8,526
Views
98
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The Road to Paris: Contending Climate Governance Discourses in the Post-Copenhagen Era

&
Pages 519-532 | Received 27 Apr 2015, Accepted 30 Jan 2016, Published online: 08 Mar 2016

References

  • Adler, B. (2015). Paris agreement represent progress on cutting emissions, but not so much on climate justice. Blogpost. Retrieved January 23, 2016, from http://grist.org/climate-energy/paris-agreement-represents-progress-on-cutting-emissions-but-not-so-much-on-climate-justice/
  • Aldy, J., & Stavins, R. (2010). Post-Kyoto international climate policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Au, B., Conrad, B., Deng, L., Hale, T., Liepprand, T., Lieber, A., … Wang, J. (2011). Beyond a global deal. A UN+ Approach to climate governance. Berlin: Global Public Policy Institute.
  • Bäckstrand, K. (2011). The democratic legitimacy of global climate governance after Copenhagen. In J. Dryzek, R. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 669–684). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2006). Planting trees to mitigate climate change. Contested discourses of ecological modernization, green governmentality and civic environmentalism. Global Environmental Politics, 6(1), 51–71. doi: 10.1162/glep.2006.6.1.50
  • Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Climate governance beyond 2012. Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernization and civic environmentalism. In M. Pettenger (Ed.), The social construction of climate change. (pp. 123–147). Aldershot: Ashgate.
  • Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
  • Bodansky, D. (2010). The Copenhagen climate conference: A post-mortem. American Journal of International Law, 104(2), 230–240. doi: 10.5305/amerjintelaw.104.2.0230
  • Bodansky, D. (2016). Reflections on the Paris conference, Opinio Juris. Retrieved from http://opiniojuris.org/2015/12/15/reflections-on-the-paris-conference/
  • Bond, P. (2012). Politics of climate justice. Paralysis above, movement below. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu Natal Press.
  • Bulkeley, H., Andonova, L., Betsill, M., Compagnon, D., Hale, T., Hoffmann, M., … VanDeveer, S. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Campbell, L. M., Corson, C., Gray, N. J., McDonald, K. I., & Brosius, P. J. (2014). Studying global environmental meetings to understand global environmental governance: Collaborative event ethnography at the tenth conference of the parties to the convention on biological diversity. Global Environmental Politics, 14(3), 1–20. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_e_00236
  • CAN. (2013). Coal smoke obscures climate ambition in Warsaw. CAN Press Release. Retrieved January 8, 2013, from http://www.climatenetwork.org/press-release/coal-smoke-obscures-climate-ambition-warsaw
  • Center for Low Carbon Futures (CFLF). (2011). The economics of low carbon cities. Side event. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • Chatterton, P., Featherston, D., & Routledge, P. (2013). Articulating climate justice in Copenhagen: Antagonism, the commons and solidarity. Antipode, 45(3), 602–620. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8330.2012.01025.x
  • Christoff, P. (2010). Cold climate in Copenhagen. China and the United States at COP15. Environmental Politics, 19(4), 637–656. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2010.489718
  • Death, C. (2010). Governing sustainable development. Partnerships, protests and power at the world summit. London: Routledge.
  • Derman, B. (2014). Climate governance, justice, and transnational civil society. Climate Policy, 14(1), 23–41. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2014.849492
  • Dimitrov, R. (2010). Inside Copenhagen: The state of climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 18–24. doi: 10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.18
  • Dryzek, J. (2013). The politics of the Earth. Environmental discourses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Dyer, H. (2014). Climate anarchy. Creating disorder in world politics. International Political Sociology, 8, 182–200. doi: 10.1111/ips.12051
  • EcoNexus. (2011). Agriculture, soils and forests in Carbon markets? Impacts on climate and climate justice. Side event. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • European Union (EU). (2011). Statement on behalf of the EU and its member States. 14th session of the Ad hoc Working Group on Long-term Cooperative Action under the Convention, Opening Plenary. Durban: European Union.
  • Friends of the Earth International (FOEI). (2013). Warsaw walkout. FoE press release. Retrieved January 8, 2014, from http://www.foe.co.uk/news/warsaw-walk-out.
  • Friends of the Earth International (FOEI). (2014). Retrieved April 23, 2015, from http://www.foei.org/news/central-lima-shut-down-by-march-for-climate-justice.
  • Friends of the Earth International (FOEI). (2015). Demand climate justice now! The Road to Paris, FOEI briefing. Retrieved September 18, 2015, from http://www.foe-scotland.org.uk/sites/www.foe-scotland.org.uk/files/The%20Road%20to%20Paris%20briefing%20web_May%202015.pdf
  • Green, J. (2014). Rethinking private authority. Agents and entrepreneurs in global environmental governance. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Gupta, J. (2014). The history of global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hadden, J. (2015). Networks in contention. The divisive politics of climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Hajer, M., & Versteeg, M. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
  • Hale, T., & Roger, C. (2014). Orchestration and transnational climate governance. Review of International Organization, 9, 59–82. doi: 10.1007/s11558-013-9174-0
  • Hoffmann, M. (2011). Climate governance at the cross-roads. Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Höhne, N., Fekete, H., & Day, T. (2014). What the Lima call for climate actions means for Intended Nationally Determined Contributions (INDCs). Retrieved April 23, 2015, from http://newclimate.org/2014/12/15/what-the-lima-call-for-climate-action-means-for-intended-nationally-determined-contributions-indcs/
  • Hoy, D. C. (1998). Genealogy and the scope of the political. In J. Moss (Ed.), The later Foucault (pp. 18–32). London: Sage.
  • ICCT. (2011). Global transportation roadmap. Side event. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • ICLEI. (2011). Building low carbon climate resilient cities as an essential elements of global efforts. Local Governments for Sustainability, Side event. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • IFPRI. (2011). Climate change and BRICS: Findings from the Int'l Conference on climate change and food security, International Food Policy Research Institute. Side event. Durban.
  • IISD. (2011a). Durban highlight, Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 30(525). Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  • IISD. (2011b). Summary of the Durban Climate Change Conference. Earth Negotiations Bulletin, 12(534). Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  • IISD. (2014). Summary of the Lima Climate Change Conference. Earth Negotiation Bulletin, 12(619). Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  • IISD. (2015). Summary of the Paris Climate Change Conference, 29 November to 13 December 2015. Earth Negotiation Bulletin 12(663): 1–47. Canada: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  • International Emissions Trading Association (IETA). (2011). Greenhouse gas market 2011. Asia and beyond: The roadmap to global Carbon and energy markets. Geneva: International Emissions Trading Association.
  • Jordan, A., Huitema, D., Hildén, M., van Asselt, H., Rayner, T., Schoenenfeld, J., … Boasson, E. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Climate Change. doi:10.1038/nclimate2725
  • Keohane, R., & Victor, D. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. doi: 10.1017/S1537592710004068
  • Klein, N. (2015). We are out of time: We need to take a leap. Moyers and Company. Retrieved from http://billmoyers.com/story/we-are-out-of-time-we-need-to-take-a-leap/
  • Lemke, T. (2012). Foucault, governmentality, and critique. Boulder, CO: Paradigm.
  • Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2011). Making climate change governable: Accounting for carbon as sinks, credits and personal budgets. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 187–200. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576531
  • McGee, J., & Taplin, R. (2009). The role of Asia Pacific Partnership in the discursive contestation of the international climate regime. International Environmental Agreement, 9, 213–238. doi: 10.1007/s10784-009-9101-2
  • Miller, P., & Rose, N. (2008). Governing the present. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  • Mittler, D. (2015). The end of the fossil fuels is near. But where is the Justice? Blogpost Greenpeace International. Retrieved January 23, 2015, from http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/news/Blogs/makingwaves/paris-agreement-expectations-COP21-wrapup/blog/55112/
  • Morgan, J., Waskow, D., Dagnet, Y., McGray, H., Elliot, C., Ballesteros, A., … Lefevre, B. (2014). COP20 lays the groundwork for Paris climate pact: 7 key developments. Retrieved January 23, 2015, from http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/12/cop20-lays-groundwork-paris-climate-pact-7-key-developments.
  • Oels, A. (2005). Rendering climate change governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(3), 185–207. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339661
  • Paul, H. (2010). Carbon markets – A distraction from the real priority: Immediate emissions reduction. Oxford: EcoNexus.
  • Pearse, R. (2016). Climate justice and an end to fossil fuels: The Paris agreement won't satisfy activists. The Conversation. Retrieved January 21, 2016, from http://theconversation.com/climate-justice-and-an-end-to-fossil-fuels-the-paris-agreement-wont-satisfy-activists-52260
  • PMCC. (2011). Peoples’ movement on climate change. Philippines: IBUN Center.
  • Rayner, S. (2011). How to eat an elephant. A bottom-up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10(6), 615–621. doi: 10.3763/cpol.2010.0138
  • Reitan, R., & Gibson, S. (2012). Climate change or social change. Environmental and leftist praxis and participatory action research. Globalizations, 9(3), 395–410. doi: 10.1080/14747731.2012.680735
  • Roberts, T. (2011). Multipolarity and the new world (dis)order: US hegemonic decline and the fragmentation of the global climate regime. Global Environmental Change, 21, 776–784. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.017
  • Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å., Chapin III, F. S., Lambin, S., … Foley, J. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
  • Schlosberg, D., & Collins, L. B. (2014). From environmental to climate justice: Climate change and the discourse of environmental justice. WIREs Climate Change, 5, 359–364.
  • Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Stripple, J., & Bulkeley, H. (Eds.). (2014). Governing the climate. New approaches to rationality, power and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Third World Network. (2011). What must Durban deliver? Side event. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • Triantafillou, P. (2012). New forms of governing. A Foucauldian inspired analysis. Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
  • UNFCCC. (2011a). Outcome of the work of the ad hoc working group on further commitments for annex 1 parties under the Kyoto protocol at its sixteenth session, CP.8. Bonn: Author.
  • UNFCCC. (2012). Side events schedule Durban COP 17. Retrieved from http://regserver.unfccc.int/seors/reports/archive.html?session_id=COP17/CMP7
  • UNFCCC. (2014a). Lima call for climate action. Decision -/CP. 20. Advance unedited version.
  • UNFCCC. (2014b). Side events schedule Lima COP 20. Retrieved April 23, 2015, from https://seors.unfccc.int/seors/reports/archive.html
  • UNFCCC. (2015). Paris agreement. Conference of the parties. Twenty-first session, Paris, 30 November to 11 December 2015. FCCC/CP/2015/L.9.
  • United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). (2011b). Establishment of an ad hoc working group on the Durban platform for enhanced action, CP.17, December.
  • United Nations (UN). (1992). United Nations framework convention on climate change. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/convkp/conveng.pdf
  • United Nations (UN). (2011). The secretary general's remarks to UNFCCC COP 17 high level segment. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • Van Asselt, H., & Zelli, F. (2014). Connect the dots. Managing the fragmentation of global climate governance. Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, 16, 137–155. doi: 10.1007/s10018-013-0060-z
  • Victor, D. (2011). Global warming gridlock. Creating more effective strategies for protecting the planet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Victor, D. (2014). Strengthening the global trade system. A case for climate clubs. Think piece E15 expert group on measures to address climate change and the trade system. London: Climate Strategies.
  • Walters, W. (2012). Governmentality. Critical encounters. New York: Routledge.
  • Waskow, D., & Morgan, J. (2015). The Paris agreement: Turning point for a climate solution. World Resources Institute. Retrieved from http://www.wri.org/blog/2015/12/paris-agreement-turning-point-climate-solution
  • Widerberg, O., & Pattberg, P. (2015). International cooperative initiatives in global climate governance. Raising the ambition level or Delegitimizing the UNFCCC. Global Policy, 6(1), 45–54. doi: 10.1111/1758-5899.12184
  • World Resources Institute (WRI). (2011). Building the climate change regime. Survey and Analysis of Approaches, Working Paper (World Resource Institute and UNEP). Washington, DC: Author.
  • World Trade Organization (WTO). (2011). Linkages between green economy measures, trade and climate Change. Side event. Durban: UNFCCC.
  • World Wide Fund for Nature (WWF). (2011). WWF expectations for the UNFCCC Durban Conference of Parties. WWF International, Global Climate and Energy Initiative 2011.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.