Collaborative learning for policy innovations: sustainable urban drainage systems in Leicester, England

References

• Alexander, M., Doorn, N., & Priest, S. (2017). Bridging the legitimacy gap – translating theory into practical signposts for legitimate flood risk governance. Regional Environmental Change, 18(2), 397–408. doi: 10.1007/s10113-017-1195-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander, M., Priest, S., Micou, A. P., Tapsell, S., Green, C., Parker, D., & Homewood, S. (2016). Analysing and evaluating flood risk governance in England – Enhancing societal resilience through comprehensive and aligned flood risk governance. STAR-FLOOD Consortium. Flood Hazard Research Centre, Middlesex University. Retreived from http://www.starflood.eu/documents/2016/03/wp3-en-final-webversion.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Argyris, C., & Schon, D. A. (1996). Organisational learning II. Theory, method, and practice. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.
   Google Scholar
• Baird, J., Plummer, R., & Bodin, Ö. (2016). Collaborative governance for climate change adaptation in Canada: Experimenting with adaptive co-management. Regional Environmental Change, 16(3), 747–758.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Begg, C., Walker, G., & Kuhlicke, C. (2015). Localism and flood risk management in England: The creation of new inequalities? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 685–702.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, A., & Elman, C. (2006). Complex causal relations and case study methods: The example of path dependence. Political Analysis, 14(3), 250–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benson, D., Lorenzoni, I., & Cook, H. (2016). Evaluating social learning in England flood risk management: An ‘individual-community interaction’ perspective. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 326–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berardo, R., Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. (2014). Interorganizational engagement in collaborative environmental management: Evidence from the South Florida ecosystem restoration task force. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 697–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brugnach, M., & Ingram, H. (2012). Ambiguity: The challenge of knowing and deciding together. Environmental Science & Policy, 15(1), 60–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cashmore, M., & Wejs, A. (2014). Constructing legitimacy for climate change planning: A study of local government in Denmark. Global Environmental Change, 24, 203–212. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.09.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crossan, M., Henry, W., & White, R. (1999). An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 522–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawes, S., Cresswell, A., & Pardo, T. (2009). From “need to know” to “need to share”: Tangled problems, information boundaries, and the building of public sector knowledge networks. Public Administration Review, 69(3), 392–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dekker, S., & Hansen, D. (2004). Learning under pressure: The effects of politicization on organizational learning in public bureaucracies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(2), 211–230.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dengler, M. (2007). Spaces of power for action: Governance of the Everglades restudy process (1992–2000). Political Geography, 26(4), 423–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs and Department for Communities and Local Governments (Defra/DCLG). (2014, December). Consultation on delivering sustainable drainage solutions. A summary of responses to the consultation and the government response. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/388941/suds-consult-sum-resp-201412.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra). (2004). Making space for water: Developing a new government strategy for flood and coastal erosion risk management in England: A consultation exercise. London: Defra.
   Google Scholar
• Dolowitz, D. P., Bell, S., & Keeley, M. (2018). Retrofitting urban drainage infrastructure: Green or grey? Urban Water Journal, 15(1), 83–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Driessen, P., Glasbergen, P., & Verdaas, C. (2001). Interactive policy-making; a model of management for public works. European Journal of Operational Research, 128, 322–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellis, J., & Lundy, L. (2016). Implementing sustainable drainage systems for urban surface water management within the regulatory framework in England and Wales. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 630–636.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A., & Heikkila, T. (2006). Comparing collaborative mechanisms in large-scale ecosystem governance. Natural Resources Journal, 46(3/4), 657–707.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A., & Heikkila, T. (in press). Tackling Key Challenges around Learning in Environmental Governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the Everglades Restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Urban complexity and spatial strategies: Towards a relational planning for our times. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. (2013).  Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W., Moellenkamp, S., Pahl-Wostl, C., & Yalcin, R. (2009). Adaptive water governance: Assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-) management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 26. [online].
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingram, H., Schneider, A., & DeLeon, P. (2007). Social construction and policy design. In P. Sabatier (Ed.), Theories of the policy process (2nd ed., pp. 93–126). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koebele, X. (2019). Policy learning in collaborative environmental governance processes. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. Advance online publication. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2019.1623661
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66, 111–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W., Weible, C., Vince, S., Siddiki, S., & Calanni, J. (2013). Fostering learning through collaboration: Knowledge acquisition and belief change in marine aquaculture partnerships. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 24(3), 591–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leicester City Council (LCC). (2015a). Sustainable drainage guide, 23 pp. Retrieved from http://www.leicester.gov.uk/media/179759/suds-guidance-april-2015.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leicester City Council (LCC). (2015b). Leicester local flood risk management strategy. Retrieved from http://www.leicester.gov.uk/your-environment/flooding-and-severe-weather/local-flood-risk-management-strategy/
   Google Scholar
• Leicester City Council (LCC). (2015c). Leicester green infrastructure strategy 2015–2025: Evidence base, actions and opportunities. Retrieved from https://www.leicester.gov.uk/media/183734/leicesters-green-infrastructure-strategy-2015-2025.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., & Friedman, V. (2002). A multifacet model of organizational learning. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1), 78–98.
   Google Scholar
• Lubell, M. (2004). Collaborative watershed management: A view from the grassroots. Policy Studies Journal, 32(3), 341–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melville-Shreeve, P., Cotterill, S., Grant, L., Arahuetes, A., Stovin, V., Farmani, R., & Butler, D. (2018). State of SuDS delivery in the United Kingdom. Water and Environment Journal, 32(1), 9–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muro, M., & Jeffrey, P. (2012). Time to talk? How the structure of dialog processes shapes stakeholder learning in participatory water resources management. Ecology and Society, 17(1), 3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Kochskämper, E., Challies, E., & Jager, N. W. (2016). Exploring governance learning: How policymakers draw on evidence, experience and intuition in designing participatory flood risk planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 353–360.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep learning: How the mind overrides experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozawa-Meida, L., Riley, J., Melenhorst, M., Becker, M., Strzelecka, A., Ulanicki, B., & Micheel, I. (2016). Deliverable 3.2. Report on Socio-technical Requirements POWER project. Unpublished.
   Google Scholar
• Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E. (2015). A realistic assessment of fluvial and coastal flood risk in England and Wales. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(1), 44–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E., & Johnson, C. (2015). The ebb and flow of power: British flood risk management and the politics of scale. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 62, 131–142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penning-Rowsell, E., & Pardoe, J. (2014). The distributional consequences of future flood risk management in England and Wales. Environment and Planning C, 32, 1301–1321.
   Google Scholar
• Pitt, M. (2008). Learning lessons from the 2007 floods: Final report. London: Independent Review Commissioned by the UK Government.
   Google Scholar
• River Soar Catchment Partnership (RSCP). (2018). Soar catchment management plan. Retrieved from https://www.trentriverstrust.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/03/Soar-Catchment-Management-Plan-March-2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rodwin, L., & Schön, D. (1994). Rethinking the development experience: Essays provoked by the work of Albert O. Hirschman. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P., Focht, W., Lubell, M., Trachtenberg, Z., Vedlitz, A., & Matlock, M. (Eds.). (2005). Swimming upstream: Collaborative approaches to watershed management. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2003). Water Environment and Water Services (Scotland) Act. London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2003/3/contents
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2010). Flood and Water Management Act 2010. London: The Stationery Office. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2010/29/pdfs/ukpga_20100029_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2011). Localism Act 2011. London: The Stationery Office Ltd. Retrieved from https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2011/20/pdfs/ukpga_20110020_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• UK Government. (2018). National Planning Policy Framework, Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government by Command of Her Majesty. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/733637/National_Planning_Policy_Framework_web_accessible_version.pdf
   Google Scholar
• van Popering-Verkerk, J., & van Buuren, A. (2017). Developing collaborative capacity in pilot projects: Lessons from three Dutch flood risk management experiments. Journal of Cleaner Production, 169, 225–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, J. L. (1969). The diffusion of innovations among the American states. American Political Science Review, 63(3), 880–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiering, M., Kaufmann, M., Mees, H., Schellenberger, T., Ganzevoort, W, & Hegger, D. L. T. (2017). Varieties of flood risk governance in Europe: How do countries respond to driving forces and what explains institutional change? Global Environmental Change, 44, 15–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilder, M., & Lankao, P. (2006). Paradoxes of decentralization: Water reform and social implications in Mexico. World Development, 34(11), 1977–1995.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woods Ballard, B., Wilson, Udale-Clarke, H., Illman, S., Scott, T., Ashley, R., & Kellagher, R. (2015). The SuDS Manual. A joint publication of Construction Industry Research and Information Association (CIRIA), Department of Food, Environment and Rural Affairs (DEFRA), and Flood and Coastal Erosion Risk Management Research & Development. Online: http://www.scotsnet.org.uk/documents/nrdg/ciria-report-c753-the-suds-manual-v6.pdf
   Google Scholar