Designing regional-level stakeholder engagement processes: striving for good governance while meeting the challenges of scale

References

• Black, J. (2008). Constructing and contesting legitimacy and accountability in polycentric regulatory regimes. Regulation & Governance, 2(2), 137–164. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-5991.2008.00034.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramwell, B., & Sharman, A. (1999). Collaboration in local tourism policymaking. Society and Natural Resources, 26, 392–415.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, J. (2011). Assuming too much? Participatory water resource governance in South Africa. The Geographical Journal, 177, 171–185. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00378.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan, T. A. (2004). Tragedy averted: The promise of collaboration. Society and Natural Resources, 17, 881–896. doi: 10.1080/08941920490505284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., Adger, W. N., Berkes, F., Garden, P., Lebel, L., Olsson, P. … Young, O. (2006). Scale and cross-scale dynamics: Governance and information in a multilevel world. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 8. Retrieved from http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/art8/ doi: 10.5751/ES-01759-110208
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cash, D. W., & Moser, S. C. (2000). Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Global Environmental Change, 10, 109–120. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(00)00017-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2001). Grounded theory. In R. Emerson (Ed.), Contemporary field research (pp. 335–352). Long Grove, IL: Waveland Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chase, L. C., Siemer, W. F., & Decker, D. J. (2002). Designing stakeholder involvement strategies to resolve wildlife management controversies. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 30(3), 937–950.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. S., Kruger, L. E., & Daniels, S. E. (2003). “Place” as an integrating concept in natural resource politics: Propositions for a social science research agenda. Society & Natural Resources, 16(2), 87–104. doi: 10.1080/08941920309199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. P. (1985). Symbolic construction of community. Harlow, U.K.: Ellis Horwood Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Crona, B. I., & Parker, J. N. (2012). Learning in support of governance: Theories, methods, and a framework to assess how bridging organizations contribute to adaptive resource governance. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 32. doi: 10.5751/ES-04534-170132
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, P. D., & Hauber, J. R. (1997). Public involvement in deer management decisions: Consensus versus consent. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(2), 399–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., & Chase, L. C. (1997). Human dimensions of living with wildlife: A management challenge for the 21st century. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 25(4), 788–795.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., Krueger, C. C., BaerJr., R. A., Knuth, B. A., & Richmond, M. E. (1996). From clients to stakeholders: A philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 1(1), 70–82. doi: 10.1080/10871209609359053
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D. J., Riley, S. J., & Siemer, W. F. (2012). Human dimensions of wildlife management (2nd ed.). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Decker, D., Smith, C., Forstchen, A., Hare, D., Pomeranz, E., Doyle-Capitman, C.,  … Organ, J. (2016). Governance principles for wildlife conservation in the 21st century. Conservation Letters, 9(4), 290–295. doi: 10.1111/conl.12211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorcey, A. (1994). Public involvement in government decision-making: Choosing the right model. Victoria, BC: Round Table on the Environment and the Economy.
   Google Scholar
• Eagles, P. F. J. (2009). Governance of recreation and tourism partnerships in parks and protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 17(2), 231–248. doi: 10.1080/09669580802495725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., & Klijn, E. (2006). Managing stakeholder involvement in decision making: A comparative analysis of six interactive processes in the Netherlands. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16(3), 417–446. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mui049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, R., & Ury, W. (1991). Getting to yes. New York, NY: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Fleegle, J. T., Rosenberry, C. S., & Wallingford, B. D. (2013). Use of citizen advisory committees to direct deer management in Pennsylvania. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 37, 129–136. doi: 10.1002/wsb.227
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (Ed.). (2005). Explosion and redemption in community mediation (or, when neighbors aren’t neighborly): A profile of John Townsend.
   Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (2009). Dealing with differences. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gergen, K. J., & Gergen, M. M. (2008). Social construction and research as action. In P. Reason & H. Bradbury (Eds.), The Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice (2nd ed., pp. 159–171). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, C. C., Ostrom, E., & Ahn, T. K. (2000). The concept of scale and the human dimensions of global change: A survey. Ecological Economics, 32, 217–239. doi: 10.1016/S0921-8009(99)00092-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Greenwood, D. J., & Levin, M. (2007). Introduction to action research: Social research for social change (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Hanson, J., & Yosifon, D. (2003). The situation: An introduction to the situational character, critical realism, power economics, and deep capture. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 152, 129–346. doi: 10.2307/3313062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, K. (2014). How involved are they really? A comparative network analysis of the institutional drivers of local actor inclusion. Land Use Policy, 39, 376–387. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C. A., & Decker, D. J. (2006). Ensuring the future of state wildlife management: Understanding challenges for institutional change. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 34, 531–536. doi: 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[531:ETFOSW]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, C. A., & Decker, D. J. (2008). Governance of state wildlife management: Reform and revive or resist and retrench? Society & Natural Resources, 21(5), 441–448. doi: 10.1080/08941920801898465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lemos, M. C., & Agrawal, A. (2006). Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31(1), 297–325. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.31.042605.135621
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leong, K. M., Decker, D. J., Lauber, T. B., Raik, D. B., & Siemer, W. F. (2009). Overcoming jurisdictional boundaries through stakeholder engagement and collaborative governance: Lessons learned from white-tailed deer management in the U.S. In K. Andersson, E. Eklund, M. Lehtola, & P. Salmi (Eds.), Beyond the rural-urban divide: Cross-continental perspectives on the differentiated countryside and its regulation (Vol. 14, pp. 221–247). Bingley, UK: Emerald Publishing Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lockwood, M., Davidson, J., Curtis, A., Stratford, E., & Griffith, R. (2010). Governance principles for natural resource management. Society & Natural Resources, 23(10), 986–1001. doi: 10.1080/08941920802178214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lofland, J., & Lofland, L. H. (2006). Analyzing social settings (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
   Google Scholar
• Lord, J. K., & Cheng, A. S. (2006). Public involvement in state fish and wildlife agencies in the U.S.: A thumbnail sketch of techniques and barriers. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 11(1), 55–69. doi: 10.1080/10871200500471017
   Google Scholar
• Lute, M. L., & Gore, M. L. (2014). Knowledge and power in wildlife management: Knowledge and power in wildlife management. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 78(6), 1060–1068. doi: 10.1002/jwmg.754
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2005). Collaborative growth management in metropolitan Denver: “Fig leaf or valiant effort?” Land Use Policy, 22, 373–386. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2004.03.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2008). A typology of collaboration efforts in environmental management. Environmental Management, 41(4), 487–500. doi: 10.1007/s00267-008-9067-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2011). Beyond consensus: Improving collaborative planning and management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, B. K., & Jones, R. E. (2005). Citizen participation in natural resource management: Does representativeness matter? Sociological Spectrum, 25, 715–737. doi: 10.1080/02732170500256732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, T. (2007). Muting the voice of the local in the age of the global: How communication practices compromised public participation in India’s Allain Dunhagan environmental impact assessment. Environmental Communication, 1(2), 171–193. doi: 10.1080/17524030701642595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maynard, C. M. (2013). How public participation in river management improvements is affected by scale: Public participation in river management improvements. Area, 45(2), 230–238. doi: 10.1111/area.12015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazmanian, D. A., & Kraft, M. E. (2009). Toward sustainable communities: Transitions and transformations in environmental policy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCreary, S. T., Gamman, J. K., & Brooks, B. (2001). Refining and testing joint fact-finding for environmental dispute resolution: Ten years of success. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 18(4), 329–348. doi: 10.1002/crq.3890180403
   Google Scholar
• Ozawa, C. P. (2006). Science and intractable conflict. Conflict Resolution Quarterly, 24(2), 197–205. doi: 10.1002/crq.168
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pelstring, L. M. (1999). Stakeholder outreach and citizen task forces: An examination of the New York state department of environmental conservation’s public participation relating to deer management (Master’s thesis). Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Plummer, R., & Fitzgibbon, J. (2004). Co-management of natural resources: A proposed framework. Environmental Management, 33, 876–885. doi: 10.1007/s00267-003-3038-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, E. F., Decker, D. J., Siemer, W. F., Kirsch, A., Hurst, J., & Farquhar, J. (2014). Challenges for multilevel stakeholder engagement in public trust resource governance. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 19(5), 448–457. doi: 10.1080/10871209.2014.936069
   Google Scholar
• Pomeranz, E. F., Decker, D. J., Siemer, W. F., Stedman, R. C., & Russell, J. (2017). Evaluation of a pilot program to improve public input about deer and deer impacts. Human Dimensions Research Unit Publication Series 17–02. Ithaca, NY: Department of Natural Resources, Cornell University.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, J. (1997). Participation run amok: The costs of mass participation for deliberative agency decision making. Northwestern University Law Review, 92, 173–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2005). A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(2), 251–290. doi: 10.1177/0162243904271724
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selin, S. (1999). Developing a typology of sustainable tourism partnerships. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 7(3–4), 260–273. doi: 10.1080/09669589908667339
   Google Scholar
• Selin, S., & Chavez, D. (1995). Developing a collaborative model for environmental planning and management. Environmental Management, 19, 189–195. doi: 10.1007/BF02471990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheng, K. (2009). What is good governance? United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific. Retrieved from http://www.unescap.org/pdd/prs/ProjectActivities/Ongoing/gg/governance.asp
   Google Scholar
• Smith, P. D., & McDonough, M. H. (2001). Beyond public participation: Fairness in natural resource decision making. Society and Natural Resources, 14, 239–249. doi: 10.1080/089419201750111056
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart, R. E., Walters, L. C., Balint, P. J., & Desai, A. (2004). Managing wicked environmental problems. Report to Jack Blackwell, Regional Forester, USDA Forest Service, Pacific Southwest Region. Fairfax, VA: George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, R. J., Decker, D. J., Knuth, B. A., Proud, J. C., & Nelson, D. H. (1996). Comparison of three public-involvement approaches for stakeholder input into deer management decisions: A case study. Wildlife Society Bulletin, 24(2), 312–317.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stringer, L. C., Dougill, A. J., Fraser, E., Huback, K., Prell, C., & Reed, M. S. (2006). Unpacking “participation” in the adaptive management of social-ecological systems: A critical review. Ecology and Society, 11(2), 39. doi: 10.5751/ES-01896-110239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Talley, J. L., Schneider, J., & Lindquist, E. (2016). A simplified approach to stakeholder engagement in natural resource management: The five-feature framework. Ecology and Society, 21(4), 38. doi: 10.5751/ES-08830-210438
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuler, S., & Webler, T. (2010). How preferences for public participation are linked to perceptions of the context, preferences for outcomes, and individual characteristics. Environmental Management, 46, 254–267. doi: 10.1007/s00267-010-9515-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, R. (1994). Learning from strangers: The art and method of qualitative interview studies. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wellstead, A. M., Stedman, R. C., & Parkins, J. R. (2003). Understanding the concept of representation within the context of local forest management decision making. Forest Policy and Economics, 5(1), 1–11. doi: 10.1016/S1389-9341(02)00031-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wondolleck, J. M., & Yaffee, S. L. (2000). Making collaboration work: Lessons from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar