Enhancing ‘Boundary Work' Through the Use of Virtual Reality: Exploring the Potential within Landscape and Visual Impact Assessment

References

• Appleton, K., & Lovett, A. (2003). GIS-based visualisation of rural landscapes: Defining ‘sufficient’ realism for environmental decision-making. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 117–131. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00245-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appleton, K., & Lovett, A. (2005). GIS-based visualisation of development proposals: Reactions from planning and related professionals. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 29(3), 321–339. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2004.05.005
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, K., Lovett, A., Sunnenberg, G., & Dockerty, T. (2002). Rural landscape visualisation from GIS databases: A comparison of approaches, options, and problems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 26(2–3), 141–162. doi: 10.1016/S0198-9715(01)00041-2
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Planning Association, 35, 216–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astrom, J., Granerg, M., & Khakee, A. (2011). Apple Pie-Spinach metaphor: Shall e-Democracy make participatory planning more wholesome? Planning Practice and Research, 26, 571–586. doi: 10.1080/02697459.2011.626723
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R., & Higgs, G. (2012). Gauging levels of public acceptance of the use of visualisation tools in promoting public participation; a case study of wind farm planning in South Wales, UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(2), 229–251. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2011.591925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, R., Higgs, G., Fry, R., & Langford, M. (2011). Web based GIS approaches to enhanced public participation in wind farm planning. Transactions in GIS, 15(2), 147–172. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9671.2011.01240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carmines, E. G., & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and validity assessment. Beverly Hills: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M., Eckley, N., Guston, D. H., … Mitchell, R. B. (2003). Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8086–8091. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231332100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. doi: 10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Cutts, B. B., White, D. D., & Kinzig, A. P. (2011). Participatory geographical information systems for the co-production of science and policy in an emerging boundary organization. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 977–985. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.05.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Danese, M., Las Casas, G., & Murgante, B. (2008). 3D simulations in environmental impact assessment, Computational science and its applications. Lecture Notes in Computer Science Volume, 5072, 430–443. doi: 10.1007/978-3-540-69839-5_32
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, P., & Unwin, D. (Eds). (2002). Virtual reality in geography. New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fleischmann, K. R. (2006). Boundary objects with agency: A method for studying the design-use interface. The Information Society: An International Journal, 22(2), 77–87. doi: 10.1080/01972240600567188
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, R. (1990). Algorithms for realistic image synthesis. In D. F. Robers, & R. A. Earnshaw (Eds.), Computer graphics techniques: Theory and practice (pp. 159–234). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hallisey, E. J. (2005). Cartographic visualization: An assessment and epistemological review. The Professional Geographer, 57(3), 350–364. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-0124.2005.00483.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, F., & Chrisman, N. (1998). Boundary objects and the social construction of GIS technology. Environment and Planning A, 30, 1683–1694. doi: 10.1068/a301683
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, U. W. (2011). Which is the appropriate 3D visualisation type for participatory landscape planning workshops? A portfolio of their effectiveness. Environment and Planning B, 38, 921–939. doi: 10.1068/b36113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchen, T. (2007). Skills for planning practice. NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lai, P. C., Kwong, K. H., & Mak, A. S. H. (2010). Assessing the applicability and effectiveness of 3D visualisation in environmental impact assessment. Environmental and Planning B: Planning and Design, 37, 221–233. doi: 10.1068/b34141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landscape Institute and Institute of Environmental Management & Assessment. (2013). Guidelines for landscape and visual impact assessment (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lange, E. (2001). The limits of realism: Perceptions of virtual landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 163–182. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00134-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, E. (2011). 99 volumes later: We can visualise. Nor what? Landscape and Urban Planning, 100, 403–406. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2011.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. L. (2012). More art than science: The sources and effects of stylistic variation in visualization for planning and design. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 551–565. doi: 10.1068/b37148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachren, A. B. (2004). How maps work: Representation, visualization, and design (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McQuillan, A. G. (1998). Honesty and foresight in computer visualizations. Journal of Forestry, 96(6), 15–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. (2001). Hybrid management: Boundary organizations, science policy, and environmental governance in the climate regime. Science, Technology & Human Values, 26, 478–500. doi: 10.1177/016224390102600405
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, J. F., & Hoffman, R. E. (2001). Rating reliability and representation validity in scenic landscape assessments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 149–161. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00133-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, J. D., Campbell, C., Journeay, M., & Sheppard, R. J. (2009). The digital workshop: Exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2090–2101. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarkki, S., Niemela, J., Tinch, R., van den Hove, S., Watt, A., & Young, J. (2014). Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces. Science and Public Policy, 41(2), 194–206. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, A., Sheppard, S., Burch, S., Flanders, D., Wiek, A., Carmichael, J., … Cohen, S. (2009). Making local future tangible-synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Global Environmental Change, 19, 447–463. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J. (2001). Guidance for crystal ball gazers: Developing a code of ethics for landscape visualisation. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54, 183–199. doi: 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00135-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J. (2005). Validity, reliability, and ethics in visualization. In I. Bishop & E. Lange (Eds.), Visualization in landscape and environmental planning: Technology and applications (pp. 79–97). London: Taylor and Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J., & Cizek, P. (2009). The ethics of google earth: Crossing thresholds from spatial data to landscape visualisation. Journal of Environmental Management, 90, 2102–2117. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J., Shaw, A., Flanders, D., & Burch, S. (2008). Can visualization save the world? Lessons for Landscape Architects from visualizing local climate change. The Ninth International Conference on Digital Design in Landscape Architecture (pp. 1–20). Germany: Anhalt University of Applied Sciences Dessau/Bernburg.
   Google Scholar
• Star, S. L. (2010). This is not a boundary object: Reflections on the origin of a concept. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5), 601–617. doi: 10.1177/0162243910377624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vervoort, J. M., Kok, K., van Lammeren, R., & Veldkamp, T. (2010). Stepping into futures: Exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems. Futures, 42, 604–616. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.04.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, D. D., Wutich, A., Larson, K. L., Gober, P., Lant, T., & Senneville, C. (2010). Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: Water managers’ assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theatre. Science and Public Policy, 37(3), 219–232. doi: 10.3152/030234210X497726
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, K. J. H., Ford, R. M., Bishop, I. D., Loiterton, D., & Hickey, J. (2007). Realism and selectivity in data-driven visualisations: A process for developing viewer-oriented landscape surrogates. Landscape and Urban Planning, 81, 213–224. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, J., Lindsey, G., & Liu, G. (2008). Viewshed characteristics of urban pedestrian trails, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. Journal of Maps, 4(1), 108–118. doi: 10.4113/jom.2008.1014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, H., He, Z., & Gong, J. (2010). A virtual globe-based 3D visualisation and interactive framework for public participation in urban planning processes. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 34, 291–298. doi: 10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2009.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar