References
- AIRU (Associazione Italiana Riscaldamento Urbano). (2017). Il riscaldamento urbano: Annuario 2017. Editrice Alkes.
- Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing technologies, increasing returns and lock-in by historical events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2234208
- Avelino, F., & Wittmayer, J. M. (2016). Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 628–649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259
- Beck, U., & Levy, D. (2013). Cosmopolitanized nations: Re-imagining collectivity in world risk society. Theory, Culture & Society, 30(2), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276412457223
- Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
- Carrosio, G. (2013). Energy production from biogas in the Italian countryside: Policies and organizational models. Energy Policy, 63, 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.072
- Carrosio, G. (2015). Politiche e campi organizzativi della riqualificazione energetica degli edifici. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, 106, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2015-106002
- Ćetković, S., & Buzogány, A. (2016). Varieties of capitalism and clean energy transitions in the European Union: When renewable energy hits different economic logics. Climate Policy, 16(5), 642–657. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135778
- Cherp, A., Vinichenko, V., Jewell, J., Brutschin, E., & Sovacool, B. (2018). Integrating techno-economic, socio-technical and political perspectives on national energy transitions: A meta-theoretical framework. Energy Research & Social Science, 37, 175–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.015
- Chilvers, J., & Longhurst, N. (2016). Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced, emergent and diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 585–607. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483
- Coenen, L., Benneworth, P. S., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
- Connolly, D., Lund, H., Mathiesen, B. V., Werner, S., Möller, B., Persson, U., Boermans, T., Trier, D., Østergaard, P. A., & Nielsen, S. (2014). Heat roadmap Europe: Combining district heating with heat savings to decarbonise the EU energy system. Energy Policy, 65, 475–489. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.10.035
- Cowan, R. (1990). Nuclear power reactors: A study in technological lock-in. The Journal of Economic History, 50(3), 541–567. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022050700037153
- Dénarié, A., Muscherà, M., Calderoni, M., & Motta, M. (2019). Industrial excess heat recovery in district heating: Data assessment methodology and application to a real case study in Milano, Italy. Energy, 166, 170–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.09.153
- Devine-Wright, P., & Wiersma, B. (2013). Opening up the “local” to analysis: Exploring the spatiality of UK urban decentralised energy initiatives. Local Environment, 18(10), 1099–1116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2012.754742
- Di Lucia, L., & Ericsson, K. (2014). Low-carbon district heating in Sweden–examining a successful energy transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 4, 10–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.08.005
- Dzebo, A., & Nykvist, A. (2017). New regime and then what? Cracks and tensions in the socio-technical regime of the Swedish heat energy system. Energy Research & Social Science, 29, 113–122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.018
- Esposito, F. M. (2017). Local regulation and district heating in Italy. In A. Asquer, F. Becchis, & D. Russolillo (Eds.), The political economy of local regulation: Studies in the political economy of public policy. Palgrave Macmillan.
- Gabillet, P. (2015). Energy supply and urban planning projects: Analysing tensions around district heating provision in a French eco-district. Energy Policy, 78, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.11.006
- Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
- Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low-carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the multi-level perspective. Theory Culture and Society, 31(5), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627
- Geels, F. W., & Johnson, V. (2018). Towards a modular and temporal understanding of system diffusion: Adoption models and socio-technical theories applied to Austrian biomass district-heating (1979–2013). Energy Research & Social Science, 38, 138–153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.02.010
- Geels, F.W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
- Hawkey, D. J. (2012). District heating in the UK: A technological innovation systems analysis. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 5, 19–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.10.005
- Hughes, T. P. (1983). Networks of power: Electrification in western society, 1880-1930. Johns Hopkins University Press.
- Hui, A., & Walker, G. (2018). Concepts and methodologies for a new relational geography of energy demand: Social practices, doing-places and settings. Energy Research & Social Science, 36, 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.032
- Islas, J. (1997). Getting round the lock-in in electricity generating systems: The example of the gas turbine. Research Policy, 26(1), 49–66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(96)00912-2
- Kueck, J. D., Staunton, R. H., Labinov, S. D., & Kirby, B. J. (2003). Microgrid energy management system (Working paper). CERTS.
- Lake, A., Rezaie, B., & Beyerlein, S. (2017). Review of district heating and cooling systems for a sustainable future. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 67, 417–425. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2016.09.061
- Leurent, M., Da Costa, P., Rämä, M., Persson, U., & Jasserand, F. (2018). Cost-benefit analysis of district heating systems using heat from nuclear plants in seven European countries. Energy, 149, 454–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2018.01.149
- Liebowitz, S., & Margolis, S. E. (1995). Path dependence, lock-in and history. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 11(1), 205–226.
- Lund, H. (2005). Large-scale integration of wind power into different energy systems. Energy, 30(13), 2402–2412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2004.11.001
- Magnusson, D. (2012). Swedish district heating—A system in stagnation: Current and future trends in the district heating sector. Energy Policy, 48, 449–459. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.05.047
- Magnusson, D. (2016). Who brings the heat? From municipal to diversified ownership in the Swedish district heating market post-liberalization. Energy Research & Social Science, 22, 198–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.004
- Meadowcroft, J. (2011). Engaging with the politics of sustainability transitions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(1), 70–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.003
- Osti, G. (2012). Frames, organisations, and practices as social components of energy. International Review of Sociology, 22(3), 412–428. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2012.730821
- Osti, G. (2015). Energia e urbanizzazione: un gioco nuovo e incerto. Sociologia Urbana e Rurale, 106, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.3280/SUR2015-106001
- Smith, A., Stirling, A., & Berkhout, F. (2005). The governance of sustainable socio-technical transitions. Research Policy, 34(10), 1491–1510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.07.005
- Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2005). Conflicting strategies towards sustainable heating at an urban junction of heat infrastructure and building standards. Energy Policy, 78, 273–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.019
- Unruh, G. C. (2000). Understanding carbon lock-in. Energy Policy, 28(12), 817–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(00)00070-7
- Upham, P., & Jones, C. (2012). Don’t lock me in: Public opinion on the prospective use of waste process heat for district heating. Applied Energy, 89(1), 21–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.02.031
- Valente, T. W. (2005). Network models and methods for studying the diffusion of innovations. In P. Carrington, J. Scott, & S. Wasserman (Eds.), Models and methods in social network analysis (pp. 17–58). Cambridge University Press.
- Walker, G., & Cass, N. (2011). Public roles and socio-technical configurations: Diversity in renewable energy deployment in the UK and its implications. In P. Devine-Wright (Ed.), Renewable energy and the public: From NIMBY to participation (pp. 43–56). Earthscan.
- Webb, J. (2015). Improvising innovation in UK urban district heating: The convergence of social and environmental agendas in Aberdeen. Energy Policy, 78, 265–272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.12.003
- Wollmann, H., Baldersheim, H., Citroni, G., Marcou, G., & McEldowney, J. (2010). From public service to commodity: The demunicipalization (or remunicipalization?) of energy provision in Germany, Italy, France, the UK and Norway. In H. Wollmann & G. Marcou (Eds.), The provision of public services in Europe: Between state, local government and market (pp. 168–190). Edward Elgar.