1,721
Views
17
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The governance of climate change adaptation: are networks to blame for the implementation deficit?

, &
Pages 702-717 | Received 17 Oct 2018, Accepted 08 Aug 2019, Published online: 11 Oct 2019

References

  • Aberbach, J. D., & Rockman, B. A. (2002). Conducting and coding elite interviews. Political Science & Politics, 4(1), 673–676.
  • Amundsen, H., Berglund, F., & Westskog, H. (2010). Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation: A question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28(2), 276–289.
  • Auditor General of Canada. (2017). Adapting to the impacts of climate change. In 2017 Fall report of the commissioner of the environment and sustainable development (pp. 1–41). Ottawa: Government of Canada.
  • Auditor General of Canada. (2018). Perspectives on climate change action in Canada: A collaborative report from auditors general. Ottawa: Government of Canada.
  • Auditor General of Manitoba. (2017). Managing climate change. Winnipeg: Government of Manitoba.
  • Auditor General of Ontario. (2016). Climate change. In 2016 Annual report volume 1 (pp. 148–204). Ottawa: Government of Canada.
  • Babbie, E., & Benaquisto, L. (2010). Fundamentals of social research. Toronto: Nelson Education.
  • Baird, J., Plummer, R., & Pickering, K. (2014). Priming the governance system for climate change adaptation: The application of a social-ecological inventory to engage actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology and Society, 19(1), 1–11.
  • Bates, L. E., Green, M., Leonard, R., & Walker, I. (2013). The influence of forums and multilevel governance on the climate adaptation practices of Australian organizations. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 1–13.
  • Bednar, D., & Henstra, D. (2018). Applying a typology of governance modes to climate change adaptation. Politics and Governance, 6(3). doi:10.17645/pag.v6i3.1432
  • Bevir, M. (2009). Key concepts in governance. In SAGE key concepts (pp. 1–232). London: SAGE.
  • Bevir, M. (2012). Governance: A very short introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Biesbroek, R., Dupuis, J., Jordan, A., Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., Cairney, P., … Davidson, D. (2015). Opening up the black box of adaptation decision-making. Nature Climate Change, 5, 493–494.
  • Biesbroek, R., Klostermann, J. E. M., Termeer, C. J. A. M., & Kabat, P. (2013). On the nature of barriers to climate change adaptation. Regional Environmental Change, 13(5), 1119–1129.
  • Börzel, T. A. (2011). Networks: Reified metaphor or governance panacea? Public Administration, 89(1), 49–63.
  • City of Toronto. (2016). Resilient city: Preparing for a changing climate - status update and next steps. Toronto: City of Toronto.
  • City of Toronto. (2018). Green roof bylaw. Toronto: City of Toronto.
  • Dickinson, T., & Burton, I. (2011). Adaptation to climate change in Canada: A multi-level mosaic. In J. D. Ford, & L. Berrang-Ford (Eds.), Climate change adaptation in developed nations: From theory to practice (pp. 103–117). New York: Springer.
  • Dixon, J., & Dogan, R. (2002). Hierarchies, networks and markets: Responses to societal governance failure. Administrative Theory & Praxis, 24(1), 175–196.
  • Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). : Governance and complexity: Emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335.
  • Dupuis, J., & Knoepfel, P. (2013). The adaptation policy paradox: The implementation deficit of policies framed as climate change adaptation. Ecology and Society, 18(4), 31–46.
  • ECO. (2014). Sink, swim or tread water? Adapting infrastructure to extreme weather events (p. 16). Toronto, ON: Environmental Commissioner of Ontario.
  • Government of Ontario. (2011). Climate ready: Adaptation strategy and action plan 2011–2014. Toronto: Government of Ontario.
  • Hall, C. M. (2011). A typology of governance and its implications for tourism policy analysis. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 19(4–5), 437–457. doi: 10.1080/09669582.2011.570346
  • Hanssen, G. S., Mydske, P. K., & Dahle, E. (2013). Multi-level coordination of climate change adaptation: By national hierarchical steering or by regional network governance? Local Environment, 18(8), 869–887. doi: 10.1080/13549839.2012.738657
  • Hauge, ÅL, Hanssen, G. S., & Flyen, C. (2018). Multilevel networks for climate change adaptation – what works? International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 11(2), 215–234. doi: 10.1108/IJCCSM-10-2017-0194
  • Henstra, D. (2016). The tools of climate adaptation policy: Analysing instruments and instrument selection. Climate Policy, 16(4), 496–521. doi: 10.1080/14693062.2015.1015946
  • Henstra, D. (2017). Climate adaptation in Canada: Governing a complex policy regime. Review of Policy Research, 34(3), 378–399. doi: 10.1111/ropr.12236
  • Hertting, N., & Vedung, E. (2012). Purposes and criteria in network governance evaluation: How far does standard evaluation vocabulary take us? Evaluation, 18(1), 27–46. doi: 10.1177/1356389011431021
  • Howlett, M., & Ramesh, M. (2014). The two orders of governance failure: Design mismatches and policy capacity issues in modern governance. Policy and Society, 33(4), 317–327. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.002
  • Huitema, D., Adger, W. N., Berkhout, F., Massey, E., Mazmanian, D., Munaretto, S., … Termeer, C. C. J. A. M. (2016). The governance of adaptation: Choices, reasons, and effects. Ecology and Society, 21(3), 1–16. doi: 10.5751/ES-08797-210337
  • ICLEI Canada. (2013). Changing climate, changing communities: Guide and workbook for municipal climate adaptation. Toronto: ICLEI Canada.
  • Juhola, S., & Westerhoff, L. (2011). Challenges of adaptation to climate change across multiple scales: A case study of network governance in two European countries. Environmental Science & Policy, 14(3), 239–247. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.12.006
  • Karl, H., Curtin, C., Scarlett, L., & Hopkins, W. (2011). Adapting to climate change: A wicked problem and road map for action. In I. Linkov, & T. S. Bridges (Eds.), Climate: Global change and local adaptation (pp. 237–255). Dordrecht: Springer.
  • Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (1997a). Introduction: A management perspective on policy networks. In W. J. M. Kickert, E.-H. Klijn, & J. F. M. Koppenjan (Eds.), Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector (pp. 1–11). London: SAGE.
  • Kickert, W. J. M., Klijn, E.-H., & Koppenjan, J. F. M. (Eds.). (1997b). Managing complex networks: Strategies for the public sector. London: SAGE.
  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: SAGE.
  • Koppenjan, J., & Klijn, E.-H. (2004). Managing uncertainties in networks: A network approach to problem solving and decision making. London and New York: Routledge.
  • Kovacs, P., Guilbault, S., & Sandink, D. (2014). Cities adapt to extreme rainfall: Celebrating local leadership. Toronto: Institute for Catastrophic Loss Reduction.
  • Leck, H., & Simon, D. (2013). Fostering multiscalar collaboration and co-operation for effective governance of climate change adaptation. Urban Studies, 50(6), 1221–1238. doi: 10.1177/0042098012461675
  • Levacic, R. (1991). Markets and government: An overview. In G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies, and networks: The coordination of social life (pp. 35–47). London: SAGE.
  • Markus, M., & Savini, F. (2016). The implementation deficits of adaptation and mitigation: Green buildings and water security in Amsterdam and Boston. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), 497–515. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2016.1210666
  • Marshall, A. (1991). On markets. In G. Thompson, J. Frances, R. Levacic, & J. Mitchell (Eds.), Markets, hierarchies, and networks: The coordination of social life (pp. 24–34). London: SAGE.
  • McGuire, M., & Agranoff, R. (2011). The limitations of public management networks. Public Administration, 89(2), 265–284. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01917.x
  • Meuleman, L. (2008). Public management and the metagovernance of hierarchies, networks and markets. Heidelberg: Physica-Verl.
  • Mimura, N., Pulwarty, R. S., Duc, D. M., Elshinnawy, I., Redsteer, M. H., Huang, H.-Q., … Sanchez Rodriguez, R. A. (2014). Adaptation planning and implementation. In C. B. Field, V. R. Barros, D. J. Dokken, K. J. Mach, M. D. Mastrandrea, T. E. Bilir, & L. L. White (Eds.), Climate change 2014: Impacts, adaptation, and vulnerability (pp. 869–898). Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • MMAH. (2014). Provincial policy statement. Toronto: Government of Ontario.
  • Newig, J., Günther, D., & Pahl-Wostl, C. (2010). Synapses in the network: Learning in governance networks in the context of environmental management. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 1–16. doi: 10.5751/ES-03713-150424
  • Oulahen, G., Klein, Y., Mortsch, L., O’Connell, E., & Harford, D. (2018). Barriers and drivers of planning for climate change adaptation across three levels of government in Canada. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(3), 405–421. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2018.1481993
  • Pahl-Wostl, C. (2015). Water governance in the face of global change. New York: Springer.
  • Panzironi, F. (2017). Networks. In Oxford research encyclopaedia of international studies (Vol. 1, pp. 1–23). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Parry, J.-E., Taylor, S., Echeverria, D., McCandless, M., & Gass, P. (2012). Manitoba’s involvement in the Prairies adaptation collaborative: Synthesis report. Winnipeg: International Institute for Sustainable Development.
  • Peters, B. G. (2014). Is governance for everybody? Policy and Society, 33(4), 301–306. doi: 10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.005
  • Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (2004). Multi-level governance and democracy: A Faustian bargain? In I. Bache, & M. Flinders (Eds.), Multi-Level governance (pp. 75–89). Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Phuong, L. T. H., Biesbroek, G. R., & Wals, A. E. J. (2018). Barriers and enablers to climate change adaptation in hierarchical governance systems: The case of Vietnam. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(4), 518–532. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1447366
  • Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, politics, and the state. New York: St. Martin’s Press.
  • Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. doi: 10.1093/jopart/mum015
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1988). Beyond Westminster and Whitehall: The sub-central governments of Britain. London: Routledge.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). From marketization to diplomacy: It’s the mix that matters. Public Policy and Administration, 12(2), 31–50. doi: 10.1177/095207679701200204
  • Ryan, D. (2015). From commitment to action: A literature review on climate policy implementation at city level. Climatic Change, 131(4), 519–529. doi: 10.1007/s10584-015-1402-6
  • Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2009). Making governance networks effective and democratic through metagovernance. Public Administration, 87(2), 234–258. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2009.01753.x
  • Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., & Breeman, G. (2013). Governance of wicked climate adaptation problems. In J. Knieling, & W. L. Filho (Eds.), Climate change governance (pp. 27–38). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  • Thompson, G. (2003). Between hierarchies and markets: The logic and limits of network forms of organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Torfing, J. (2012). Governance networks. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 99–112). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Waters, E., & Barnett, J. (2018). Spatial imaginaries of adaptation governance: A public perspective. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(4), 708–725.
  • Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00866.x
  • Wellstead, A., Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2013). The neglect of governance in forest sector vulnerability assessments: Structural-functionalism and “black box” problems in climate change adaptation planning. Ecology and Society, 18(3), 1–15. doi: 10.5751/ES-05685-180323
  • Zehavi, A. (2012). New governance and policy instruments: Are governments going “soft”? In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), Oxford handbook of governance (pp. 242–254). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.