Exogenous factors in collective policy learning: the case of municipal flood risk governance in the Netherlands

References

• Literature
   Google Scholar
• Albright, E. A. (2011). Policy change and learning in response to extreme flood events in Hungary: An advocacy coalition approach. Policy Studies Journal, 39(3), 485–511. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00418.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., Marschke, M., & Plummer, R. (2008). Adaptive co-management and the paradox of learning. Global Environmental Change, 18, 86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2007.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Plummer, R., Haug, C., & Huitema, D. (2014). Learning effects of interactive decision-making processes for climate change adaptation. Global Environmental Change, 27, 51–63. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.04.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C. J., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25, 275–294. doi: 10.1007/BF00138786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryman, A. (2012). Social research methods (4th ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, M. (2011). Advancing the diagnostic analysis of environmental problems. International Journal of the Commons, 5, 346. doi: 10.18352/ijc.273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Loë, R. C., & Patterson, J. J. (2018). Boundary judgments in water governance: Diagnosing internal and external factors that matter in a complex world. Water Resources Management, 32, 565–581. doi: 10.1007/s11269-017-1827-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleischhauer, M. (2008). The role of spatial planning in strengthening urban resilience. In H. J. Pasman & I. A. Kirillov (Eds.), Resilience of cities to terrorist and other threats. NATO Science for Peace and Security Series, Series C: Environmental Security (pp. 273–298). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment & Resources, 30, 441–473. doi: 10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644. doi: 10.1093/jopart/muq089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., Heikkila, T., Smolinski, S. L., Huitema, D., & Armitage, D. (2018). Learning our way out of environmental policy problems: A review of the scholarship. Policy Sciences, 51(3), 335–371. doi: 10.1007/s11077-017-9278-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, C. M. (2011). Policy learning and policy failure in sustainable tourism governance: From first- and second-order to third-order change? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 649–671. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2011.555555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296. doi: 10.2307/422246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. The Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512. doi: 10.1111/psj.12026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinssen, J. (2012). Sustainability attitudes in local area development in the Netherlands. In K. Zoeteman (Ed.), Sustainable development drivers: The role of leadership in government, business and NGO performance (pp. 199–228). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Cashore, B. (2009). The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change: Understanding policy change as a methodological problem. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 11, 33–46. doi: 10.1080/13876980802648144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2002). The policy effects of internationalization: A subsystem adjustment analysis of policy change. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis; Research and Practice, 4, 31–50.
   Google Scholar
• Ison, R. L. (2010). Systems practice: How to act in a climate-change world. London: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Keen, M., Brown, V. A., & Dyball, R. (Eds.). (2005). Social learning in environmental management: Towards a sustainable future (pp. 3–21). London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Liefferink, D., Wiering, M., Crabbé, A., & Hegger, D. (2018). Explaining stability and change. Comparing flood risk governance in Belgium, France, the Netherlands and Poland. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 11(3), 281–290. doi: 10.1111/jfr3.12325
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D., & Rhodes, R. A. W. (1992). Policy communities and issue networks: Beyond typology. In D. Marsh & R. A. W. Rhodes (Eds.), Policy networks in British government (pp. 229–268). Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, J. (2002). Qualitative researching. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Massey, E., Biesbroek, R., Huitema, D., & Jordan, A. (2014). Climate policy innovation: The adoption and diffusion of adaptation policies across Europe. Global Environmental Change, 29, 434–443. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12, 331–354. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X00005602
   Google Scholar
• Neuvel, J. M. M., & van den Brink, A. (2009). Flood risk management in Dutch local spatial planning practices. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(7), 865–880. doi: 10.1080/09640560903180909
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsson, M. (2006). The role of assessments and institutions for policy learning: A study on Swedish climate and nuclear policy formation. Policy Sciences, 38, 225–249. doi: 10.1007/s11077-006-9006-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohrstedt, D., & Weible, C. (2010). The logic of policy change after crisis: Proximity and subsystem interaction. Risk, Hazards & Crisis in Public Policy, 1(2), 1–32. doi: 10.2202/1944-4079.1035
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2014). Water governance in the Netherlands: Fit for the future? OECD Studies on Water. OECD Publishing. doi: 10.1787/9789264102637-en
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2007). Challenges and growth: The development of the interdisciplinary field of institutional analysis. Journal of Institutional Economics, 3, 239–264. doi: 10.1017/S1744137407000719
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2011). Background on the institutional analysis and development framework. Policy Studies Journal, 39, 7–27. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0072.2010.00394.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19, 354–365. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E. C., Johnson, C., & Tunstall, S. (2017). Understanding policy change in flood risk management. Water Security, 2, 11–18. doi: 10.1016/j.wasec.2017.09.002
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2003). Big, slow-moving, and … invisible: Macrosocial processes in the study of comparative politics. In J. Mahoney & D. Rueschemeyer (Eds.), Comparative historical analysis (pp. 177–207). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reed, M. S., Evely, A. C., Cundill, G., Fazey, I., Glass, J., Laing, A., … Stringer, L. (2010). What is social learning? Ecology and Society, 15(4), r1. doi: 10.5751/ES-03564-1504r01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodela, R. (2011). Social learning and natural resource management: The emergence of three research perspectives. Ecology and Society, 16(4), 30. doi: 10.5751/ES-04554-160430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. A. (1988). An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein. Policy Sciences, 21, 129–168. doi: 10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz, M. J. C., & Koning, A. G. H. (1995). Bestemmingsplan en waterbeheer. Het Waterschap, 15, 574–579.
   Google Scholar
• Stallings, R. A. (1988). Conflict in natural disasters: A codification of consensus and conflict theories. Social Science Quarterly, 69(3), 569–586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., Rijswick, H. V., Buuren, A. V., Huitema, D., Meijerink, S., … Wiering, M. (2011). The regional governance of climate adaptation: A framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements. Climate Law, 2, 159–179. doi: 10.1163/CL-2011-032
   Google Scholar
• van Herk, S., Zevenbergen, C., Ashley, R., & Rijke, J. (2011). Learning and action alliances for the integration of flood risk management into urban planning: A new framework from empirical evidence from the Netherlands. Environmental Science & Policy, 14, 543–554. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2011.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warner, J. F. (2008). The politics of flood insecurity: Framing contested river management projects (PhD dissertation). Wageningen.
   Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (Eds.). (2017). Theories of the policy process (4th ed.). New York, NY: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wesselink, A., Warner, J., & Kok, M. (2013). You gain some funding, you lose some freedom: The ironies of flood protection in Limburg (the Netherlands). Environmental Science & Policy, 30, 113–125. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2012.10.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wheater, H., & Evans, E. (2009). Land use, water management and future flood risk. Land Use Policy, 26S, S251–S264. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2009.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., Kaufmann, M., Mees, H., Schellenberger, T., Ganzevoort, W., Hegger, D. L. T., … Matczak, P. (2017). Varieties of flood risk governance in Europe: How do countries respond to driving forces and what explains institutional change? Global Environmental Change, 44, 15–26. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2017.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, R. A. (2009). Exogenous shocks in subsystem adjustment and policy change: The credit crunch and Canadian banking regulation. Journal of Public Policy, 29(1), 29–53. doi: 10.1017/S0143814X09001007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolsink, M. (2006). River basin approach and integrated water management: Governance pitfalls for the Dutch space-water-adjustment management principle. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 37, 473–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Policy documents
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Roermond. (2008). Strategische visie Roermond 2020. Roermond investeert in haar toekomst. Retrieved from https://www.roermond.nl/
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Roermond. (2015, 27 January). Proposal to Burgemeester en Wethouders of the municipality of Roermond. Subject: Initiatievenloket Maasplassen.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Venlo. (2014). Ruimtelijke structuurvisie Venlo: Ruimte binnen grenzen.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Venlo. (2015). Bouwen met Maaswater: MIRT onderzoek Maas Venlo.
   Google Scholar
• Gemeente Venlo. (2016). Koploperproject Maas Venlo. Raadsinformatiebrief. RIB nr. 2016-132. Retrieved from https://ris.ibabs.eu/raad-venlo/
   Google Scholar
• H2O. (2004). Schultz: Bouwen langs de Maas uitzondering. Retrieved from http://edepot.wur.nl/357019
   Google Scholar
• MVW (Ministerie van Verkeer en Waterstaat). (1994a). Onderzoek Watersnood Maas. Deelrapport 1, Wateroverlast december 1993. Lelystad, NL: Rijkswaterstaat.
   Google Scholar
• MVW. (1994b). Onderzoek Watersnood Maas. Deelrapport 3, Bestuurlijke aspecten. Lelystad: Rijkswaterstaat.
   Google Scholar
• MVW. (2006). Beleidslijn grote rivieren: Beleidsbrief. Letter to the chairman of the House of Representatives (Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal). The Hague
   Google Scholar
• MVW, and MVROM (Ministry of Public Housing, Spatial Planning and Environmental Management). (1996). Beleidslijn ruimte voor de rivier. Staatscourant, 77, 9–12.
   Google Scholar
• Neimed. (2017). Progneff: Prognoses en effecten 2017. Retrieved from http://prognoses.neimed.nl/wat-is-progneff
   Google Scholar
• Provincie Limburg. (2015). Provinciaal waterplan Limburg 2016–2021: Samen werken aan water. Maastricht.
   Google Scholar
• RWS (Rijkswaterstaat). (1994). De Maas slaat toe. Verslag hoogwater Maas December 1993. Maastricht: Rijkwaterstaat directie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• RWS. (1995). De Maas slaat weer toe. Verslag hoogwater Maas 1995. Maastricht: Rijkswaterstaat directie Limburg.
   Google Scholar
• Stadsgewest Venlo c.a. (1999). Maascorridor: Een integrale visie op de Maas van Belfeld tot Broekhuizen. Venlo.
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer (Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal). (2000). Voortgang rivierdijkversterkingen. kst18106-104. The Hague.
   Google Scholar
• Tweede Kamer (Tweede Kamer der Staten-Generaal). (2016). Wijziging van de Waterwet en enkele andere wetten (nieuwe normering primaire waterkeringen). kst-34436-3. The Hague.
   Google Scholar