The (un)common good: diverging justifications for wilderness making in a modified landscape

References

• Allin, C. W. (2008). The politics of wilderness preservation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arts, I., Buijs, A. E., & Verschoor, G. (2017). Regimes of justification: Competing arguments and the construction of legitimacy in Dutch nature conservation practices. Journal of Environmental Planning & Management, 61, 1070–1084. doi: 10.1080/09640568.2017.1319346
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ban, N. C., & Frid, A. (2018). Indigenous peoples’ rights and marine protected areas. Marine Policy, 87, 180–185. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.10.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, J., Bragg, R., Pretty, J., Roberts, J., & Wood, C. (2016). The wilderness Expedition. Journal of Experiential Education, 39, 59–72. doi: 10.1177/1053825915626933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, K. (2016a). Introduction. In K. Bastmeijer (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe: The role of international, European and national law (pp. 3–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bastmeijer, K. (2016b). Natura 2000 and the protection of wilderness in Europe. In K. Bastmeijer (Ed.), Wilderness protection in Europe: The role of international, European and national law (pp. 177–198). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berleant, A. (1992). The aesthetics of environment. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop, J., & Hill, C. (2014). Global biodiversity finance: The case for international Payments for ecosystem services. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Limited.
   Google Scholar
• Blokker, P. (2011). Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory, 14, 251–261. doi: 10.1177/1368431011412344
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 359–377. doi: 10.1177/136843199002003010
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2000). The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement. Philosophical Explorations, 3, 208–231. doi: 10.1080/13869790008523332
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (2013). Distinction: A social critique of the judgement of taste. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Braun, B., & Castree, N. (1998). Remaking reality: Nature at the millennium. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brockingham, D. (2009). Celebrity and the environment: Fame, wealth and power in conservation. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, C., Mcmorran, R., & Price, M. F. (2011). Rewilding – a new paradigm for nature conservation in Scotland? Scottish Geographical Journal, 127, 288–314. doi: 10.1080/14702541.2012.666261
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cairney, P. (2011). Understanding public policy: Theories and issue. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, A. (2012). Nature and landscape: An introduction to environmental aesthetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chapman, R. (2006). Ecological restoration restored. Environmental Values, 15, 463–478. doi: 10.3197/096327106779116096
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, R. N., & Stankey, G. H. (1979). The recreation opportunity spectrum: a framework for planning, management, and research, Dept. of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Forest and Range Experiment Station.
   Google Scholar
• Clewell, A. F., & Aronson, J. (2013). Ecological restoration: Principles, values, and structure of an emerging profession. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coates, P. (1998). Nature: Western attitudes since ancient times. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, D. N., & Yung, L. (2012). Beyond naturalness: Rethinking park and wilderness stewardship in an era of rapid change. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cowell, R. J. W., & Devine-Wright, P. (2018). A “delivery-democracy dilemma”? Mapping and explaining policy change for public engagement with energy infrastructure. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20, 499–517. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2018.1443005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cronon, W. (1996). Uncommon ground: Rethinking the human place in nature. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Durnova, A. (2018). A tale of ‘fat cats’ and ‘stupid activists’: Contested values, governance and reflexivity in the brno railway station controversy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20, 720–733. doi: 10.1080/1523908X.2013.829749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E.C. (2013). Guidelines on wilderness in Natura 2000: Management of wilderness and wild areas within the Natura 2000 Network. Technical Report 2013-069. Brussels: Author.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. (2002). Guidelines on information to be contained in environmental impact statements (EIS). Dublin: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Fennell, D. A. (2014). Ecotourism. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Fereday, J. & Muir-Cochrane, E. 2006. Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5, 80–92. doi: 10.1177/160940690600500107
   Google Scholar
• Foreman, D. (2004). Rewilding North America: A vision for conservation in the 21st century. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, C. (2000). Restoring nature in American culture: An environmental aesthetic perspective. In P. H. Gobster & R. B. Hull (Eds.), Restoring nature: Perspectives from the humanities and social sciences (pp. 71–95). Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). The use of pleasure: Volume II of the history of sexuality. New York, NY: Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Fricker, M. (2007). Epistemic injustice: Power & the ethics of knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hacking, I. (2002). Historical ontology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammitt, W. E., Cole, D. N., & Monz, C. A. (2015). Wildland recreation: Ecology and management. Oxford: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, R. (1996). Landscape and the metaphysical imagination. Environmental Values, 5, 191–204. doi: 10.3197/096327196776679320
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heritage Council. (2007). Landscape character assessment (LCA) in Ireland: Baseline audit and evaluation. Kilkenny: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Huggan, G. (2013). Nature's Saviours: Celebrity conservationalist in the television age. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jorgensen, A., & Keenan, R. (2012). Urban wildscapes. London: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2015). Explaining the currency of novel policy concepts: Learning from green infrastructure planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 33, 1039–1057. doi: 10.1177/0263774X15605939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2017). The moral-material ontologies of nature conservation: Exploring the discord between ecological restoration and novel ecosystems. Environmental Values, 26, 5–29. doi: 10.3197/096327117X14809634978474
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorimer, J., & Driessen, C. (2014). Wild experiments at the Oostvaardersplassen: Rethinking environmentalism in the Anthropocene. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 39, 169–181. doi: 10.1111/tran.12030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• More, T. A., Bulmer, S., Henzel, L., & Mates, A. (2003). Extending the recreation opportunity spectrum to nonfederal lands in the northeast: An implementation guide. Newtown Square, Pennsylvania, U.S.A: U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Northeastern Research Station.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, B., Clarke, T., Tiernan, D., Strong, D., Neville, P., Murphy, P., … Quinn, L. (2011). The Wild Nephin Project: an examination of the feasibility of setting aside the Nephin Forest area as a WILDERNESS AREA (Unpublished report).
   Google Scholar
• Nash, R. F. (2014). Wilderness and the American Mind: Fifth edition. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Navarro, L., & Pereira, H. (2012). Rewilding abandoned landscapes in Europe. Ecosystems, 15, 900–912. doi: 10.1007/s10021-012-9558-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, M. P., & Callicott, J. B. (2008). The wilderness debate rages on: Continuing the great new wilderness debate. Athens, GA: University of Georgia Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neumann, R. P. (2002). Imposing wilderness: Struggles over livelihood and nature preservation in Africa. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• NPWS. (2017). Ballycroy National Park [Online]. Retrieved from: http://test.ballycroynationalpark.ie
   Google Scholar
• Oelschlaeger, M. (1991). The idea of wilderness: From prehistory to the age of ecology. London: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ollman, B. (1976). Alienation: Marx's conception of man in a capitalist society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O'riordan, M., McDonagh, J., & Mahon, M. (2016). Local knowledge and environmentality in legitimacy discourses on Irish peatlands regulation. Land Use Policy, 59, 423–433. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2016.07.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pereira, H. M., & Navarro, L. (2016). Rewilding European landscapes. London: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, J., & Brady, E. (2017). Environmental aesthetics and rewilding. Environmental Values, 26, 31–51. doi: 10.3197/096327117X14809634978519
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheridan, A. (1980). Michel Foucault: The will to truth. Oxford: Tavistock Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• TEEB. (2010). The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: Mainstreaming the economics of nature: A synthesis of the approach, conclusions and recommendations of TEEB. Malta: Progress Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L. (2007). The plurality of cognitive formats and engagement: Moving between the familiar and the public. European Journal of Social Theory, 10, 409–423. doi: 10.1177/1368431007080703
   Google Scholar
• Thévenot, L., Moody, M., & Lafaye, C. (2000). Forms of valuing nature: Arguments and modes of justification in French and American environmental disputes. In M. Lamont & L. Thévenot (Eds.), Rethinking comparative cultural sociology (pp. 229–272). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. M., & Cronon, W. (2012). The Promise of wilderness: American environmental politics since 1964. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2011). Nagoya protocol on access to genetic resources and the fair and equitable sharing of benefits arising from their utilization to the convention on biological diversity: Text and annex/secretariat of the convention on biological diversity. Montreal: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Vannini, P., & Vannini, A. (2016). Wilderness. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, P. (1999). After justification: Repertoires of evaluation and the sociology of modernity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2, 341–357. doi: 10.1177/13684319922224572
   Google Scholar
• Williams, F. (2017). The nature fix: Why nature makes us happier, healthier, and more creative. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Wuerthner, G., Crist, E., & Butler, T. (2015). Protecting the wild: Parks and wilderness, the foundation for conservation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
   Google Scholar