Leveraging the power of learning to overcome negotiation deadlocks in global climate governance and low carbon transitions

References

• Argyris, C., & Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning. A theory of action perspective. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
   Google Scholar
• Bellinson, R., & Chu, E. (2018). Learning pathways and the governance of innovations in urban climate change resilience and adaptation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1493916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bennett, C., & Howlett, M. (1992). The lessons of learning: Reconciling theories of policy learning and policy change. Policy Sciences, 25(3), 275–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., & Cashore, B. (2012). Complex global governance and domestic policies: Four pathways of influence. International Affairs, 88(3), 585–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsill, M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO Diplomacy: The influence of Nongovernmental organizations in international environment negotiations. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2007). Policy learning in an enlarged European Union: Environmental NGOs and new policy instruments. Journal of European Public Policy, 14(2), 248–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, M. (2009). The evolution of emissions trading in the European Union – the role of policy networks, knowledge and policy entrepreneurs. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 469–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canete, M. A. (2015). ‘EU Climate Commissioner: How We Formed the High Ambition Coalition’, Business Green, 15 December, Policy. Retrieved from http://www.businessgreen.com/bg/opinion/2439215/eu-climate-commissioner-how-we-formed-the-high-ambition-coalition
   Google Scholar
• Christoff, P. (2016). The promissory note: COP 21 and the Paris Climate Agreement. Environmental Politics, 25(5), 765–787.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daugbjerg, C., & Swinbank, A. (2016). Three decades of policy layering and politically sustainable reform in the European Union’s agricultural policy. Governance, 29(2), 265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubash, N. (2017). Safeguarding development and limiting vulnerability: India’s stakes in the Paris Agreement. WIRES Climate Change, 8, 1–10. doi: 10.1002/wcc.444
   Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A. (2009). Policy transfer as learning: Capturing variation in what decision-makers learn from epistemic communities. Policy Studies, 30(3), 289–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2013). Systematising policy learning: From monolith to dimensions. Political Studies, 61(3), 599–619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunlop, C. A., & Radaelli, C. M. (2016). Policy learning in the Eurozone crisis: Modes, power and functionality. Policy Sciences, 49(2), 107–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elgström, O., & Jönsson, C. (2000). Negotiation in the European Union: Bargaining or problem-solving? Journal of European Public Policy, 7(5), 684–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falkner, R. (2016). The Paris Agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H. (2010). Policy-Learning and environmental policy integration in the common agricultural policy, 1973-2003. Public Administration, 88(2), 296–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueres, C. (2015). Paris climate summit: The world is ready for change. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2015/oct/30/paris-climate-summit-the-world-is-ready-for-change
   Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, J. (2012). Negotiating challenges and climate change. Climate Policy, 12(5), 630–644.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, E. B. (1980). Why Collaborate? Issue-linkage and international regimes. World Politics, 32(3), 357–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, P., & Haas, E. (1995). Learning to learn: Improving international governance. Global Governance, 1, 255–285.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2016). ‘All hands on deck’: The Paris Agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (1993). Policy Paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2013). Tracing the progress of process tracing. European Political Science, 12(1), 20–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2013). Building a conceptual approach to collective learning: Lessons for public policy scholars. Policy Studies Journal, 41(3), 484–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, I., & Kerr, O. (2017). The Paris Agreement: China’s ‘new normal’ role in international climate negotiations. Climate Policy, 17(1), 48–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howlett, M., Muhkerjee, I., & Koppenjan, J. (2017). Policy learning and policy networks in theory and practice: The role of policy brokers in the Indonesian biodiesel policy network. Policy & Society, 36(2), 233–250.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2007). Climate change 2007: Synthesis report. Valencia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Climate change 2014: Synthesis report. Valencia: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanova, M. (2016). Good COP, bad COP: Climate reality after Paris. Global Policy, 7(3), 411–420.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2012). Deadline 2015. Nature, 481, 137–138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, M. (2016). High pressure for Low emissions: How civil society created the Paris Climate Agreement. Juncture, 22(4), 314–323.
   Google Scholar
• Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making. A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. London: Macmillan Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., & Weehuizen, R. (2005). Policy learning, what does it mean and how can we study it? Publin Report No. D15, NIFU-STEP, Oslo. Retrieved from https://brage.bibsys.no/xmlui/bitstream/handle/11250/226561/d15policylearning.pdf?sequence=1
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, R., & Victor, D. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, M., & Lindenthal, A. (2011). Learning within the European Commission: The case of environmental integration. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(7), 980–998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, T. (2018). Network comparison of socialization, learning and collaboration in the C40 cities climate group. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1433998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1975). The uncertainty of the past: Organizational learning under ambiguity. European Journal of Political Research, 3, 147–171.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J. (1992). Policy learning and failure. Journal of Public Policy, 12(4), 331–354.
   Google Scholar
• McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2018). Is learning without teaching possible? The productive tension between network governance and reflexivity. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 797–812. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2014.986568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelowa, K., & Michaelowa, A. (2017). Transnational climate governance initiatives: Designed for effective climate change mitigation? International Interactions, 43(1), 129–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2013). Policy entrepreneurs and controversial science: Governing human embryonic stem cell research. Journal of European Public Policy, 20(3), 442–457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy Entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monheim, K. (2014). How effective negotiation management promotes multilateral cooperation: The power of process in climate, trade and biosafety negotiations. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Morales, A. (2015). 8 Lessons from climate calamity and why Paris worked. Retrieved from http://www.fin24.com/Economy/8-lessons-from-climate-calamity-and-why-paris-worked-20151214
   Google Scholar
• Nachmany, M., Fankhauser, S., Townshend, T., Collins, M., Landesman, T., Matthews, A., … Setzer, J. (2014). The GLOBE climate legislation study: A review of climate change legislation in 66 countries (4th ed.). London: GLOBE International and the Grantham Research Institute, London School of Economics and Political Science.
   Google Scholar
• New Climate Economy. (2014). Better growth, better climate. Retrieved from http://newclimateeconomy.report/2014/
   Google Scholar
• Nhamo, G., & Nhamo, S. (2016). One global deal from Paris 2015: Convergence and contestations on the future climate mitigation agenda. South African Journal of International Affairs, 23(3), 323–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, J. (1987). Nuclear learning and U.S.–Soviet security regimes. International Organization, 41(3), 371–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (2016). Reflections on global climate politics post Paris: Power. Interests and Polycentricity. International Spectator, 51(4), 80–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Odell, J. (2009). Breaking deadlocks in international institutional negotiations: The WTO, Seattle, and Doha. International Studies Quarterly, 53, 273–299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: Polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (1995). The role of knowledge in the policy process. Journal of European Public Policy, 2(2), 159–183.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact Assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rajamani, L. (2012). The Durban Platform for enhanced action and the future of the climate regime. International & Comparative Law Quarterly, 61(2), 501–518.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rietig, K. (2014). Reinforcement of multilevel governance dynamics: Creating momentum for increasing ambitions in international climate negotiations. International Environmental Agreements, 14, 371–389.
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K. (2018). Learning within the European Commission in renewable energy policy making. In C. Radaelli, C. Dunlop, & J. Trein (Eds.), Learning in Public policy (pp. 51–74). London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K., & Perkins, R. (2018). Does learning matter for policy outcomes? The case of integrating climate finance into the EU budget. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(4), 487–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, P. (1987). Knowledge, policy-oriented learning and policy change. Knowledge, 8, 649–692.
   Google Scholar
• Tallberg, J. (2006). Leadership and negotiation in the European Union: The power of the Presidency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, L. (2001). The Mind and heart of the negotiator (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2005–2015). Participation lists. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/documentation/document_lists/items/2960.php
   Google Scholar
• UNFCCC. (2018). Facilitative dialogue on enhancing ambition and support. Retrieved from http://unfccc.int/cooperation_and_support/financial_mechanism/items/9985.php
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, S., Tian, H., Whalley, J., & Agarwal, M. (2011). China and India’s participation in global climate negotiations. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law, Economics, 11, 261–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warntjen, A. (2008). The council presidency: Power broker or Burden? An empirical analysis. European Union Politics, 9(3), 315–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, C. M. (2008). Expert-based information and policy subsystems: A review and synthesis. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 615–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zito, A., & Schout, A. (2009). Learning theory reconsidered: EU integration theories and learning. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1103–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar