Reflexive governance: exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Introduction to the special issue

References

• Ashenden, S. (1996). Reflexive governance and child sexual abouse: Liberal welfare rationality and the Cleveland inquirty. Economy and Society, 25(1), 64–88. doi: 10.1080/03085149600000003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avelino, F., Grin, J., Pel, B., & Jhagroe, S. (2016). The politics of sustainability transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 557–567. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1216782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Kronsell, A. (2015). Rethinking the green state: Environmental governance towards climate and sustainability transitions. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, S., Borie, M., Chilvers, J., Esguerra, A., Heubach, K., Hulme, M., … Görg, C. (2014). Towards a reflexive turn in the governance of global environmental expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 23(2), 80–87. doi: 10.14512/gaia.23.2.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1992). Risk society. Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1994). The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In U. Beck, A. Giddens, & S. Lash (Eds.), Reflexive modernization (pp. 1–55). Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., Giddens, A., & Lash, S. (1994). Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Grande, E. (2010). Varieties of second modernity: The cosmopolitan turn in social and political theory and research. The British Journal of Sociology, 61(3), 409–443. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2010.01320.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U., & Lau, C. (2005). Second modernity as a research agenda: Theoretical and empirical explorations in the ‘meta-change’ of modern society. The British Journal of Sociology, 56(4), 525–557. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-4446.2005.00082.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boström, M., Grönholm, S., & Hassler, B. (2016). The ecosystem approach to management in Baltic Sea governance: Towards increased reflexivity? In M. Gilek, M. Karlsson, S. Linke, & K. Smolarz (Eds.), Environmental governance of the Baltic Sea (pp. 149–172). Cham: Springer International Publishing. MARE Publication Series.
   Google Scholar
• Carstensen, M. B., & Schmidt, V. A. (2016). Power through, over and in ideas: Conceptualizing ideational power in discursive institutionalism. Journal of European Public Policy, 23(3), 318–337. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2015.1115534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carvalho, A., Pinto-Coelho, Z., & Seixas, E. (2016). Listening to the public – enacting power: Citizen access, standing and influence in public participation discourses. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–19. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1149772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Considine, M. (2000). Contract regimes and reflexive governance: Comparing employment service reforms in the United Kingdom, the Netherlands, New Zealand and Australia. Public Administration, 78(3), 613–638. doi: 10.1111/1467-9299.00221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2005). From bioprospecting to reflexive governance. Ecological Economics, 53(4), 473–491. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2004.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedeurwaerdere, T. (2009, June 21–24). Engaging with reflexive governance. Presentation at the IDDRI-AgroParisTech-REFGOV-IUFRO International Symposium, Nancy, France. Retrieved October 31, 2010, from http://www.iddri.org/Activites/Conferences-internationales/090622_Nancy_IUFRO_RefGov_Dedeurwaerdere.pdf
   Google Scholar
• De Schutter, O., & Lenoble, J. (2010). Reflexive governance: Redefining the public interest in a pluralistic world. Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2017). Deliberation as a catalyst for reflexive environmental governance. Ecological Economics, 131, 353–360. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., Feindt, P. H., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Greening Leviathan: The rise of the environmental state? Environmental Politics, 25(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1085218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durnova, A. (2018). A tale of ‘fat cats’ and ‘stupid activists’: Contested values, governance and reflexivity in the Brno railway station controversy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 720–733. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2013.829749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H. (2012). Reflexive governance, public goods and sustainability – Conceptual reflections and empirical evidence in agricultural policy. In E. Brousseau, T. Dedeurwaerdere, & B. Siebenhüner (Eds.), Reflexive governance for global public goods (pp. 159–178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., Gottschick, M., Mölders, T., Müller, F., Sodtke, R., & Weiland, S. (2008). Nachhaltige Agrarpolitik als reflexive Politik. Plädoyer für einen neuen Diskurs zwischen Politik und Wissenschaft. Berlin: Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Newig, J. (2005). Partizipation, Öffentlichkeitsbeteiligung, Nachhaltigkeit. Perspektiven der politischen Ökonomie. Marburg: Metropolis.
   Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Oels, A. (2005). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 161–173. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339638
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2003). Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gaede, J., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016). A question of authenticity: Status quo bias and the international energy agency’s world energy outlook. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 608–627. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1116380
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerritsen, A. L., Stuiver, M., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2013). Knowledge governance: An exploration of principles, impact, and barriers. Science and Public Policy, 40(5), 604–615. doi: 10.1093/scipol/sct012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gottschick, M. (2018). Reflexive capacity in local networks for sustainable development: Integrating conflict and understanding into a multi-level perspective transition framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 704–719. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2013.842890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griggs, S., & Howarth, D. (2017). Discourse, policy and the environment: Hegemony, statements and the analysis of U.K. airport expansion. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–15. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1266930
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term transformative change. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (1995). The politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. doi: 10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: The case of economic policy-making in britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism. Institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., Dryzek, J. S., & Hunold, C. (2007). Turning up the heat: Partisanship in deliberative innovation. Political Studies, 55(2), 362–383. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9248.2007.00667.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3&4), 333–350. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Hertin, J. (2016). Making government more reflexive (PhD dissertation), Wageningen University, Wageningen. Retrieved September 30, 2018, from http://edepot.wur.nl/370535
   Google Scholar
• Hewson, M. (1994). Surveillance and the global political economy. In E. A. Comor (Ed.), The global political economy of communication (pp. 61–80). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén, M., Jordan, A., & Huitema, D. (2017). Special issue on experimentation for climate change solutions editorial: The search for climate change and sustainability solutions – The promise and the pitfalls of experimentation. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoekema, A. J. (2001). Reflexive governance and indigenous self-rule: Lessons in associative democracy? Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, 4(1), 157–186. doi: 10.1080/13698230108403342
   Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Jordan, A., Munaretto, S., & Hildén, M. (2018). Policy experimentation: Core concepts, political dynamics, governance and impacts. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 143–159. doi: 10.1007/s11077-018-9321-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jachtenfuchs, M. (1995). Theoretical perspectives on European governance. European Law Journal, 1(2), 115–133. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0386.1995.tb00010.x
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. (2006). The environmental state and environmental flows: The need to reinvent the nation-state. In G. Spaargaren, A. P. J. Mol, & F. H. Buttel (Eds.), Governing environmental flows: Global challenges to social theory (pp. 83–105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernization – new perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 557–565. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssens, J., & van Tatenhove, J. P. M. (2000). Green planning: From sectoral to integrative planning arrangements? In J. P. M. van Tatenhove, B. Arts, & P. Leroy (Eds.), Political modernisation and the environment (pp. 145–174). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jhagroe, S., & Loorbach, D. (2015). See no evil, hear no evil: The democratic potential of transition management. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 15, 65–83. doi: 10.1016/j.eist.2014.07.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K. W., & Zito, A. R. (2003). New instruments of environmental governance? National experiences and prospects. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kates, R. W., & Parris, T. M. (2003). Long-term trends and a sustainability transition. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8062–8067. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1231331100
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Loorbach, D. (2006). Transition management: A reflexive governance approach. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 103–130). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2007). Assessing the Dutch energy transition policy: How does it deal with dilemmas of managing transitions? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 315–331. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622816
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenis, A., Bono, F., & Mathijs, E. (2016). Unravelling the (post-)political in transition management: Interrogating pathways towards sustainable change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 568–584. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2016.1141672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirwan, J., Maye, D., & Brunori, G. (2017). Reflexive governance, incorporating ethics and changing understandings of food chain performance. Sociologia Ruralis, 57(3), 357–377. doi: 10.1111/soru.12169
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laws, D., & Rein, M. (2003). Reframing practice. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis (pp. 172–206). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lenoble, J., & Maesschalck, M. (2010). Renewing the theory of public interest: The quest for a reflexive and learning-based approach to governance. In O. De Schutter & J. Lenoble (Eds.), Reflexive governance. Redefining the public interest in a pluralistic world (pp. 3–21). Oxford: Hart.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A. (2002). Environmental policy integration. Greening sectoral policies in Europe. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Lenschow, A., Newig, J., & Challies, E. (2016). Globalization’s limits to the environmental state? Integrating telecoupling into global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 136–159. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074384
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance, 23(1), 161–183. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsden, T. (2013). From post-productionism to reflexive governance: Contested transitions in securing more sustainable food futures. Journal of Rural Studies, 29, 123–134. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2011.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2018). Is learning without teaching possible? The productive tension between network governance and reflexivity. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 769–780. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2014.986568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., & Steurer, R. (2018). Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: A contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 734–751. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2013.829750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mees, H., Alexander, M., Gralepois, M., Matczak, P., & Mees, H. (2018). Typologies of citizen co-production in flood risk governance. Environmental Science & Policy, 89, 330–339. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2018.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. A. P., & Van Zuydam, S. (2018). Pigs in the city: Reflective deliberations on the boundary concept of agroparks in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 675–688. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.819780
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minsch, J., Feindt, P. H., Meister, H.-P., Schneidewind, U., & Schulz, T. (1998). Institutionelle Reformen für eine Politik der Nachhaltigkeit. Studie im Auftrag der Enquete-Kommission “Schutz des Menschen und der Umwelt” des 13. Deutschen Bundestages. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. (2016). The environmental nation state in decline. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 48–68. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074385
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P., & Buttel, F. H. (2002). The environmental state under pressure. Bingley: Emerald Insight.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2000). Ecological modernization around the world: An introduction. Environmental Politics, 9(1), 1–14. doi: 10.1080/09644010008414510
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., Spaargaren, G., & Buttel, F. H. (2006). Governing environmental flows. Global challenges for social theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Voß, J.-P., & Monstadt, J. (2007). Editorial: Governance for sustainable development in the face of ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power: An introduction. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 185–192. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622832
   Google Scholar
• Phelps, N. A., & Tewdwr-Jones, M. (2000). Scratching the surface of collaborative and associative governance: Identifying the diversity of social action in institutional capacity building. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 32(1), 111–130. doi: 10.1068/a31175
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (1993). When effect becomes cause. Policy feedback and political change. World Politics, 45(July), 595–628. doi: 10.2307/2950710
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267. doi: 10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raskin, P., Banuri, T., Gallopín, G., Gutman, P., Hammond, A., Kates, R., & Swart, R. (2002). Great Transition. Umbrüche und Übergänge auf dem Weg zu einer planetarischen Gesellschaft. Frankfurt: Institut für sozial-ökologische Forschung (ISOE) GmbH, Hessische Landesstiftung der Heinrich-Böll-Stiftung e.V. (HGDÖ).
   Google Scholar
• Rein, M., & Schön, D. (1993). Reframing policy discourse. In F. Fischer & F. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 145–166). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez, I., Sletto, B., Bilbao, B., Sánchez-Rose, I., & Leal, A. (2018). Speaking of fire: Reflexive governance in landscapes of social change and shifting local identities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 689–703. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.766579
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & van Asselt, M. (2001). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15–31. doi: 10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2007). Learning from difference: The new architecture of experimentalist governance in the European union. Retrieved from http://www.connex-network.org/eurogov/pdf/egp-connex-C-07-02.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, C. F., & Zeitlin, J. (2010). Experimentalist governance in the European Union: Towards a new architecture. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmalz-Bruns, R. (1995). Reflexive Demokratie. Die demokratische Transformation moderner Politik. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2010). Taking ideas and discourses seriously: Explaining change through discursive institutionalism as the fourth ‘new institutionalism’. European Political Science Review, 2(2), 1–25. doi: 10.1017/S175577390999021X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Wieczorek, A. J., & Raven, R. (2016). Experimenting for sustainability transitions: A systematic literature review. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.08.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E. (2004). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. London: Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39, 471–476. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2010). The politics of social-ecological resilience and sustainable sociotechnical transitions. Ecology and Society, 15(1), 11. doi: 10.5751/ES-03218-150111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34, 1491–1510. doi: 10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sonnino, R., Lozano Torres, C., & Schneider, S. (2014). Reflexive governance for food security: The example of school feeding in Brazil. Journal of Rural Studies, 36, 1–12. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2006). Precaution, foresight and sustainability: Reflection and reflexivity in the governance of science and technology. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 225–272). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2008). “Opening up” and “closing down”: Power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(2), 262–294. doi: 10.1177/0162243907311265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2014). From sustainability to transformation: Dynamics and diversity in reflexive governance of vulnerability. SPRU Working Paper Series 2014–06, University of Sussex, Brighton. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2742113
   Google Scholar
• Streeck, W., & Thelen, K. A. (2005). Beyond continuity: Institutional change in advanced political economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Teubner, G., & Willke, H. (1984). Kontext und Autonomie: gesellschaftliche Selbststeuerung durch reflexives Recht. Zeitschrift für Rechtssoziologie, 5(1), 4–35. doi: 10.1515/zfrs-1984-0102
   Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (1999). Historical institutionalism in comparative politics. Annual Review of Political Science, 2, 369–404. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K., & Mahoney, J. (2010). Explaining institutional change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. (2018). Reflexivity and developmental constructs: The case of sustainable futures. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 781–791. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2013.817949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Meer, M., Visser, J., & Wilthagen, T. (2005). Adaptive and reflexive governance: The limits of organized decentralization. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 11(3), 347–365. doi: 10.1177/0959680105057215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J. P. (2017). Transboundary marine spatial planning: A reflexive marine governance experiment? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(6), 783–794. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1292120
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Tatenhove, J. P. M. (2016). The environmental state at sea. Environmental Politics, 25(1), 160–179. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2015.1074386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., & Bornemann, B. (2011). The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 9. doi: 10.5751/ES-04051-160209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., & Shove, E. (2007). Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 213–225. doi: 10.1080/15239080701622840
   Google Scholar
• Weiland, S., Bleicher, A., Polzin, C., Rauschmayer, F., & Rode, J. (2017). The nature of experiments for sustainability transformations: A search for common ground. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 30–38. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiner, R. R. (2018). Les reciproqueteurs: Post-regulatory corporatism. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 752–768. doi: 10.1080/1523908x.2014.947923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Westling, E. L., Sharp, L., Rychlewski, M., & Carrozza, C. (2014). Developing adaptive capacity through reflexivity: Lessons from collaborative research with a UK water utility. Critical Policy Studies, 8(4), 427–446. doi: 10.1080/19460171.2014.957334
   Google Scholar