Re-reading marine spatial planning through Foucault, Haugaard and others: an analysis of domination, empowerment and freedom

References

• Agardy, T., Di Sciara, G., & Christie, P. (2011). Mind the gap: Addressing the shortcomings of marine protected areas through large scale marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 35, 226–232. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2010.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachrach, P., & Baratz, M. (1962). Two faces of power. The American Political Science Review, 56(4), 947–952. doi: 10.2307/1952796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birnbaum, S. (2016). Environmental co-governance, legitimacy, and the quest for compliance: When and why is stakeholder participation desirable? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 18(3), 306–323. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2015.1077440
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calado, H., Bentz, J., Ng, K., Zivian, A., Schaefer, N., Pringle, C., … Phillips, M. (2012). NGO involvement in marine spatial planning: A way forward? Marine Policy, 36, 382–388. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2011.07.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, R. (1957). The concept of power. Behavioral Science, 2(3), 201–215. doi: 10.1002/bs.3830020303
   Google Scholar
• Douvere, F. (2008). The importance of marine spatial planning in advancing ecosystem-based sea use management. Marine Policy, 32(5), 762–771. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehler, C., & Douvere, F. (2009). Marine spatial planning: A step-by-step approach toward ecosystem-based management. Intergovernmental Oceanographic Commission and Man and the Biosphere Programme. Paris: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., Clarke, J., & McAteer, B. (2019). Politics and power in marine spatial planning. In J. Zaucha & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime spatial planning: Past, present and future (pp. 201–217). Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., Ellis, G., Ellis, G., Flannery, W., Nursey-Bray, M., van Tatenhove, J. P. M. … O’Hagan, A. M. (2016). Exploring the winners and losers of marine environmental governance/marine spatial planning: Cui bono?/’’more than fishy business’’: Epistemology, integration and conflict in marine spatial planning/marine spatial planning: Power and scaping/surely not all planning is evil?/marine spatial planning: A Canadian perspective/marine spatial planning – ‘‘Ad utilitatem omnium ‘‘/marine spatial planning: ‘‘better to be on the train than being hit by it’’/reflections from perspective of recreational anglers and boats for hire/maritime spatial planning and marine renewable energy. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 121–151. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2015.1131482
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flannery, W., Healy, N., & Luna, M. (2018). Exclusion and non-participation in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 88, 32–40. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B., & Richardson, T. (2002). Planning and Foucault: In search of the dark side of planning theory. In P. Allmendinger & M. Tewdwr-Jones (Eds.), Planning futures: New directions for planning theory (pp. 44–62). London & New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1982). The subject and power. Critical Inquiry, 8(4), 777–795. doi: 10.1086/448181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1983). Discourse and truth: The problematization of parrhesia (six lectures given by Michel Foucault at Berkeley, Oct-Nov. 1983). Retrieved from http://www.cscd.osaka-u.ac.jp/user/rosaldo/On_Parrehesia_by_Foucault_1983.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1990). The use of pleasure: The history of sexuality (Vol. II). New York: Vintage Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1991). The ethic of care for the self as a practice of freedom: An interview. In J. Bernauer & D. Rassmussen (Eds.). The final Foucault (Gautier, J. Trans.) (pp. 1–20). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedmann, J. (1973). Retracking America: A theory of transactive planning. New York: Doubleday.
   Google Scholar
• Gaventa, J. (2006). Finding the spaces for change: A power analysis. IDS Bulletin, 37(6), 23–33. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-5436.2006.tb00320.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilek, M., Saunders, F., & Stalmokaite, I. (2018). The ecosystem approach and sustainable development in Baltic Sea marine spatial planning: The social pillar, a “slow train coming”. In D. Langlet & R. Rayfuse (Eds.), The ecosystem approach in ocean planning and governance perspectives from Europe and beyond (pp. 160–194). Publications on Ocean Development, Volume 87. Leiden: Koninklijke brill NV.
   Google Scholar
• Gilliland, P., & Laffoley, D. (2008). Key elements and steps in the process of developing ecosystem-based marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32(5), 787–796. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gopnik, M., Fieseler, C., Cantral, L., McClellan, K., Pendleton, L., & Crowder, L. (2012). Coming to the table: Early stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 36, 1139–1149. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gunder, M. (2003). Passionate planning for the other’s desire: An agonistic response to the dark side of planning. Progress in Planning, 60, 235–319. doi: 10.1016/S0305-9006(02)00115-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248. doi: 10.1126/science.162.3859.1243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassler, B., Gee, K., Gilek, M., et al. (2018). Collective action and agency in Baltic Sea marine spatial planning: Transnational policy coordination in the promotion of regional coherence. Marine Policy, 92, 138–147. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2003). Reflections on seven ways of creating power. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(1), 87–113. doi: 10.1177/1368431003006001562
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2008). Power and habitus. Journal of Power, 1(2), 189–206. doi: 10.1080/17540290802227593
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2012). Rethinking the four dimensions of power: Domination and empowerment. Journal of Political Power, 5(1), 33–54. doi: 10.1080/2158379X.2012.660810
   Google Scholar
• Haugaard, M. (2015). Concerted power over. Constellations (oxford, England), 22(1), 147–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inch, A., Laurian, L., Mouat, C., Davies, R., Davy, B., Legacy, C., & Symonds, C. (2017). Planning in the face of immovable subjects: A dialogue about resistance to development forces. Planning Theory and Practice, 18(3), 469–488. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2017.1328811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jay, S., Flannery, W., Vince, J., Liu, W.-H., et al. (2013). International progress in marine spatial planning. In A. Chircop, S. Coffen-Smout, & M. McConnnell (Eds.), Ocean year book 27 (pp. 121–212). Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S. (2017). Small-scale fisheries within maritime spatial planning: Knowledge integration and power. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 19(3), 266–278. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2017.1304210
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jentoft, S., & Knol, M. (2014). Marine spatial planning: Risk or opportunity for fisheries in the North Sea? Maritime Studies, 12(13), 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Jones, P., Lieberknecht, L., & Qiu, W. (2016). Marine spatial planning in reality: Introduction to case studies and discussion of findings. Marine Policy, 71, 256–264. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.04.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juda, L. (2007). The European Union and ocean management: The marine strategy and the maritime policy. Ocean Development and International Law, 38(3), 259–282. doi: 10.1080/00908320701530466
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, S., & Ellis, G. (2012). From the land to the sea and back again? Using terrestrial planning to understand the process of marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 14(1), 49–66. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2012.662382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2013). Reconceptualizing territoriality and spatial planning: Insights from the sea. Planning Theory and Practice, 14(2), 180–197. doi: 10.1080/14649357.2013.784348
   Google Scholar
• Kidd, S., & Shaw, D. (2014). Quo Vadimus. The social and political realities of marine spatial planning: Some land-based reflections. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 71(7), 1535–1541. doi: 10.1093/icesjms/fsu006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, N. (1959). Planning and politics in urban development. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 25(4), 167–169. doi: 10.1080/01944365908978328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lukes, S. ((1974) [2005]). Power: A radical view (2nd ed.). London: Macmillan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, J., Soneryd, L., & Linke, S. (2017). The legitimization of concern: A flexible framework for investigating the nenactment of stakeholders in environmental planning and governance processes. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 49(11), 2517–2535. doi: 10.1177/0308518X17727284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nursey-Bray, M., Vince, J., Scott, M., Haward, M., O’Toole, K., Harvey, N., & Clarke, B. (2014). Science into policy? Discourse, coastal management and knowledge. Environmental Science and Policy, 38, 107–119. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peel, D., & Lloyd, M. G. (2004). The social re-construction of the marine environment: Towards marine spatial planning. The Town Planning Review, 75(3), 359–378. doi: 10.3828/tpr.75.3.6
   Google Scholar
• Pomeroy, R., & Douvere, F. (2008). The engagement of stakeholders in the marine spatial planning process. Marine Policy, 32, 816–822. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qiu, W., & Jones, P. (2013). The emerging policy landscape for marine spatial planning in Europe. Marine Policy, 39, 182–190. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.10.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie, H., & Ellis, G. (2010). A system that works for the sea’? Exploring stakeholder engagement in marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 53(6), 701–723. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2010.488100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saunders, F., Gilek, M., & Tafon, R. (2019). Adding people to the sea: Conceptualizing social sustainability in maritime spatial planning. In J. Zaucha, & K. Gee (Eds.), Maritime spatial planning: Past, present and future (pp. 175–199). Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G., & Jentoft, S. (2017). Marine spatial planning in Scotland: Levelling the playing field? Marine Policy, 84, 33–41. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, H., Maes, F., Stojanovic, T., & Ballinger, R. (2011). The integration of land and marine spatial planning. Journal of Coastal Conservation, 15, 291–303. doi: 10.1007/s11852-010-0098-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• St. Martin, K., & Hall-Arber, M. (2008). The Missing Layer: Geo-technologies, communities, and implications for marine spatial planning. Marine Policy, 32, 779–786. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2008.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R. (2018). Taking power to sea: Towards a post-structuralist discourse theoretical critique of marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2), 258–273.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R. V. (2019). Small-scale fishers as allies of opponents? Unlocking looming tensions and potential exclusions in Poland’s marine spatial planning. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1661235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tafon, R., Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2019). The politics of Estonia’s offshore wind energy programme: Discourse, power and marine spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(1), 157–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trouillet, B., Bellanger-Husi, L., Ghaziri, A., Lamberts, C., Plissonneau, E., & Rollo, N. (2019). More than maps: Providing an alternative for fisheries and fishers in marine spatial planning. Ocean & Coastal Management, 173, 90–103. doi: 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.02.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., & Beunen, R. (2014). Power and contingency in planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46, 2385–2400. doi: 10.1068/a130080p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar