Beyond argumentation: a practice-based approach to environmental policy

References

• Adler, E., & Pouliot, V. (2011). International practices. International Theory, 3(1), 1–36. doi: 10.1017/S175297191000031X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agrawal, A. (2001). Common property institutions and sustainable governance of resources. World Development, 29(10), 1649–1672. doi: 10.1016/S0305-750X(01)00063-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, J. (2001). Forests and people. 25 years of community forestry. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B. (2010). Theories for forest policy analysis: A systematic and longitudinal overview. International Forestry Review, 12, 432.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Babili, I. (2013). Global forest governance: Multiple practices of policy performance. In B. Arts, & J. H. Behagel, et al. (Eds.), Forest and nature governance. A practice-based approach (pp. 111–130). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Behagel, J. H., van Bommel, S., de Koning, J., & Turnhout, E. (Eds.). (2013). Forest and nature governance – a practice based approach, World Forests, 14. Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Behagel, J. H., Turnhout, E., de Koning, J., & van Bommel, S. (2014). A practice based approach to forest governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 49, 4–11. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, B., Kleinschmit, D., & Pülzl, H. (2016). Forest governance: Connecting global to local practices. In G. Spaargaren, D. Weenink, & M. Lamers (Eds.), Practice theory and research. Exploring the dynamics of social life (pp. 202–229). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, J. (1962). How to do things with words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ayana, A., Arts, B., & Wiersum, K. F. (2013). Historical development of forest policy in Ethiopia: Trends of institutionalization and deinstitutionalization. Land Use Policy, 32, 186–196. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayana, A., Vandenabeele, N., & Arts, B. (2015). Performance of participatory forest management in Ethiopia: Institutional arrangement versus local practices. Critical Policy Studies, 1–20. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2015.1024703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babili, I., & Wiersum, F. (2012). Evolution and diversification of community forestry regimes in Babati district, Tanzania. Small-scale Forestry, 12(4), 539–557. doi: 10.1007/s11842-012-9228-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P. (2013). Public encounters: The history and future of face-to-face contact between public professionals and citizens. Public Administration, 91(2), 469–483. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2012.02101.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, K. P., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2014). Symposium introduction: Usable knowledge in practice. What action research has to offer to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 8(4), 397–406. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.957335
   Google Scholar
• Behagel, J. H. (2012). The politics of democratic governance. The implementation of the water framework directive in the Netherlands (Doctoral dissertation). Wageningen University.
   Google Scholar
• Behagel, J., & Turnhout, E. (2011). Democratic legitimacy in the implementation of the water framework directive in the Netherlands: Towards participatory and deliberative norms? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(3), 297–316. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2011.607002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M. (2004). Governance and interpretation: What are the implications of postfoundationalism? Public Administration, 82(3), 605–625. doi: 10.1111/j.0033-3298.2004.00409.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blomley, T., Kerstin, P., Isango J., Zahabu E., Ahrends A., Burgess N. (2008). Seeing the wood for the trees. An assessment of the impact of participatory forest management on the forest condition in Tanzania. Oryx, 42(3), 380–391. doi: 10.1017/S0030605308071433
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a theory of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, M. (2009). Science in democracy: Expertise, institutions, and representation. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bueger, C. (2014). Pathways to practice: Praxiography and international politics. European Political Science Review, 6(3), 383–406. doi: 10.1017/S1755773913000167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). Excitable speech: A politics of the performative. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Callon, M. (Ed.). (1998). The laws of the markets. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Charnley, S., & Poe, M. (2007). Community forestry in theory and practice: Where are we now? Annual Review of Anthropology, 36, 301–336. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleaver, F. D., & de Koning, J. (2015). Furthering critical institutionalism. International Journal of the Commons, 9(1), 1–18. doi: 10.18352/ijc.605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. (2014). Interpretation in the analysis of policy. Australian Journal of Public Administration, 73(3), 349–356. doi: 10.1111/1467-8500.12088
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collinge, C. (2006). Flat ontology and the deconstruction of scale: A response to Marston, Jones and Woodward. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 31(2), 244–251. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2006.00201.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, S. N., & Wagenaar, H. (2012). Navigating the eternally unfolding present: Toward an epistemology of practice. The American Review of Public Administration, 42(1), 3–38. doi: 10.1177/0275074011407404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Certeau, M. (1984). The practice of everyday life. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2010). Global forest resources assessment 2010. Rome: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 161–173. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339638
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (Eds.). (1993). The argumentative turn in policy and planning. London: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (2013). The argumentative turn in public policy revisited: Twenty years later. Critical Policy Studies, 7(4), 425–433. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.851164
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1999). The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Boston, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Tavistock.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, R., Griggs, S., & Boaz, A. (2011). The practice of policy making. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 7(2), 127–136. doi: 10.1332/174426411X579180
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Haraway, D. J. (2008). When species meet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hay, C. (2002). Political analysis: A critical introduction. Hampshire: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2000). Discourse. Bukingham: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• International Forestry Resources and Institutions. (2015). Documenting lessons from research by the IFRI network on developing policies and programs on community forestry. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan.
   Google Scholar
• Kipnis, A. (2015). Agency between humanism and posthumanism: Latour and his opponents. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 5(2), 43–58. doi: 10.14318/hau5.2.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2009). Politics of nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leipold, S. (2014). Creating forests with words – a review of forest-related discourse studies. Forest Policy and Economics, 40, 12–20. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2013.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumann, I. B. (2002). Returning practice to the linguistic turn: The case of diplomacy. Millennium-Journal of International Studies, 31(3), 627–651. doi: 10.1177/03058298020310031201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicolini, D. (2012). Practice theory, work, and organization: An introduction. Oxford: Oxford university press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, A. (1993). The mangle of practice: Agency and emergence in the sociology of science. American Journal of Sociology, 99(3), 559–589. doi: 10.1086/230316
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polanyi, M. (1966). The logic of tacit inference. Philosophy, 41(155), 1–18. doi: 10.1017/S0031819100066110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pülzl, H. (2013). Forest and nature governance: A practice based approach, edited by B. Arts, J. H. Behagel, S. van Bommel, J. de Koning, E. Turnhout. Critical Policy Studies, 7(3), 367–369. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2013.826012
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki, T. R., Knorr-Cetina, K., & von Savigny, E. (Eds.). (2001). The practice turn in contemporary theory. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schatzki. (2001). Introduction: Practice theory. In T. R. Schatzki, K. Knorr-Cetina, & E. von Savigny (Eds.), The practice turn in contemporary theory (pp. 10–23). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2014). Putting practice into policy: Reconfiguring questions of consumption and climate change. Contemporary Social Science, 9(4), 415–429. doi: 10.1080/21582041.2012.692484
   Google Scholar
• Spaargaren, G. (2011). Theories of practices: Agency, technology, and culture: Exploring the relevance of practice theories for the governance of sustainable consumption practices in the new world-order. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 813–822. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Waterton, C., Neves, K., & Buizer, M. (2013). Rethinking biodiversity: From goods and services to ‘living with’. Conservation Letters, 6(3), 154–161. doi: 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00307.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umans, L. (1993). A discourse on forestry science. Agriculture and Human Values, 10(4), 26–40. doi: 10.1007/BF02217558
   Google Scholar
• van der Arend, S., & Behagel, J. H. (2011). What participants do. A practice based approach to public participation in two policy fields. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 169–186. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2011.576529
   Google Scholar
• van der Arend, S., & Behagel, J. H. (2016). Training participants: Building a community of practice to negotiate sustainability. In J.-P. Vo & R. Freeman (Eds.), Knowing governance: The epistemic construction of political order (pp. 193–214). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenabbeele, N. (2012). A case study of local practices of participatory forest management (PFM) in Kaffa, Ethiopia. Self-formation between principle and practice (Master Thesis). Wageningen University, Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Waage, E. R., & Benediktsson, K. (2010). Performing expertise: Landscape, governmentality and conservation planning in Iceland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(1), 1–22. doi: 10.1080/15239080903220112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H. (2011). Meaning in action. Interpretation and dialogue in policy analysis. New York, NY: ME Sharp.
   Google Scholar
• Wagenaar, H., & Wilkinson, C. (2013). Enacting resilience: A performative account of governing for urban resilience. Urban Studies: an International Journal for Research in Urban Studies, 52(7), 1265–1284. doi: 10.1177/0042098013505655
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2007). Interpretation in policy analysis: On methods and practice. Critical Policy Analysis, 1(1), 110–122.
   Google Scholar
• Yanow, D., & Tsoukas, H. (2009). What is reflection in action? A phenomenological account. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 1339–1364. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00859.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar