Beyond accountability: alternative rationales for transparency in global trade politics

References

• 1.8 million say no to corporate power grabs. (2014, May 28). Retrieved from http://350.org/press-release/1-8-million-say-no-to-corporate-power-grabs/
   Google Scholar
• Appleton, A. (2017, 8 December). Improving the transparency of fisheries subsidies. Retrieved from https://www.ictsd.org/opinion/improving-the-transparency-of-fisheries-subsidies
   Google Scholar
• Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade (DFAT). (2011). Release of confidentiality letter. Retrieved from https://www.dfat.gov.au/fta/tpp/111221-tpp-confidentiality-letter.html
   Google Scholar
• Australian Foreign Affairs, Defence and Trade References Committee. (2015, June 25). Blind agreement: Reforming Australia's treaty-making process. Retrieved from http://www.aph.gov.au/Parliamentary_Business/Committees/Senate/Foreign_Affairs_Defence_and_Trade/Treaty-making_process/Report
   Google Scholar
• Better Regulation Watchdog. (n.d.). Founding statement. Retrieved from http://www.betterregwatch.eu
   Google Scholar
• Birchall, C. (2011). Introduction to ‘secrecy and transparency’: The politics of opacity and openness. Theory, Culture & Society, 28, 7–25. doi: 10.1177/0263276411427744
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkinshaw, P. (2006). Transparency as a human right. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 47–57). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2004). Behind closed doors: Publicity, secrecy, and the quality of deliberation. Journal of Political Philosophy, 12(4), 389–410. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9760.2004.00206.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2010). Open vs closed constitutional negotiations. In D. Kahane, et al. (Ed.), Deliberative democracy in practice (pp. 77–91). Vancouver: UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). (2014, October 30). European Ombudman’s public consultation on transparency of the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) negotiations. Retrieved from http://www.ombudsman.europa.eu/cases/correspondence.faces/en/58686/html.bookmark
   Google Scholar
• Corporate Europe Observatory (CEO). (2015, May 5). TTIP talks: Despite the PR, still under a cloak of secrecy. Retrieved from http://corporateeurope.org/international-trade/2015/05/ttip-talks-despite-pr-still-under-cloak-secrecy
   Google Scholar
• De Ville, F., & Siles-Brügge, G. (2016). TTIP: The truth about the transatlantic trade and investment partnership. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the Global Reporting Initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10, 74–96. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, J. (1995). Strategic uses of argument. In K. Arrow (Ed.), Barriers to conflict resolution (pp. 236–257). New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• EU meets US regulatory demands halfway with ‘Better Regulation Agenda’. (2015, October 7). World trade online. Retrieved from http://www.bilaterals.org/?eu-meets-u-s-regulatory-demands
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2014, November 24). Opening the windows: Commission commits to enhanced transparency. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-14-2131_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (EC). (2015, September 16). Commission proposes new investment court system for TTIP and other EU trade and investment negotiations. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-15-5651_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A. (2007). Introduction: The battle over transparency. In A. Florini (Ed.), The right to know: Transparency for an open world (pp. 1–18). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, S. (2011, October 22). Statement: Leaked US proposal for a TPP pharmaceutical chapter. Retrieved from http://infojustice.org/archives/5814
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1977). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Froman, M. (2013, September 30). Remarks by U.S. Trade Representative Michael Froman on the United States, the European Union, and the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership. Retrieved from https://ustr.gov/about-us/policy-offices/press-office/speeches/transcripts/2013/september/froman-us-eu-ttip
   Google Scholar
• Froman, M. (2014, February 18). A values-driven trade policy. Retrieved from http://www.ustr.gov/about-us/press-office/press-releases/2014/February/A-Values-Driven-Trade-Policy_Remarks-by-USTR-Froman-at-Center-for-American-P
   Google Scholar
• Garsten, C., & de Montoya, M. (Eds.). (2008). Transparency in a new global order: Unveiling organizational visions. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Gheyle, N., & De Ville, F. (2017). How much is enough? Explaining the continuous transparency conflict in TTIP. Politics and Governance, 5(3), 16–28. doi: 10.17645/pag.v5i3.1024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill, S. (2003). Power and resistance in the new world order. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• González, A. (2014). Executive summary. Mega-regional trade agreements: game-changers or costly distractions for the world trading system? Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/GAC/2014/WEF_GAC_TradeFDI_MegaRegionalTradeAgreements_Report_2014.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Goyens, M. (2016, May 4). Since when is TTIP not a BIG deal? Euractiv. Retrieved from https://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/opinion/since-when-is-ttip-not-a-big-deal/
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R., & Keohane, R. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99(1), 29–43. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenpeace Netherlands. (n.d.). TTIP leaks. Retrieved from https://www.ttip-leaks.org
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, A. (2016, May 2). TTIP leaked documents could spell the end of controversial trade deal, say campaigners. The Independent.
   Google Scholar
• Groser, T. (2015, September 23). Respondent’s submissions in Jane Kelsey v. Minister of Trade, An Application for Judicial Review, High Court of New Zealand. Retrieved from https://tpplegal.files.wordpress.com/2015/08/3194201_respondent_s-submissions-23-september-20151.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 1–7. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2014). A transparency turn in global environmental governance. In A. Gupta & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency in global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 3–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutmann, A., & Thompson, D. (1996). Democracy and disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2008). Transparency, accountability, and global governance. Global Governance: A Review of Multilateralism and International Organizations, 14(1), 73–94. doi: 10.1163/19426720-01401006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heald, D. (2006). Varieties of transparency. In C. Hood & D. Heald (Eds.), Transparency: The key to better governance? (pp. 25–43). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holzner, B., & Holzner, L. (2006). Transparency in global change: The vanguard of the open society. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, C., & Heald, D. (2006). Transparency: The key to better governance? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ingraham, C. (2014, February 28). Interactive: How companies wield off-the-record influence on Obama’s trade policy. Washington Post Wonkblog. Retrieved from http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2014/02/28/how-companies-wield-off-the-record-influence-on-obamas-trade-policy/
   Google Scholar
• Jurgenson, N., & Rey, P. (2014). Liquid information leaks. International Journal of Communication, 8, 2651–2665.
   Google Scholar
• Kaminski, M. (2014). The capture of international intellectual property law through the US trade regime. Southern California Law Review, 87, 977–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knight, B. (2015, August 1). Wikileaks releases documents reportedly showing US spied on Japan for years. ABC News. Retrieved from http://www.abc.net.au/news/2015-08-01/wikileaks-claims-the-us-spied-on-ally-japan/6665034
   Google Scholar
• Lekkas, F. (2015, May 31). TTIP transparency debated at Yale. Retrieved from https://www.opendemocracy.net/can-europe-make-it/fil-lekkas/ttip-transparency-debated-at-yale
   Google Scholar
• Lord, K. (2006). The perils and promise of global transparency. New York: State University of New York Press.
   Google Scholar
• Love, J. (2015, January 9). Fast track trade bill fails to correct asymmetric secrecy of trade negotiations. Retrieved from http://keionline.org/node/1898
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 8–13. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2014). The lost innocence of transparency in environmental politics. In A. Gupta & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency in global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 39–60). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moody, G. (2014, February 19). Learning from ACTA: Will TAFTA/TTIP be more transparent than TPP? TechDirt. Retrieved from http://www.techdirt.com/articles/20140214/09554126229/learning-acta-will-taftattip-be-more-transparent-than-tpp.shtml
   Google Scholar
• Nicola, F. (2015, February 5). The paradox of transparency: The politics of regulatory cooperation in the TTIP negotiation. Retrieved from http://www.sidi-isil.org/sidiblog/?p=1298
   Google Scholar
• Parker, R. (2015). Four challenges for TTIP regulatory cooperation. Columbia Journal of European Law, 22(1), 1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Picherack, J. (2008). The expanding scope of the fair and equitable treatment standard: Have recent tribunals gone too far? Journal of World Investment & Trade, 9, 255–291.
   Google Scholar
• Pilkington, P. (2010, December 19). The Deleuzian philosophy of Julian Assange. Retrieved from https://fixingtheeconomists.wordpress.com/2010/12/19/the-deleuzian-philosophy-of-julian-assange/
   Google Scholar
• Setälä, M. (2009). Rhetoric and deliberative democracy. In K. Palonen & T. Pulkkinen (Eds.), Redescription. Yearbook of political thought. Conceptual history and feminist theory, 13 (pp. 61–82). Münster: LIT Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Shaffer, G. (2016). Transparency and the governance of subsidies. UC Irvine School of Law Research Paper No. 2016-32. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2782553
   Google Scholar
• Stasavage, D. (2004). Open-door or closed-door? Transparency in domestic and international bargaining. International Organization, 58(4), 667–703. doi: 10.1017/S0020818304040214
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sutton, M. (2014, February 24). US trade rep on the charm offensive—slight tweaks to secret TPP process is far from enough. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2014/02/us-trade-rep-charm-offensive-slight-tweaks-secret-tpp-process-far-enough
   Google Scholar
• Sutton, M. (2015, September 11). More closed-door meetings, a new Chief Transparency Officer, and growing international opposition to the deal: What's going on with the TPP. Retrieved from https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2015/09/whats-going-tpp-more-closed-door-meetings-new-chief-transparency-officer
   Google Scholar
• Swartz, W. (2015, October 13). Ask an expert: What impacts will the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) have on the trade of fish and seafood? Retrieved from http://www.nereusprogram.org/ask-an-expert-what-impacts-will-the-trans-pacific-partnership-tpp-have-on-the-trade-of-fish-and-seafood/
   Google Scholar
• Tienhaara, K. (2009). The expropriation of environmental governance: Protecting foreign investors at the expense of public policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. (2003). Democracy through policy discourse. In M. Hajer & H. Wagenaar (Eds.), Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society (pp. 113–138). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNCTAD. (2012). Transparency, UNCTAD series on issues in international investment agreements II. Geneva: United Nations. Retrieved from http://unctad.org/en/PublicationsLibrary/unctaddiaeia2011d6_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• US Trade Representative. (2015). Transparency and anti-corruption chapter summary. Retrieved from https://ustr.gov/sites/default/files/TPP-Chapter-Summary-Transparency-and-Anti-corruption.pdf
   Google Scholar
• White, M. (2016, April 6). The Panama papers: Leaktivism’s coming of age. The Guardian.
   Google Scholar
• Wyden, R. (2012, May 23). Statement for the record: On introduction of the “Congressional Oversight Over Trade Negotiations Act”. Retrieved from http://www.wyden.senate.gov/download/?id=e937adde-69ef-4396-b7cf-89da99d8c493&download=1
   Google Scholar