1,939
Views
24
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Small-scale fishers as allies or opponents? Unlocking looming tensions and potential exclusions in Poland's marine spatial planning

Pages 637-648 | Received 06 Mar 2018, Accepted 28 Jun 2019, Published online: 30 Aug 2019

References

  • Afflerbach, J., Lester, S., Dougherty, D., & Poon, S. (2014). A global survey of “TURF-Reserves”: Territorial use rights for fisheries coupled with marine reserves. Global Ecology and Conservation, 2, 97–106.
  • Aitken, M., McDonald, S., & Strachan, P. (2008). Locating ‘power’ in wind power planning processes: The (not so) influential role of local objectors. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(6), 777–799.
  • Barner, A., Lubchenco, J., Costello, C., Gaines, S., Leland, A., Jenks, B., … Spring, M. (2015). Solutions for recovering and sustaining the bounty of the ocean: Combining fishery reforms, rights-based fisheries management, and marine reserves. Oceanography, 25(2), 252–263.
  • Bavinck, M., & Jentoft, S. (2011). Subsidiarity as a guiding principle for small-scale fisheries. In R. Chuenpagdee (Ed.), World small-scale fisheries: Contemporary visions (pp. 311–320). Delft: Eburon.
  • Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., Pascual-Fernandez, J., & Marciniak, B. (2015). Interactive coastal management: The role of pre-modern fisher organizations in improving governability. Ocean and Coastal Management, 117, 52–60.
  • Calado, H., Bentz, J., Ng, K., Zivian, A., Schaefer, N., Pringle, C., … Phillips, M. (2012). NGO involvement in marine spatial planning: A way forward? Marine Policy, 36, 382–388.
  • Campbell, S. (1996). Green cities, growing cities, just cities?: Urban planning and the contradictions of sustainable development. Journal of the American Planning Association, 62(3), 296–312.
  • Ciołek, D., Matczak, M., Piwowarczyk, J., Szefler, K., & Zaucha, J. (2018). The perspective of Polish fishermen on maritime spatial planning. Ocean and Coastal Management, 166, 113–124.
  • Day, J. C. (2017). Effective public participation is fundamental for marine conservation: Lessons from large-scale MPA. Coastal Management, 45(6), 470–486.
  • Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Paris: UNESCO.
  • Figus, E. (2013). Is Poland ready for transferable fishing concessions? Transition fatigue with a twist. Annuals of Marine Sociology, 22, 38–50.
  • Figus, E. (2015). Stakeholder participation in the Polish Baltic Sea commercial fishing fleet. Annuals of Marine Sociology, 24, 21–34.
  • Figus, E., Carothers, C., & Beaudreau, A. H. (2017). Using local ecological knowledge to inform fisheries assessment: Measuring agreement among Polish fishermen about the abundance and condition of Baltic cod (Gadus morhua). ICES Journal of Marine Science, 1–10. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsx061
  • Flannery, W., Clarke, J., & McAteer, B. (2019). Politics and power in marine spatial planning. In J. Zaucha & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime spatial planning: Past, present and future (pp. 201–217). Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Flannery, W., Ellis, G., Ellis, G., Flannery, W., Nursey-Bray, M., van Tatenhove, J. P. M., … O’Hagan, A. M. (2016). Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/marine spatial planning: Cui bono?/“more than fishy business”: Epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/marine spatial planning: Power and scaping/surely not all planning is evil?/marine spatial planning: A Canadian perspective/marine spatial planning – “Ad utilitatem omnium”/marine spatial planning: “It is better to be on the train than being hit by it”/reflections from perspective of recreational anglers and boats for hire/maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 121–151.
  • Flannery, W., Healy, N., & Luna, M. (2018). Exclusion and non-participation in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 88, 32–40.
  • Fox, E., Miller-Henson, M., Ugoretz, J., Weber, M., Gleason, M., Kirlin, J., … Mastrup, S. (2013). Enabling conditions to support marine protected area network planning: California's Marine Life protection Act Initiative as a case study. Ocean & Coastal Management, 74, 14–23.
  • Gilek, M., Saunders, F., & Stalmokaite, I. (2018). The ecosystem approach and sustainable development in the Baltic Sea marine spatial planning: The social pillar, a “slow train coming”. In D. Langlet & R. Rayfuse (Eds.), The ecosystem approach in ocean planning and governance (pp. 1–2). Netherlands: Brill Open.
  • Government of Poland. (2016). Study of conditions of spatial development of Polish sea areas. Retrieved from http://www.ums.gov.pl/ObszaryMorskie/2015/Study20of20conditions20of20Spatial%20Development.pdf
  • Gunder, M. (2003). Passionate planning for the other's desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning. Progress in Planning, 60, 235–319.
  • Inch, A., Laurian, L., Mouat, C., Davies, R., Davy, B., Legacy, C., & Symonds, C. (2017). Planning in the face of immovable subjects: A dialogue about resistance to development forces. Planning Theory and Practice, 18(3), 469–488.
  • Janßen, H., Bastardie, F., Eero, M., Hamon, K., Hinrichsen, H.-H., Marchal, P., … Tidd, A. (2018). Integration of fisheries into marine spatial planning: Quo vadis? Estuarine, Coastal and Shelf Science, 201, 105–113.
  • Jay, S. (2010). Planners to the rescue: Spatial planning facilitating the development of offshore wind energy. Marine Pollution Bulletin, 60(4), 493–499.
  • Jay, S., Ellis, G., & Kidd, S. (2012). Marine spatial planning: A new frontier? Journal of Environmental Planning and Policy, 14(1), 1–5.
  • Jenkins, L. D. (2015). From conflict to collaboration: The role of expertise in fisheries management. Ocean and Coastal Management, 103, 123–133.
  • Jentoft, S. (2017). Small-scale fisheries within maritime spatial planning: Knowledge integration and power. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(3), 266–278.
  • Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.
  • Jentoft, S., & Knol, M. (2014). Marine spatial planning: Risk or opportunity for fisheries in the North Sea? Maritime Studies, 12(13), 1–16.
  • Jones, P., Lieberknecht, L., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy, 71, 256–264.
  • Jones, R., Rigg, C., & Lee, L. (2010). Haida Marine Planning: First Nations as a partner in marine conservation. Ecology & Society, 15(1), 12. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss1/art12/
  • Jones, R., Rigg, C., & Pinkerton, E. (2017). Strategies for assertion of conservation and local management rights: A Haida Gwaii herring story. Marine Policy, 80, 154–167.
  • Kafas, A., McLay, A., Chimienti, M., Scott, B., Davies, I., & Gubbins, M. (2017). Scotmap: Participatory mapping of inshore fishing activity to inform marine spatial planning in Scotland. Marine Policy, 79, 8–18.
  • Kidd, S., & Ellis, G. (2012). From land to sea and back again? Using terrestrial planning to understand the process of marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14(1), 49–66.
  • Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2014). The social and political realities of marine spatial planning: Some land-based reflections. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(7), 1535–1541.
  • Lamp, J. (2012). Towards integration of fisheries into maritime spatial planning. BaltSeaPlan Report 26.
  • Marciniak, B. (2011). Vanished prosperity: Poverty and marginalization in a small Polish fishing community. In S. Jentoft & A. Eide (Eds.), Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries (pp. 125–146). New York: Springer.
  • Marciniak, B., & Jentoft, S. (1997). Fisheries management in post-communist Poland: Prospects of user-participation. Ocean and Coastal Management, 34(1), 73–89.
  • Ovando, D., Deacon, R., Lester, S., Costello, C., Van Leuvan, T., McIlwain, K., … Uchida, H. (2013). Conservation incentives and collective choices in cooperative fisheries. Marine Policy, 37, 132–140.
  • Piwowarczyk, J., Gee, K., Gilek, M., Hassler, B., Luttmann, A., Maack, L., … Zaucha, J. (2019). Insights into integration challenges in the Baltic Sea region marine spatial planning: Implications for the HELCOM-VASB principles. Ocean and Coastal Management, 175, 98–109.
  • Piwowarczyk, J., Matczak, M., Rakowski, M., & Zaucha, J. (forthcoming). Challenges for integration of the Polish fishing sector into marine spatial planning (MSP): Do fishers and planners tell the same story?
  • Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32, 816–822.
  • Rakowski, M., & Szymanek, L. (2015). Rybołówstwo w kontekście potencjalnych konfliktów dotyczących zagospodarowania przestrzennego obszarów morskich i przybrzeżnych. Gdynia: Morski Instytut Rybacki – Państwowy Instytut Badawczy (MIR-PIB).
  • Rovelli, R., & Zaiceva, A. (2013). Did support for economic and political reforms increase during the post-communist transition, and if so, why? Economics of Transition, 21(2), 193–240.
  • Said, A., MacMillan, D., Schembri, M., & Tzanopoulos, J. (2017). Fishing in a congested sea: What do marine protected areas imply for the future of the Maltese artisanal fleet? Applied Geography, 87, 245–255.
  • Saunders, P., Gallardo-Fernández, G., Van Tuyen, T., Raemaekers, S., Marciniak, B., & Plá, R. (2016). Transformation of small-scale fisheries – critical transdisciplinary challenges and possibilities. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 20, 26–31.
  • Saunders, F., Gilek, M., Gee, K., Dahl, K., Hassler, B., Luttmann, A., … Zaucha, J. (2017). MSP as a governance approach? Knowledge integration challenges in MSP in the Baltic Sea. Retrieved from https://www.baltspace.eu/files/BONUS_BALTSPACE_D2-4.pdf
  • Saunders, F., Gilek, M., & Tafon, R. (2019). Adding people to the sea: Conceptualizing social sustainability in maritime spatial planning. In J. Zaucha, & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime spatial planning: Past, present and future (pp. 175–199). Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Smith, G., & Jentoft, J. (2017). Marine spatial planning in Scotland. Levelling the playing field? Marine Policy, 84, 33–41.
  • St, Martin, & Hall-Arber, M. (2008). The missing layer: Geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32, 779–786.
  • Tafon, R. (2018). Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 258–273.
  • Tafon, R., Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2019). The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(1), 157–176.
  • Tafon, R., Saunders, F., & Gilek, M. (forthcoming). Re-reading marine spatial planning through Foucault, Haugaard and others: An analysis of domination, empowerment and freedom.
  • Trouillet, B., Bellanger-Husi, L., El Ghaziri, A., Lamberts, C., Plissonneau, E., & Rollo, N. (2019). More than maps: Providing an alternative for fisheries and fishers in marine spatial planning. Ocean & Coastal Management, 173, 90–103.
  • Turski, J., Matczak, M., Szałucka, I., & Witkowska, J. (2018). Maritime spatial planning (MSP) as an integrative factor in Poland. Bulleting of the Maritime Institute of Gdańsk, 33(1), 83–93.
  • Zaucha, J. (2012). Offshore spatial information: Maritime spatial planning in Poland. Regional Studies, 46(4), 459–473.