2,114
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Interpretive Affinities: The Constitutionalization of Rights of Nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador

Pages 608-622 | Received 26 Jan 2015, Accepted 25 Oct 2015, Published online: 07 Dec 2015

References

  • Act 028. (2008, March 19). Montecristi: Constituent Assembly.
  • Act 033. (2008, April 8). Montecristi: Constituent Assembly.
  • Act 040. (2008, April 29). Montecristi: Constituent Assembly.
  • ANA. (2008). Hacía una Sociedad Equitativa y Sostenible [Towards an equitable and sustainable society]. Quito: Asamblea Nacional Ambiental [National Environmental Assembly].
  • Andolina, R. (2003). The Sovereign and its shadow: Constituent assembly and indigenous movement in Ecuador. Journal of Latin American Studies, 35(04), 721–750. doi:10.1017/S0022216X03006965
  • Asamblea Nacional [National Assembly]. (2008). Constitución de la República del Ecuador [Constitution of the Republic of Ecuador]. Quito: Asamblea Nacional República del Ecuador [National Assembly of the Republic of Ecuador].
  • Bassi, M. P. (2009). La Naturaleza O Pacha Mama de Ecuador: What doctrine should grant trees standing. Oregon Review of International Law, 11(461), 461–478. Retrieved from http://law.uoregon.edu/org/oril/docs/11-2/Bassi.pdf
  • Baumgarten, B., & Ullrich, P. (2012). Discourse, power and governmentality. Social movement research with and beyond foucault discussion paper SP-IV. Berlin: Social Science Research Center Berlin. Retrieved from Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZS): http://bibliothek.wzb.eu/pdf/2012/iv12-401.pdf
  • Bebbington, A., & Humphreys, D. (2011). An Andean avatar: Post-neoliberal and neoliberal strategies for securing the unobtainable. New Political Economy, 16(1), 131–145. doi:10.1080/13563461003789803
  • Becker, M. (2011). Correa, indigenous movements, and the writing of a new constitution in Ecuador. Latin American Perspectives, 38(1), 47–62. doi:10.1177/0094582×10384209
  • Bell, M. (2003). Thomas berry and an earth jurisprudence: An exploratory essay. The Trumpeter. Journal of Ecosophy, 19(1), 69–96. Retrieved from http://trumpeter.athabascau.ca/index.php/trumpet/article/view/106/110
  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. ([1967]1991). The social construction of reality—A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Books.
  • Burdon, P. (2011). Exploring wild law—The philosophy of earth jurisprudence. Kent Town: Wakefield Press.
  • Casas-Cortés, M. I., Osterweil, M., & Powell, D. E. (2008). Blurring boundaries: Recognizing knowledge-practices in the study of social movements. Anthropological Quarterly, 81(1), 17–58. doi:10.2307/30052739
  • Chomsky, A., & Striffler, S. (2014). Empire, labor, and environment: Coal mining and anticapitalist environmentalism in the Americas. International Labor and Working-Class History, 85, 194–200. doi:10.1017/S0147547913000525
  • CONAIE. (2007). Por un Estado Plurinacional, Unitario, Soberano, Incluyente, Equitativo y Laico [For a Plurinational State, Unitary, Sovereign, Inclusive, Equitable and Laic]. Quito: Author.
  • Cullinan, C. (2002). Wild law. A manifesto for earth justice. Totnes: Green Books.
  • Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevón (Eds.), Translating organizational change (pp. 13–48). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
  • Della Porta, D., & Diani, M. (2006). Social movements: An introduction (2nd ed.). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Dove, M. R. (2006). Indigenous people and environmental politics. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35, 191–208. doi:10.2307/25064921
  • Dryzek, J. (2005). The politics of the earth. Environmental discourses (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Espinosa, C. (2013). The riddle of leaving the oil in the soil—Ecuador’s Yasuní-ITT project from a discourse perspective. Forest Policy and Economics, 36, 27–36. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.07.012
  • Espinosa, C. (2014). The advocacy of the previously inconceivable: A discourse analysis of the Universal Declaration of the Rights of Mother Earth at Rio+20. The Journal of Environment & Development, 23(4), 391–416. doi:10.1177/1070496514536049
  • Gudynas, E. (2009). El mandato ecológico. Derechos de la Naturaleza y políticas ambientales en la nueva Constitución [The ecological mandate. Rights of nature and environmental policies in the new constitution]. Quito: Abya-Yala.
  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi:10.1080/15239080500339646
  • Keller, R. (2011). The sociology of knowledge approach to discourse. Human Studies, 34(1), 43–65. doi:10.1007/s10746-011-9175-z
  • Keller, R. (2013). Doing discourse research. An introduction for social scientists. London: Sage.
  • Kendall, C. (2008, September 24). A new law of nature, The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/environment/2008/sep/24/equador.conservation.
  • Kimmerling, J. (2006). Indigenous peoples and the oil frontier in Amazonia: The case of Ecuador, Chevron Texaco and Aguinda v. Texaco. International Law and Politics, 34, 413–664. Retrieved from http://nyujilp.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/02/38.3-Kimerling.pdf
  • Margil, M. (2010). Los Derechos de la Naturaleza: Rights-Based Protection for Pachamama. Retrieved from http://therightsofnature.org/wp-content/uploads/pdfs/Margil_Rights-Based%20Protection_Pachamama.pdf
  • Marohn, S. (2007, April–September). Thomas Linzey: Bringing democracy back to America. Pennsylvania Natural Pages, pp. 5–10. Retrieved from http://www.celdf.org/downloads/PA20NATURAL20PAGES20APRIL202007_1.pdf
  • Melo, M., Greene, N., & Puente, F. (2010). Reconocimiento de los Derechos de la Naturaleza en la Constitución Ecuatoriana [The recognition of rights of nature in the Ecuadorian constitution]. Quito: Fundación Pachamama and Grupo Faro.
  • Nygren, A. (1999). Local knowledge in the environment–development discourse: From dichotomies to situated knowledges. Critique of Anthropology, 19(3), 267–288. doi:10.1177/0308275×9901900304
  • Olson, C. (2013). Constitutive visions. University Park: Penn State University Press.
  • Ortiz, P. (2005). Protestas locales amazónicas y modelo petrolero en Ecuador. [Local Amazonian protests and Ecuador's oil extraction model]. OSAL, 17, 53–60. Retrieved from http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/clacso/osal/20110313044849/6ortiz.pdf
  • Price, M. (1994). Ecopolitics and environmental nongovernmental organizations in Latin America. Geographical Review, 84(1), 42–58. doi:10.2307/215780
  • Rochon, T. R. (1998). Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values/Thomas R. Rochon. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Schwartz-Shea, P., & Yanow, D. (2012). Interpretive research design: Concepts and processes. New York: Routledge.
  • Steinberg, M. W. (2002). Toward a more dialogic analysis of social movement culture. In B. Robnett, N. Whittier, & D. S. Meyer (Eds.), Social movements: Identity, culture, and the state (pp. 208–225). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Ullrich, P., & Keller, R. (2014). Comparing discourse between cultures: A discursive approach to movement knowledge. In B. Baumgarten, P. Daphi, & P. Ullrich (Eds.), Conceptualizing culture in social movement research (pp. 113–139). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Unda, M. (2005). Quito en abril: los forajidos derrotan al coronel [Quito in April: Outlaws defeat the colonel]. OSAL, 16, 129–139. Retrieved from http://bibliotecavirtual.clacso.org.ar/ar/libros/osal/osal16/CRA16Unda.pdf
  • Varea, A. M., Barrera, C., Maldonado, A. M., Endara, L., & Real, B. (1997). Ecologismo Ecuatorial, conflictos socioambientales y movimiento ecologista en el Ecuador [Equatorial ecologism: Socio-environmental concepts and ecological social movements in Ecuador]. Quito: Abya-Yala.
  • Walsh, C. (2012). ‘Other' knowledges, ‘other' critiques: Reflections on the politics and practices of philosophy and decoloniality in the ‘other' America. Transmodernity, 11–29. Retrieved from http://escholarship.org/uc/item/6qd721cp?query=Other%20Knowledge
  • Whittemore, M. E. (2011). The problem of enforcing nature's rights under Ecuador's constitution: Why the 2008 environmental amendments have no bite. Pacific Rim Law & Policy Journal Association, 20(3), 671–675. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/1773.1/1032

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.