Towards harder soft governance? Monitoring climate policy in the EU

References

• Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E. (2014). The crucial role of policy surveillance in international climate policy. Climatic Change, 126(3-4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1238-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aldy, J. E. (2018). Policy surveillance: Its role in monitoring, reporting, evaluating and learning. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 210–227). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2019). Process tracing methods: Foundations and guidelines (2nd ed.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Best, E. (2007). Legislative procedures after Lisbon: Fewer, simpler, clearer? Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law, 15(1), 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1023263X0701500109
   Google Scholar
• Blomqvist, P. (2016). Soft and hard governing tools. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 267–278). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bodansky, D. (1993). The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change: A commentary. Yale Journal of International Law, 18, 451–558.
   Google Scholar
• Brandsen, T., Boogers, M., & Tops, P. (2006). Soft governance, hard consequences: The ambiguous status of unofficial guidelines. Public Administration Review, 66(4), 546–553. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00615.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brooks, E., Bocquillon, P., & Maltby, T. (2020). Speak softly and carry a big stick: Hardening soft governance in EU energy and health policies. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, C. (2016). The European Parliament and climate change: A constrained leader? In R. Wurzel, J. Connelly, & D. Liefferink (Eds.), The European Union in international climate change politics: Still taking a lead? (pp. 52–65). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Consolidated version of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union. (2012). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12012E/TXT&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Consolidated versions of the Treaty on European Union and of the Treaty establishing the European Community. (2002). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:12002E/TXT&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• Dahler-Larsen, P. (2011). Taking one’s own medicine? The self-evaluation of the Danish evaluation institute. In P. Eliadis, J. Furubo, & S. Jacob (Eds.), Evaluation: Seeking truth or power? (pp. 75–88). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• de la Porte, C., & Stiller, S. (2020). Lessons about the ‘harder’ elements of OMC governance for the EU Energy Union. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1785281 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ETC/ACC. (2012). Assessment of the Member States’ policies and measures submitted under the EU Monitoring Mechanism in 2011 (No. ETC/ACM Technical Paper 2011/19). European Topic Centre on Air Pollution and Climate Change Mitigation. http://acm.eionet.europa.eu/reports/docs/ETCACM_TP_2011_19_assessment_GHG_PAM.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Climate Law, 2020/0036 (COD). (2020). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52020PC0080&from=EN.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). State of the Energy Union 2015. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:ebdf266c-8eab-11e5-983e-01aa75ed71a1.0008.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2016). Impact assessment accompanying the document proposal for a regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the governance of the Energy Union (No. SWD(2016) 394 final). Brussels: European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017a). Second report on the state of the Energy Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/2nd-report-state-energy-union_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2017b). Third report on the state of the Energy Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/third-report-state-energy-union_en.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2019). Fourth report on the state of the Energy Union. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/sites/beta-political/files/fourth-report-state-of-energy-union-april2019_en_0.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2013). Synthesis of the data on GHG policies and measures reported by Member States under the Monitoring Mechanism Decision in 2013.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2015). Overview of reported national policies and measures on climate change mitigation in Europe in 2015: Information reported by Member States under the European Union Monitoring Mechanism Regulation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2016). Environment and climate policy evaluation.https://www.eea.europa.eu/publications/environment-and-climate-policy-evaluation/at_download/file.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2018a). EEA database on climate change mitigation policies and measures in Europe. http://pam.apps.eea.europa.eu
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2018b). National policies and measures on climate change mitigation in Europe in 2017: Technical overview of the information reported by Member States under the European Union’s climate Monitoring Mechanism Regulation. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• The European Green Deal, COM(2019) 640 final. (2019). https://eur-lex.europa.eu/resource.html?uri=cellar:b828d165-1c22-11ea-8c1f-01aa75ed71a1.0002.02/DOC_1&format=PDF.
   Google Scholar
• European Topic Centre on Climate Change Mitigation and Energy. (2019). Overview of reported national policies and measures on climate change mitigation in Europe in 2019. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Fransen, T., & Cronin, C. (2013). A critical decade for climate policy: Tools and initiatives to track our progress. http://www.wri.org/sites/default/files/pdf/critical_decade_for_climate_policy_tools_and_initiatives_to_track_our_progress.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Furubo, J., & Vestman, K. O. (2011). Evaluation: For public good or professional power? In P. Eliadis, J. Furubo, & S. Jacob (Eds.), Evaluation seeking truth or power? (pp. 1–35). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Graziano, P. R., & Halpern, C. (2016). EU governance in times of crisis: Inclusiveness and effectiveness beyond the ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law divide. Comparative European Politics, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2016). Disclosing or obscuring? The politics of transparency in global climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 82–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.11.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haigh, N. (2016). EU environmental policy: Its journey to centre stage. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Haug, C. C., & Jordan, A. (2010). Burden sharing: Distributing burdens or sharing efforts? In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, T. Rayner, & F. Berkhout (Eds.), Climate change policy in the European Union: Confronting the dilemmas of adaptation and mitigation? (pp. 83–103). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hildén, M., Jordan, A. J., & Rayner, T. (2014). Climate policy innovation: Developing an evaluation perspective. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 884–905. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.924205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvarinen, J. (1999). The European Community’s Monitoring Mechanism for CO2 and other greenhouse gases: The Kyoto Protocol and other recent developments. Review of European Community & International Environmental Law, 8(2), 191–197. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9388.00197 .
   Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H. C., Nohrstedt, D., Weible, C. M., & Sabatier, P. A. (2014). The advocacy coalition framework: Foundations, evolution, and ongoing research. In P. A. Sabatier & C. M. Weible (Eds.), Theories of the Policy Process (pp. 183–224). Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M. (2018). EU energy policy. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU (pp. 224–240). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2018). The European Commission as a policy shaper–harder soft governance in the Energy Union. In J. Ege, M. W. Bauer, & S. Becker (Eds.), The European Commission in turbulent times (pp. 181–206). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
   Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., Ringel, M., & Müller, R. (2020). ‘Harder’ soft governance in the European Energy Union. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1781604 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knodt, M., & Schoenefeld, J. J. (2020). Harder soft governance in European climate and energy policy: Following a new trend? Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehtonen, M. (2020). Harder governance built on soft foundations: Experience from OECD peer reviews. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martens, M. (2010). Voice or loyalty? The evolution of the European Environment Agency (EEA). Journal of Common Market Studies, 48(4), 881–901. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2010.02078.x .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oberthür, S. (2019). Hard or soft governance? The EU’s climate and energy policy framework for 2030. Politics and Governance, 7(1), 17–27. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v7i1.1796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD-DAC. (2002). Glossary of key terms in evaluation and results based management. Paris: DAC Network on Development Evaluation, OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Peters, A. (2011). Soft law as a new mode of governance. In U. Diedrichs, W. Reiners, & W. Wessels (Eds.), The dynamics of change in EU governance (pp. 21–51). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Radaelli, C. M. (2018). Halfway through the better regulation strategy of the Juncker Commission: What does the evidence say? Journal of Common Market Studies, 56(S1), 85–95. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.12768 .
   Google Scholar
• Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018). The governance of the European Energy Union: Efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the winter package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.047 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Henry, G. T. (2018). Evaluation: A systematic approach (8th ed.). London: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2020). Normative transformations in the European Union: On hardening and softening law. West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1762440 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schäfer, A. (2006). A new form of governance? Comparing the Open Method of Co-ordination to multilateral surveillance by the IMF and the OECD. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500380742 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. J. (2018). The challenges of monitoring national climate policy: Learning lessons from the EU. Climate Policy, 18(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248887
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J. J., & Jordan, A. J. (2019). Environmental policy evaluation in the EU: Between learning, accountability, and political opportunities? Environmental Politics, 28(2), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1549782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J. J., & Knodt, M. (2020). Softening the surface but hardening the core? Governing renewable energy in the EU. West European Politics. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2020.1761732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J. J., & Rayner, T. (2019). Monitoring energy policy. In M. Knodt & J. Kemmerzell (Eds.), Handbook of energy governance in Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_43-1 .
   Google Scholar
• Schoenefeld, J. J., Schulze, K., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. (2019). Policy monitoring in the EU: The impact of institutions, implementation and quality. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00209-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephenson, P., Schoenefeld, J. J., & Leeuw, F. L. (2019). The politicisation of evaluation: Constructing and contesting EU policy performance. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00212-7 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stüwe, K. (2013). Die Inszenierung des Neubeginns: Antrittsreden von Regierungschefs in den USA, Großbritannien, Frankreich und Deutschland. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Szulecki, K., Fischer, S., Gullberg, A. T., & Sartor, O. (2016). Shaping the ‘Energy Union’: Between national positions and governance innovation in EU energy and climate policy. Climate Policy, 16(5), 548–567. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2015.1135100 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tholoniat, L. (2010). The career of the Open Method of Coordination: Lessons from a ‘soft’ EU instrument. West European Politics, 33(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354122 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J. (2012). Environmental monitoring and enforcement in Europe: A review of empirical research. Environmental Policy and Governance, 22(6), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, J., De Francesco, F., & Leopold, L. (2020). Distinguishing policy surveillance from policy tracking: Transnational municipal networks in climate and energy governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1785280 .
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twena, M. (2012). Networked environmental governance in the European Union: Who participates and (how) do they learn? (Unpublished PhD). University of East Anglia. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/41973/.
   Google Scholar
• Wanta, W., Stephenson, M. A., Turk, J. V., & McCombs, M. E. (1989). How president’s state of union talk influenced news media agendas. Journalism Quarterly, 66(3), 537–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/107769908906600301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R. K. W., & Connelly, J. (2011). The European Union as a leader in international climate change politics. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Zoll, M. (2020). Energy governance in the Republic of Poland. In M. Knodt & J. Kemmerzell (Eds.), Handbook of energy governance in Europe. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_22-1 .
   Google Scholar