452
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

An Institutional and Opinion Analysis of Colorado’s Hydraulic Fracturing Disclosure Policy

, &

References

  • Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. doi: 10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
  • André, K., Simonsson, L., Swartling, A. G., & Linnér, B. (2012). Method development for identifying and analysing stakeholders in climate change adaptation processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(3), 243–261. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.702562
  • Bardach, E. (1977). The implementation game. Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Basurto, X., Kingsley, G., McQueen, K., Smith, M., & Weible, C. M. (2010). A systematic approach to institutional analysis: Applying Crawford and Ostrom’s grammatical syntax. Political Science Quarterly, 63(3), 523–537.
  • Bomberg, E. (2015). Shall we drill? Discourse dynamics in UK fracking debates. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1053111
  • Boulder County Commissioners. (2011). Public comment on disclosure rulemaking process made on November 21, 2011. Retrieved June 4, 2013, from http://cogcc.state.co.us/
  • Carter, D. P., Weible, C. M., Siddiki, S., Brett, J., & Chonaiew, S. M. (2015). Assessing policy divergence: How to investigate the differences between a law and a corresponding regulation. Public Administration, 93(1), 159–176. doi: 10.1111/padm.12120
  • Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission(COGCC). (2008). 2008 Rulemaking COGCC amended rules redline. Retrieved October 18, 2015, from http://cogcc.state.co.us/
  • Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission(COGCC). (2011). Order 1R-114 the final hydraulic fracturing disclosure rule. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://cogcc.state.co.us/
  • Colorado Oil and Gas Conservation Commission (COGCC). (2012, December 11). Staff testimony for setback rulemaking. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://cogcc.state.co.us/
  • Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (1995). A grammar of institutions. The American Political Science Review, 89(3), 582–600. doi: 10.2307/2082975
  • Crawford, S., & Ostrom, E. (2005). A grammar of institutions. In E. Ostrom (Ed.), Understanding institutional diversity (pp. 137–174). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Dahl, R. A. (1989). Democracy and its critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Earth and Industry. (2011, December 14). Colorado oks toughest fracking fluid rules in U.S. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://earthandindustry.com/2011/12/colorado-fracking-fluid-disclosure-rules/
  • Earth Justice. (2011). Colorado adopts new fracking disclosure rule. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://earthjustice.org/news/press/2011/colorado-adopts-new-fracking-disclosure-rule
  • Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences 26 (3), 165–187. doi: 10.1007/BF00999715
  • Fisk, J. M. (2013). The right to know? State politics of fracking disclosure. Review of Policy Research, 30(4), 345–365. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12025
  • Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hall, K. B. (2013). Hydraulic fracturing: Trade secrets and the mandatory disclosure of fracturing water composition. Louisiana State University Law Center. Journal Articles. Paper 189. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://digitalcommons.law.lsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1189&context=faculty_scholarship
  • Heikkila, T. (2004). Institutional boundaries and common-pool resource management: A comparative analysis of water management programs in California. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 23(1), 97–117. doi: 10.1002/pam.10181
  • Heikkila, T., Pierce, J. J., Gallaher, S., Kagan, J., Crow, D. A., & Weible, C. M. (2014). Understanding a period of policy change: The case of hydraulic fracturing disclosure policy in Colorado. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 65–87. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12058
  • Heikkila, T., Schlager, E., & Davis, M. W. (2011). The role of cross-scale institutional linkages in common pool resource management: Assessing interstate river compact. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 121–145. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00399.x
  • Hood, C. (1986). The tools of government. Chatham: Chatham House Publishers.
  • Howlet, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47, 187–207. doi: 10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
  • Howlett, M., & Lejano, R. (2013). Tales from the crypt: The rise and fall (and re-birth?) of policy design studies. Administration & Society, 45(3), 357–381. doi: 10.1177/0095399712459725
  • Hupe, P. L., & Hill, M. J. (2015). ‘And the rest is implementation.’ Comparing approaches to what happens in policy processes beyond Great Expectations. Public Policy and Administration. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1177/0952076715598828
  • Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (3rd ed., pp. 183–223). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Konschnik, K. (2013). Legal fractures in chemical disclosure laws: Why the voluntary chemical disclosure registry FracFocus fails as a regulatory compliance tool. Harvard Law School, April 23. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/environmentallawprogram/files/2013/04/4-23-2013-LEGAL-FRACTURES.pdf
  • Leslie, H. M., Basurto, X., Nenadovic, M., Sievanen, L., Cavanaugh, K. C., Cota-Nieto, J. J., & Aburto-Oroza, O. (2015). Operationalizing the social-ecological systems framework to assess sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(19), 5979–5984. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414640112
  • Lowi, T. (1972). Four systems of policy, politics, and choice. Public Administration Review, 32, 298–310. doi: 10.2307/974990
  • Matland, R. E. (1995). Synthesizing the implementation literature: The ambiguity-conflict model of policy implementation. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 5(2), 145–174.
  • May, P. J. (1986). Politics and policy analysis. Political Science Quarterly, 101(1), 109–25. doi: 10.2307/2151446
  • Meltsner, A. J. (1972). Political feasibility and policy analysis. Public Administration Review, 32(November/December), 859–867. doi: 10.2307/974646
  • Metze, T. (2014). Fracking the debate: Frame shifts and boundary work in Dutch decision making on shale gas. Journal of Environment Policy & Planning. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.941462
  • Murrill, B. J., & Vann, A. (2012). Hydraulic fracturing: Chemical disclosure requirements. Congressional Research Service, 7–5700. June 19. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R42461.pdf
  • Natural Resource Defense Council (NRDC). (2012). State hydraulic fracturing disclosure rules and enforcement: A comparison. IB: 12-06-A, July. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://www.nrdc.org/energy/files/Fracking-Disclosure-IB.pdf
  • Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Ostrom, E. (2008). Institutions and the environment. Economic Affairs, 28(3), 24–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0270.2008.00840.x
  • Ostrom, V., & Ostrom, E. (1972). Legal and political conditions of water resource development. Land Economics, 48(1), 1–14. doi: 10.2307/3145634
  • Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1973). Implementation. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  • Rinfret, S., Cook, J. J., & Pautz, M. C. (2014). Understanding state rulemaking processes: Developing fracking rules in Colorado, New York, and Ohio. Review of Policy Research, 31(2), 88–104. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12060
  • Sabatier, P., & Mazmanian, D. (1980). The implementation of public policy: A framework of analysis. Policy Studies Journal, 8(4), 538–560. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1980.tb01266.x
  • Salamon, L. M. (2002). The new governance and the tools of public action: An introduction. In L. M. Salamon (Ed.), The tools of government: A guide to the new governance (pp. 1–47). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Schneider, A., & Ingram, H. (1993). Social construction of target populations: Implications for politics and policy. The American Political Science Review, 87(2), 334–347. doi: 10.2307/2939044
  • Siddiki, S., Basurto, X., & Weible, C. M. (2012). Using the institutional grammar tool to understand regulatory compliance: The case of Colorado aquaculture. Regulation & Governance, 6(2), 167–188. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2012.01132.x
  • Siddiki, S., Weible, C. M., Basurto, X., & Calanni, J. (2011). Dissecting policy designs: An application of the institutional grammar tool. Policy Studies Journal, 39(1), 79–103. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00397.x
  • Simon, H. A. (1985). Human nature in politics: The dialogue of psychology with political science. The American Political Science Review, 79(2), 293–304. doi: 10.2307/1956650
  • State of Colorado. (2011, December 13). Gov. Hickenlooper hails fracking disclosure rules as national model. Retrieved March 16, 2016, from http://dnr.state.co.us/SiteCollectionDocuments/2011-12-13%20new%20fracking%20rules.pdf
  • Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value-belief-norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–98.
  • Susskind, L., & Thomas-Larmer, J. (1999). Conducting a conflict assessment. In L. Susskind, S. McKearnan, & J. Thomas-Larmer (Eds.), The consensus building handbook (pp. 99–136). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Teddlie, C., & Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Termeer, C. J. A. M., Stuiver, M., Gerritsen, A. L., & Huntjens, P. M. J. M. (2013). Integrating self-governance in heavily regulated policy fields: Insights from a Dutch Farmers’ Cooperative. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 15(2), 285–302. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.778670
  • Trout Unlimited. (2011). Comments to COGCC Rulemaking on disclosure of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Docket No 1112-RM-04. November 23. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://cogcc.state.co.us/
  • Weible, C. M. (2007). An advocacy coalition framework approach to stakeholder analysis: Understanding the political context of California marine protected area policy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17(1), 95–117. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muj015
  • Western Resource Advocates. (2011). COGCC Rulemaking on disclosure of hydraulic fracturing fluids. Docket No. 1112-RM-04. November 23. Retrieved June 4, 2014, from http://cogcc.state.co.us/
  • Wilson, J. Q. (1973). Political organizations. New York, NY: Basic Books.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.