Transparency, accountability and empowerment in sustainability governance: a conceptual review

References

• Andonova, L. B. (2010). Public-private partnerships for the Earth: Politics and patterns of hybrid authority in the multilateral system. Global Environmental Politics, 10(2), 25–53. doi: 10.1162/glep.2010.10.2.25
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, G., & Gulbrandsen, L. H. (2010). Transparency in nonstate certification: Consequences for accountability and legitimacy. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 97–119. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auld, G., Renckens, S., & Cashore, B. (2015). Transnational private governance between the logics of empowerment and control. Regulation & Governance, 9, 108–124. doi: 10.1111/rego.12075
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2008). Accountability of networked climate governance: The rise of transnational climate partnerships. Global Environmental Politics, 8(3), 74–102. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.3.74
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2012). Are partnerships for sustainable development democratic and legitimate? In P. Pattberg, F. Biermann, S. Chan, & A. Mert (Eds.), Partnerships for sustainable development: Emergence, influence and legitimacy (pp. 165–182). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bae, H., Wilcoxen, P., & Popp, D. (2010). Information disclosure policy: Do state data processing efforts help more than the information disclosure itself? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 29, 163–182. doi: 10.1002/pam.20483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, S. (2003). Environment and statecraft: The strategy of environmental treaty-making. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bauhr, M., & Nasiritousi, N. (2012). Resisting transparency: Corruption, legitimacy and the quality of global environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 12(4), 9–29. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. (2014). Earth system governance: World politics in the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blackman, A., Afsah, S., & Ratunanda, D. (2004). How do public disclosure control programs work? Evidence from Indonesia. Human Ecology Review, 11, 235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Bosetti, V., Carrao, C., De Cian, E., & Mosetti, E. (2013). Incentives and stability in international climate coalitions: An integrated assessment. Energy Policy, 55, 44–56. doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracking, S. (2015). The anti-politics of climate finance: The creation and performativity of the Green climate Fund. Antipode, 47, 281–302. doi: 10.1111/anti.12123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caron, M.-A., & Turcotte, M.-F. B. (2009). Path dependence and path creation: Framing the extra-financial information market for a sustainable trajectory. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 22, 272–297. doi: 10.1108/09513570910933979
   Google Scholar
• Ciplet, D., Adams, K. M., Weikmans, R., & Timmons Roberts, J. (2018). The transformative capacity of transparency in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 18, 130–150. doi: 10.1162/glep_a_00472
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clapp, J. (2008). Illegal GMO releases and corporate responsibility: Questioning the effectiveness of voluntary measures. Ecological Economics, 66, 348–358. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dingwerth, K., & Eichinger, M. (2010). Tamed transparency: How information disclosure under the global reporting Initiative fails to empower. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 74–96. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecosystem Marketplace. (2016). Raising ambition: State of the voluntary carbon markets. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
   Google Scholar
• Ehresman, T., & Stevis, D. (2014). Transparency and environmental equity: The international Finance corporation’s disclosure practices. In A. Gupta, & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 297–320). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A. (2007). Introduction: The battle over transparency. In A. Florini (Ed.), The right to know: Transparency for an open world (pp. 1–16). New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A., & Jairaj, B. (2014). The national context for transparency-based global environmental governance. In A. Gupta & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 61–80). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The perils and promise of transparency. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• García, J. H., Afsah, S., & Sterner, T. (2009). What firms are more sensitive to public disclosure schemes for pollution control? Evidence from Indonesia’s PROPER program. Environmental and Resource Economics, 42, 151–168. doi: 10.1007/s10640-008-9211-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Global Reporting Initiative. (2016). Empowering sustainable decisions: GRI’s annual report 2015-2016. Amsterdam: Global Reporting Initiative.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, R. W., & Keohane, R. O. (2005). Accountability and abuses of power in world politics. American Political Science Review, 99, 29–43. doi: 10.1017/S0003055405051476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gulbrandsen, L. H., & Auld, G. (2016). Contested accountability logics in evolving nonstate certification for fisheries sustainability. Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 42–60. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00353
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A. (2008). Transparency under scrutiny: Information disclosure in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 1–7. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2014). A transparency turn in global environmental governance. In A. Gupta & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 3–38). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 82–90. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., Vijge, M. J., Turnhout, E., & Pistorius, T. (2014). Making REDD+ transparent: The politics of measuring, reporting and verification systems. In A. Gupta, & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 181–201). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Habermas, J. (1998). On the pragmatics of communication. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Haufler, V. (2010). Disclosure as governance: The extractive industries transparency Initiative and resource management in the developing world. Global Environmental Politics, 10(3), 53–73. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., & Chen, D. (2015). Does environmental information disclosure benefit waste discharge reduction? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 535–552. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2173-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, T., & Yue, Q. (2017). A borrowed cloak: The institutional bottlenecks to legislating environmental information disclosure by Chinese listed companies. Journal of Environmental Law, 29, 445–473. doi: 10.1093/jel/eqx019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox-Hayes, J., & Levy, D. (2014). The political economy of governance by disclosure: Carbon disclosure and nonfinancial reporting as contested fields of governance. In A. Gupta & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 205–223). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. E., Stephan, M., & Abel, T. D. (2011). Coming clean: Information disclosure and environmental performance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarz, T., & Park, S. (2016). Accountability in global environmental governance: A meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 1–21. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lee, E., Lejano, R. P., & Connelly, R. J. (2013). Regulation-by-information in areas of limited statehood: Lessons from the Philippines’ environmental regulation. Regulation & Governance, 7, 387–405. doi: 10.1111/rego.12013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. (2005). Power: A radical view (second edition). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Lyon, T., & Maxwell, J. (2011). Greenwash: Corporate environmental disclosure under threat of audit. Journal of Economics and Management Strategy, 20, 3–41. doi: 10.1111/j.1530-9134.2010.00282.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyon, T., & Montgomery, A. W. (2015). The means and ends of greenwash. Organization and Environment, 28, 223–249. doi: 10.1177/1086026615575332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2005). The new accountability: Environmental responsibility across borders. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8, 8–13. doi: 10.1162/glep.2008.8.2.8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2014). So far but no further? Transparency and disclosure in the Aarhus Convention. In A. Gupta & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency and global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 83–105). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matisoff, D. C. (2013). Different rays of sunlight: Understanding information disclosure and carbon transparency. Energy Policy, 55, 579–592. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. B. (2011). Transparency for governance: The mechanisms and effectiveness of disclosure-based and education-based transparency policies. Ecological Economics, 70, 1882–1890. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.03.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2008). Environmental reform in the information age: The contours of informational governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newell, P. (2008). The political economy of global environmental governance. Review of International Studies, 34, 507–529. doi: 10.1017/S0260210508008140
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norton, B. G. (2005). Sustainability: A philosophy of adaptive management. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Park, S. (2010). World Bank Group interactions with environmentalists: Changing international organisation identities. London: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Partzsch, L., & Vlaskamp, M. C. (2016). Mandatory due diligence for ‘conflict minerals’ and illegally logged timber: Emergence and cascade of a new norm on foreign accountability. The Extractive Industries and Society, 3, 978–986. doi: 10.1016/j.exis.2016.07.003
   Google Scholar
• Pattberg, P. (2017). The emergence of carbon disclosure: Exploring the role of governance entrepreneurs. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35, 1437–1455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å, Stuart Chapin,III, F, Lambin, E. F., … Foley, J. A. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, J. (2017). More than a question of agency: Privatized project implementation, accountabilities, and global environmental governance. Review of Policy Research, 34, 10–30. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schleifer, P. (2016). Private governance undermined: India and the Roundtable on sustainable Palm Oil. Global Environmental Politics, 16(1), 38–58. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00335
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347, 736. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, M. (2002). Environmental information disclosure programmes: They work but why? Social Science Quarterly, 83, 190–381. doi: 10.1111/1540-6237.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swyngedouw, E. (2011). Depoliticized environments: The end of nature, climate change and the post-political condition. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement, 69, 253–274. doi: 10.1017/S1358246111000300
   Google Scholar
• Thomson Reuters. (2016). Carbon market monitor: America to the rescue. Oslo: Thomson Reuters.
   Google Scholar
• Tian, X.-L., Guo, Q.-G., Han, C., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Different extent of environmental information disclosure across Chinese cities: Contributing factors and correlation with local pollution. Global Environmental Change, 39, 244–257. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Transparency International. (2017). A tale of four funds: Best practices of multilateral trust funds in safe-guarding climate finance from corruption and waste. Berlin: Transparency International.
   Google Scholar
• Vijge, M. J. (2018). The (dis)empowering effects of transparency beyond information disclosure: The extractive industries transparency Initiative in Myanmar. Global Environmental Politics, 18, 13–32. doi: 10.1162/GLEP_a_00442
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler, H., Mantlana, B., & Letete, T. (2017). Transparency of action and support in the Paris Agreement. Climate Policy, 17, 853–872. doi:10.1080/14693062.2017.1302918.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank Inspection Panel. (2009). Accountability at the World Bank: The Inspection Panel at 15 Years. Washington: IBRD/World Bank.
   Google Scholar