Lessons about the ‘Harder’ elements of OMC governance for the EU energy Union

References

• Armstrong, K. (2010). Europeanization through policy coordination. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barcevicius, E., Weishaupt, T., & Zeitlin, J. (2014). Assessing the open method of coordination: Institutional design and national influence of EU social policy coordination. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Büchs, M. (2007). New governance in European social policy: The open method of coordination. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Büchs, M. (2008). The open method of co-ordination as a ‘two-level’ game. Policy & Politics, 36(1), 21–37. doi: 10.1332/030557308783431689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland, D., & Daly, M. (2018). The European Semester and social policy. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(5), 1001–1018. doi: 10.1111/jcms.12703
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M. (2008). Structural funds as a driver for institutional change in Poland. Europe-Asia Studies, 60(2), 227–248. doi: 10.1080/09668130701820101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dabrowski, M. (2014). EU cohesion policy, horizontal partnership and the patterns of sub-national governance: Insights from central and Eastern Europe’. European Urban and Regional Studies, 21(4), 364–383. doi: 10.1177/0969776413481983
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Da Graça Carvalho, M. (2012). EU energy and climate change strategy. Energy, 40(1), 19–22. doi: 10.1016/j.energy.2012.01.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Búrca, G. (1998). The principle of subsidiarity and the Court of Justice as an institutional actor. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 36(2), 217–235. doi: 10.1111/1468-5965.00107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dehousse, R. (2016). Why has EU macroeconomic governance become more supranational? Journal of European Integration, 38(5), 617–631. doi: 10.1080/07036337.2016.1180826
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C. (2011). Principal–agent theory and the open method of co-ordination: The case of the European employment strategy. Journal of European Public Policy, 18(4), 485–503. doi:10.1080/13501763.2011.560071
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., & Heins, E. (2015). A new era of European integration? Governance of labour market and social policy since the sovereign debt crisis. Comparative European Politics, 13(1), 8–28. doi: 10.1057/cep.2014.39
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., & Jacobsson, K. (2012). Social investment or re-commodification? Assessing the employment policies of the EU member states. In N. Morel, B. Palier, & J. Palme (Eds.), Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges (pp. 117–152). Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., & Natali, D. (2018). Agents of institutional change in EU policy: The social investment moment. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(6), 828–843. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1401110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., & Pochet, P. (2012). Why (and how) still study the OMC? Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 336–349. doi: 10.1177/0958928711433629
   Google Scholar
• Efstathiou, K., & Wolf, G. (2019). What drives national implementation of EU policy recommendations, Brueghel working paper, Issue 4, April 2019. Retrieved from http://bruegel.org/2019/04/what-drives-national-implementation-of-eu-policy-recommendations/ on 16 June 2019
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Contribution of the European Structural and Investment Funds to the 10 Commission priorities: Energy Union and Climate. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/commission/publications/contribution-european-structural-and-investment-funds-energy-union-climate_nl
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018a). More growth and jobs: € 500 million in EU funding available for clean energy infrastructure. [News item]. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/news/more-growth-and-jobs-eu500-million-eu-funding-available-clean-energy-infrastructure-2018-jun-11_en
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018b). The Energy Union gets simplified, robust and transparent governance. [EC Press Release]. Retrieved from http://europa.eu/rapid/press-release_IP-18-4229_en.htm
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018c). Report from the Commission on the development of childcare facilities for young children with a view to increase female labour participation, strike a work-life balance for working parents and bring about sustainable and inclusive growth in Europe. Retrieved from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX%3A52018DC0273
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, M., & Sacchi, S. (2005). The open method of co-ordination and national institutional capabilities.The Italian experience. In J. Zeitlin & P. Pochet (Eds.), The open method of coordination in action: The European employment and social inclusion strategies (pp. 137–172). Brussels: Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Guidi, M., & Guardiancich, I. (2018). Intergovernmental or supranational integration? A quantitative analysis of pension recommendations in the European Semester. European Union Politics, 19(4), 684–706. doi: 10.1177/1465116518781029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helm, D. (2014). The European framework for energy and climate policies. Energy Policy, 64, 29–35. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Interview Climate Action Network. (2018). Elite interview with official from the network, June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobsson, K., & Johansson, H. (2009). The Micro-Politics of the Open Method of coordination. In M. Heidenreich & J. Zeitlin (Eds.), Changing European employment and welfare Regimes: The influence of the Open Method of coordination on national reforms (pp. 173–191). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jessoula, M., & Madama, I. (2018). Fighting poverty and social exclusion in the EU: A chance in Europe 2020. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, J. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies. New York City, NY: Harper Collins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M. (2018). EU energy policy. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU (pp. 224–240). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., Ringel, M., & Müller, R. (2020, this issue). Variations of “harder” soft governance in European energy policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Schoenefeld, J. (2020, this issue). Harder soft governance in European climate and energy policy: Following a new trend? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. Forthcoming.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liobikienė, G., & Butkus, M. (2017). The European Union possibilities to achieve targets of Europe 2020 and Paris agreement climate policy. Renewable Energy, 106, 298–309. doi: 10.1016/j.renene.2017.01.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Santana, M. (2008). The domestic implications of European soft law: Framing and transmitting change in employment policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(4), 481–499. doi: 10.1080/13501760600693853
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López-Santana, M. (2009). Having a say and acting: Assessing the effectiveness of the European employment strategy as an intra-governmental coordinative instrument. European Integration Online Papers, 13. http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2009-015a.htm
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, C. (2011). The Lisbonization of EU cohesion policy: A successful case of experimentalist governance? European Planning Studies, 19(3), 519–537. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2011.548368
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintrom, M. (2019). So you want to be a policy entrepreneur? Policy Design and Practice, 2(4), 307–323. doi: 10.1080/25741292.2019.1675989
   Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (2019). Hard or soft governance? The EU’s climate and energy policy Framework for 2030. Politics and Governance, 7 (1), 17–27. doi: 10.17645/pag.v7i1.1796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, J., & Trubek, D. (2002). Mind the gap: Law and new approaches to governance in the European Union. European Law Journal, 8(1), 1–18. doi: 10.1111/1468-0386.00139
   Google Scholar
• Stiller, S. (2010). Ideational leadership in German welfare state reform: How politicians and policy ideas Transform Resilient institutions. Amsterdam University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stiller, S., & van Gerven, M. (2012). The European employment strategy and national core executives: Impacts on activation reforms in the Netherlands and Germany. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(2), 118–132. doi: 10.1177/0958928711433652
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuchlijk, A. (2017). European Semester: Assessing the 2017 priorities. European Parliamentary Research Service, 1–2. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/ATAG/2017/599261/EPRS_ATA(2017)599261_EN.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, F., Hemerijck, A., & Palier, B. (2011). The EU needs a social investment pact. OSE Opinion Paper No. 5.
   Google Scholar
• Verdun, A. (2015). A historical institutionalist explanation of the EU’s responses to the euro area financial crisis. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(2), 219–237. doi: 10.1080/13501763.2014.994023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschraegen, G., Vanhercke, B., & Verpoorten, R. (2011). The European social Fund and domestic activation policies: Europeanization mechanisms. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(1), 55–72. doi: 10.1177/0958928710385733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar