The digital frontiers of fisheries governance: fish attraction devices, drones and satellites

References

• Agnew, D. J., Pearce, J., Pramod, G., Peatman, T., Watson, R., Beddington, J. R., & Pitcher, T. J. (2009). Estimating the worldwide extent of illegal fishing. PLoS ONE, 4(2), e4570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Abdulrazzak, D., & Pauly, D. (2014). Managing fisheries from space: Google earth improves estimates of distant fish catches. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(3), 450–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K., & Gaston, K. J. (2013). Lightweight unmanned aerial vehicles will revolutionize spatial ecology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 11(3), 138–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews, S. (2016). Drones: Keeping a watchful eye on illegal fishing. The Fish Site.
   Google Scholar
• Ardron, J. A., Rayfuse, R., Gjerde, K., & Warner, R. (2014). The sustainable use and conservation of biodiversity in ABNJ: What can be achieved using existing international agreements? Marine Policy, 49, 98–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baske, A., Gibbon, J., Benn, J., & Nickson, A. (2012). Estimating the use of drifting fish aggregation devices (FADs) around the globe. Washington, DC: PEW Environmental Group.
   Google Scholar
• Bear, C. (2012). Assembling the sea: Materiality, movement and regulatory practices in the cardigan Bay scallop fishery. Cultural Geographies, 20(1), 21–41. doi: 10.1177/1474474012463665
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bear, C., & Eden, S. (2008). Making space for fish: The regional, network and fluid spaces of fisheries certification. Social & Cultural Geography, 9(5), 487–504. doi: 10.1080/14649360802224358
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergseth, B. J., Russ, G. R., & Cinner, J. E. (2015). Measuring and monitoring compliance in no-take marine reserves. Fish and Fisheries, 16(2), 240–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Hughes, T. P., Steneck, R. S., Wilson, J. A., Bellwood, D. R., Crona, B., … Norberg, J. (2006). Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science, 311(5767), 1557–1558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bez, N., Walker, E., Gaertner, D., Rivoirard, J., & Gaspar, P. (2011). Fishing activity of tuna purse seiners estimated from vessel monitoring system (VMS) data. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 68(11), 1998–2010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bromhead, D., Foster, J., Attard, R., Findlay, J., & Kalish, J. (2003). A review of the impacts of fish aggregating devices (FADs) on tuna fisheries: Final report to the Fisheries Resources Research Fund. Canberra: Bureau of Rural Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Bush, S. R., Bailey, M., van Zwieten, P., Kochen, M., Wiryawan, B., Doddema, A., & Mangunsong, S. C. (2017). Private provision of public information in tuna fisheries. Marine Policy, 77, 130–135.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bush, S. R., & Mol, A. P. (2015). Governing in a placeless environment: Sustainability and fish aggregating devices. Environmental Science & Policy, 53, 27–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campling, L. (2012). The tuna ‘commodity frontier’: Business strategies and environment in the industrial tuna fisheries of the western Indian ocean. Journal of Agrarian Change, 12(2–3), 252–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, S.-K. (2011). Application of a vessel monitoring system to advance sustainable fisheries management – benefits received in Taiwan. Marine Policy, 35(2), 116–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke, R. (2014). Understanding the drone epidemic. Computer Law & Security Review, 30(3), 230–246. doi: 10.1016/j.clsr.2014.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullis-Suzuki, S., & Pauly, D. (2010). Failing the high seas: A global evaluation of regional fisheries management organizations. Marine Policy, 34(5), 1036–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutlip, K. (2017). Flag of convenience or clock of malfeasance? Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/
   Google Scholar
• Dagorn, L., Bez, N., Fauvel, T., & Walker, E. (2013). How much do fish aggregating devices (FADs) modify the floating object environment in the ocean? Fisheries Oceanography, 22(3), 147–153.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dagorn, L., Holland, K. N., Restrepo, V., & Moreno, G. (2013). Is it good or bad to fish with FADs? What are the real impacts of the use of drifting FADs on pelagic marine ecosystems? Fish and Fisheries, 14(3), 391–415.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daume, S., Morison, A. & BrandGardner, S. (2017). Heard island and McDonald islands (HIMI) toothfish fishery MSC full assessment report. Emeryville, CA: S. G. Services.
   Google Scholar
• Davies, T. K., Mees, C. C., & Milner-Gulland, E. (2014). The past, present and future use of drifting fish aggregating devices (FADs) in the Indian ocean. Marine Policy, 45, 163–170.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dempster, T., & Taquet, M. (2004). Fish aggregation device (FAD) research: Gaps in current knowledge and future directions for ecological studies. Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries, 14(1), 21–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Souza, E. N., Boerder, K., Matwin, S., & Worm, B. (2016). Improving fishing pattern detection from satellite AIS using data mining and machine learning. PLoS ONE, 11(7), e0158248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doulman, D. J. (1994). Technical assistance in fisheries monitoring control and surveillance: A historical perpective of FAO’s role. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• FAO. (2001). International plan of action to prevent, deter and eliminate illegal, unreported and unregulated fishing. Rome: FAO.
   Google Scholar
• Finn, R. L., & Wright, D. (2012). Unmanned aircraft systems: Surveillance, ethics and privacy in civil applications. Computer Law & Security Review, 28(2), 184–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foley, P. (2013). National government responses to Marine Stewardship Council (MSC) fisheries certification: Insights from Atlantic Canada. New Political Economy, 18(2), 284–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilman, E. L. (2011). Bycatch governance and best practice mitigation technology in global tuna fisheries. Marine Policy, 35(5), 590–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Fishing Watch. (2017a). About the project. Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/the-project
   Google Scholar
• Global Fishing Watch. (2017b). Map. Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/map/
   Google Scholar
• Global Fishing Watch. (2017c). A new era in transparency. Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/
   Google Scholar
• Global Fishing Watch. (2017d). Partners. Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/partners
   Google Scholar
• Global Fishing Watch. (2018). Bright lights reveal the ‘dark’ fleet. Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/
   Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010). Transnational environmental governance: The emergence and effects of the certification of forest and fisheries. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2010). Transparency in global environmental governance: A coming of age? Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hallier, J.-P., & Gaertner, D. (2008). Drifting fish aggregation devices could act as an ecological trap for tropical tuna species. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 353, 255–264.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanich, Q., Teo, F., & Tsamenyi, M. (2010). A collective approach to Pacific islands fisheries management: Moving beyond regional agreements. Marine Policy, 34(1), 85–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgson, A., Kelly, N., & Peel, D. (2013). Unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for surveying marine fauna: A dugong case study. PLoS ONE, 8(11), e79556.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, B. C. (2016). Watch how drones fight pirate fishing from the sky. National Geographic.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2015). Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In S. Jasanoff & S. H. Kim (Eds.), Dreamscapes of modernity: Sociotechnical imaginaries and the fabrication of power (pp. 1–47). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2017). From rhetoric to reality: Implementing the voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries. In S. Jentoft, R. Chuenpagdee, M. J. Barragán-Paladines, & N. Franz (Eds.), The small-scale fisheries guidelines (pp. 789–812). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Klemas, V. (2013). Fisheries applications of remote sensing: An overview. Fisheries Research, 148, 124–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Chuenpagdee, R., Mahon, R., & Pullin, R. (2008). Interactive governance and governability: An introduction. The Journal of Transdisciplinary Environmental Studies, 7(1), 1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Kopaska, J. (2014). Drones – A fisheries assessment tool? Fisheries, 39(7), 319–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kroodsma, D. A., Miller, N. A., & Roan, A. (2017). The global view of transhipments – preliminary findings. Retrieved from http://globalfishingwatch.org/publications
   Google Scholar
• Lancaster, D., Dearden, P., Haggarty, D. R., Volpe, J. P., & Ban, N. C. (2017). Effectiveness of shore based remote camera monitoring for quantifying recreational fisher compliance in marine conservation areas. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems, 27(4), 804–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukaczyk, T., Bieri, T., de Sousa, J. T., Levy, J., & McGillivary, P. A. (2016). Unmanned aircraft as mobile components of Ocean Observing Systems for management of marine resources. OCEANS 2016 MTS/IEEE Monterey.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, G. T. (2016). Windows into the soul: Surveillance and society in an age of high technology. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maxwell, S. M., Hazen, E. L., Lewison, R. L., Dunn, D. C., Bailey, H., Bograd, S. J., … Crowder, L. B. (2015). Dynamic ocean management: Defining and conceptualizing real-time management of the ocean. Marine Policy, 58, 42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCauley, D. J., Woods, P., Sullivan, B., Bergman, B., Jablonicky, C., Roan, A., … Worm, B. (2016). Ending hide and seek at sea. Science, 351(6278), 1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, D. G. M., Slicer, N. M., & Hanich, Q. (2013). Monitoring, control and surveillance of protected areas and specially managed areas in the marine domain. Marine Policy, 39, 64–71. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. (2008). Environmental reform in the information age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A., & Law, J. (1994). Regions, networks and fluids: Anaemia and social topology. Social Studies of Science, 24(4), 641–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P., & Spaargaren, G. (2005). From additions and withdrawals to environmental flows: Reframing debates in the environmental social sciences. Organization & Environment, 18(1), 91–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, E. J. (2005). Addressing regulatory gaps in high seas fisheries. The International Journal of Marine and Coastal Law, 20(3), 533–570.
   Google Scholar
• Mulero-Pázmány, M., Stolper, R., Van Essen, L., Negro, J. J., & Sassen, T. (2014). Remotely piloted aircraft systems as a rhinoceros anti-poaching tool in Africa. PLoS ONE, 9(1), e83873.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Österblom, H. (2014). Catching up on fisheries crime. Conservation Biology, 28(3), 877–879.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paneque-Gálvez, J., McCall, M. K., Napoletano, B. M., Wich, S. A., & Koh, L. P. (2014). Small drones for community-based forest monitoring: An assessment of their feasibility and potential in tropical areas. Forests, 5(6), 1481–1507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peña, J. M., Torres-Sánchez, J., de Castro, A. I., Kelly, M., & López-Granados, F. (2013). Weed mapping in early-season maize fields using object-based analysis of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) images. PLoS ONE, 8(10), e77151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petrossian, G. A. (2015). Preventing illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: A situational approach. Biological Conservation, 189, 39–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Restrepo, V., Scott, G., & Koehler, H. (2016). Options for managing FAD impacts on target tuna stocks. Collected Volume of Scientific Papers ICCAT, 72(3), 681–696.
   Google Scholar
• Sandbrook, C. (2015). The social implications of using drones for biodiversity conservation. Ambio, 44(4), 636–647.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• SoarOcean. (2013). Soarocean. Low cost drones for ocean conservation. Retrieved from http://soarocean.org/
   Google Scholar
• Song, A. M., Johnsen, J. P., & Morrison, T. H. (2018). Reconstructing governability: How fisheries are made governable. Fish and Fisheries, 19(2), 377–389. doi: 10.1111/faf.12262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuart, V., Platt, T., & Sathyendranath, S. (2011). The future of fisheries science in management: A remote-sensing perspective. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 68(4), 644–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suchman, L. A. (2002). Practice-based design of information systems: Notes from the hyperdeveloped world. The Information Society, 18(2), 139–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumaila, U. R., Alder, J., & Keith, H. (2006). Global scope and economics of illegal fishing. Marine Policy, 30(6), 696–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumaila, U. R., Jacquet, J., & Witter, A. (2017). When bad gets worse: Corruption and fisheries. In A. Williams & P. Le Billon (Eds.), Corruption, natural resources and development: From resource curse to political ecology (pp. 93–104). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Taquet, M. (2013). Fish aggregating devices (FADs): Good or bad fishing tools? A question of scale and knowledge. Aquatic Living Resources, 26(1), 25–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tidd, A. N., Pilling, G. M., & Harley, S. (2015). Examining productivity changes within the tropical WCPO purse seine fishery. Pohnpei: WCPFC.
   Google Scholar
• Tidd, A. N., Reid, C., Pilling, G. M., & Harley, S. J. (2016). Estimating productivity, technical and efficiency changes in the Western Pacific purse-seine fleets. ICES Journal of Marine Science: Journal du Conseil, 73(4), 1226–1234. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsv262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toonen. (2013). Sea@shore: Informational governance in marine spatial conflicts at the North Sea (PhD thesis). Wageningen UR.
   Google Scholar
• Toonen, H. M., & Mol, A. P. J. (2016). Governing the marine environment through information: Fisheries, shipping, and tourism. In B. H. MacDonald, S. S. Soomai, E. M. De Santo, & P. G. Wells (Eds.), Science, information and policy interface for effective coastal and ocean management (pp. 125–151). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
   Google Scholar
• UCS. (2016). UCS satellite database. Retrieved from http://www.ucsusa.org/nuclear-weapons/space-weapons/satellite-database
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea of 10 December 1982. (1982).
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandergeest, P., & Peluso, N. L. (1995). Territorialization and state power in Thailand. Theory and Society, 24(3), 385–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vandergeest, P., Ponte, S., & Bush, S. (2015). Assembling sustainable territories: Space, subjects, objects, and expertise in seafood certification. Environment and Planning A, 47(9), 1907–1925.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J. P. (2016). The environmental state at sea. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 160–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witt, M. J., & Godley, B. J. (2007). A step towards seascape scale conservation: Using vessel monitoring systems (VMS) to map fishing activity. PLoS ONE, 2(10), e1111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, B. (2015). Big brother watching mother nature: Conservation drones and their international and domestic privacy implications. Vermont Journal of Environmental Law, 17, 138.
   Google Scholar