2,099
Views
46
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Learning pathways and the governance of innovations in urban climate change resilience and adaptation

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 76-89 | Received 11 Aug 2017, Accepted 25 Jun 2018, Published online: 09 Jul 2018

References

  • Ahern, J. (2013). Urban landscape sustainability and resilience: The promise and challenges of integrating ecology with urban planning and design. Landscape Ecology, 28(6), 1203–1212. doi: 10.1007/s10980-012-9799-z
  • Andonova, L. B., Betsill, M. M., & Bulkeley, H. (2013). Transnational climate governance. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  • Anguelovski, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 169–175. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017
  • Anguelovski, I., Chu, E., & Carmin, J. (2014). Variations in approaches to urban climate adaptation: Experiences and experimentation from the global south. Global Environmental Change, 27, 156–167. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.05.010
  • Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organizational learning II: Theory, method and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
  • Bassett, E., & Shandas, V. (2010). Innovation and climate action planning: Perspectives from municipal plans. Journal of the American Planning Association, 76(4), 435–450. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2010.509703
  • Berry, F. S. (1994). Sizing up state policy innovation research. Policy Studies Journal, 22(3), 442–456. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.1994.tb01480.x
  • Berry, F. S., & Berry, W. D. (1999). Innovation and diffusion models in policy research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (pp. 169–200). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • Blanco, I. (2013). Analysing urban governance networks: Bringing regime theory back in. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(2), 276–291. doi: 10.1068/c11174
  • Bogason, P., & Musso, J. A. (2006). The democratic prospects of network governance. American Review of Public Administration, 36(1), 3–18. doi: 10.1177/0275074005282581
  • Boyd, E., & Osbahr, H. (2010). Responses to climate change: Exploring organizational learning across internationally networked organizations for development. Environmental Education Research, 16, 629–643. doi: 10.1080/13504622.2010.505444
  • Bulkeley, H. (2013). Reconfiguring environmental governance: Towards a politics of scales and networks. Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling, 53(9), 1689–1699.
  • Bulkeley, H., & Betsill, M. M. (2013). Revisiting the urban politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 136–154. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2013.755797
  • Bulkeley, H., & Castan Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
  • Carmin, J., Anguelovski, I., & Roberts, D. (2012). Urban climate adaptation in the global south: Planning in an emerging policy domain. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 32(1), 18–32. doi: 10.1177/0739456X11430951
  • Carmin, J., Dodman, D., & Chu, E. (2013). Urban climate adaptation and leadership: From conceptual understanding to practical action. Paris: OECD Publishing.
  • Chu, E. (2016). The governance of climate change adaptation through urban policy experiments. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(6), 439–451. doi: 10.1002/eet.1727
  • Chu, E. (2018). Transnational support for urban climate adaptation: Emerging forms of agency and dependency. Global Environmental Politics, 18(3), 25–46. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00467
  • Chu, E., Anguelovski, I., & Roberts, D. (2017). Climate adaptation as strategic urbanism: Assessing opportunities and uncertainties for equity and inclusive development in cities. Cities, 60, 378–387. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.10.016
  • Chu, E., Schenk, T., & Patterson, J. (2018). The dilemmas of citizen inclusion in urban planning and governance to enable a 1.5°C climate change scenario. Urban Planning, 3(2), 128–140. doi: 10.17645/up.v3i2.1292
  • City of Berkeley. (2009). Climate action plan. Berkeley, CA: Department of Planning and Development.
  • City of Berkeley. (2015). Climate action plan progress update. Berkeley, CA: Office of Energy and Sustainable Development.
  • City of Berkeley. (2016). Berkeley resilience strategy. Berkeley, CA: Office of Energy and Sustainable Development.
  • City of Rotterdam. (2009). Rotterdam climate proof: The Rotterdam challenge on water and climate adaptation. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Climate Proof.
  • City of Rotterdam. (2013). Rotterdam climate change adaptation strategy. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Climate Proof.
  • City of Rotterdam. (2016). Rotterdam resilience strategy: Ready for the 21st century. Rotterdam: Rotterdam Climate Initiative.
  • Coen, D., & Thatcher, M. (2008). Network governance and multi-level delegation: European networks of regulatory agencies. Journal of Public Policy, 28(1), 49–71. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X08000779
  • Dzebo, A., & Stripple, J. (2015). Transnational adaptation governance: An emerging fourth era of adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 35, 423–435. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.10.006
  • Eggers, W. D., & Singh, S. K. (2009). The public innovator’s playbook: Nurturing bold ideas in government. Cambridge, MA: Ash Institute, Harvard Kennedy School.
  • Fink, J. (2018). Contrasting governance learning processes of climate leading and lagging cities: Portland, Oregon, and Phoenix, Arizona, USA. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1487280
  • Francis, T. B., Whittaker, K. A., Shandas, V., Mills, A. V., & Graybill, J. K. (2005). Incorporating science into the environmental policy process: A case study from Washington State. Ecology and Society, 10(1), 35. doi: 10.5751/ES-01359-100135
  • Freeman, C. (1991). Networks of innovators: A synthesis of research issues. Research Policy, 20(5), 499–514. doi: 10.1016/0048-7333(91)90072-X
  • Friend, R., Jarvie, J., Reed, S. O., Sutarto, R., Thinphanga, P., & Toan, V. C. (2014). Mainstreaming urban climate resilience into policy and planning: Reflections from Asia. Urban Climate, 7, 6–19. doi: 10.1016/j.uclim.2013.08.001
  • Gerring, J. (2006). Case study research: Principles and practices. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Giest, S., & Howlett, M. (2013). Comparative climate change governance: Lessons from European transnational municipal network management efforts. Environmental Policy and Governance, 23(6), 341–353. doi: 10.1002/eet.1628
  • Gordon, D. J. (2013). Between local innovation and global impact: Cities, networks, and the governance of climate change. Canadian Foreign Policy Journal, 19(3), 288–307. doi: 10.1080/11926422.2013.844186
  • Harris, L. M., Chu, E. K., & Ziervogel, G. (2017). Negotiated resilience. Resilience, 1, 1–19. doi:10.1080/21693293.2017.1353196
  • Healey, P. (1998). Building institutional capacity through collaborative approaches to urban planning. Environment and Planning A, 30(9), 1531–1546. doi: 10.1068/a301531
  • Heikkinen, M., Ylä-Anttila, T., & Juhola, S. (2018). Incremental, reformistic or transformational: What kind of change do C40 Cities advocate to deal with climate change? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1473151
  • Hoffmann, M. J. (2011). Climate governance at the crossroads: Experimenting with a global response after Kyoto. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Holden, M. (2011). Public participation and local sustainability: Questioning a common agenda in urban governance. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 35, 312–329. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2010.00957.x
  • Hughes, S., Chu, E. K., & Mason, S. G. (Eds.). (2018). Climate change in cities: Innovations in multi-level governance. Cham: Springer.
  • Innes, J. E. (1998). Information in communicative planning. Journal of the American Planning Association, 64(1), 52–63. doi: 10.1080/01944369808975956
  • Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: The politics of invention, diffusion, and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2014.923614
  • Kern, K., & Alber, G. (2009). Governing climate change in cities: Modes of urban climate governance in multi-level systems. Competitive Cities and Climate Change, OECD conference proceedings, Milan, Italy, 171–196.
  • Kern, K., & Bulkeley, H. (2009). Cities, Europeanization and multi-level governance: Governing climate change through transnational municipal networks. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 47(2), 309–332.
  • Leck, H., & Simon, D. (2013). Fostering multiscalar collaboration and co-operation for effective governance of climate change adaptation. Urban Studies, 50, 1221–1238. doi: 10.1177/0042098012461675
  • Lee, T. (2013). Global cities and transnational climate change networks. Global Environmental Politics, 13(1), 108–127. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00156
  • Lee, T. (2018). Network comparison of socialization, learning and collaboration in the C40 Cities Climate Group. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
  • MacCullum, D., Moulaert, F., Hillier, J., & Haddock, S. V. (Eds.). (2009). Social innovation and territorial development. London: Routledge.
  • Marvin, S., Mai, L., McCormick, K., Palgan, Y.V., & Bulkeley, H. (Eds.). (2018). Urban living labs: Experimenting with city futures. London: Routledge.
  • Massey, E., Biesbroek, R., Huitema, D., & Jordan, A. (2014). Climate policy innovation: The adoption and diffusion of adaptation policies across Europe. Global Environmental Change, 29, 434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.002
  • McCann, E. (2011). Urban policy mobilities and global circuits of knowledge: Toward a research agenda. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 101(1), 107–130. doi: 10.1080/00045608.2010.520219
  • Meerow, S., & Stults, M. (2016). Comparing conceptualizations of urban climate resilience in theory and practice. Sustainability, 8(7), 701. doi: 10.3390/su8070701
  • Melo, M. A., & Baiocchi, G. (2006). Deliberative democracy and local governance: Towards a new agenda. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 30(3), 587–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2006.00686.x
  • Nagorny-Koring, N. (2018). Learning the way with examples and ideas? Governing climate change in German municipalities through best practices. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2018.1461083
  • Nelson, R. R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Okereke, C., Bulkeley, H., & Schroeder, H. (2009). Conceptualizing climate governance beyond the international regime. Global Environmental Politics, 9(1), 58–78. doi: 10.1162/glep.2009.9.1.58
  • Pierre, J. (2011). The politics of urban governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2007). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
  • Robinson, P., & Gore, C. (2015). Municipal climate reporting: Gaps in monitoring and implications for governance and action. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33(5), 1058–1075. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15605940
  • Shi, L., Chu, E., & Debats, J. (2015). Explaining progress in climate adaptation planning across 156 U.S. municipalities. Journal of the American Planning Association, 81, 191–202. doi: 10.1080/01944363.2015.1074526
  • Small, M. L. (2009). How many cases do I need? On science and the logic of case selection in field-based research. Ethnography, 10(1), 5–38. doi: 10.1177/1466138108099586
  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2011). Enhancing collaborative innovation in the public sector. Administration & Society, 43(8), 842–868. doi: 10.1177/0095399711418768
  • Spaans, M., & Waterhout, B. (2017). Building up resilience in cities worldwide – Rotterdam as participant in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme. Cities, 61, 109–116. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2016.05.011
  • Walker, R., & Storper, M. (1989). The capitalist imperative: Territory, technology and industrial growth. Cambridge, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Wolfram, M. (2018). Learning transformative urban energy governance: The role of leadership, community action and translocal networks in three Korean cities. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
  • Wolfram, M., van der Heijden, J., Patterson, J., & Juhola, S. (2018). Guest editorial: Learning and meta-learning in urban climate governance: Concepts, key issues and challenges ahead. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
  • Yin, R. K. (2013). Case study research: Design and methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Ziervogel, G., Pelling, M., Cartwright, A., Chu, E., Deshpande, T., Harris, L., … Zweig, P. (2017). Inserting rights and justice into urban resilience: A focus on everyday risk. Environment and Urbanization, 29, 123–138. doi: 10.1177/0956247816686905

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.