Between environmental and ecological democracy: theory and practice at the democracy-environment nexus

References

• Agyeman, J., Schlosberg, D., Craven, L., & Matthews, C. (2016). Trends and directions in environmental justice: From inequity to everyday life, community, and just sustainabilities. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41, 321–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Maldonado, M. (2012). Real green: Sustainability after the end of nature. Farnham: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Asafu-Adjaye, J., Blomquist, L., Brand, S., Brook, B. W., DeFries, R., Ellis, E., … Lynas, M. (2015). An Ecomodernist Manifesto. Oakland, CA: Breakthrough Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2005). Deliberative environmental politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2015). Consensus and global environmental governance: Deliberative democracy in nature’s regime. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baber, W. F., & Bartlett, R. V. (2020). A rights foundation for ecological democracy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 72–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K. (2006). Multi-stakeholder partnerships for sustainable development: Rethinking legitimacy, accountability and effectiveness. European Environment, 16(5), 290–306.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Khan, J., Kronsell, A., & Lövbrand, E. (2010). Environmental politics and deliberative democracy: Examining the promise of new modes of governance. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Zelli, F., & Schleifer, P. (2018). Legitimacy and accountability in polycentric climate governance. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. v. Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action (pp. 338–356). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bang, H., & Marsh, D. (2018). Populism: A major threat to democracy? Policy Studies, 39(3), 352–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barry, J. (1998). Rethinking green politics: Nature, virtue and progress. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bättig, M. B., & Bernauer, T. (2009). National institutions and global public goods: Are democracies more cooperative in climate change policy? International Organization, 63(2), 281–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., & Lidskog, R. (2018). Deliberative democracy meets democratised science: A deliberative systems approach to global environmental governance. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S. (2001). The compromise of liberal environmentalism. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Betsill, M. M., & Corell, E. (2008). NGO diplomacy: The influence of nongovernmental organizations in international environmental negotiations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Bai, X., Bondre, N., Broadgate, W., Chen, C.-T. A., Dube, O. P., … Seto, K. C. (2016). Down to earth: Contextualizing the anthropocene. Global Environmental Change, 39, 341–350.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., & Gupta, A. (2011). Accountability and legitimacy in earth system governance: A research framework. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1856–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blühdorn, I. (2013). The governance of unsustainability: Ecology and democracy after the post-democratic turn. Environmental Politics, 22(1), 16–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., & Betzold, C. (2013). The impact of environmental interest groups in international negotiations: Do ENGOs induce stronger environmental commitments? International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics 13 (2): 127-151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Böhmelt, T., Böker, M., & Ward, H. (2016). Democratic inclusiveness. Climate Policy Outputs, and Climate Policy Outcomes. Democratization, 23(7), 1272–1291.
   Google Scholar
• Bomberg, E. (2017). Environmental politics in the trump era: An early assessment. Environmental Politics, 26(5), 956–963.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourg, D. (2011). Pour Une 6e République Écologique. Paris: Editions Odile Jacob.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, S., Gupta, A., Inoue, C. Y. A., Kalfagianni, A., Persson, Å., Gerlak, A. K., … Zondervan, R. (2019). New directions in earth system governance research. Earth System Governance, 1, 100006.
   Google Scholar
• Cole, L. W., & Foster, S. R. (2001). From the ground up: Environmental racism and the rise of the environmental justice movement. New York, NY: NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Delina, L. L. (2020). Climate mobilizations and democracy: The promise of scaling community energy transitions in a deliberative system. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 30–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Disch, L. (2016). Ecological democracy and the co-participation of things. In T. Gabrielson, C. A. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 624–636). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2003). Citizenship and the environment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dobson, A. (2016). Are there limits to limits? In T. Gabrielson, C. A. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 289–303). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Doherty, B., & de Geus, M. (Eds.). (1996). Democracy and green political thought: Sustainability, rights, and citizenship. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (1987). Rational ecology: Environment and political economy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2000). Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2013). The politics of the earth: Environmental discourses (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., Downes, D., Hunold, C., & Schlosberg, D. (2003). Green states and social movements: Environmentalism in the United States, United Kingdom, Germany, and Norway. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Pickering, J. (2019). The politics of the anthropocene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S., & Stevenson, H. (2011). Global democracy and earth system governance. Ecological Economics, 70(11), 1865–1874.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., Feindt, P. H., & Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Greening Leviathan: The rise of the environmental state? Environmental Politics, 25(1), 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: Toward an ecocentric approach. London: UCL Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2004). The green state: Rethinking democracy and sovereignty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2011). Representing nature. In S. Alonso, J. Kean, & W. Merkel (Eds.), The future of representative democracy (pp. 236–257). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2017). Geopolitan democracy in the anthropocene. Political Studies, 65(4), 983–999.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckersley, R. (2019). Ecological democracy and the rise and decline of liberal democracy: Looking back, looking forward. Environmental Politics, 1–21. doi:10.1080/09644016.2019.1594536.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ECLAC. (2018). Regional agreement on access to information, public participation and justice in environmental matters in Latin America and the Caribbean. UN Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean. https://www.cepal.org/en/escazuagreement
   Google Scholar
• Esguerra, A., Beck, S., & Lidskog, R. (2016). Stakeholder engagement in the making: IPBES legitimization politics. Global Environmental Politics, 17(1), 59–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Espinosa, C. (2019). Interpretive affinities: The constitutionalization of rights of nature, Pacha Mama, in Ecuador. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(5), 608–622.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etemire, U. (2016). Insights on the UNEP Bali guidelines and the development of environmental democratic rights. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(3), 393–413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, D. J. (1998). The struggle for ecological democracy: Environmental justice movements in the United States. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fiorino, D. J. (2018). Can democracy handle climate change? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (2017). Climate crisis and the democratic prospect: Participatory governance in sustainable communities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• France. (2008). Le Grenelle De L’environnement Un an Après. http://www.vie-publique.fr/actualite/dossier/grenelle-an/grenelle-environnement-an-apres.html#onglet1
   Google Scholar
• Fredriksson, P. G., & Neumayer, E. (2013). Democracy and climate change policies: Is history important? Ecological Economics, 95(0), 11–19.
   Google Scholar
• Gellers, J. C. (2017). The global emergence of constitutional environmental rights. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gellers, J. C., & Jeffords, C. (2018). Toward environmental democracy? Procedural environmental rights and environmental justice. Global Environmental Politics, 18(1), 99–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (2009). The politics of climate change. Oxford: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Gills, B., & Morgan, J. (2019). Global climate emergency: After COP24, climate science, urgency, and the threat to humanity. Globalizations, 1–18. doi:10.1080/14747731.2019.1669915.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (1992). Green political theory. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Goodin, R. E. (1996). Enfranchising the earth, and its alternatives. Political Studies, 44(5), 835–849.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guha, R. (1989). Radical American environmentalism and wilderness preservation: A third world critique. Environmental Ethics, 11(1), 71–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gundersen, A. G. (1995). The environmental promise of democratic deliberation. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hale, T. (2016). “All Hands on Deck”: The Paris agreement and nonstate climate action. Global Environmental Politics, 16(3), 12–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammond, M. (2019). A cultural account of ecological democracy. Environmental Values, 28(1), 55–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanusch, F. (2018). Democracy and climate change. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162(3859), 1243–1248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward, T. (2005). Constitutional environmental rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbroner, R. (1974). An inquiry into the human condition. New York, NY: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Hickmann, T., Partzsch, L., Pattberg, P., & Weiland, S. (2019). Conclusion: Towards a ‘Deep Debate’ on the anthropocene. In T. Hickmann, L. Partzsch, P. Pattberg, & S. Weiland (Eds.), The anthropocene debate and political science (pp. 237–251). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hobson, K., & Niemeyer, S. (2011). Public responses to climate change: The role of deliberation in building capacity for adaptive action. Global Environmental Change, 21(3), 957–971.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphrey, M. (2007). Ecological politics and democratic theory: The challenge to the deliberative ideal. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jasanoff, S. (1996). The dilemma of environmental democracy. Issues in Science & Technology, 13(1), 63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kashwan, P. (2017). Democracy in the woods: Environmental conservation and social justice in India, Tanzania, and Mexico. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klein, N. (2017). No is not enough: Resisting Trump's shock politics and winning the world we need. London: Penguin.
   Google Scholar
• Kothari, A., Demaria, F., & Acosta, A. (2014). Buen Vivir, degrowth and ecological Swaraj: Alternatives to sustainable development and the green economy. Development, 57(3–4), 362–375.
   Google Scholar
• Kramarz, T., & Park, S. (2016). Accountability in global environmental governance: A meaningful tool for action? Global Environmental Politics, 16(2), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lafferty, W. M., & Meadowcroft, J. (1996). Democracy and the environment: Problems and prospects. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Lepori, M. (2019). Towards a new ecological democracy: A critical evaluation of the deliberation paradigm within green political theory. Environmental Values, 28(1), 75–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, Q., & Reuveny, R. (2006). Democracy and environmental degradation. International Studies Quarterly, 50(4), 935–956.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipschutz, R. D., & Mayer, J. (1996). Global civil society and global environmental governance: The politics of nature from place to planet. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, A. Y. (2013). Agreeing to pay under value disagreement: Reconceptualizing preference transformation in terms of pluralism with evidence from small-group deliberations on climate change. Ecological Economics, 87, 84–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Machin, A. (2013). Negotiating climate change: Radical democracy and the illusion of consensus. London: Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Malm, A., & Hornborg, A. (2014). The geology of mankind? A critique of the anthropocene narrative. The Anthropocene Review, 1(1), 62–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (1999). Environmental democracy. London: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). Transparency for whom? Information disclosure and power in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(2), 8–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathews, F. (1995). Introduction. Environmental Politics, 4(4), 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy, J. (2019). Authoritarianism, populism, and the environment: Comparative experiences, insights, and perspectives. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 109(2), 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mert, A. (2019a). Democracy in the anthropocene: A new scale. In F. Biermann & E. Lövbrand (Eds.), Anthropocene encounters: New directions in green political thinking (pp. 128–149). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mert, A. (2019b). Participation(s) in transnational environmental governance: Green values versus instrumental use. Environmental Values, 28(1), 101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, J. M. (2015). Engaging the everyday: Environmental social criticism and the resonance dilemma. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, R. E. (2006). Green politics or environmental blues? Analyzing ecological democracy. Public Understanding of Science, 15(4), 459–480.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. (2011). Carbon democracy: Political power in the age of oil. London: Verso Books.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, R. (1995). Ecological democracy. Boston, MA: South End Press.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, T. H., Adger, W. N., Brown, K., Lemos, M. C., Huitema, D., & Hughes, T. P. (2017). Mitigation and adaptation inpolycentric systems: sources of power in the pursuit of collective goals. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 8(5), 1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neumayer, E. (2002). Do democracies exhibit stronger international environmental commitment? A cross-country analysis. Journal of Peace Research, 39(2), 139–164.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newig, J., & Fritsch, O. (2009). Environmental governance: Participatory, multi-level – and effective? Environmental Policy and Governance, 19(3), 197–214.
   Google Scholar
• New Internationalist. (1987, May 5). Action and worth reading. New Internationalist. Retrieved from https://newint.org/features/1987/05/05/action
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, S. (2014). A defence of (deliberative) democracy in the anthropocene. Ethical Perspectives, 21(1), 15–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, S. (2020). Deliberation and ecological democracy: from citizen to global system. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ophuls, W. (1977). Ecology and the politics of scarcity. San Francisco, CA: WH Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottinger, G. (2013). Changing knowledge, local knowledge, and knowledge gaps: STS insights into procedural justice. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(2), 250–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pellow, D. N. (2017). What is critical environmental justice? Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Pickering, J., & Persson, Å. (2020). Democratising planetary boundaries: experts, social values and deliberative risk evaluation in Earth system governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 59–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Povitkina, M. (2018). The limits of democracy in tackling climate change. Environmental Politics, 27(3), 411–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purdy, J. (2015). After nature: A politics for the anthropocene. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rask, M., Worthington, R., & Lammi, M. (2012). Citizen participation in global environmental governance. Abingdon: Earthscan.
   Google Scholar
• Rietig, K. (2016). The power of strategy: Environmental NGO influence in international climate negotiations. Global Governance, 22(2), 269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Safi, M. (2017, March 21). Ganges and Yamuna Rivers Granted Same Legal Rights as Human Beings. Guardian (UK). Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/world/2017/mar/21/ganges-and-yamuna-rivers-granted-same-legal-rights-as-human-beings
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D. (2016). Environmental management in the anthropocene. In T. Gabrielson, C. A. Hall, J. M. Meyer, & D. Schlosberg (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of environmental political theory (pp. 193–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., Bäckstrand, K., & Pickering, J. (2019). Reconciling ecological and democratic values: Recent perspectives on ecological democracy. Environmental Values, 28(1), 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., & Coles, R. (2016). The new environmentalism of everyday life: Sustainability, material flows and movements. Contemporary Political Theory, 15(2), 160–181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, D., & Craven, L. (2019). Sustainable materialism: Environmental practice and the politics of everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sénit, C.-A., Biermann, F., & Kalfagianni, A. (2017). The representativeness of global deliberation: A critical assessment of civil society consultations for sustainable development. Global Policy, 8(1), 62–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahar, D. C. (2015). Rejecting eco-authoritarianism, again. Environmental Values, 24(3), 345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shearman, D. J., & Smith, J. W. (2007). The climate change challenge and the failure of democracy. Westport, CT: Praeger.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, G. (2003). Deliberative democracy and the environment. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sommerer, T., & Tallberg, J. (2017). Transnational access to international organizations 1950–2010: A new data set. International Studies Perspectives, 18(3), 247–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steffen, W., Grinevald, J., Crutzen, P., & McNeill, J. (2011). The anthropocene: Conceptual and historical perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 369(1938), 842–867.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, H., & Dryzek, J. S. (2014). Democratizing global climate governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stirling, A. (2015). Emancipating transformations: From controlling ‘the transition’ to culturing plural radical progress. In I. Scoones, M. Leach, & P. Newell (Eds.), The politics of green transformations (pp. 72–85) London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K. (2018). Conceptualizing energy democracy. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 21–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Takacs, D. (2020). Whose voices count in biodiversity conservation? Ecological democracy in biodiversity offsetting, REDD+, and rewilding. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(1), 43–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tremmel, J. (2019). The anthropocene concept as a wake-up call for reforming democracy. In T. Hickmann, L. Partzsch, P. Pattberg, & S. Weiland (Eds.), The anthropocene debate and political science (pp. 219–237). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• UN. (1992). Agenda 21: The United Nations program for action from Rio. New York, NY: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UNECE. (1998). Convention on access to information, public participation in decision-making and access to justice in environmental matters [Aarhus convention]. Geneva: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe.
   Google Scholar
• UNEP. (2018). A bid to strengthen environmental democracy in Latin America and the Caribbean. Retrieved from https://www.unenvironment.org/news-and-stories/story/bid-strengthen-environmental-democracy-latin-america-and-caribbean
   Google Scholar
• Wahlström, M., Kocyba, P., De Vydt, M., & de Moor, J. (2019). Protest for a Future: Composition, Mobilization and Motives of the Participants in Fridays for Future Climate Protests on 15 March, 2019 in 13 European Cities. Retrieved from http://eprints.keele.ac.uk/6571/7/20190709_Protest%20for%20a%20future_GCS%20Descriptive%20Report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Wapner, P. K. (1996). Environmental activism and world civic politics. New York: SUNY Press.
   Google Scholar
• Winslow, M. (2005). Is democracy good for the environment? Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(5), 771–783.
   Google Scholar
• Winter, C. J. (2019). Decolonising dignity for inclusive democracy. Environmental Values, 28(1), 9–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissenburg, M. (1998). Green liberalism: The free and the green society. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, J. K. (2016). A dilemma of green democracy. Political Studies, 64(1 suppl), 136–155.
   Google Scholar
• WRI. 2015. Environmental democracy index. World Resources Institute. https://www.wri.org/resources/websites/environmental-democracy-index
   Google Scholar
• Wurster, S. (2013). Comparing ecological sustainability in autocracies and democracies. Contemporary Politics, 19(1), 76–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, L. (2015). Rethinking prefiguration: Alternatives, micropolitics and goals in social movements. Social Movement Studies, 14(1), 1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar