Visualization in environmental policy and planning: a systematic review and research agenda

References

• Al-Kodmany, K. (2001). Visualization tools and methods for participatory planning and design. Journal of Urban Technology, 8(2), 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/106307301316904772
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al-Kodmany, K. (2002). Visualization tools and methods in community planning: From freehand sketches to virtual reality. Journal of Planning Literature, 17(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1177/088541202762475946
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alshuwaikhat, H. M., & Nkwenti, D. I. (2002). Visualizing decisionmaking: Perspectives on collaborative and participative approach to sustainable urban planning and management. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 29(4), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1068/b12818
   Google Scholar
• An, K., & Powe, N. A. (2015). Enhancing ‘boundary work’ through the use of virtual reality: Exploring the potential within landscape and visual impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17(5), 673–690. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1012757
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, K., Angelstam, P., Axelsson, R., Elbakidze, M., & Tornblom, J. (2013). Connecting municipal and regional level planning: Analysis and visualization of sustainability indicators in Bergslagen, Sweden. European Planning Studies, 21(8), 1210–1234. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2012.722943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Axelsson, R., Angelstam, P., Degerman, E., Teitelbaum, S., Andersson, K., Elbakidze, M., & Drotz, M. K. (2013). Social and cultural sustainability: Criteria, indicators, verifier variables for measurement and maps for visualization to support planning. Ambio, 42(2, SI), 215–228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-012-0376-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baile, I., West, J., & Whitehead, I. (2011). Out of sight but not out of mind? Public perceptions of wave energy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 13(2), 139–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.573632
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balayannis, A. (2019). Routine exposures: Reimaging the visual politics of hazardous sites. GeoHumanities, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/2373566x.2019.1624189
   Google Scholar
• Bekkers, V., & Moody, R. (2014). Accountability and the framing power of visual technologies: How do visualized reconstructions of incidents influence public and political accountability discussions? The Information Society, 30(2), 144–158. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2013.873749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beratan, K. A. (2019). Improving problem definition and project planning in complex natural resource management problem situations using knowledge brokers and visual design principles. Ecology and Society, 24(2), https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10815-240231
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berger, J. (1972). John berger. Ways of Seeing, 50, 249–259. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&dopt=Citation&list_uids=19833147
   Google Scholar
• Berry, R., & Higgs, G. (2012). Gauging levels of public acceptance of the use of visualisation tools in promoting public participation; a case study of wind farm planning in South Wales, UK. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 55(2), 229–251. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2011.591925
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Billger, M., Thuvander, L., & Wastberg, B. S. (2017). In search of visualization challenges: The development and implementation of visualization tools for supporting dialogue in urban planning processes. Environment and Planning B-Urban Analytics and City Science, 44(6), 1012–1035. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265813516657341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bouattou, Z., Laurini, R., & Belbachir, H. (2017). Animated chorem-based summaries of geographic data streams from sensors in real time. Journal of Visual Languages and Computing, 41(October), 54–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvlc.2017.03.002
   Google Scholar
• Brunet, R. (1989). Les villes ‘europeennes’ (RECLUS). Rapport pour la Datar.
   Google Scholar
• Bryan, B. A. (2003). Physical environmental modeling, visualization and query for supporting landscape planning decisions. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(4), 237–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00059-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burch, S., Sheppard, S. R. J., Shaw, A., & Flanders, D. (2010). Planning for climate change in a flood-prone community: Municipal barriers to policy action and the use of visualizations as decision-support tools. Journal of Flood Risk Management, 3(2), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-318X.2010.01062.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlile, P. R. (2002). View of knowledge and boundaries : Boundary objects in new product development. Organization Science, 13(4), 442–455. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.4.442.2953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerku, A. (2019). Applied visual anthropology in the progressive era: The influence of Lewis Hine’s child labor photographs. Visual Anthropology, 32(3–4), 221–239. https://doi.org/10.1080/08949468.2019.1637670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chau, K. W., Anson, M., & Zhang, J. P. (2003). Implementation of visualization as planning and scheduling tool in construction. Building and Environment, 38(5), 713–719. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1323(02)00239-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clancy, K. A., & Clancy, B. (2016). Growing monstrous organisms: The construction of anti-GMO visual rhetoric through digital media. Critical Studies in Media Communication, 33(3), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1080/15295036.2016.1193670
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Club of Rome. (1972). The Limits to growth. A Potomac Associates Book.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, T. C. (2001). Whither scenic beauty? Visual landscape quality assessment in the 21st century. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 267–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00141-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, D., Diani, M., Doerr, N., Mattoni, A., & Teune, S. (2014). Visuals in social movements. In The Oxford handbook of social movements, March 2018 (pp. 1–13). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199678402.013.48
   Google Scholar
• DeSimone, J. C., Everling, S., & Heath, M. (2015). The antisaccade task: Visual distractors elicit a location-independent planning ‘cost.’ PLoS ONE, 10(4), e0122345. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0122345
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, N. (2017a). Bridging language barriers, bonding against immigrants: A visual case study of transnational network publics created by far-right activists in Europe. Discourse and Society, 28(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0957926516676689
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doerr, N. (2017b). How right-wing versus cosmopolitan political actors mobilize and translate images of immigrants in transnational contexts. Visual Communication, 16(3), 315–336. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357217702850
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dühr, S. (2004). The form, style, and use of cartographic visualisations in European spatial planning: Examples from England and Germany. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 36(11), 1961–1989. https://doi.org/10.1068/a35262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupont, L., Antrop, M., & Van Eetvelde, V. (2015). Does landscape related expertise influence the visual perception of landscape photographs? Implications for participatory landscape planning and management. Landscape and Urban Planning, 141, 68–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppler, M. J., & Platts, K. W. (2009). Visual strategizing. The systematic use of visualization in the strategic-planning process. Long Range Planning, 42(1), 42–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2008.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feng, W., Wenhua, L., & Xiangguan, G. (2019). The research on the construction of urban visual planning system based on the development of cultural tourism industry. Open House International, 44(3), 136–140.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filova, L., Vojar, J., Svobodova, K., & Sklenicka, P. (2015). The effect of landscape type and landscape elements on public visual preferences: Ways to use knowledge in the context of landscape planning. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 58(11), 2037–2055. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2014.973481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forester, J. (1989). Planning in the face of power. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frosh, P. (2001). The public eye and the citizen-voyeur: Photography as a performance of power. Social Semiotics, 11(1), 43–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330123316
   Google Scholar
• George Szekely. (2006). 30 years of planning an artist-teacher’s visual lesson plan books. Art Education, 59(3), 48–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2006.11651595
   Google Scholar
• Gill, L., Lange, E., Morgan, E., & Romano, D. (2013). An analysis of usage of different types of visualisation media within a collaborative planning workshop environment. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 40(4), 742–754. https://doi.org/10.1068/b38049
   Google Scholar
• Girling, C., Senbel, M., & Kellett, R. (2016). Effects of visualizations and information rich public engagement in planning for energy and emissions. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research, 33(2), 140–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaas, E., Ballantyne, A. G., Neset, T. S., & Linnér, B. O. (2017). Visualization for supporting individual climate change adaptation planning: Assessment of a web-based tool. Landscape and Urban Planning, 158, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.09.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gobster, P. H., Ribe, R. G., & Palmer, J. F. (2019). Themes and trends in visual assessment research: Introduction to the landscape and urban planning special collection on the visual assessment of landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 191(July), Article 103635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103635
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Northeastern Univrsity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Green, J. E. (2010). The eyes of the people: Democracy in an age of spectatorship. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guldi, J. (2017). A history of the participatory map. Public Culture, 29(1), 79–112. https://doi.org/10.1215/08992363-3644409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haara, A., Pykalainen, J., Tolvanen, A., & Kurttila, M. (2018). Use of interactive data visualization in multi-objective forest planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 210, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.01.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haggett, C. (2008). Over the sea and far away? A consideration of the planning, politics and public perception of offshore wind farms. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 10(3), 289–306. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080802242787
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, A., Trodd, N., Zhang, X., Fernando, T., & Watson, K. (2001). Learning through visual systems to enhance the urban planning process. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28(6), 833–845. https://doi.org/10.1068/b2747t
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayek, U. W. (2011). Which is the appropriate 3D visualization type for participatory landscape planning workshops? A portfolio of their effectiveness. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 38(5), 921–939. https://doi.org/10.1068/b36113
   Google Scholar
• Hemmersam, P., Martin, N., Westvang, E., Aspen, J., & Morrison, A. (2015). Exploring urban data visualization and public participation in planning. Journal of Urban Technology, 22(4), 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2015.1073898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendriks, C. M., Ercan, S. A., & Duus, S. (2017, June 28–30). A picture worth a thousand words? Visuals in public deliberation. 3rd International Conference on Public Policy (ICPP3), Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Huggins, T. J., & Peace, R. (2014). Visually planning sustainability research: A case study of interdisciplinary collaboration. Sustainability: The Journal of Record, 7(4), 209–218. https://doi.org/10.1089/SUS.2014.9781
   Google Scholar
• Jász, B. (2018). Mental map of the city: Elements of visual argumentation and creativity in modern city planning. Creativity Studies, 11(2), 284–293. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2018.6901
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J. S., Jesus Montero-Parejo, M., Garcia-Moruno, L., & Hernandez-Blanco, J. (2015). The visual evaluation of rural areas: A methodological approach for the spatial planning and color design of scattered second homes with an example in Hervas, Western Spain. Land Use Policy, 46, 330–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, N. F., Velásquez, N., Restrepo, N. J., Leahy, R., Gabriel, N., El Oud, S., Zheng, M., Manrique, P., & Wuchty, S. (2020). The online competition between pro- and anti-vaccination views.. Nature. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2281-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karlsson-Vinkhuyzen, S. I., Friberg, L., & Saccenti, E. (2016). Read all about it!? Public accountability, fragmented global climate governance and the media. Climate Policy, 3062(August), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1213695
   Google Scholar
• Kask, S., Kull, T., & Orru, K. (2018). The use of 3D visualization for sustainable tourism planning. Journal of Baltic Studies, 49(3), 371–385. https://doi.org/10.1080/01629778.2018.1455719
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, P. R., & Keller, M. M. (1993). Visual cues: Practical data visualization. IEEE ComputerSocietyPress.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, K. H., & Wilson, J. P. (2015). Planning and visualising 3D routes for indoor and outdoor spaces using CityEngine. Journal of Spatial Science, 60(1), 179–193. https://doi.org/10.1080/14498596.2014.911126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, A. (2016). Dat visualization: A handbook for data driven design. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Klerkx, L., van Bommel, S., Bos, B., Holster, H., Zwartkruis, J. V., & Aarts, N. (2012). Design process outputs as boundary objects in agricultural innovation projects: Functions and limitations. Agricultural Systems, 113, 39–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2012.07.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozaki, M & Hirate, K. (2016). Basic research for developing lighting planning chart of retail: Focusing on visual environmental index and lighting environmental factors. Journal of Environmental Engineering (Transactions of AIJ), 81(724), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.3130/aije.81.503
   Google Scholar
• Krassanakis, V., & Vassilopoulou, V. (2018). Introducing a data-driven approach towards the identification of grid cell size threshold (CST) for spatial data visualization: An application on marine spatial planning (MSP). Journal of Urban and Environmental Engineering, 12(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.4090/juee.2018.v12n1.003014
   Google Scholar
• Krause, A., & Bucy, E. P. (2018). Interpreting images of fracking: How visual frames and standing attitudes shape perceptions of environmental risk and economic benefit. Environmental Communication, 12(3), 322–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2017.1412996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krisp, J. M. (2010). Planning fire and rescue services by visualizing mobile phone density. Journal of Urban Technology, 17(1), 61–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630731003597330
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2003). George Lakoff and Mark Johnsen (2003) metaphors we live by. The University of Chicago Press. Noter om layout : Innholdsfortegnelse i Word : In Journal of Philosophy.
   Google Scholar
• Lakoff, G. (2010). Why it matters how we frame the environment. Environmental Communication, 4(1), 70–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/17524030903529749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lange, E., & Hehl-Lange, S. (2006). Integrating 3D visualisation in landscape design and environmental planning. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 15(3), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.15.3.15
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee-Miller, T., Marneweck, M., Santello, M., & Gordon, A. M. (2016). Visual cues of object properties differentially affect anticipatory planning of digit forces and placement. PLoS ONE, 11(4), e0154033. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0154033
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. L. (2012). More art than science: The sources and effects of stylistic variation in visualization for planning and design. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 39(3), 551–565. https://doi.org/10.1068/b37148
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, J. L., & Sheppard, S. R. J. (2006). Culture and communication: Can landscape visualization improve forest management consultation with indigenous communities? Landscape and Urban Planning, 77(3), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.04.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lovett, A., Appleton, K., Warren-Kretzschmar, B., & Von Haaren, C. (2015). Using 3D visualization methods in landscape planning: An evaluation of options and practical issues. Landscape and Urban Planning, 142, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.02.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maffei, L., Masullo, M., Pascale, A., Ruggiero, G., & Romero, V. P. (2016). Immersive virtual reality in community planning: Acoustic and visual congruence of simulated vs real world. Sustainable Cities and Society, 27, 338–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2016.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahony, M. (2015). Climate change and the geographies of objectivity: The case of the IPCC’s burning embers diagram. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 40(2), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon, R., Stauffacher, M., & Knutti, R. (2016). The scientific veneer of IPCC visuals. Climatic Change, 138(3–4), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1758-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2010). Innovation Ltd.: boundary work in deliberative governance in land use planning. Eburon.
   Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2017). Fracking the debate: Frame shifts and boundary work in Dutch decision making on shale gas. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.941462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metze, T. (2018). Visual framing for policy learning. In N. F. Dotti (Ed.), Knowledge, policymaking and learning for European cities and regions (pp. 165–180). Edward Elgar (New Horizons in regional science series ).
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, T. W. (2005). What do pictures want? The lives and loves of images. University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Natori, Y., Fukui, W., & Hikasa, M. (2005). Empowering nature conservation in Japanese rural areas: A planning strategy integrating visual and biological landscape perspectives. Landscape and Urban Planning, 70(3–4 SPEC. ISS), 315–324. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2003.10.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, R., Canessa, R., & Sharma, T. (2017). Visualizing our options for coastal places: Exploring realistic immersive geovisualizations as tools for inclusive approaches to coastal planning and management. Frontiers in Marine Science, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmars.2017.00290
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olfat, H., Jani, A., Shojaei, D., Darvill, A., Briffa, M., Rajabifard, A., & Badiee, F. (2019). Tackling the challenges of visualising digital cadastral plans: The Victorian cadastre experience. Land Use Policy, 83, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.01.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Onitsuka, K., Ninomiya, K., & Hoshino, S. (2018). Potential of 3D visualization for collaborative rural landscape planning with remote participants. Sustainability, 10(9), https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orenstein, D. E., Zimroni, H., & Eizenberg, E. (2015). The immersive visualization theater: A new tool for ecosystem assessment and landscape planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 54, 347–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oreskes, N., & Conway, E. M. (2010). Merchants of doubt. Bloomsburry Press.
   Google Scholar
• Paar, P. (2006). Landscape visualizations: Applications and requirements of 3D visualization software for environmental planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 30(6), 815–839. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2005.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paklone, I. (2011). Conceptualization of visual representation in urban planning. Limes, 4(2), 150–161. https://doi.org/10.3846/20290187.2011.631046
   Google Scholar
• Pearce, W., Niederer, S., Özkula, S. M., & Sánchez Querubín, N. (2019). The social media life of climate change: Platforms, publics, and future imaginaries. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 10(2), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. A. (2004). When scientists politicize science: Making sense of controversy over The Skeptical Environmentalist. Environmental Science and Policy, 7(5), 405–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pielke, R. (2007). The honest broker: Making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Radinsky, J., Milz, D., Zellner, M., Pudlock, K., Witek, C., Hoch, C., & Lyons, L. (2017). How planners and stakeholders learn with visualization tools: Using learning sciences methods to examine planning processes. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(7), 1296–1323. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2016.1221795
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, S. (2018). Assessing the visual landscape potential of coastal territories for spatial planning. A case study in the French Mediterranean. Land Use Policy, 72, 138–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L., & Asoro, R. L. (2012). Visual representations of genetic engineering and genetically modified organisms in the online media. Visual Communication Quarterly, 19(4), 232–245. https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2012.735585
   Google Scholar
• Rodriguez, L., & Dimitrova, D. V. (2011). The levels of visual framing. Journal of Visual Literacy, 30(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/23796529.2011.11674684
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, R. (2013). Digital methods. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roggema, R. (2016). Research by design: Proposition for a methodological approach. Urban Science, 1(1), 2. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci1010002
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2001). Visual methodologies. SAGE.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, G. (2007). Visual methodologies an introduction to the interpretation of visual materials. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Royse, K. R., Reeves, H. J., & Gibson, A. R. (2008). The modelling and visualization of digital geoscientific data as a communication aid to land-use planning in the urban environment: An example from the Thames Gateway. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 305(January), 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1144/SP305.10
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, B. D. (2011). Reading through a plan: A visual interpretation of what plans mean and how they innovate. Journal of the American Planning Association, 77(4), 309–327. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2011.616995
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter, J. D., Campbell, C., Journeay, M., & Sheppard, S. R. J. (2009). The digital workshop: Exploring the use of interactive and immersive visualisation tools in participatory planning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(6, SI), 2090–2101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, D. (2004). How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy, 7(5), 385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schellnhuber, H. J. (2010). Tragic triumph. Climatic Change, 100(1), 229–238. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-010-9838-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid, W. A. (2001). The emerging role of visual resource assessment and visualisation in landscape planning in Switzerland. Landscape and Urban Planning, 54(1–4), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00137-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, A. (2003). Assessing public perception of landscape: From practice to policy. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 5(2), 123–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908032000121193
   Google Scholar
• Servillo, L., & Schreurs, J. (2013). Pragmatism and research by design: Epistemological virtues and methodological challenges. International Planning Studies, 18(3–4), 358–371. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2013.837136
   Google Scholar
• Shanken, A. M. (2018). The visual culture of planning. Journal of Planning History, 17(4), 300–319. https://doi.org/10.1177/1538513218775122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, E. (1995). GIS and society: Towards a research agenda. Hy and Geographic Information Systems, 1995(22), 5–16. https://doi.org/10.1559/152304095782540555
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J. (2005). Landscape visualisation and climate change: The potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science and Policy, 8(6), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2005.08.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J. (2008). Local change climate visioning: A new process for community planning and outreach using visualization tools. Plan Canada, 8(1), 36–40.
   Google Scholar
• Sheppard, S. R. J., Shaw, A., Flanders, D., Burch, S., Wiek, A., Carmichael, J., Robinson, J., & Cohen, S. (2011). Future visioning of local climate change: A framework for community engagement and planning with scenarios and visualisation. Futures, 43(4, SI), 400–412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2011.01.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sizarta Sarshar, S. H. (2018). Visualizing risk related information for work orders through the planning process of maintenance activities. Safety Science, 2018(101), 144–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.09.001
   Google Scholar
• Sklenicka, P., & Zouhar, J. (2018). Predicting the visual impact of onshore wind farms via landscape indices: A method for objectivizing planning and decision processes. Applied Energy, 209(December 2017), 445–454. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.11.027
   Google Scholar
• Spiegel, S. J. (2019). Visual storytelling and socioenvironmental change: Images, photographic encounters, and knowledge construction in resource frontiers. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/24694452.2019.1613953
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Star, S. L., & Griesemer, J. R. (1989). Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology. Social Studies of Science, 19(3), 387–420. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631289019003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocchetti, M. (2014). Images and power in the digital age: The political role of digital visuality. Kome, 2(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.17646/KOME.2014.21
   Google Scholar
• Sui, K. (2019). Kun Sui, Hyung-Gi, Kim. 17.
   Google Scholar
• Torabi Moghadam, S., Coccolo, S., Mutani, G., Lombardi, P., Scartezzini, J. L., & Mauree, D. (2019). A new clustering and visualization method to evaluate urban heat energy planning scenarios. Cities, 88(December 2018), 19–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.12.007
   Google Scholar
• Tress, B., & Tress, G. (2003). Scenario visualisation for participatory landscape planning – a study from Denmark. Landscape and Urban Planning, 64(3), 161–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00219-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Stuiver, M., Klostermann, J., Harms, B., & Leeuwis, C. (2013). New roles of science in society: Different repertoires of knowledge brokering. Science and Public Policy, 40(3), 354–365. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scs114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tyrväinen, L., Gustavsson, R., Konijnendijk, C., & Ode, Å. (2006). Visualization and landscape laboratories in planning, design and management of urban woodlands. Forest Policy and Economics, 8(8), 811–823. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2004.12.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wardekker, A., & Lorenz, S. (2019). The visual framing of climate change impacts and adaptation in the IPCC assessment reports. Climatic Change, 156(1–2), 273–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-019-02522-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wissen, U., Schroth, O., Lange, E., & Schmid, W. A. (2008). Approaches to integrating indicators into 3D landscape visualisations and their benefits for participative planning situations. Journal of Environmental Management, 89(3), 184–196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.01.062
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, M. (2019). Multimodal communication: A social semiotic approach to text and image in print and digital media. In Multimodal communication: A social semiotic approach to text and image in print and digital media. doi: 10.1007/978-3-030-15428-8
   Google Scholar
• Wuebbles, D. J. (2012). Celebrating the ‘blue marble.’ Eos, Transactions American Geophysical Union, 93(49), 509–510. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012EO490001
   Google Scholar
• Zheng, Y., Lan, S., Chen, W. Y., Chen, X., Xu, X., Chen, Y., & Dong, J. (2019). Visual sensitivity versus ecological sensitivity: An application of GIS in urban forest park planning. Urban Forestry and Urban Greening, 41(March), 139–149. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2019.03.010
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Dao, T. H. D., Thill, J.-C., & Delmelle, E. (2015). Enhanced 3D visualization techniques in support of indoor location planning. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 50(3), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2014.10.003
   Google Scholar