2,654
Views
18
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Harder soft governance in European climate and energy policy: exploring a new trend in public policy

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 761-773 | Received 10 Aug 2020, Accepted 11 Sep 2020, Published online: 14 Oct 2020

References

  • Abbott, K. W., Keohane, R. O., Moravcsik, A., Slaughter, A., & Snidal, D. (2000). The concept of legalization. International Organization, 54(3), 401–419. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551271
  • Abbott, K. W., & Snidal, D. (2000). Hard and soft law in international governance. International Organization, 54(3), 421–456. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081800551280
  • Aldy, J. E. (2014). The crucial role of policy surveillance in international climate policy. Climatic Change, 126(3-4), 279–292. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-014-1238-5
  • Aldy, J. E. (2018). Policy surveillance: Its role in monitoring, reporting, evaluating and learning. In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? (pp. 210–227). Cambridge University Press.
  • Atkinson, A. B., Marlier, E., & Nolan, B. (2004). Indicators and targets for social inclusion in the European Union. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 42(1), 47–75. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0021-9886.2004.00476.x
  • Bauer, A., Feichtinger, J., & Steurer, R. (2012). The governance of climate change adaptation in 10 OECD countries: Challenges and approaches. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 14(3), 279–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2012.707406
  • Blomqvist, P. (2016). Soft and hard governing tools. In C. Ansell, & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance (pp. 267–278). Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Bocquillon, P., Brooks, E., & Maltby, T. (2020). Speak softly and carry a big stick: Hardening soft governance in EU energy and health policies. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792860
  • Borrás, S., & Jacobsson, K. (2004). The open method of co-ordination and new governance patterns in the EU. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 185–208. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000194395
  • Capano, G., & Howlett, M. (2020). The knowns and unknowns of policy instrument analysis: Policy tools and the current research agenda on policy mixes. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900568
  • Caviedes, A. (2004). The open method of co-ordination in immigration policy: A tool for prying open fortress Europe? Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 289–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000194449
  • Citi, M., & Rhodes, M. (2006). New modes of governance in the European Union: A critical survey and analysis. In K. E. Jørgensen, M. A. Pollack, & B. Rosamond (Eds.), Handbook of European Union Politics (pp. 463–482). SAGE.
  • Czempiel, E. O., & Rosenau, J. (1992). Governance without government: Order and change in world politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • De Francesco, F., Leopold, L., & Tosun, J. (2020). Distinguishing policy surveillance from policy tracking: Transnational municipal networks in climate and energy governance. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1785280
  • de la porte, C., & Nanz, P. (2004). The OMC–a deliberative-democratic mode of governance? The cases of employment and pensions. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000194430
  • de la Porte, C., & Stiller, S. (2020). Lessons about the ‘harder’ elements of OMC governance for the EU Energy Union. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1785281
  • Eckhard, S., & Jankauskas, V. (2019). International bureaucracies as strategic actors: How the better regulation reform strengthens the European Commission. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 681–699. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00189-3
  • Ellwein, T., & Hesse, J. J. (1994). Der überforderte Staat. Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  • Eshuis, J., & Van Woerkum, C. (2003). Trust and monitoring in governance processes: Lessons from landscape management by farmers in a Dutch municipality. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 5(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908032000171620
  • Falkner, G., Treib, O., Hartlapp, M., & Leiber, S. (Eds.). (2005). Complying with Europe: EU harmonisation and soft law in the member states. Cambridge University Press.
  • Goldthau, A., & Sitter, N. (2015). Soft power with a hard edge: EU policy tools and energy security. Review of International Political Economy, 22(5), 941–965. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2015.1008547
  • Graziano, P. R., & Halpern, C. (2016). EU governance in times of crisis: Inclusiveness and effectiveness beyond the ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ law divide. Comparative European Politics, 14(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1057/cep.2015.6
  • Hodson, D. (2004). Macroeconomic co-ordination in the Euro area: The scope and limits of the open method. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 231–248. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000194412
  • Howlett, M., & Rayner, J. (2007). Design principles for policy mixes: Cohesion and coherence in ‘new governance arrangements’. Policy and Society, 26(4), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1449-4035(07)70118-2
  • Jalbert, K., & Kinchy, A. J. (2016). Sense and influence: Environmental monitoring tools and the power of citizen science. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(3), 379–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1100985
  • Jordan, A., Wurzel, R. K., & Zito, A. (2005). The rise of ‘new’ policy instruments in comparative perspective: Has governance eclipsed government? Political Studies, 53(3), 477–496. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2005.00540.x
  • Kaiser, R., & Prange, H. (2004). Managing diversity in a system of multi-level governance: The open method of co-ordination in innovation policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 11(2), 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/1350176042000194421
  • Knodt, M. (2018). EU energy policy. In H. Heinelt & S. Münch (Eds.), Handbook of European policies: Interpretive approaches to the EU (pp. 224–240). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  • Knodt, M. (2019a). Multilevel coordination in EU energy policy: A new type of “harder” soft governance? In N. Behnke, J. Broschek, & J. Sonnicksen (Eds.), Configurations, dynamics and mechanisms of multilevel governance (pp. 173–191). Cham, Switzerland: Palgrave Macmillan/Springer Nature.
  • Knodt, M. (2019b). Steuerung der Energietransformation durch die EU. der moderne staat – Zeitschrift für Public Policy, Recht und Management, 12(2), 367–381. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v12i2.11
  • Knodt, M., & Ringel, M. (2018). The European Commission as a policy shaper–harder soft governance in the Energy Union. In J. Ege, M. W. Bauer, & S. Becker (Eds.), The European Commission in turbulent times (pp. 181–206). Baden-Baden: Nomos.
  • Knodt, M., Ringel, M., & Müller, R. (2020). ‘Harder’ soft governance in the European Energy Union. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1781604
  • Kohler-Koch, B., & Rittberger, B. (2006). Review article: The ‘governance turn’ in EU studies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 44(s1), 27–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5965.2006.00642.x
  • Kooiman, J. (2003). Governing as governance. London: Sage.
  • Lange, P., Driessen, P. P., Sauer, A., Bornemann, B., & Burger, P. (2013). Governing towards sustainability—conceptualizing modes of governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(3), 403–425. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.769414
  • Lehtonen, M. (2020). Harder governance built on soft foundations: Experience from OECD peer reviews. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1793746
  • Levi-Faur, D. (2012). Oxford handbook of governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • McAdam, D. (1996). Conceptual origins, current problems, future directions. In D. McAdam, J. D. McCarthy, & M. N. Zald (Eds.), Comparative perspectives on social movements: Political opportunities, mobilizing structures, and cultural framings (pp. 23–40). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Meadowcroft, J., & Steurer, R. (2013). Assessment practices in the policy and politics cycles: A contribution to reflexive governance for sustainable development? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(6), 734–751.
  • Mintrom, M., & Norman, P. (2009). Policy entrepreneurship and policy change. Policy Studies Journal, 37(4), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2009.00329.x
  • Oberthür, S. (2016). Where to go from Paris? The European Union in climate geopolitics. Global Affairs, 2(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2016.1166332
  • Oberthür, S., & Groen, L. (2020). Hardening and softening of multilateral climate governance towards the Paris Agreement . Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning. doi:10.1080/1523908X.2020.1832882
  • Oberthür, S., & Kelly, C. R. (2008). EU leadership in international climate policy: Achievements and challenges. The International Spectator, 43(3), 35–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/03932720802280594
  • Peters, A., & Pagotto, I. (2006). Soft law as a new mode of governance: A legal perspective. NEWGOV: New Modes of Governance. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1668531
  • Pierre, J. (2000). Introduction: Understanding governance. In J. Pierre (Ed.), Debating governance: Authority, steering, and democracy (pp. 1–10). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
  • Rhodes, R. A. W. (2007). Understanding governance: Ten years on. Organization Studies, 28(8), 1243–1264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607076586
  • Ringel, M., & Knodt, M. (2018). The governance of the European Energy Union: Efficiency, effectiveness and acceptance of the winter package 2016. Energy Policy, 112, 209–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.09.047
  • Saurugger, S., & Terpan, F. (2020). Normative transformations in the European Union: On hardening and softening law. West European Politics, 44(1), 1–20.
  • Schäfer, A. (2006). A new form of governance? Comparing the open method of co-ordination to multilateral surveillance by the IMF and the OECD. Journal of European Public Policy, 13(1), 70–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760500380742
  • Scharpf, F. W. (2002). The European social model. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(4), 645–670. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00392
  • Schmitter, P. C. (2002). Participation in governance arrangements: Is there any reason to expect it will achieve “Sustainable and Innovative Policies in a Multi-Level Context”? In J.R. Grote & B. Gbikpi (Eds.), Participatory Governance (pp. 51–69). Wiesbaden, Hessen, Germany: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
  • Schoenefeld, J. J., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. J. (2018). The challenges of monitoring national climate policy: Learning lessons from the EU. Climate Policy, 18(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2016.1248887
  • Schoenefeld, J. J., & Jordan, A. J. (2019). Environmental policy evaluation in the EU: Between learning, accountability, and political opportunities? Environmental Politics, 28(2), 365–384. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1549782
  • Schoenefeld, J. J., & Jordan, A. J. (2020). Towards harder soft governance? Monitoring climate policy in the EU. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2020.1792861
  • Schoenefeld, J. J., & Knodt, M. (2021). Softening the surface but hardening the core? Governing renewable energy in the EU. West European Politics, 44(1), 49–71.
  • Schoenefeld, J. J., & Rayner, T. (2019). Monitoring energy policy. In M. Knodt & J. Kemmerzell (Eds.), Handbook of energy governance in Europe. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73526-9_43-1
  • Schoenefeld, J. J., Schulze, K., Hildén, M., & Jordan, A. (2019). Policy monitoring in the EU: The impact of institutions, implementation and quality. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 719–741. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00209-2
  • Slominski, P. (2008). Taking hybridity of hard and soft forms of governance seriously: Concept, choice and interaction of legal instruments in the EU. Paper presented at the ECPR Standing Group on the European Union Pan-European Conference, Riga, 27-28 September 2008 .
  • Stephenson, P., Schoenefeld, J. J., & Leeuw, F. L. (2019). The politicization of evaluation: Constructing and contesting EU policy performance. Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 60(4), 663–679. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11615-019-00212-7
  • Terpan, F. (2015). Soft law in the European Union—the changing nature of EU law. European Law Journal, 21(1), 68–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12090
  • Tholoniat, L. (2010). The career of the open method of coordination: Lessons from a ‘soft’ EU instrument. West European Politics, 33(1), 93–117. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402380903354122
  • Trubek, D. M., Cottrell, M. P., & Nance, M. (2005). ‘Soft law,’ ‘hard law,’ and European integration: Toward a theory of hybridity (University of Wisconsin Legal Studies Research Paper, No. 1002). https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=855447
  • Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2005). Hard and soft law in the construction of social Europe: The role of the open method of co-ordination. European Law Journal, 11(3), 343–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0386.2005.00263.x
  • Trubek, D. M., & Trubek, L. G. (2007). New governance and legal regulation: Complementarity, rivalry, and transformation. Columbia Journal of European Law, 13(3), 539–564.
  • Twena, M. (2012). Networked environmental governance in the European Union: Who participates and (how) do they learn? [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of East Anglia. https://ueaeprints.uea.ac.uk/41973/
  • Van Der Veer, R. A., & Haverland, M. (2018). Bread and butter or bread and circuses? Politicisation and the European Commission in the European Semester. European Union Politics, 19(3), 524–545. https://doi.org/10.1177/1465116518769753
  • Verdun, A., & Zeitlin, J. (2018). Introduction: The European Semester as a new architecture of EU socioeconomic governance in theory and practice. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363807
  • Wallace, H. (2001). The changing politics of the EU: An overview. Journal of Common Market Studies, 39(4), 581–594. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5965.00322
  • Zeitlin, J., Pochet, P., & Magnusson, L. (Eds.). (2005). The open method of coordination in action: The European employment and social inclusion strategies. Brussels: Peter Lang.
  • Zeitlin, J., & Vanhercke, B. (2018). Socializing the European semester: EU social and economic policy co-ordination in crisis and beyond. Journal of European Public Policy, 25(2), 149–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2017.1363269

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.