‘Doing’ system innovations from within the heart of the regime

References

• Akrich, M. (1992). The de-scription of technical objects. In W. Bijker, & J. Law (Eds.), Shaping technology/building society: Studies in sociotechnical change (pp. 205–224). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Avelino, F. (2009). Empowerment and the challenge of applying transition management to ongoing projects. Policy Science, 42(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9102-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (1997). Re-inventing politics. Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, U. (2006). Reflexive governance: Politics in the global risk society. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 31–56). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Berkhout, F., Smith, A., & Stirling, A. (2004). Socio-technological regimes and transition contexts. In B. Elzen, F. W. Geels, & K. Green (Eds.), System innovation and the transition to sustainability: Theory, evidence and policy (pp. 48–75). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, A. P. (2008). Instrumentalization theory and reflexive design in animal husbandry. Social Epistemology, 1(1), 29–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/02691720701773502
   Google Scholar
• Bos, A. P., & Grin, J. (2012). Reflexive interactive design as an instrument for dual track governance. In M. Barbier, & B. E. Elzen (Eds.), System innovations, knowledge regimes, and design practices towards transitions for sustainable agriculture (pp. 132–153). INRA.
   Google Scholar
• Bos, B., & Grin, J. (2008). ‘Doing’ reflexive modernization in pig husbandry: The hard work of changing the course of a river. Science, Technology & Human Values, 33(4), 480–507. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243907306697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bos, A. P., Koerkamp, G., Peter, W. G., Gosselink, J. M. J., & Bokma, S. J. (2009). Reflexive interactive design and its application in a project on sustainable dairy husbandry systems. Outlook on Agriculture, 38(2), 137–145. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000009788632386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. A., Castán Broto, V., & Edwards, G. A. S. (2014). An urban politics of climate change: Experimentation and the governing of socio-technical transitions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V. (2016). Innovation territories and energy transitions: energy, water and modernity in Spain, 1939–1975. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 712–729. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1075195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Haan, F. J., & Rotmans, J. (2011). Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 78(1), 90–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H., & Weiland, S. (2018). Reflexive governance: exploring the concept and assessing its critical potential for sustainable development. Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 661–674. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1532562
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2014). Regime resistance against low carbon transitions: Introducing politics and power into the muli-level perspective. Theory, Culture & Society, 31(5), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276414531627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2003). ‘Health technology assessment between our health care system and our health. Exploring the potential of reflexive TA. Poiesis & Praxis, 2(2-3), 157–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10202-003-0049-y
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2006). Reflexive modernization as a governance issue – or: designing and shaping Re- structuration. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive, governance for sustainable development (pp. 54–81). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2010). Understanding transitions from a Governance perspective. Part III. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term structural change (pp. 223–319). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J. (2012). Changing governments, kitchens, supermarkets, firms and farms: The governance of transitions between societal practices and supply systems. Chapter 2. In G. Spaargaren, P. Oosterveer, & A. Loeber (Eds.), Food practices in transition: Changing food consumption, retail and production in the age of reflexive modernity (pp. 35–56). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Felix, F., Bos, B., & Spoelstra, S. (2004). Practices for reflexive design: Lessons from a Dutch programme on sustainable agriculture. International Journal of Foresight and Innovation Policy, 1(1-2), 126–149. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJFIP.2004.004618
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., Rotmans, J., & Schot, J. (2010). Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term structural change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grin, J., & van de Graaf, H. (1996). Technology assessment as learning. Science, Technology and Human Values, 20(1), 72–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. (2006). Doing discourse analysis: Coalitions, practices, meaning. In M. van den Brink, & T. Metze (Eds.), Words matter in policy and planning: Discourse theory and the method in the social sciences (pp. 65–74). Koninklijk Nederlands Aardrijkskundig Genootschap.
   Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., & Grin, J. (2007). Contextualising reflexive governance: The politics of Dutch transitions to sustainability. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3-4), 333–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701622790
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, J., & Loeber, A. (2016). Exploring the micro-politics in transitions from a practice perspective: The case of greenhouse innovation in the Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 692–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1113514
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoogma, R. (2000). Exploiting technological niches (Thesis, Twente University).
   Google Scholar
• Hoppe, R. (2011). The governance of problems. Puzzling, powering, participation. Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kemp, R., Schot, J. W., & Hoogma, R. (1998). Regime shifts to sustainability through processes of niche formation: the approach of strategic niche management. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 10(2), 175–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537329808524310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koerkamp, G., Peter, W. G., & Bos, A. P. (2008). Designing complex and sustainable agricultural production systems; an integrated and reflexive approach for the case of table egg production in the Netherlands. NJAS – Wageningen journal of life sciences, 55(2), 113–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214(08)80032-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lintsen, H., Veraart, F., Smits, J. P., & Grin, J. (2018). Well-being, sustainability and social development: The Netherlands 1850–2050. Springer Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Lissandrello, E., & Grin, J. (2011). Reflexive planning as design and work: lessons from the Port of Amsterdam. Planning Theory & Practice, 12(2), 223–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2011.580156
   Google Scholar
• Loeber, A., & Vermeulen, T. (2016). Reflexive project management in high-ambition projects: Exploring the competencies for managing innovative sustainable designs. Social Business, 6(1), 15–37.
   Google Scholar
• Lowndes, V., & Roberts, M. (2015). Why Institutions Matter. The New Institutionalism in Political Science. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P. (1984). The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life. The American Political Science Review, 78(3), 734–749. https://doi.org/10.2307/1961840
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsh, D. (2010). Stability and change: the last dualism? Critical Policy Studies, 4(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003715036
   Google Scholar
• McNutt, K., & Rayner, J. (2018). Is learning without teaching possible? The productive tension between network governance and reflexivity. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 769–780. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.986568
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meadowcroft, J. (2009). What about the politics? Sustainable development, transition management, and long term energy transitions. Policy Sciences, 42(4), 323–340. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-009-9097-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons, C. (2010). Constructvism. In D. Marsh, & G. Stoker (Eds.), Theory and methods in political science (pp. 80–98). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Raven, R., Sengers, F., Spaeth, P., Xie, L., Cheshmehzangi, A., & de Jong, M. (2019). Urban experimentation and institutional arrangements. European Planning Studies, 27(2), 258–281. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2017.1393047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., Kemp, R. P. M., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner, & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change. Vol. II, resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roep, D., van der Ploeg, J. D., & Wiskerke, H. S. C. (2003). Managing technical-institutional design processes: some strategic lessons from environmental co-operatives in the Netherlands. Netherlands Journal of Agrarian Studies, 51(1–2), 195–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1573-5214
   Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., & Loorbach, D. (2010). Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance. Part II. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term structural change (pp. 105–220). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think-in-action. Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. W. (1998). The usefulness of evolutionary models for explaining innovation. The case of the Netherlands in the nineteenth century. History and Technology, 14(3), 173–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/07341519808581928
   Google Scholar
• Schot, J. W., & Geels, F. W. (2010). The dynamics of transitions: A sociohisotrical perspective. In J. Grin, J. Rotmans, & J. Schot (Eds.), Transitions to sustainable development. New directions in the study of long term structural change (pp. 11–101). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schuitmaker-Warnaar, T. J. (2012). Identifying and unravelling persistent problems. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1021–1031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sengers, F., Späth, P., & Raven, R. P. J. M. (2018). Smart city construction: Towards an analytical framework for smart urban living labs. In S. Marvin, H. Bulkeley, Q. Mai, K. McCormick, & P. Voytenko (Eds.), Urban living labs: Experimentation and socio-technical transitions. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Swilling, M., Musango, J., & Wakeford, J. (2016). Developmental states and sustainability transitions: prospects of a just transition in South Africa. Africa. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 650–672. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1107716
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Switzer, A. W., Bertolini, L., & Grin, J. (2013). Transitions of mobility systems in urban regions: a heuristic framework. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(2), 141–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.746182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ter Haar-van Twillert, E., & van den Bosch, S. (2017). Trying to transform structure, culture and practice: Comparing two innovation projects of the transition program in long-term care. In J. Broerse, & J. Grin (Eds.), Towards Systems Innovations in Health Systems (pp. 183–207). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Van Den Kroonenberg, H. H., & Siers, F. J. (1999). Structured design: Methods, examples and exercises. Educatieve Partners Nederland.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., Bauknecht, D., & Kemp, R. (Eds.). (2006). Reflexive governance for sustainable development. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., & Kemp, R. (2006). Sustainability and reflexive governance: Introduction. In J.-P. Voß, D. Bauknecht, & R. Kemp (Eds.), Reflexive governance for sustainable development (pp. 3–29). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, P. L., van Grootveld, J. G., & Ph. Vergragt, E. v. S. (2000). Sustainable technology development. Greenleaf Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Wilk, R. (2009). The edge of agency: Routines, habits and volition. In E. Shove, F. Trentmann, & R. Wilk (Eds.), Time, consumption and everyday life: Practice, materiality and culture (pp. 143–155). Bloomsbury.
   Google Scholar