Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes

References

• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Dzyundzyak, A., Baird, J., Bodin, Ö, Plummer, R., & Schultz, L. (2018). An approach to assess learning conditions, effects and outcomes in environmental governance. Environmental Policy and Governance, 28(1), 3–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auerbach, C., & Silverstein, L. B. (2003). Qualitative data: An introduction to coding and analysis. New York, NY: NYU press.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: Role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (2006). Lessons of disaster: Policy change after catastrophic events. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colorado Water Conservation Board. (2018). Basin roundtables. Retrieved from http://cwcb.state.co.us/water-management/basin-roundtables/Pages/main.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Crow, D. A., & Baysha, O. (2013). “Conservation” as a catalyst for conflict: Considering stakeholder understanding in policy making. Review of Policy Research, 30(3), 302–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillman, D. A., Smyth, J. D., & Christian, L. M. (2009). Internet, mail, and mixed mode survey: The tailored design method (3rd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2017). Learning in the bath-tub: The micro and macro dimensions of the causal relationship between learning and policy change. Policy and Society, 36(2), 304–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ernst, A. (2019). Review of factors influencing social learning within participatory environmental governance. Ecology and Society, 24(1), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fish, R. D., Ioris, A. A., & Watson, N. M. (2010). Integrating water and agricultural management: Collaborative governance for a complex policy problem. Science of the Total Environment, 408(23), 5623–5630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., & Lubell, M. (2013). The promise and performance of collaborative governance. In S. Kamieniecki & M. E. Kraft (Eds.), Oxford handbook of U.S. environmental policy (pp. 413–434). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S. L., Huitema, D., & Armitage, D. (2018). Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: A review of the scholarship. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 335–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goyal, N., & Howlett, M. (2018). Lessons Learned and Not Learned: Bibliometric Analysis of Policy Learning. In C. A. Dunlop, C. M. Radaelli, & P. Trein (Eds.), Learning in public policy: Analysis, modes, and outcomes (pp. 27–49). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hager, P., & Johnsson, M. C. (2012). Collective Learning Practice. In P. Hager, A. Lee, & A. Reich (Eds.), Practice-Theory Perspectives on Professional Learning  (pp. 249–265). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. (1988). Multivariate data analysis (5th ed.). London: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2018). Working on learning: How the institutional rules of environmental governance matter. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 106–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). Collaborative policymaking: Governance through dialogue. In M. A. Hager & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 33–59). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Ingold, K. (2018). The advocacy coalition framework: An overview of the research program. In C. M. Weible & P. A. Sabatier (Eds.), Theories of the policy process (4th ed., pp. 135–172). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Karpowitz, C. F., Mendelberg, T., & Shaker, L. (2012). Gender inequality in deliberative participation. American Political Science Review, 106(3), 533–547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kenney, D. S. (2000). Arguing about consensus: Examining the case against Western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resources management. Boulder, CO: Natural Resources Law Center.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. (2014). Social learning in collaborative watershed planning: The importance of process control and efficacy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 57(10), 1572–1593.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M. (2016). Back to the future? Collaborative environmental governance theory and practice. In R. D. Margerum & C. J. Robinson (Eds.), The challenges of collaboration in environmental governance: Barriers and responses (pp. 54–80). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Newig, J. (2014). From planning to implementation: Top-down and bottom-up approaches for collaborative watershed management. Policy Studies Journal, 42(3), 416–442.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lauber, T. B., Decker, D. J., & Knuth, B. A. (2008). Social networks and community-based natural resource management. Environmental Management, 42(4), 677–687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D. (2006). Collaborative public management and democracy: Evidence from western watershed partnerships. Public Administration Review, 66(supplement), 100–110.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005a). Are trust and social capital the keys to success? Watershed partnerships in California and Washington. In P. A. Sabatier, W. Focht, M. Lubell, Z. Trachtenberg, A. Vedlitz, & M. Matlock (Eds.), Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management (pp. 233–258). Cambrige, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005b). To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. American Political Science Review, 99(04), 491–503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., Weible, C. M., Vince, S. R., Siddiki, S. N., & Calanni, J. C. (2014). Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 591–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levesque, V. R., Calhoun, A. J., Bell, K. P., & Johnson, T. R. (2017). Turning contention into collaboration: Engaging power, trust, and learning in collaborative networks. Society & Natural Resources, 30(2), 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lubell, M., Robins, G., & Wang, P. (2014). Network structure and institutional complexity in an ecology of water management games. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundmark, C., Matti, S., & Sandström, A. (2018). The transforming capacity of collaborative institutions: Belief change and coalition reformation in conflicted wildlife management. Journal of Environmental Management, 226, 226–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D., & Robinson, C. J. (2016). Introduction: The challanges of collaboration in environmental governance. In R. D. Margerum & C. J. Robinson (Eds.), The challenges of collaboration in environmental governance: Barriers and responses (pp. 1–24). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12, 331–354.
   Google Scholar
• Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert, E., Pahl-Wostl, C., Rees, Y., Searle, B., Tàbara, D., & Tippett, J. (2007). Social learning in European river-basin management: Barriers and fostering mechanisms from 10 river basins. Ecology and Society, 12(1), 19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyson, S. (2017). Cognition and policy change: The consistency of policy learning in the advocacy coalition framework. Policy and Society, 36(2), 320–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyson, S. (2018). Policy learning over a decade or more and the role of interests therein: The European liberalization policy process of Belgian network industries. Public Policy and Administration, 33(1), 88–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyson, S., Scholten, P., & Weible, C. M. (2017). Policy learning and policy change: Theorizing their relations from different perspectives. Policy and Society, 36(2), 161–177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2008). A critical review of the theory and application of social learning in participatory natural resource management processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), 325–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2012). Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Jager, N., Kochskaemper, E., & Challies, E. (this issue). Learning in participatory environmental governance — its antecedents and affects. Findings from a Case Survey Meta Analysis.
   Google Scholar
• Oh, Y., & Bush, C. B. (2016). Exploring the role of dynamic social capital in collaborative governance. Administration & Society, 48(2), 216–236.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C., Craps, M., Dewulf, A., Mostert, E., Tabara, D., & Taillieu, T. (2007). Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society, 12(2), 5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pattison, A. (2018). Factors shaping policy learning: A study of policy actors in subnational climate and energy issues. Review of Policy Research, 35(4), 535–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J., & Rubin, I. S. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.) London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21(2–3), 129–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework: Innovation and clarification. In P. A. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 189–220). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Siddiki, S., Kim, J., & Leach, W. D. (2017). Diversity, trust, and social learning in collaborative governance. Public Administration Review, 77(6), 863–874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinkovics, R., & Alfoldi, E. A. (2012). Facilitating the interaction between theory and data in qualitative research using CAQDAS. In G. Symon & C. Cassell (Eds.), Qualitative organizational research: Core methods and current challenges (pp. 109–131). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• State of Colorado. (2018). Colorado’s water plan. Retrieved from https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/cowaterplan
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2009). Coalitions, science, and belief change: Comparing adversarial and collaborative policy subsystems. Policy Studies Journal, 37(2), 195–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar