References
- Adelle, C., & Weiland, S. (2012). Policy assessment: The state of the art. Impact Assessment and Project Appraisal, 30(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/14615517.2012.663256
- Adelle, C., Weiland, S., Dick, J., González Olivo, D., Marquardt, J., Rots, G., Wübbeke, J., & Zasada, I. (2016). Regulatory impact assessment: A survey of selected developing and emerging economies. Public Money & Management, 36(2), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2016.1118930
- Bauknecht, D., Heinemann, C., Stronzik, M., & Schmitt, S. (2015). Austesten von regulatorischen Innovationen – das Instrument der Regulatorischen Innovationszone. Energiewirtschaftliche Tagesfragen, 65(7), 61–67.
- Baumgartner, F., & Jones, B. (2009). Agendas and instability in American politics. Chicago UP.
- Brand, U. (2016). “Transformation” as a new critical orthodoxy. The Strategic Use of the Term “Transformation” Does Not Prevent Multiple Crisis. GAIA, 25(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.25.1.7
- Busch, P-O, & Jörgens, H. (2005). International patterns of environmental policy change and convergence. European Environment, 15(2), 80–101. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.374
- Cairney, P. (2013). Standing on the shoulders of giants: How do we combine the insights of multiple theories in public policy studies? Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12000
- Chataway, J., Daniels, C., Kanger, L., Ramirez, M., Schot, J., & Steinmueller, E. (2017). Developing and enacting transformative innovation policy. A Comparative Study, 1–28. https://www.johanschot.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/Developing-and-enacting-Transformative-Innovation-Policy-A-Comparative-Study-FINAL-DRAFT.pdf
- Dimitropoulos, A., Oueslati, W., & Sintek, C. (2016). The rebound effect in road transport. A meta-analysis of empirical studies. OECD environment working papers.
- Emerson, K., & Baldwin, E. (2019). Effectiveness in NEPA decision making: In search of evidence and theory. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(4), 427–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2019.1615421
- Flanagan, K., Uyarra, E., & Laranja, M. (2011). Reconceptualising the ‘policy mix’ for innovation. Research Policy, 40(5), 702–713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.02.005
- Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
- Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. (2017).
- Grießhammer, R., & Brohmann, B. (2016). Wie Transformationen und gesellschaftliche Innovationen gelingen können. Transformationsstrategien und Models of Change für nachhaltigen gesellschaftlichen Wandel. Nomos.
- Hall, P. (1993). Policy paradigms, social learning, and the state: The case of economic policymaking in Britain. Comparative Politics, 25(3), 275–293. https://doi.org/10.2307/422246
- Heyen, D. A., Hermwille, L., & Wehnert, T. (2017). Out of the comfort zone! Governing the exnovation of unsustainable technologies and practices. GAIA – Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 26(4), 326–331. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.26.4.9
- Howlett, M. P., & Cuenca, J. S. (2017). The use of indicators in environmental policy appraisal: Lessons from the design and evolution of water security policy measures. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(2), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1207507
- Huttunen, S. (2015). Farming practices and experienced policy coherence in agri-environmental policies: The case of land clearing in Finland. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(5), 573–592. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003348
- ILO. (2020). List of green jobs assessments. https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/green-jobs/publications/assessments/lang—en/index.htm
- Jacob, K., Graaf, L., Wolff, F., & Heyen, D. A. (2020). Transformative Umweltpolitik: Ansätze zur Förderung gesellschaftlichen Wandels. Dessau UBA Texte.
- Jacob, K., Kannen, H., & Niestroy, I. (2015). An international comparison of sustainability strategies. In B. Stiftung (Ed.), Developing successful sustainability strategies: Strategies for a sustainable future in Germany, Europe and Worldwide. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
- Jacob, K., Weiland, S., Ferretti, J., Wascher, D., & Chodorowska, D. (2011). Integrating the environment in regulatory impact assessments. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://www.oecd.org/gov/regulatory-policy/Integrating20RIA20in20Decision20Making.pdf
- Jänicke, M., & Jacob, K. (2013). A third industrial revolution? In B. Siebenhüner, M. Arnold, K. Eisenack, & K. Jacob (Eds.), Long term governance for social ecological change (pp. 47–70).
- Jänicke, M., & Rennings, K. (2011). Ecosystem dynamics: The principle of co-evolution and success stories from climate policy. International Journal of Technology, Policy and Management, 11(3/4), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTPM.2011.042084
- John, B., Withycombe Keeler, L., Wiek, A., & Lang, D. L. (2015). How much sustainability substance is in urban visions? An analysis of visioning projects in urban planning. Cities, 48, 86–98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.001
- Kemp, R., & Pontoglio, S. (2011). The innovation effects of environmental policy instruments – A typical case of the blind men and the elephant? Ecological Economics, 72, 28–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.09.014
- Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agendas, alternatives and public policies (2nd ed.). Harper & Collins.
- Knaggård, Å. (2014). What do policy-makers do with scientific uncertainty? The incremental character of Swedish climate change policy-making. Policy Studies, 35(1), 22–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2013.804175
- Kondratieff, N. D. (1926). Die langen Wellen der Konjunktur. Archiv Für Sozialwissenschaften Und Sozialpolitik, 56, 573–609.
- Kostka, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (2013). Implementation and participation in China’s local environmental politics: Challenges and innovations. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.763629
- Kowarsch, M. (2016). A pragmatist orientation for the social Sciences in climate policy. How to make integrated economic assessments serve society. Springer.
- Lindberg, H. (2013). Knowledge and policy change (pp. 62–88). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
- Lindblom, C. E. (1959). The science of “muddling through”. Public Administration Review, 19(2), 79–88. https://doi.org/10.2307/973677
- Loorbach, D. (2010). Transition management for sustainable development: A prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 23(1), 161–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.2009.01471.x
- Maeße, J. (2013). Ökonomie, Diskurs, Regierung. Globale Politische Ökonomie, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-01294-6
- Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. W. (1995). Der Ansatz des akteurzentrierten Institutionalismus. Gesellschaftliche Selbstregelung Und Politische Steuerung, Schriften Des Max-Planck-Instituts Für Gesellschaftsforschung, 23, 39–72. https://doi.org/292
- Meadowcroft, J. (2007). Who is in charge here? Governance for sustainable development in a complex world*. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 9(3–4), 299–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080701631544
- Meadowcroft, J., & Steurer, R. (2018). Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: A contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 734–751. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.829750
- Mickwitz, P., Aix, F., Beck, S., Carss, D., Ferrand, N., Görg, C., Jensen, A., Kivimaa, P., Kuhlicke, C., Kuindersma, W., Máñez, M., Melanen, M., Monni, S., Pedersen, A. B., Reinert, H., & van Bommel, S. (2009). Climate policy integration, coherence and governance. PEER Report. Partnership for European Environmental Research. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/3987
- Pomeranz, E. F., & Decker, D. J. (2018). Designing regional-level stakeholder engagement processes: Striving for good governance while meeting the challenges of scale. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(4), 403–418. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1417119
- Pomeranz, E. F., & Stedman, R. C. (2020). Measuring good governance: Piloting an instrument for evaluating good governance principles. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 22(3), 428–440. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1753181
- Radaelli, C. M. (2009). Measuring policy learning: Regulatory impact assessment in Europe. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(8), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760903332647
- Renewable Energy Policy Network for the 21st Century (REN21). (2017). Renewables 2017 global status report.
- Rennings, K. (2014). Der mikro-ökonomische Rebound Effekt. Ergebnisse eines inter- und transdisziplinären Forschungsprojekts. Vortrag auf der Green Economy Konferenz des BMBF 18.11.2014. https://www.fona.de/mediathek/event/ge2014/beitrag/c1_rennings_klaus_01_presentation_ge2014.pdf
- Sachverständigenrat für Umweltfragen (SRU). (2016). Umweltgutachten 2016. Impulse für eine integrative Umweltpolitik. Hg. v. SRU. Online verfügbar unter https://www.umweltrat.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/01_Umweltgutachten/2016_Umweltgutachten_HD.html
- Schot, J., & Geel, F. W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: Theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 20(5), 537–554. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320802292651
- Schubert, U., & Sedlacek, S. (2005). The structure of environmental policy and environment-orientated technology policy signals for environment-orientated innovation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(4), 317–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500441111
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper & Brothers.
- Semmling, E., Peters, A., Marth, H., Kahlenborn, W., & de Haan, P. (2015). Rebound-Effekte: Ihre Bedeutung für die Umweltpolitik.
- United Nations Environment Programme. (2011). Towards a green economy: Pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication.
- United Nations Environment Programme. (2019a). Global environmental outlook GEO-6. Healthy planet, healthy people.
- United Nations Environment Programme. (2019b). Global environmental outlook GEO-6. Summary for policymakers.
- van der Heijden, J. (2015). What ‘works’ in environmental policy-design? Lessons from experiments in the Australian and Dutch building sectors. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(1), 44–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.886504
- WBGU (German Advisory Council on Global Change). (2012). World in transition. A social contract for sustainability.https://www.wbgu.de/fileadmin/user_upload/wbgu/publikationen/hauptgutachten/hg2011/pdf/wbgu_jg2011_en.pdf
- Welzer, H., & Leggewie, C. (2010). Cultural and societal requirements of the great transformations. Journal of Renewable and Sustainable Energy, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.1063/1.3384314
- Wiek, A., & Iwaniec, D. (2014). Quality criteria for visions and visioning in sustainability science. Sustainability Science, 9(4), 497–512. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-013-0208-6
- Wolff, F., Schönherr, N., & Heyen, D. A. (2017). Effects and success factors of sustainable consumption policy instruments: A comparative assessment across Europe. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(4), 457–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1254035
- Yin, H., & Powers, N. (2010). Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation? Energy Policy, 38(2), 1140–1149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2009.10.067