Environmental Co-governance, Legitimacy, and the Quest for Compliance: When and Why Is Stakeholder Participation Desirable?

References

• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Plummer, R., Berkes, F., Arthur, R. I., Charles, A., Davidson-Hunt, I., & Diduck, A. (2009). Adaptive co-management for social-ecological complexity. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 7(2), 95–102. doi: 10.1890/070089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (Eds.). (2010). Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Béné, C., & Neiland, A. E. (2006). From participation to governance: A critical review of the concepts of governance, co-management and participation, and their implementation in small-scale inland fisheries in developing countries, WorldFish Centre Studies and Reviews 29. The WorldFish Center, Penang, Malaysia and the CGIAR Challenge Program on Water and Food, Colombo, Sri Lanka. Retrieved from http://pubs.iclarm.net/resource_centre/GovernancePaper.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2012). Implementing ecosystem-based management: Evolution or revolution? Fish and Fisheries, 13(4), 465–476. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-2979.2011.00452.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite, V. (1995). Games of engagement: Postures within the regulatory community. Law and Policy, 17(3), 225–255. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9930.1995.tb00149.x
   Google Scholar
• Carlsson, L., & Berkes, F. (2005). Co-management: Concepts and methodological implications. Journal of Environmental Management, 75(1), 65–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.11.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, T., & Robertson, P. J. (2014). Deliberation and decision in collaborative governance: A simulation of approaches to mitigate power imbalance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(2), 495–518. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mut003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cialdini, R. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(4), 105–109. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daw, T., & Gray, T. (2005). Fisheries science and sustainability in international policy: A study of failure in the European Union's common fisheries policy. Marine Policy, 29(3), 189–197. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2004.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Duit, A., & Hall, O. (2014). Causes and consequences of stakeholder participation in natural resource management: Evidence from 143 biosphere reserves in 55 countries. In A. Duit (Ed.), State and environment: The comparative study of environmental governance (pp. 293–319). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, L., Cherrett, N., & Pemsl, D. (2011). Assessing the impact of fisheries co-management interventions in developing countries: A meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Management, 92(8), 1938–1949. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.03.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66 ( special issue), 66–75. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (Eds.). (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Gilek, M., & Kern, K. (Eds.). (2015). Governing Europe's marine environment: Europeanization of regional seas or regionalization of EU policies. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, T. S. (Ed.). (2005). Participation in fisheries governance. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gutiérrez, N., Hilborn, R., & Defeo, O. (2011). Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature, 470(17), 386–389. doi: 10.1038/nature09689
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (2004). Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, T. (2011). Self-organized governance networks for ecosystem management: Who is accountable? Ecology and Society, 16(2), Article 18. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol16/iss2/art18/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatcher, A., Jaffry, S., Thebaud, O., & Bennett, E. (2000). Normative and social influences affecting compliance with fishery regulations. Land Economics, 76(3), 448–461. doi: 10.2307/3147040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernes, H. K., S. Jentoft, & Mikalsen, K. (2005). Fisheries governance, social justice and participatory decision making. In T. S. Gray (Ed.), Participation in fisheries governance (pp. 103–118). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hønneland, G. (2000). Compliance in the Barents Sea fisheries. How fishermen account for conformity with rules. Marine Policy, 24(1), 11–19. doi: 10.1016/S0308-597X(98)00058-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jagers, S., Berlin, D., & Jentoft, S. (2012). Why comply? Attitudes towards harvest regulations among Swedish fishers. Marine Policy, 36(5), 969–976. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. (2000). Legitimacy and disappointment in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 24(2), 141–148. doi: 10.1016/S0308-597X(99)00025-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. (2013). Social justice in the context of fisheries—A governability challenge. In M. Bavinck, R. Chuenpagdee, S. Jentoft, & J. Kooiman (Eds.), Governability of fisheries and aquaculture: Theory and applications (pp. 45–65). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., & McKay, B. J. (1995). User participation in fisheries management: Lessons drawn from international experiences. Marine Policy, 19(3), 227–246. doi: 10.1016/0308-597X(94)00010-P
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, D., & Sutinen, J. (2010). Rational noncompliance and the liquidation of northeast groundfish resources. Marine Policy, 34(1), 7–21. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2009.04.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An introduction. Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66( special issue), 111–121. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lane, M. (2003). Decentralization or privatization of environmental governance? Forest conflict and bioregional assessment in Australia. Journal of Rural Studies, 19(3), 283–294. doi: 10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00084-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M. (1997). Consent, dissent, and patriotism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lidskog, R. (2008). Scientised citizens and democratised science. Re-assessing the expert-lay divide. Journal of Risk Research, 11(1–2), 69–86. doi: 10.1080/13669870701521636
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linke, S., & Jentoft, S. (2013). A communicative turnaround: Shifting the burden of proof in European fisheries governance. Marine Policy, 38( March), 337–345. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.06.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., … Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 1–26). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. (2004). Compliance motivations: Affirmative and negative bases. Law and Society Review, 38(1), 41–68. doi: 10.1111/j.0023-9216.2004.03801002.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2004). Deliberative democracy. In R. F. Durant, D. J. Fiorino, & R. O'Leary (Eds.), Environmental governance reconsidered (pp. 183–218). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nielsen, J. R. (2003). An analytical framework for studying compliance and legitimacy in fisheries management. Marine Policy, 27(5), 425–432. doi: 10.1016/S0308-597X(03)00022-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson, M. (1971). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Österblom, H., Symes, D., Kadin, M., Daw, T., & Folke, C. (2011). Incentives, social-ecological feedbacks and European fisheries. Marine Policy, 35(5), 568–574. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.01.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkins, J., & Mitchell, R. (2005). Public participation as public debate: A deliberative turn in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 18(6), 529–540. doi: 10.1080/08941920590947977
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pateman, C. (2012). Participatory democracy revisited. Perspectives on Politics, 10(1), 7–19. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004877
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (2012). On the people's terms: A republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R. S., & Rivera-Guieb, R. (2006). Fishery co-management: A practical handbook. Cambridge, MA: CABI.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S. (2008). Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological Conservation, 141(10), 2417–2431. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Risse, T. (2004). Global governance and communicative action. Government and Opposition, 39(2), 288–313. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.2004.00124.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothstein, B. (2005). Social traps and the problem of trust. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schuckman, M. (2001). Making the hard choices: A collaborative governance model for the biodiversity context. Washington University Law Quarterly, 79(1), 343–365.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (2009). The idea of justice. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Sen, S., & Nielsen, J. R. (1996). Fisheries co-management: A comparative analysis. Marine Policy, 20(5), 405–418. doi: 10.1016/0308-597X(96)00028-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Symes, D. (2012). Regionalising the common fisheries policy: Context, content and controversy. Maritime Studies, 11(6), 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, T. R. (1990). Why people obey the law. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webler, T., & Tuler, S. (2000). Fairness and competence in citizen participation: Theoretical reflections from a case study. Administration and Society, 32(5), 566–595. doi: 10.1177/00953990022019588
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. (2003). Republicanism, patriotism, and global justice. In D. A. Bell & A. de-Shalit (Eds.), Forms of justice: Critical perspectives on David Miller's philosophy (pp. 251–268). Oxford: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, D. C., Raakjaer Nielsen, J., & Degnbol, P. (2003). The fisheries co-management experience, accomplishments, challenges and prospects. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Zachrisson, A. (2010). Deliberative democracy and co-management of natural resources. International Journal of the Commons, 4(1), 273–292. doi: 10.18352/ijc.116
   Google Scholar