Rethinking strategy in environmental governance

References

• Albrechts, L. (2004). Strategic (spatial) planning reexamined. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 31(5), 743–758. https://doi.org/10.1068/b3065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., & Ashcraft, K. L. (2009). Critical methodology in management and organization research. In A. Bryman & D. Buchanan (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational research methods (pp. 61–77). SAGE Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., Bridgman, T., & Willmott, H. (eds.). (2009). The Oxford handbook of critical management studies. Oxford Handbooks.
   Google Scholar
• Alvesson, M., Hardy, C., & Harley, B. (2008). Reflecting on reflexivity: Reflexive textual practices in organization and management theory. Journal of Management Studies, 45(3), 480–501. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2007.00765.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2017). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aristotle, D. A. (2015). [4th C BC] politics. Aeterna Press.
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, D., & Plummer, R. (2010). Adapting and transforming: Governance for navigating change. In Adaptive capacity and environmental governance (pp. 287–302). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Barbuto, J. E., Jr. (2016). How is strategy formed in organizations? A multi-disciplinary taxonomy of strategy-making approaches. Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 3(1), 822.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M., Newman, J., & Sullivan, H. C. (2007). Power, participation and political renewal: Case studies in public participation. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, D., & Elmes, M. (1997). Strategy retold: Toward a narrative view of strategic discourse. Academy of Management Review, 22(2), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1997.9707154065
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, S., & Hindmoor, A. (2009). Rethinking governance: The centrality of the state in modern society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., & Patterson, J. J. (2019). Analysing institutional change in environmental governance: Exploring the concept of ‘insti- tutional work’. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(1), 12–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1257423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., Patterson, J., & Van Assche, K. (2017). Governing for resilience: The role of institutional work. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 10–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. (eds.). (2015). Routledge handbook of interpretive political science. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bevir, M., & Rhodes, R. A. (eds.). (2016). Rethinking governance: Ruling, rationalities and resistance. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Biermann, F., Kanie, N., & Kim, R. E. (2017). Global governance by goal-setting: The novel approach of the UN Sustainable development goals. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 26–27, 26–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bloom, A., & Kirsch, A. (2016). The republic of Plato. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Bodin, Ö. (2017). Collaborative environmental governance: Achieving collective action in social-ecological systems. Science, 357(6352), eaan1114. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan1114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bragd, A., Christensen, D., Czarniawska, B., & Tullberg, M. (2008). Discourse as the means of community creation. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 24(3), 199–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2008.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brindley, T., Rydin, Y., & Stoker, G. (2005). Remaking planning: The politics of urban change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Edwards, L. E., & Van Slyke, D. M. (2018). Getting strategic about strategic planning research. Public Management Review, 20(3), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1285111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabantous, L., Gond, J. P., & Wright, A. (2018). The performativity of strategy: Taking stock and moving ahead. Long Range Planning, 51(3), 407–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chettiparamb, A. (2006). Metaphors in complexity theory and planning. Planning Theory, 5(1), 71–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095206061022
   Google Scholar
• Clegg, S. R., Carter, C., Kornberger, M., & Schweitzer, J. (2011). Strategy: Theory and practice. Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Cooke, B., & Kothari, U. (eds.). (2001). Participation: The new tyranny? Zed books.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (1997). Narrating the organization: Dramas of institutional identity. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (2014). A theory of organizing. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Dean, M. (2010). Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• De Roo, G. (2010). Being or becoming? That is the question! Confronting complexity with contemporary planning theory. A planner’s encounter with complexity. In G. De Roo, & E. Silva (Eds.), A planners encounter with complexity (pp. 19–40). Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• De Roo, G. (2017). Integrating city planning and environmental improvement: Practicable strategies for sustainable urban development. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Duineveld, M., Van Assche, K., & Beunen, R. (2017). Re-conceptualising political landscapes after the material turn: A typology of material events. Landscape Research, 42(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1290791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., & Galaz, V. (2008). Governance and complexity—emerging issues for governance theory. Governance, 21(3), 311–335. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2008.00402.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duit, A., Galaz, V., Eckerberg, K., & Ebbesson, J. (2010). Governance, complexity, and resilience. Global Environmental Change.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson, P., & Lehtimäki, H. (2001). Strategy rhetoric in city management: How the presumptions of classic strategic management live on? Scandinavian Journal of Management, 17(2), 201–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0956-5221(99)00029-9
   Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., de Mello, J. M. C., & Almeida, M. (2005). Towards ‘meta-innovation’ in Brazil: The evolution of the incubator and the emergence of a triple helix. Research Policy, 34(4), 411–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Weiland, S. (2018). Reflexive governance: Exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 20(6), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1532562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fenton, C., & Langley, A. (2011). Strategy as practice and the narrative turn. Organization Studies, 32(9), 1171–1196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840611410838
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, F. (1993). Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: From theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences, 26(3), 165–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00999715
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. University of Chicago press.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1988). Planning in the Face of power. Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2012). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. Vintage.
   Google Scholar
• Freedman, L. (2015). Strategy: A history. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Golsorkhi, D., Rouleau, L., Seidl, D., & Vaara, E. (2010). Cambridge handbook of strategy as practice. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grotenbreg, S., & Van Buuren, A. (2017). Facilitation as a governance strategy: Unravelling governments’ facilitation frames. Sustainability, 9(1), 160. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9010160
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grunwald, A. (2007). Working towards sustainable development in the face of uncertainty and incomplete knowledge. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 245–262. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622774
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2009). Planning in ten words or less: A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Hax, A. C., & Majluf, N. S. (1988). The concept of strategy and the strategy formation process. Interfaces, 18(3), 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1287/inte.18.3.99
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2006). Transforming governance: Challenges of institutional adaptation and a new politics of space. European Planning Studies, 14(3), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310500420792
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualizing reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Hertin, J., & Berkhout, F. (2003). Analysing institutional strategies for environmental policy integration: The case of EU enterprise policy. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5(1), 39–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080305603
   Google Scholar
• Hillier, J. (2002). Shadows of power: An allegory of prudence in land-use planning. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Höglund, L., & Svärdsten, F. (2018). Strategy work in the public sector—A balancing act of competing discourses. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 34(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scaman.2018.06.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. (2010). Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 309–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619725
   Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T. (2005). Using collaboration as a governance strategy: Lessons from six watershed management programs. Administration & Society, 37(3), 281–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarzabkowski, P. (2004). Strategy as practice: Recursiveness, adaptation, and practices-in-use. Organization Studies, 25(4), 529–560. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840604040675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kagan, K. (2006). Redefining Roman grand strategy. The Journal of Military History, 70(2), 333–362. https://doi.org/10.1353/jmh.2006.0104
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kornberger, M., & Engberg-Pedersen, A. (2019). Reading Clausewitz, reimagining the practice of strategy. Strategic Organization. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127019854963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence, A. (2017). Adapting through practice: Silviculture, innovation and forest governance for the age of extreme uncertainty. Forest Policy and Economics, 79, 50–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2016.07.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindseth, G. (2005). Local level adaptation to climate change: Discursive strategies in the Norwegian context. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 7(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500251908
   Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1990). Political theory in the welfare state. Walter de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1995). Social systems. Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Machiavelli, N. (2009 [1517]). Discourses on Livy. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCann, E. J. (2001). Collaborative visioning or urban planning as therapy? The politics of public-private policy making. The Professional Geographer, 53(2), 207–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/0033-0124.00280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mead, G. H. (1967). Mind, self and society. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J., & Steurer, R. (2018). Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: A contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 734–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.829750
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meppem, T. (2000). The discursive community: Evolving institutional structures for planning. Ecological Economics, 34(1), 47–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8009(00)00151-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkus, S., Willems, T., & Veenswijk, M. (2019). Strategy implementation as performative practice: Reshaping organization into Alignment with strategy. Organization Management Journal, 16(3), 140–155.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, D. (1986). Configurations of strategy and structure: Towards a synthesis. Strategic Management Journal, 7(3), 233–249. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250070305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, H. T., & Fox, C. J. (2007). Postmodern public administration. M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1978). Patterns in strategy formation. Management Science, 24(9), 934–948. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.24.9.934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neugebauer, F., Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2016). Planned or emergent strategy making? Exploring the formation of corporate sustainability strategies. Business Strategy and the Environment, 25(5), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.jpart.a024379
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J. (ed.). (2000). Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy. OUP.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, B. (2005). Governing complex societies: Trajectories and scenarios. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2019). Governance, politics and the state. Red Globe Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). The limits of design: Explaining institutional origins and change. Governance, 13(4), 475–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/0952-1895.00142
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressman, J. L., & Wildavsky, A. (1984). Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rap, E. (2006). The success of a policy model: Irrigation management transfer in Mexico. The Journal of Development Studies, 42(8), 1301–1324. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220380600930606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasche, A., & Seidl, D. (2017). A Luhmannian perspective on strategy: Strategy as paradox and meta-communication. Critical Perspectives on Accounting.
   Google Scholar
• Renn, O., Klinke, A., & Van Asselt, M. (2011). Coping with complexity, uncertainty and ambiguity in risk governance: A synthesis. Ambio, 40(2), 231–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-010-0134-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (ed.). (1998). Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history (Vol. 2). University of California Univ of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeneborn, D. (2011). Organization as communication: A Luhmannian perspective. Management Communication Quarterly, 25(4), 663–689. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318911405622
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J. C. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., & Thomas, C. W. (2017). Unpacking the collaborative toolbox: Why and when do public managers choose collaborative governance strategies? Policy Studies Journal, 45(1), 191–214. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12162
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sehring, J. (2009). Path dependencies and institutional bricolage in post-Soviet water governance. Water Alternatives, 2, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. (2007). General strategy concepts and the ecology of strategy discourses: A systemic-discursive perspective. Organization Studies, 28(2), 197–218. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840606067994
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. (2016). Organisational identity and self-transformation: An autopoietic perspective. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D., & Becker, K. H. (eds.). (2005). Niklas Luhmann and organization studies. Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D., & Whittington, R. (2014). Enlarging the strategy-as-practice research agenda: Towards taller and flatter ontologies. Organization Studies, 35(10), 1407–1421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840614541886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieber, S. (2013). Fatal remedies: The ironies of social intervention. Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Y. (ed.). (2019). Routledge Handbook of Psychoanalytic political theory. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Stout, L. A. (2011). Uncertainty, dangerous optimism, and speculation: An inquiry into some limits of democratic governance. Cornell Law Review, 97, 1177. https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/clqv97&i=1199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suddaby, R., Seidl, D., & Lê, J. K. (2013). Strategy-as-practice meets neo-institutional theory. Strategic Organization, 11(3), 329–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127013497618
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tadajewski, M., Maclaran, P., & Parsons, E. (eds.). (2011). Key concepts in critical management studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1996). Planning as persuasive storytelling: The rhetorical construction of Chicago’s electric future. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Torgerson, D. (2018). Reflexivity and developmental constructs: The case of sustainable futures. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 781–791. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.817949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaara, E., & Lamberg, J. A. (2016). Taking historical embeddedness seriously: Three historical approaches to advance strategy process and practice research. Academy of Management Review, 41(4), 633–657. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2014.0172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2012). Performing success and failure in governance: Dutch planning experiences. Public Administration, 90(3), 567–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.01972.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2014). Evolutionary governance theory: An introduction. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2016). Citizens, leaders and the common good in a world of necessity and scarcity: Machiavelli’s lessons for community-based natural resource management. Ethics. Policy & Environment, 19(1), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/21550085.2016.1173791
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Duineveld, M., & Gruezmacher, M. (2017a). Power/knowledge and natural resource management: Foucaultian foundations in the analysis of adaptive governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1338560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Gruezmacher, M., Duineveld, M., Deacon, L., Summers, R., Halstrom, L., & Jones, K. (2019). Research methods as bridging devices: Path and context mapping in governance. Journal of Organizational Change Management. https://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-06-2019-0185
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., & Beunen, R. (2014b). Power and contingency in planning. Environment and Planning A, 46(10), 2385–2400. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130080p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Gruezmacher, M., & Deacon, L. (2020). Land use tools for tempering boom and bust: Strategy and capacity building in governance. Land Use Policy, 93, 103994. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Hornidge, A.-K., Schlüter, A., & Vaidianu, N. (2020). Governance and the coastal condition: Towards new modes of observation, adaptation and integration. Marine Policy, 112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Verschraegen, G., Valentinov, V., & Gruezmacher, M. (2019). The social, the ecological, and the adaptive. Von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory and the adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasquez, J. A. (1998). The power of power politics: From classical realism to neotraditionalism (No. 63). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. P. (2005). Strategic management from a systems-theoretical perspective. In D. Seidl & K. H. Becker (Eds.), Niklas Luhmann and organization studies (Vol. 14, pp. 363–383). Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Voss, J. P., Newig, J., Kastens, B., Monstadt, J., & Nölting, B. (2007). Steering for sustainable development: A typology of problems and strategies with respect to ambivalence, uncertainty and distributed power. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3– 4), 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622881
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B., Gunderson, L., Kinzig, A., Folke, C., Carpenter, S., & Schultz, L. (2006). A handful of heuristics and some propositions for understanding resilience in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, G., & Shove, E. (2007). Ambivalence, sustainability and the governance of socio-technical transitions. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 213–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622840
   Google Scholar
• Weick, K. E. (2012). Making sense of the organization, Vol 2: The impermanent organization (Vol. 2). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Whittington, R. (1996). Strategy as practice. Long Range Planning, 29(5), 731–735. https://doi.org/10.1016/0024-6301(96)00068-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yanow, D. (2014). Interpretive analysis and comparative research. In Comparative policy studies (pp. 131–159). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.
   Google Scholar