Democratising planetary boundaries: experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earth system governance

References

• Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2015). Consensus and global environmental governance: Deliberative democracy in nature’s regime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2017). Critical loads: Negotiating what nature can withstand. In J. Meadowcroft & D. J. Fiorino (Eds.), Conceptual innovation in environmental policy (pp. 129–153). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, M., & Lidskog, R. (2018). Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: A deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1080/09644016.2017.1371919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F. (2012). Planetary boundaries and Earth system governance: Exploring the links. Ecological Economics, 81, 4–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowker, G., & Star, S. L. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brook, B. W., Ellis, E. C., Perring, M. P., Mackay, A. W., & Blomqvist, L. (2013). Does the terrestrial biosphere have planetary tipping points? Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 28(7), 396–401. doi: 10.1016/j.tree.2013.01.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. B. (2016). Environmental science and politics. In T. Gabrielson, C. A. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 491–504). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chambers, S. (2003). Deliberative democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 6(1), 307–326. doi: 10.1146/annurev.polisci.6.121901.085538
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapron, G., Epstein, Y., Trouwborst, A., & López-Bao, J. V. (2017). Bolster legal boundaries to stay within planetary boundaries. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(3), s41559-41017-40086. doi: 10.1038/s41559-017-0086
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiano, T. (2012). Rational deliberation among experts and citizens. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale (pp. 27–51). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, M. J., Bailey, R. M., & New, M. G. (2014). Tracking sustainable development with a national barometer for South Africa using a downscaled ‘Safe and Just Space’ framework. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(42), E4399–E4408. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1400985111
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins, M., Knutti, R., Arblaster, J., Dufresne, J.-L., Fichefet, T., Friedlingstein, P., … Wehner, M. (2013). Long-term climate change: Projections, commitments and irreversibility. Climate Change 2013: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (pp. 1029–1136) Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dearing, J. A., Wang, R., Zhang, K., Dyke, J. G., Haberl, H., Hossain, M. S., … Poppy, G. M. (2014). Safe and just operating spaces for regional social-ecological systems. Global Environmental Change, 28, 227–238. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2010). Foundations and frontiers of deliberative governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the Earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2016). Institutions for the Anthropocene: Governance in a changing Earth system. British Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 937–956. doi: 10.1017/s0007123414000453
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2019). The politics of the Anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durant, D. (2011). Models of democracy in social studies of science. Social Studies of Science, 41(5), 691–714. doi: 10.1177/0306312711414759
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eastin, J., Grundmann, R., & Prakash, A. (2011). The two limits debates: ‘Limits to Growth’ and climate change. Futures, 43(1), 16–26. doi: 10.1016/j.futures.2010.03.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edenhofer, O., & Kowarsch, M. (2015). Cartography of pathways: A new model for environmental policy assessments. Environmental Science & Policy, 51, 56–64. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2009). Democracy and expertise: Reorienting policy inquiry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Funtowicz, S. O., & Ravetz, J. R. (1993). Science for the post-normal age. Futures, 25(7), 739–755. doi: 10.1016/0016-3287(93)90022-L
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaz, V., Biermann, F., Crona, B., Loorbach, R., Folke, C., Olsson, P., … Reischl, G. (2012). ‘Planetary Boundaries’ – exploring the challenges for global environmental governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability. Open issue, 4(1), 80–87. doi: 10.1016/j.cosust.2012.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., & Cheshire, D. (2006). Defining and identifying environmental limits for sustainable development: A scoping study. Nottingham: Centre for Environmental Management, University of Nottingham.
   Google Scholar
• Holz, C., Kartha, S., & Athanasiou, T. (2018). Fairly sharing 1.5: National fair shares of a 1.5°C-compliant global mitigation effort. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 18(1), 117–134. doi: 10.1007/s10784-017-9371-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IGBP. (2017). Earth system definitions. IGBP global change. Retrieved from http://www.igbp.net/globalchange/earthsystemdefinitions.4.d8b4c3c12bf3be638a80001040.html
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The co-production of science and the social order. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• King, A. D., & Harrington, L. J. (2018). The inequality of climate change from 1.5 to 2°C of global Warming. Geophysical Research Letters, 45(10), 5030–5033. doi: 10.1029/2018GL078430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitcher, P. (2011). Science in a democratic society. Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
   Google Scholar
• Klinke, A., & Renn, O. (2014). Expertise and experience: A deliberative system of a functional division of labor for post-normal risk governance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 27(4), 442–465. doi: 10.1080/13511610.2014.943160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kowarsch, M., & Edenhofer, O. (2016). Principles or pathways? Improving the contribution of philosophical ethics to climate policy. In D. Roser & C. Heyward (Eds.), Climate justice in a non-ideal world (pp. 296–317). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kowarsch, M., Garard, J., Riousset, P., Lenzi, D., Dorsch, M. J., Knopf, B., … Edenhofer, O. (2016). Scientific assessments to facilitate deliberative policy learning. Palgrave Communications, 2, 16092. doi: 10.1057/palcomms.2016.92
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, M. (2013, March 28). Democracy in the Anthropocene? Science and sustainable development goals at the UN. Huffington Post. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/Melissa-Leach/democracy-in-the-anthropocene_b_2966341.html
   Google Scholar
• Leach, M., Raworth, K., & Rockström, J. (2013). Between social and planetary boundaries: Navigating pathways in the safe and just space for humanity. In World Social Science Report 2013: Changing Global Environments, edited by International Social Science Council and UNESCO, pp. 84–89. Paris: OECD and UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, S. L. (2012). We must set planetary boundaries wisely. Nature News, 485(7399), 417. doi: 10.1038/485417a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnér, B.-A., & Selin, H. (2013). The United Nations conference on sustainable development: Forty years in the making. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(6), 971–987. doi: 10.1068/c12287
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A. Y. (2013). Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: Reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change. Ecological Economics, 87, 84–94. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2012.12.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lövbrand, E., Pielke Jr., R., & Beck, S. (2011). A democracy paradox in studies of science and technology. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 36(4), 474–496. doi: 10.1177/0162243910366154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, J., Bohman, J., Chambers, S., Christiano, T., Fung, A., Parkinson, J., … Warren, M. E. (2012). A systemic approach to deliberative democracy. In J. Parkinson & J. Mansbridge (Eds.), Deliberative systems (pp. 1–26). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2012). Pushing the boundaries: Governance for sustainable development and a politics of limits. In J. Meadowcroft, O. Langhelle, & A. Rudd (Eds.), Governance, democracy and sustainable development: Moving beyond the impasse (pp. 272–296). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Moellendorf, D. (2011). A normative account of dangerous climate change. Climatic Change, 108(1), 57–72. doi: 10.1007/s10584-010-0007-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morseletto, P., Biermann, F., & Pattberg, P. (2017). Governing by targets: Reductio Ad Unum and evolution of the two-degree climate target. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(5), 655–676. doi: 10.1007/s10784-016-9336-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Towards green growth. Paris: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, Jr. R. A. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pielke, Jr. R. A. (2013, April 4). Planetary boundaries as power grab. Roger Pielke Jr.’s Blog. Retrieved from http://rogerpielkejr.blogspot.se/2013/04/planetary-boundries-as-power-grab.html
   Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. (2015). After nature: A politics for the Anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Raworth, K. (2017). Doughnut economics: Seven ways to think like a 21st-century economist. London: Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O. (2008). Risk governance: Coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å, Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E., … Foley, J. (2009a). Planetary boundaries: Exploring the safe operating space for humanity. Ecology and Society, 14(2), 32. doi: 10.5751/ES-03180-140232
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rockström, J., Steffen, W., Noone, K., Persson, Å, Chapin, F. S., Lambin, E. F., … Foley, J. A. (2009b). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472–475. doi: 10.1038/461472a
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. (2016). Environmental management in the Anthropocene. In T. Gabrielson, C. A. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 193–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Shaw, C. (2013). Choosing a dangerous limit for climate change: Public representations of the decision making process. Global Environmental Change, 23(2), 563–571. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2012.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative democracy and the environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Persson, Å, Deutsch, L., Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Richardson, K., … Svedin, U. (2011). The Anthropocene: From global change to planetary stewardship. Ambio, 40(7), 739–761. doi: 10.1007/s13280-011-0185-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Richardson, K., Rockström, J., Cornell, S. E., Fetzer, I., Bennett, E. M., … Sörlin, S. (2015). Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science, 347(6223), 1259855. doi: 10.1126/science.1259855
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Rockström, J., & Costanza, R. (2011). How defining planetary boundaries can transform our approach to growth. Solutions, 2(3), 59–65.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2015, October 16). Time to Rei(g)n back the Anthropocene? STEPS Centre Blog. Retrieved from http://steps-centre.org/2015/blog/time-to-reign-back-the-anthropocene/
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2012). GEO5 global environment outlook: Environment for the future we want. Nairobi: UNEP.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations Secretary-General’s High-level Panel on Global Sustainability. (2012). Resilient people, Resilient planet: A future worth choosing. New York, NY: UN.
   Google Scholar