Destabilizing Environmentalism: Epiphanal Change and the Emergence of Pro-Nuclear Environmentalism

References

• Anderson, J. M. (2010). From ‘zombies' to ‘coyotes’: Environmentalism where we are. Environmental Politics, 19(6), 37–41. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2010.518684
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aoki, M., & Rothwell, G. (2013). A comparative institutional analysis of the Fukushima nuclear disaster: Lessons and policy implications. Energy Policy, 53, 240–247. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.058
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. (2014). Foe nuclear rumours Craig Bennett (FoE). www.foe.co.uk. Retrieved July 28, 2015, from http://www.foe.co.uk/blog/nuclear-power-big-distraction.
   Google Scholar
• BERR (Dept. Business, Enterprise & Regulatory Reform). (2008). Meeting the energy challenge: A white paper on nuclear power. CM 7296. London: The Stationary Office.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerstaff, K., Lorenzoni, I., Pidgeon, N. F., Poortinga, W., & Simmons, P. (2008). Reframing nuclear power in the UK energy debate: Nuclear power, climate change mitigation and radioactive waste. Public Understanding of Science, 17(2), 145–169. doi: 10.1177/0963662506066719
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi: 10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
   Google Scholar
• Butler, C., Parkhill, K. A., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2011). Nuclear power after Japan: The social dimensions. Environment: Science and Policy for Sustainable Development, 53(6), 3–14. doi: 10.1080/00139157.2011.623051
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connor, S. (2015). Nuclear power is the greenest option, say top scientists. The Independent (online). Retrieved January 9, 2015, from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/nuclear-power-is-the-greenest-option-say-top-scientists-9955997.html.
   Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K. (2001). Interpretive interactionism: Applied social research methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Doyle, J. (2011). Acclimatizing nuclear? Climate change, nuclear power and the reframing of risk in the UK news media. International Communication Gazette, 73(1–2), 107–125. doi: 10.1177/1748048510386744
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2005). The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses (2nd ed.). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eyerman, R., & Jamison, A. (1991). Social Movements: A Cognitive Approach. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fielding, J. (2001). Coding and managing data. In N. Gilbert (Ed.), Researching Social Life (1st ed., pp. 218–238). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Frank, A. W. (2008). Why study people's stories? The dialogical ethics of narrative analysis. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 1(1), 109–117. doi: 10.1177/160940690200100102
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, S. (2003). Psychosocial studies and psychology: Is a critical approach emerging? Human Relations, 56(12), 1545–1567. doi: 10.1177/00187267035612005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, W. A., & Modigliani, A. (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology. doi: 10.1086/229213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodall, C. (2009). The green movement must learn to love nuclear power. The Independent (online). Retrieved February 26, 2014, from http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/commentators/chris-goodall-the-green-movement-must-learn-to-love-nuclear-power-1629354.html.
   Google Scholar
• Greenslade, R. (2012). The BBC buys lots of copies of the Guardian. The Guardian (online). Retrieved August 3, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/aug/14/bbc-guardian-most-popular-newspaper.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2009). Authoritative governance: Policy making in the age of mediatization. Oxford: OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Hards, S. (2012). Tales of transformation: The potential of a narrative approach to pro-environmental practices. Geoforum, 43(4), 113–138. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hecht, G. (2006). Nuclear Ontologies. Constellations, 13(3), 320–331. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8675.2006.00404.x
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H. (2014). The great fear: European environmentalism in the atomic age. In M. Armiero & L. Sedrez (Eds.), A history of environmentalism: Local struggles, global histories (pp. 185–211). London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Heijden, H., Koopmans, R., & Giugni, M. (1992). The west European environmental movement. In M. Finger (Ed.), The green movement worldwide. Greenwich, CT: JAI-Press.
   Google Scholar
• Irwin, A., Allan, S., & Welsh, I. (2000). Nuclear risks: Three problematics. In B. Adam, U. Beck, & J. Van Loon (Eds.), The risk society and beyond: Critical issues for social theory (pp. 78–104). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Jarvis, N. A. (1997). Taking a break: Preliminary investigations into the psychology of epiphanies as discontinuous change experiences. Amherst: University of Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins, R. (2008). Social identity (3rd ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Joskow, P. L., & Parsons, J. E. (2012). The future of nuclear power after Fukushima. Boston, MA: MIT Center for Energy and Environmental Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Litmanen, T. (2010). Nuclear power in societal flux: The renewal of nuclear power in Finland in the context of global concern over energy security. Nuclear Safety and Simulation, 1(4), 280–290.
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, M. G. (2008). The nature of epiphanic experience. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 48(1), 89–115. doi: 10.1177/0022167807311878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, W., & C’de Baca, J. (1993). Quantum change: Toward a psychology of transformation. In T. Heatherton & J. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 253–280). Washington, DC: American Sociological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, W., & C’de Baca, J. (2001). Quantum change: When epiphanies and sudden insights transform ordinary lives. New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2012). End of an era. www.monbiot.com. Retrieved January 14, 2015, from http://www.monbiot.com/2012/06/25/end-of-an-era/.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2014). About George. Retrieved from http://www.monbiot.com/about/.
   Google Scholar
• Monbiot, G. (2015). A state licence to rob the public. www.monbiot.com. Retrieved August 17, 2015, from http://www.monbiot.com/2015/01/23/a-state-licence-to-rob-the-public/.
   Google Scholar
• Nuclear Industry Association. (2014). NIA comment: Scientists say nuclear power is the greenest option. www.niauk.org. Retrieved January 9, 2015, from http://www.niauk.org/promos/2139-scientists-say-nuclear-power-is-the-greenest-option.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2010). Public attitudes to nuclear power. Paris: Nuclear Energy Authority of the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Owens, S., & Driffill, L. (2008). How to change attitudes and behaviours in the context of energy. Energy Policy, 36(12), 4412–4418. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2008.09.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, M. S. (2011). Environmentalism then and now: from fears to opportunities, 1970–2010. Environmental Science & Technology, 45(1), 5–9. doi: 10.1021/es101424p
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pepper, D. (1984). The roots of modern environmentalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pidgeon, N., & Demski, C. C. (2012). From nuclear to renewable: Energy system transformation and public attitudes. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 68(4), 41–51. doi: 10.1177/0096340212451592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poortinga, W., Pidgeon, N., Capstick, S., & Aoyagi, M. (2014). Public attitudes to nuclear power and climate change in Britain two years after the Fukushima accident –Synthesis report. UKERC report UKERC/RR/ES/2014/001. London.
   Google Scholar
• Porritt, J. (2014). The nuclear industry today: Declining but not (yet) dying. www.theecologist.org. Retrieved August 26, 2014, from http://www.theecologist.org/blogs_and_comments/commentators/2529402/the_nuclear_industry_today_declining_but_not_yet_dying.html.
   Google Scholar
• Ramana, M. V. (2011). Nuclear power and the public. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 67(4), 43–51. doi: 10.1177/0096340211413358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. (2008). Discursive insitutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 303–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1989). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (1991). The malaise of modernity. Toronto: House of Anansi.
   Google Scholar
• The Guardian. (2014). Reach a global audience with the Guardian. The Guardian (online). Retrieved August 3, 2015, from http://www.theguardian.com/advertising/audience.
   Google Scholar
• Wells, K. (2011). Narrative inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wengraf, T. (2001). Qualitative research interviewing: Biographic narrative and semi-structured interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, J. (1999). Elite opinion and media diffusion: Exploring environmental attitudes. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 4(3), 62–86. doi: 10.1177/1081180X99004003006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar