‘Harder’ soft governance in the European Energy Union

References

• Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A.-M., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organisation, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, K. M. (2015). Social policy in the European Union. Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P. (2018). Soft and hard governing tools. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on Theories of governance (pp. 267–278). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(29), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union – General approach. 15235/17. Brussels, 12 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017a). ES comments on the Governance Regulation. WK 4437/2017 INIT, 18 April (non-paper).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017b). CZ comments on the revised Governance Regulation. WK 7464/2017 INIT, 30 June (non-paper).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017c). PL comments on the revised Governance Regulation. WK 7548/2017 INIT, 3 July (non-paper).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017d). LT comments on the revised Governance Regulation. WK 8377/2017 INIT, 20 July (non-paper).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017e). CZ, HU, PL, RO and SK joint written proposal on the revised Governance Regulation. WK 9650/2017 INIT, 15 September (non-paper).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2017f). SE comments on the revised Governance Regulation. WK 13388/2017 INIT, 17 November).
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2018a). Governance of the Energy Union: Council confirms deal reached with the European Parliament. Press Release 424/18.
   Google Scholar
• Council of the European Union. (2018b). Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union. Analysis of the final compromise text with a view to agreement. Interinstitutional File: 2016/0375 (COD), 10307/18, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• da Graça Carvalho, M. (2012). EU energy and climate change strategy. Energy, 40(1), 19–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deganis, I. (2006). The politics behind consensus: Tracing the role of the Commission within the European Employment Strategy. Journal of Contemporary European Research, 2(1), 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., & Stiller, S. (2018). Lessons from OMC governance for climate and energy policy governance in the EU energy Union: Ideas, institutions, incentives. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Hamburg 23–25 August 2018, Section ‘Energy Policy and Politics: Conceptual Challenges, Core Problems and Emerging Issues’, Panel P015: ‘An Energy Union by Policy Surveillance?’, Chairs: J. Schönefeld & M. Knodt.
   Google Scholar
• Dyson, K. (1999). Economic and Monetary Union in Europe. A transformation of governance. In B. Kohler-Koch & R. Eising (Eds.), The transformation of governance in the European Union (pp. 98–118). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eikeland, P. O. (2011). The third internal market package: New power relations among member states, EU institutions and non-state actors? Journal of Common Marked Studies, 49(2), 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02140.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Proposal for a Regulation on the Governance of the Energy Union. COM(2016) 759 final, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2017a). Amendments tabled in committee. Legislative Observatory. Documentation Gateway. European Parliament, 2016/0375(COD), 4 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament. (2017b). Report on the proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council on the Governance of the Energy Union. Joint Committee ENVI/ITRE. A8-0402/2017, 14 December 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (2005). Complying with Europe: EU harmonisation and soft law in the member states. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S. (2014). The EU’s New Energy and Climate Policy Framework for 2030. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik: SWP Comments, 55/2014.
   Google Scholar
• Fischer, S., & Geden, O. (2015). Limits of an „Energy Union“. Only pragmatic progress on EU energy market regulation expected in the coming months. SWP-comments 2015/C28. Berlin: Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik.
   Google Scholar
• Früh, W. (2011). Inhaltsanalyse (7ed.). UVK.
   Google Scholar
• Gehring, T. (2002). Schutzstandards in der WTO? Die scheichende Verknüpfung der Welthandelsordnung mit standardsetzenden internationalen Institutionen. In M. Knodt & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Regieren in internationalen Institutionen (pp. 111–140). Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, P. R., & Halpern, C. (2016). EU governance in times of crisis: Inclusiveness and effectiveness beyond the ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law divide. Comparative European Politics, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, M. (2009). Learning about policy learning. Reflections on the European Employment strategy [special issue]. European Integration Online Papers, 1(13/7).
   Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2014). The European framework for energy and climate policies. Energy Policy, 64, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodt, M. (2005). Regieren im erweiterten europäischen Mehrebenensystem – die internationale Einbettung der EU. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M. (2018). Energy policy. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU (pp. 224–240). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M. (2019). Multi-level coordination in EU energy policy: A new type of “harder” soft governance? In N. Behnke, J. Broschek, & J. Sonnicksen (Eds.), Multilevel governance, configurations, dynamics, consequences (pp. 173–192). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M. (2020). Steuerung der Energietransformation durch die EU. der moderne staat, i.E.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Jachtenfuchs, M. (2002). Regieren in internationalen Institutionen. In M. Knodt & M. Jachtenfuchs (Eds.), Regieren in internationalen Institutionen (pp. 9–28). Leske + Budrich.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2017). Governance der Energieunion: Weiche Steuerung mit harten Zügen? [Governance in the Energy Union: Soft Governance with hard elements?]. Integration, 2, 125–140.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2018). The European Commission as a policy shaper – harder Soft Governance in the Energy Union. In M. W. Bauer, J. Ege, & S. Becker (Eds.), The European Commission in Turbulent Times (pp. 181–204). Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Stoiber, M. (2010). Comparative politics in the context of multilevel analysis. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 4(1), 79–102. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12286-009-0068-8
   Google Scholar
• Linsenmann, I., & Meyer, C. (2002). Dritter Weg, Übergang oder Teststrecke? Theoretische Konzeption und Praxis der offenen Politikkoordinierung [Third path, transition or test track? Theoretical concept and practice of the open method of coordination]. Integration (Tokyo, Japan), 4(25), 285–296.
   Google Scholar
• Liobikienė, G., & Butkus, M. (2017). The European Union possibilities to achieve targets of Europe 2020 and Paris agreement climate policy. Renewable Energy, 106, 298–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maltby, T. (2013). European Union Energy policy integration: A case of European commission policy entrepreneurship and increasing supranationalism. Energy Policy, 55, 435–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.12.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattocks, K. (2017). Co-ordinating co-ordination: The European Commission and the culture open method of co-ordination. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(2), 318–334. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung und politische Steuerung. Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2010). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse (11th ed.). Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (2019). Hard or soft governance? The EU’s climate and energy policy framework of 2030. Politics and Governance, 7(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S., & Gehring, T. (2006). Institutional interaction in global environmental governance – synergy and conflict among international and EU policies. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, A. & Pagotto, I. (2006). Soft Law as a new mode of governance: A legal perspective, February 28. NEWGOV: New Modes of Governance. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=1668531
   Google Scholar
• Puntscher-Riekmann (1998). Die kommissarische Neuordnung Europas: Das Dispositiv der integration, Wien: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Regulation (EU) 2018/1999. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union, amending Directive 94/22/EC, Directive 98/70/EC, Directive 2009/31/EC, Regulation (EC) No 663/2009, Regulation (EC) No 715/2009, Directive 2009/73/EC, Council Directive 2009/119/ EC, Directive 2010/31/EU, Directive 2012/27/EU, Directive 2013/30/EU and Council Directive (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018). The governance of the European Energy Union. Efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the Winter Package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2019). EU 2030 Energy Policies: A review of the clean energy package from a stakeholder perspective. ZfU, 4, published online first.
   Google Scholar
• Roederer-Rynning, C., & Greenwood, J. (2015). The culture of trilogues. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(8), 1148–1165. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2014.992934
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaefer, A. (2004). A new form of governance? Comparing the open method of coordination to multilateral surveillance by the IMF and the OECD. MPIfG Working Paper, 04/5.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1994). Games real actors could play. Positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6(1), 27–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0951692894006001002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, F. W. (1997). Games real actors play. Actor-centered institutionalism in policy research. Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schlacke, S., & Knodt, M. (2019). The governance system of the European Energy Union and climate action. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law, 16(4), 344–360. https://doi.org/10.1163/18760104-01604002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, G., & Kull, S. (2005). Die Europäische Beschäftigungsstrategie. Perspektiven der Offenen Methode der Koordinierung [The European employment strategy. Perspectives on the open method of coordination]. In H. Kaelble & G. Schmid (Eds.), Das europäische Sozialmodell. Auf dem Weg zum transnationalen Sozialstaat (pp. 317–343). Edition Sigma.
   Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gulberg, A. T., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the, Energy Union‘: Between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(5), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., & Westphal, K. (2014). The Cardinal Sins of the European Energy Policy: Nongovernance in an Uncertain Global Landscape. Global Policy, 5(s1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12153
   Google Scholar
• Terpan, F. (2015). Soft law in the European Union – the changing nature of EU Law. European Law Journal, 21(1), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. (2010). The career of the open method of coordination: Lessons from a ‘Soft’ EU instrument. West European Politics, 33(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2005). Hard and soft law in the construction of social Europe: The role of the open method of co-ordination. European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x
   Google Scholar
• Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2007). New governance and legal regulation: Complementarity, rivalry, and transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13, 540–564.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S. (2015). Embedding principles of good governance into the 2030 Climate & Energy Framework. https://www.foeeurope.org/sites/default/files/renewable_energy/2015/turner_2015-six_principles_of_good_governance.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Turner, S., Genard, Q., Roberts, J., & Luebbke, I. (2015). Four key messages for the governance of the European Climate and Energy Policies after 2030. https://www.e3g.org/docs/E3G_Four_Key_Messages_for_the_governance_of_EU_climate_and_energy_policies_after_2020_V2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Umpfenbach, K. (2015). Streamlining planning and reporting requirements in the EU Energy Union framework. http://ecologic.eu/sites/files/publication/ 2015/planning_reporting_ecologic_institute_final_20150908_2.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Van der Veer, R. A., & Haverland, M. (2017). Bread and butter or bread and games: The effect of politicisation on the issuing of country-specific recommendations in European Economic Governance. Paper prepared for the CES Conference Glasgow, 12–14 July 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Wettestadt, J., Eikeland, P. O., & Nilsson, M. (2012). EU climate and energy policy: A hesitant supranational turn. Global Environmental Politics, 12(2), 67–86. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00109
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar