Science–policy interactions in Austrian, Dutch, and Swiss climate policy: a comparative account

References

• ACRP. (2012). Austrian climate research programme – ACRP. 5th call for proposals. Guide for the submission of proposals. K.-C. a. E. Fund (Ed.) Retrieved from http://www.klimafonds.gv.at/assets/Uploads/Downloads-Frderungen/ACRP/2012ACRP.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. (2009). Von der Beratung zur Verhandlung – Der Fall IPCC. In J. Halfmann & F. Schützenmeister (Eds.), Organisationen der Forschung. Der Fall der Atmosphärenwissenschaft (pp. 120–144). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S. (2012). The challenges of building cosmopolitan climate expertise: The case of Germany. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 3(1), 1–17. doi:10.1002/wcc.151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Bommel, S., & Kuindersma, W. (2009). Policy integration, coherence and governance in Dutch climate policy. A multi-level analysis of mitigation and adaptation policy. Retrieved from Alterra, Wageningen
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U., & Pawlow, A. (2014). Selectives at work: Climate concerns in the midst of corporatist interests. The case of Austria. Journal of Environmental Protection, 5, 780–795. doi: 10.4236/jep.2014.59080
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Umwelt. (2012, März). Anpassung an den Klimawandel in der Schweiz. Ziele, Herausforderungen und Handlungsfelder. Erster Teil der Strategie des Bundesrates vom 2. Retrieved from www.bafu.admin.ch/klimaanpassung/11529/index.html?lang=de&download=NHzLpZeg7t,lnp6I0NTU042l2Z6ln1acy4Zn4Z2qZpnO2Yuq2Z6gpJCHdn95f2ym162epYbg2c_JjKbNoKSn6A--
   Google Scholar
• Bundesamt für Umwelt BAFU. (2010). Schweizer Klimapolitik auf einen Blick. Kurzfassung des klimapolitischen Berichts 2009 der Schweiz an das UNO-Klimasekretariat. Retrieved from Bern: www.bafu.admin.ch/publikationen/publikation/01530/index.html?lang=de&download=NHzLpZig7t,lnp6I0NTU042l2Z6ln1acy4Zn4Z2qZpnO2Yuq2Z6gpJCGeHt5gGym162dpYbUzd,Gpd6emK2Oz9aGodetmqaN19XI2IdvoaCVZ,s-.pdf
   Google Scholar
• CCCA. (2012). Climate change centre Austria – Klimaforschungsnetzwerk Österreich. Retrieved from http://ccca.boku.ac.at/
   Google Scholar
• Climate, N. (2013). NCCR climate – Swiss climate research. Retrieved from http://www.nccr-climate.unibe.ch/
   Google Scholar
• Degelsegger, A., & Torgersen, H. (2011). Participatory paternalism: Citizens’ conferences in Austrian technology governance. Science and Public Policy, 38(5), 391–402. doi: 10.3152/030234211X12924093660679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, A. E., Jäger, J., & VanDeveer, S. D. (2006). Overview: Understanding design choices. In A. E. Farrell & J. Jäger (Eds.), Assessments of regional and global environmental risks: Designing processes for the effective use of science in decisionmaking (pp. 1–14). Washington, DC: RFF Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–756. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2010). Exerteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse als Instrumente rekonstruierender Untersuchungen. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Halffman, W. (2005). Science-policy boundaries: National styles? Science and Public Policy, 32(6), 457–467. doi: 10.3152/147154305781779281
   Google Scholar
• Halffman, W. (2009). Measuring the stakes: The Dutch planning Bureaus. In J. Lentsch & P. Weingart (Eds.), Scientific advice to policy making. International comparison (pp. 41–65). Opladen: Verlag Barbara Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Halffman, W., & Hoppe, R. (2005). Science/policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice. In S. Maasen & P. Weingart (Eds.), Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making (pp. 135–151). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
   Google Scholar
• Halfmann, J., & Schützenmeister, F. (Eds.). (2009). Organisationen der Forschung. Der Fall der Atmosphärenwissenschaft. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Hessels, L. K., Wardenaar, T., Boon, W. P. C., & Ploeg, M. (2014). The role of knowledge users in public–private research programs: An evaluation challenge. Research Evaluation. doi: 10.1093/reseval/rvu007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2015). Patterns of science-policy interaction. In P. Scholten & F. van Nispen (Eds.), Policy analysis in The Netherlands (pp. 49–86). Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hugi, A. (2013). Politikberatung in der Schweiz. Brückenbauer und Übersetzer. In F. Thierry (Ed.), Politikberatung in Österreich. Herausforderungen. Strategien. Perspektiven (pp. 295–300). Wien: New Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2010). Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 558–564. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, T. (2013). Analyzing policy advice: The case of climate policy in Germany. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 7(1), 88–110.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, K., & Fischer, M. (2014). Drivers of collaboration to mitigate climate change: An illustration of Swiss climate policy over 15 years. Global Environmental Change, 24, 88–98. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.11.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2005). Designs on nature. Science and democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2010). Testing time for climate science. Science, 328(5979), 695–696. doi: 10.1126/science.1189420
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2011). Cosmopolitan knowledge: Climate science and global civic epistemology. In J. S. Dryzek, R. B. Norgaard, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of climate change and society (pp. 129–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kagan, R. (2000). Introduction: Comparing national styles of regulation in Japan and the United States. Law & Policy, 22(3–4), 225–244. doi: 10.1111/1467-9930.00092
   Google Scholar
• Karlhofer, F. (2006). The long shadow of corporatism: Scope and limits of think tank activities in Austria. German Policy Studies, 3(2), 347–381.
   Google Scholar
• Lebensministerium. (2011). Die österreichische Strategie zur Anpassung an den Klimawandel. Teil 2 – Aktionsplan. Handlungsempfehlungen für die Umsetzung. Retrieved from http://www.lebensministerium.at/umwelt/klimaschutz/klimapolitik_national/anpassungsstrategie/strategie-aussendung.html
   Google Scholar
• Lederer, A., & Neugschwandtner, G. (2006). Das funktioniert hier alles ein bisserl anders – Politikberatung in Österreich. In S. Falk, D. Rehfeld, A. Römmele, & M. Thunert (Eds.), Handbuch Politikberatung (pp. 576–589). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Lehmann, L., & Rieder, S. (2002). Wissenschaftliches Wissen in der politischen Auseinandersetzung. Fallstudie zur Genese des CO2-Gesetzes im Auftrag der Arbeitsgruppe Transdisziplinarität der Energiekommission der Schweizerischen Akademie der Technischen Wissenschaften (SATW). Retrieved from Zürich.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, K., Cashore, B., Bernstein, S., & Auld, G. (2012). Overcoming the tragedy of super wicked problems: Constraining our future selves to ameliorate global climate change. Policy Sciences, 45(2), 123–152. doi: 10.1007/s11077-012-9151-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, W. (2009). Das politische system der Schweiz. In W. Ismayr (Ed.), Die politischen Systeme Westeuropas (pp. 567–605). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Löfstedt, R., & Vogel, D. (2001). The changing character of regulation: A comparison of Europe and the United States. Risk Analysis, 21(3), 399–416. doi: 10.1111/0272-4332.213121
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, C. A. (2004). Climate science and the making of a global political order. In S. Jasanoff (Ed.), States of knowledge: The coproduction of science and social order (pp. 46–66). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Housing, S. P. a. E. V. (1994). Netherlands’ national communication on climate change policies. Prepared for the conference of the parties under the framework convention on climate change. Retrieved from The Hague: http://www.broeikasgassen.nl/docs/199420VROM20First20National20Communication20NL20scan.pdf
   Google Scholar
• O’Riordan, T., & Wynne, B. (1987). Regulating environmental risks: A comparative perspective. In P. R. Kleindorfer & H. Kunreuther (Eds.), Insuring and managing hazardous risks: From Seveso to Bhopal and beyond (pp. 389–410). Berlin: Springer Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Pregernig, M. (2005). Wissenschaftliche Politikberatung als kulturgebundene Grenzarbeit: Vergleich der Interaktionsmuster in den USA und Österreich. In A. Bogner & H. Torgersen (Eds.), Wozu Experten? Ambivalenz der Beziehung von Wissenschaft und Politik (pp. 267–290). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Pregernig, M. (2007). Zwischen Alibi und Aushandlung: Ein empirischer Blick auf die Interaktion zwischen Wissenschaft ung Politik am Beispiel der österreichischen Umwelt- und Ressourcenpolitik. In M. Krott & M. Suda (Eds.), Macht Wissenschaft Politik? Erfahrungen wissenschaftlicher Beratung im Politikfeld Wald und Umwelt (pp. 43–79). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Pregernig, M., & Böcher, M. (2013). The role of expertise in environmental governance: Theoretical perspectives and empirical evidence. In B. Siebenhüner, M. Arnold, K. Eisenack, & K. Jacob (Eds.), Long-term governance for social-ecological change (pp. 26–46). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• ProClim. (2011). ProClim – Forum for climate and global change – Swiss academy of sciences. Retrieved from http://www.naturwissenschaften.ch/organisations/proclim
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (1995). Cultural styles. Style of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework. Science and Public Policy, 22(3), 147–156. doi: 10.1093/spp/22.3.147
   Google Scholar
• Sager, F., & Stadelmann-Steffen, I. (2008). Politikberatung in der Schweiz. In S. Bröchler & R. Schützeichel (Eds.), Politikberatung (pp. 465–479). Stuttgart: Lucius & Lucius Verlagsgesellschaft mbH.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitter, P. C. (1989). Corporatism is dead! Long live corporatism! Government and Opposition, 24(1), 54–73. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-7053.1989.tb00107.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siaroff, A. (1999). Corporatism in 24 industrial democracies: Meaning and measurement. European Journal of Political Research, 36, 175–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slob, M., & Statman, J. (2012). Policy and the evidence beast – a Dutch study of the expectations and practices in the area of evidence-based policy. Den Haag: Rathenau Instituut.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, I., & Linder, W. (2006). Switzerland: Think tanks and vested interests in Swiss policy making. German Policy Studies, 3(2), 310–346.
   Google Scholar
• Steurer, R. (1999). Klimaschutzpolitik in Österreich. SWS-Rundschau, 39(3), 197–219.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D., Denham, A., & Garnett, M. (Eds.). (1998). Think tanks across nations: A comparative approach. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Straßheim, H. (2012). Wissensordnungen: Konzeptionelle Grundlagen und analytische Potentiale eines Grenzbegriffs. In A. Buch & J. Hofmann (Eds.), Politik und Regulierung von Information. Sonderheft der Politischen Vierteljahresschrift (pp. 48–84). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Thierry, F. (2013). Politikberatung in Österreich. Herausforderungen, Strategien, Perspektiven (2nd ed.). Vienna: New Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vatter, A. (2008). Vom Extremtyp zum Normalfall? Die schweizerische Konsensusdemokratie im Wandel: Eine Re-Analyse von Lijpharts Studie für die Schweiz von 1997 bis 2007. Swiss Political Science Review, 14(1), 1–47. doi: 10.1002/j.1662-6370.2008.tb00095.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, D. (1986). National styles of regulation: Environmental policy in Great Britain and the United States (Vol. 242). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar