Reconciling local control with appropriate scale in Norwegian moose management

References

• Agrawal, A., & Ostrom, E. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and decentralization in resource use in India and Nepal. Politics and Society, 29(4), 485–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, M., & Kusel, J. (2003). Community forestry in the United States: Learning from the past, crafting the future. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2006a, June). The problematique of community-based conservation in a multi-level world. Paper presented at the Biennial Meeting of the International Association for the Study of the Commons, Bali, Indonesia. Retrieved from http://hdl.handle.net/10535/1880
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2006b). From community-based resource management to complex systems: The scale issue and marine commons. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 45. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art45/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2008). Commons in a multi-level world. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 1–6 ( see entire special issue).
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2010). Devolution of environment and resources governance: Trends and future. Environmental Conservation, 37(4), 489–500.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biggs, D., Cooney, R., Roe, D., Dublin, H., Allan, J., Challender, D., … Skinner, D. (2015). Engaging local communities in tackling illegal wildlife trade: Can a ‘Theory of Change’ help? IIED discussion paper. Retrieved from http://pubs.iied.org/14656IIED
   Google Scholar
• Bromley, D. W., & Feeny, D. (1992). Making the commons work: Theory, practice, and policy. San Francisco, CA: ICS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brosius, J. P., Tsing, A. L., & Zerner, C. (1998). Representing communities: Histories and politics of community-based natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 11(2), 157–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brottveit, Å., & Aagedal, O. (Eds.). (1999). Jakta på elgjakt-kulturen. Oslo: Abstrakt forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Bryden, J., & Geisler, C. (2007). Community-based land reform: Lessons from Scotland. Land Use Policy, 24, 24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger, J., Ostrom, E., Norgaard, R. B., Policansky, D., & Goldstein, B. D. (Eds.). (2001). Protecting the commons: A framework for resource management in the Americas. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights. (2010). Resources, rights and cooperation: A sourcebook on property rights and collective action for sustainable development. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Charnley, S., & Poe, M. R. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Child, B. (1996). The practice and principles of community-based wildlife management in Zimbabwe: The CAMPFIRE programme. Biodiversity and Conservation, 5, 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortner, H. J., & Moote, M. A. (1999). The politics of ecosystem management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Danielsen, J. (2001). Local community based moose management plans in Norway. Alces, 37(1), 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Daugstad, K., Svarstad, H., & Vistad, O. I. (2006). A case of conflicts in conservation: Two trenches or a three-dimensional complexity? Landscape Research, 31(1), 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. (2011). It’s too late for incrementalism: Let’s transform to a new approach for fish and wildlife conservation in the 21st century. White paper for discussion at NCSE Habitat Conservation Conference, Annapolis, MD, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D., Raik, D., Carpenter, L., Organ, J., & Schusler, T. (2005). Collaboration for community-based wildlife management. Urban Ecosystems, 8, 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Direktoratet for Naturforvaltning. (2012). Forskrift og retningslinjer til forskrift 10. februar 2012 nr. 134 om forvaltning av hjortevilt.
   Google Scholar
• Dramstad, W. E., Olson, J. D., & Forman, R. T. T. (Eds.). (1996). Landscape ecology principles in landscape architecture and land-use planning. Washington, DC: Harvard University Graduate School of Design.
   Google Scholar
• Eggertsson, T. (1993). Analyzing institutional successes and failures: A millennium of common mountain pastures in Iceland. In T. L. Anderson & R. T. Simmons (Eds.), The political economy of customs and culture: Informal solutions to the commons problem (pp. 109–126). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
   Google Scholar
• Fabricius, C., & Collins, S. (2007). Community-based natural resource management: Governing the commons. Water Policy, 9(2), 83–97.
   Google Scholar
• Falleth, E. I., & Hovik, S. (2009). Local government and nature conservation in Norway: Decentralization as a strategy in environmental policy. Local Environment: The International Journal of Justice and Sustainability, 14(3), 221–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiege, M. (2005). The weedy west: Mobile nature, boundaries, and common space in the Montana landscape. The Western Historical Quarterly, 35(1), 22–47.
   Google Scholar
• Flø, B. E. (2008). Bygdedyret og elgen – ei stiavhengig analyse av næringsutvikling i elgskogen. In R. Almås, M. Haugen, J. F. Rye, & M. Villa (Eds.), Den nye bygda (pp. 371–389). Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Flø, B. E. (2011). Sex, sprit og storokse – marknaden i møte med den østerdalske elgjaktetos. In M. Haugen & E. P. Stræte (Eds.), Rurale brytningar (pp. 227–244). Trondheim: Tapir akademisk forlag.
   Google Scholar
• Flø, B. E. (2012). Kjøt, kjensle og kameratskap – om reglar, normer og kulturell danning. In M. B. Bringslid (Ed.), Bygdeutviklingas paradoks (pp. 275–303). Olso: Spartacus.
   Google Scholar
• Forman, R. T. T., & Godron, M. (1986). Landscape ecology. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Freyfogle, E. T. (2002). The tragedy of fragmentation. Valparaiso University Law Review, 36(2), 307–337.
   Google Scholar
• Freyfogle, E. T. (2003). The land we share: Private property and the common good. Washington, DC: Island Press/Shearwater Books.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, V. (1995). North American policies of wildlife conservation. In V. Geist & I. McTaggart-Cowan (Eds.), Wildlife conservation policy (pp. 77–129). Calgary, AB: Detselig Enterprises.
   Google Scholar
• Geist, V., & Organ, J. F. (2004). The public trust foundation of the North American model of wildlife conservation. Northeast Wildlife, 58, 49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Glück, P. (2000). Policy means for ensuring the full value of forests to society. Land Use Policy, 17, 177–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grumbine, R. E. (1994). What is ecosystem management? Conservation Biology, 8(1), 27–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunnloven. (2014). Kongeriket Norges Grunnlov. LOV-1814-05-17. Sist endret 14. Mai 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Gunter, J., & Jodway, S. (2000). Community-based natural resource management: A strategy for community economic development. Burnaby, BC: Centre for Community Economic Development, Simon Fraser University.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, M. A. (2008). The gridlock economy: How too much ownership wrecks markets, stops innovation, and costs lives. New York, NY: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, R. J. (1990). Rethinking the commons. Agriculture and Human Values, 7(2), 88–104.
   Google Scholar
• Herring, R. J. (2001). Authority and scale in political ecology: Some cautions on localism. In L. E. Buck, C. C. Geisler, J. Schelhas, & E. Wollenberg (Eds.), Biological diversity: Balancing interests through adaptive collaborative management (pp. 187–204). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hjorteviltforskriften. (2012). Forskrift om forvaltning av hjortevilt. Gjeldande frå 15. Februar 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, M. (2015). Community commons in Norway: The role of common property in Norwegian outfield management. Land Tenure Journal, 1(15), 146–171.
   Google Scholar
• Hongslo, E., Hovik, S., Zachrisson, A., Kristine, A., & Lundberg, A. (2015). Decentralization of conservation management in Norway and Sweden—Different translations of an international trend. Society and Natural Resources. doi: 10.1080/08941920.2015.1086456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C., & Decker, D. (2008). Governance of state wildlife management: Reform and revive or resist and retrench? Society and Natural Resources, 21, 441–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaktloven. 1951. Lov om jakt og fangst. Gjeldande frå 14. desember 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Katon, B., Knox, A., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and devolution of natural resources management. CAPRi policy brief No. 2. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Knox, A., & Meinzen-Dick, R. (2001). Collective action, property rights, and devolution of natural resource management: Exchange of knowledge and implications for policy (a workshop summary paper). CAPRi (working paper no. 11). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Landbruksdepartementet. (2001). St. meld. nr. 19. 2001–2002. Nye oppgåver for lokaldemokratiet—lokalt og regional nivå. Retrieved from http://www.regjeringen.no
   Google Scholar
• Larson, A., & Soto, F. (2008). Decentralization of natural resource governance regimes. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 33, 213–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavsund, S., Nygren, T., & Solberg, E. J. (2003). Status of moose populations and challenges to moose management in Fennoscandia. Alces, 39, 109–130.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, R. G., & Field, D. R. (2005). Communities and forests: Where people meet the land. Corvallis, OR: Oregon State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Lovdata. (2002). Forskrift om forvaltning av hjortevilt og bever. Gjeldande frå 22. mars 2002. Retrieved from http://www.lovdata.no/cgi-wift/ldles?doc=/sf/sf/sf-20020322-0314.html
   Google Scholar
• Lynch, O. J., & Alcorn, J. B. (1993). Tenurial rights and community-based conservation. In D. Western & R. M. Wright (Eds.), Natural connections: Perspectives in community-based conservation (pp. 373–392). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. R. (2004). Farmers cooperating in the commons? A study of collective action in salinity management. Ecological Economics, 51, 271–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. R. (2005). Economics for collaborative environmental management: Renegotiating the commons. New York, NY: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, G. R. (2008). Nesting, subsidiarity, and community-based environmental governance beyond the local level. International Journal of the Commons, 2(1), 75–97.
   Google Scholar
• McCay, B. J., & Acheson, J. M. (Eds.). (1987). The question of the commons: The culture and ecology of communal resources. Tucson, AZ: University of Arizona Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKean, M. (2000). Common property: What is it, what is it good for, and what makes it work? In M. A. McKean, C. Gibson, & E. Ostrom (Eds.), People and forests: Communities, institutions, and governance (pp. 27–55). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKean, M. (2002). Nesting institutions for complex common-pool resource systems. In J. Graham, I. R. Reeve, & D. J. Brunckhorst (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2nd international symposium on landscape futures, December 2001. Armindale: Institute for Rural Futures and University of New England.
   Google Scholar
• Meinzen-Dick, R., & Di Gregorio, M. (2004). Collective action and property rights for sustainable development: Overview (brief 1 of 16). In R. Meinzen-Dick & M. Di Gregorio (Eds.), Collective action and property rights for sustainable development (pp. 3–4). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Murphree, M. W. (2009). The strategic pillars of communal natural resource management: Benefit, empowerment and conservation. Biodiversity Conservation, 18, 2551–2562.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naturmangfoldloven. (2009). Love om forvaltning av naturens mangfold. Gjeldande frå 19. Juni 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Netting, R. M. (1981). Balancing on an Alp: Ecological change and continuity in a Swiss mountain community. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Norwegian Statute. (1957). LOV 1957-06-28 nr16: Outdoor Recreation Act (Friluftsloven).
   Google Scholar
• Noss, R. F. (1987). Protecting natural areas in fragmented landscapes. Natural Areas Journal, 7(1), 2–13.
   Google Scholar
• Øian, H., & Skogen, K. (2016). Property and possession: Hunting tourism and the morality of landownership in rural Norway. Society and Natural Resources, 29(1), 104–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity: Prologue to a political theory of the steady state. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Organ, J. F., Geist, V., Mahoney, S. P., Williams, S., Krausman, P. R., Batcheller, G. R., … Decker, D. J. (2012). The North American model of wildlife conservation. Technical review 12–04. Bethesda, MD: The Wildlife Society.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1992). The rudiments of a theory of the origins, survival, and performance of common property institutions. In D. W. Bromley (Ed.), Making the commons work: Theory, practice, and policy (pp. 293–318). San Francisco, CA: Institute for Contemporary Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2004). Collective action and property rights for sustainable development: Understanding collective action (brief 2 of 16). In R. Meinzen-Dick & M. Di Gregorio (Eds.), Collective action and property rights for sustainable development (pp. 5–6). Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Phuthego, T. C., & Chanda, R. (2004). Traditional ecological knowledge and community-based natural resource management: Lessons from a Botswana wildlife management area. Applied Geography, 24(1), 57–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pretty, J., & Ward, H. (2001). Social capital and the environment. World Development, 29(2), 209–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ribot, J. C. (2004). Waiting for democracy: The politics of choice in natural resource decentralization. Washington, DC: World Resources Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Rice, M. (2001). What is community-based natural resource management? An introduction to CBNRM. Retrieved from http://www.cbnrm.net/pdf/rice_m_001.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rolandsen, C. M., Solberg, E. J., Bjørneraas, K., Heim, M., Van Moorter, B., Herfindal, I., … Os, Ø. (2010). Elgundersøkelsene i Nord-Trøndelag, Bindal og Rissa 2005–2010: Sluttrapport. NINA Rapport 588. Trondheim: Norsk Institutt for Naturforskning.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, C. M. (2002). Common property, regulatory property, and environmental protection: Comparing community-based management to tradable environmental allowances. In E. Ostrom, T. Dietz, N. Dolšak, P. C. Stern, S. Stonich, & E. U. Weber (Eds.), The drama of the commons (pp. 233–258). Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sæther, B.-E., Solbraa, K., Søldal, D. P., & Hjelijord, O. (1992). Sluttrapport Elg-Skog-Samfunn (Vol. 28, pp. 1–153). Trondheim, Norway: NINA forskningsrapport.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, C., Gasper, S. W. D., & Öhman, K. (2013). Conflict resolution through ecosystem-based management: The case of Swedish moose management. International Journal of the Commons, 7(2), 549–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shackleton, S., Campbell, B., Wollenberg, E., & Edmunds, D. (2002). Devolution and community-based natural resource management: Creating space for local people to benefit? Natural Resource Perspectives, 76, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Skaarnæs-Moldestad, A. (2012). Forvaltning av elg (Alces alces) i norske kommuner: En samfunnsvitenskaplig undersøkelse av det norske forvaltningssystemet for elg. Masteroppgave 30 stp. Ås, Norway: Institutt for naturforvalting, UMB.
   Google Scholar
• Skogen, K. (2012). Norwegian hunters’ notions of legal and moral property. In J. D. C. Linnel, K. Skogen, & C. Næss (Eds.), HUNTing for sustainability: A summary of research findings from Norway (pp. 8–9). Trondheim: NINA.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, R. J. (1981). Resolving the tragedy of the commons by creating private property rights in wildlife. The Cato Journal, 1(2), 439–468.
   Google Scholar
• Solberg, E. J., & Sæther, B.-E. (1999). Hunter observations of moose Alces alces as a management tool. Wildlife Biology, 5, 107–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, G. G. (1991). Common property economics: A general theory and land use applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Treue, T., & Nathan, I. (2007). Community based natural resource management. Danida technical note. Copenhagen, DK: Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, M. (2007). Ecological complexity and the management of common property resources. Tenure Brief, (5), 1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Uphoff, N. (1998, May 10–14). Community-based natural resource management: Connecting micro and macro processes, and people with their environments. Plenary presentation, international workshop on CBNRM, World Bank, Washington, DC, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Vedeld, P. (2002). The process of institution building to facilitate local biodiversity management. Ås, Norway: Noragric Agricultural University of Norway.
   Google Scholar
• Viltloven. 1981. Lov om viltet. Gjeldande frå 29. mai 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Wittman, H., & Geisler, C. (2005). Negotiating locality: Decentralization and communal forest management in the Guatemalan highlands. Human Organization, 64(1), 62–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar