroup conflict in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 32, 377–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. (2005). Learning, frames, and environmental policy integration: The case of Swedish energy policy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 23, 207–226. doi: 10.1068/c0405j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M., & Eckerberg, K. (2007). Environmental policy integration in practice: Shaping institutions for learning. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, B. (2000). Strategic environmental assessment: What is it? What makes it strategic? Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management, 2, 203–224.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips, P. (2007). Governing transformative technological innovation: Who's in charge? Oxford: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out: The strange disappearance of social capital in America. PS: Political Science & Politics, 28, 664–683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2007). Whither better regulation for the Lisbon agenda? Journal of European Public Policy, 14, 190–207. doi: 10.1080/13501760601122274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayner, J., & Howlett, M. (2009). Implementing integrated land management in Western Canada: Policy reform and the resilience of clientelism. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 1, 321–334. doi: 10.1080/19390450903137565
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2008). Transition management: Reflexive governance of societal complexity through searching, learning and experimenting. In J. C. J. M. Van Den Bergh & F. R. Bruinsma (Eds.), Managing the transition to renewable energy: Theory and practice from local, regional and macro perspectives (pp. 15–46). Cheltenham: Edward.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1994). Games real actors could play: Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6, 27–53. doi: 10.1177/0951692894006001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (1998). Ideas, paradigms and institutions: Agricultural exceptionalism in the European Union and the United States. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration, 11, 463–490. doi: 10.1111/0952-1895.00082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2003). Legitimacy and/or policy effectiveness? Network governance and GMO regulation in the European Union. Journal of European Public Policy, 10, 321–338. doi: 10.1080/1350176032000085333
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smyth, S., & McHughen, A. (2008). Regulating innovative crop technologies in Canada: The case of regulating genetically modified crops. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 6, 213–225. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7652.2007.00309.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). Network governance and post-liberal democracy. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 27, 197–237. doi: 10.1080/10841806.2005.11029489
   Google Scholar
• Sorensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theories of democratic network governance. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, J., Nilsson, M., Russel, D., Jordan, A., Hertin, J., & Nykvist, B. (2008). Why is integrating policy assessment so hard? A comparative analysis of the institutional capacities and constraints. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51, 759–775. doi: 10.1080/09640560802423541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Oxford: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., & Bornemann, B. (2011). The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 9–31. doi: 10.5751/ES-04051-160209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–28). Oxford: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zeitlin, J., & Sabel, C. (2012). Experimentalist governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 169–183). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar