Understanding China’s transition to environmental information transparency: citizens’ protest attitudes and choice behaviours

References

• Altayar, M. S. (2018). Motivations for open data adoption: An institutional theory perspective. Government Information Quarterly, 35(4), 633–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2018.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, K., Ioris, A. A. R., Macleod, C. J. A., Han, X., Sripada, S. G., Braga, J. R. Z., & van der Wal, R. (2016). Environmental communication in the information age: Institutional barriers and opportunities in the provision of river data to the general public. Environmental Science & Policy, 55, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.08.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, R., Blumberg, S. J., Brick, J. M., Couper, M. P., Courtright, M., Dennie, J. M., Dillman, D., Frankel, M. R., Garland, P., Groves, R. M., Kennedy, C., Krosnick, J., Lavrakas, P. J., Lee, S., Link, M., Piekarski, L., Rao, K., Tomas, R. K., & Zahs, D. (2010). Research synthesis: AAPOR report on online panels. Public Opinion Quarterly, 74(4), 711–781. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfq048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrio, M., & Loureiro, M. L. (2018). Evaluating management options for a Marine and Terrestrial National Park: Heterogeneous preferences in choice experiments. Marine Policy, 95, 85–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.06.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrowclough, M. J., & Alwang, J. (2018). Conservation agriculture in Ecuador’s highlands: A discrete choice experiment. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 20(6), 2681–2705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-017-0011-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, N. B., Becker, R. A., Erraguntla, N., Farland, W. H., Gran, R. L., Gray, G., Kirman, C., LaKind, J. S., Lewis, R. J., Nance, P., Pottenger, L. H., Santos, S. L., Shirley, S., Simon, T., & Dourson, M. L. (2016). Approaches for describing and communicating overall uncertainty in toxicity charaterizations: U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS) as a case study. Environment International, 89-90, 110–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.12.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birol, E., & Bennett, J. (2010). Choice experiments in developing countries: Implementation, challenges and policy implications. Edward Elgar, 321 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bonnichsen, O., & Ladenburg, J. (2009). Using an Ex-ante Entreaty to reduce protest zero bias in stated preference surveys – a health economic case. Journal of Choice Modelling, 2(2), 200–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70010-1
   Google Scholar
• Börger, T. (2016). Are fast responses more random? Testing the effect of response time on scale in an online choice experiment. Environmental and Resource Economics, 65(2), 389–413. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9905-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börger, T., & Hattam, C. (2017). Motivations matter: Behavioural determinants of preferences for remote and unfamiliar environmental goods. Ecological Economics, 131, 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boxall, P. C., & Adamowicz, W. L. (2002). Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach. Environmental and Resource Economics, 23(4), 421–446. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021351721619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brouwer, R., Bliem, M., Getzner, M., Kerekes, S., Milton, S., Palarie, T., Szerényi, Z., Vadineanu, A., & Wagtendonk, A. (2016). Valuation and transferability of the non-market benefits of river restoration in the Danube river basin using a choice experiment. Ecological Engineering, 87, 20–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, W., Li, Y., Shen, Y., Wang, C., Wang, P., Wanf, L., Niu, L., & Zhang, W. (2019). Vertical distribution and assemblages of microbial communities and their potential effects on sulfur metabolism in a black-odor urban river. Journal of Environmental Management, 235, 368–376. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.01.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlo Bertot, J., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2012). Promoting transparency and accountability through ICTs, social media, and collaborative e-government. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 6(1), 78–91. https://doi-org/10.1108/17506161211214831
   Google Scholar
• Carson, R. T., & Czajkowski, M. (2014). The discrete choice experiment approach to environmental contingent valuation. In S. Hess, & A. Daly (Eds.), Handbook of choice modelling (pp. 202–235). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Che, Y., Li, W., Shang, Z., Liu, C., & Yang, K. (2014). Residential preferences for river Network improvement: An exploration of choice Experiments in Zhujiajiao, Shanghai, China. Environmental Management, 54(3), 517–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-014-0323-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y. (2017). Environmental externalities of urban river pollution and restoration: A hedonic analysis in Guangzhou (China). Landscape and Urban Planning, 157, 170–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2016.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., & Cho, F. (2019). Environmental information disclosure and societal preferences for urban river restoration: Latent class modelling of a discrete-choice experiment. Journal of Cleaner Production, 231, 1294–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., & Hua, J. (2015). Citizens’ distrust of government and their protest responses in a contingent valuation study of urban heritage trees in Guangzhou, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 155, 40–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.03.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., Hua, J., Liekens, I., & Broekx, S. (2018). Preference heterogeneity and scale heterogeneity in urban river restoration: A comparative study between Brussels and Guangzhou using discrete choice experiments. Landscape and Urban Planning, 173, 9–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.01.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, W. Y., Liekens, I., & Broekx, S. (2017). Identifying societal preferences for river restoration in a densely populated urban environment: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in central Brussels. Environmental Management, 60(2), 263–279. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0885-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cook, F. L., Jacobs, L. R., & Kim, D. (2010). Trusting what you know: Information, knowledge, and confidence in social security. The Journal of Politics, 72(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunha-e-Sá, M. A., Madureira, L., Nunes, L. C., & Otrachshenko, V. (2012). Protesting and justifying: A latent class model for contingent valuation with attitudinal data. Environmental and Resource Economics, 52(4), 531–548. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-011-9541-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., Hanley, N., & Nyborg, K. (2017). Social norms, moral and self-interest as determinants of pro-environment behaviours: The case of household recycling. Environmental and Resource Economics, 66(4), 647–670. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-015-9964-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czajkowski, M., Vossler, C. A., Budziński, W., Wiśniewska, A., & Zawojska, E. (2017). Addressing empirical challenges related to the incentive compatibility of stated preferences methods. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 142, 47–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2017.07.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dai, Y. (2019). Policy instrument designed to gain transition legitimacy: A case of Chinese nuclear development. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 30, 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly, A., Hess, S., Patruni, B., Potoglou, D., & Rohr, C. (2012). Using ordered attitudinal indicators in a latern variable choice model: A study of the impact of security on rail travel behaviour. Transportation, 39(2), 267–297. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9351-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Valck, J., Vlaeminck, P., Broekx, S., Liekens, I., Aertsens, J., Chen, W., & Vranken, L. (2014). Benefits of clearing forest plantations to restore nature? Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Flanders, Belgium. Landscape and Urban Planning, 125, 65–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.02.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enserink, B., & Koppenjan, J. (2007). Public participation in China: Sustainable urbanization and governance. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 18(4), 459–474. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777830710753848
   Google Scholar
• Florini, A. (2007). Introduction: The battle over transparency. In A. Florini (Ed.), The right to know: Transparency for an open world (pp. 1–16). Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fox, J. (2007). The uncertain relationship between transparency and accountability. Development in Practice, 17(4-5), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.1080/09614520701469955
   Google Scholar
• Frantzeskaki, N., & Rok, A. (2018). Co-producing urban sustainability transitions knowledge with community, policy and science. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 29, 47–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A., Graham, M., & Weil, D. (2007). Full disclosure: The Perils and promise of transparency. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Galera, A. N., de los Ríos Berjillos, A., Lozano, M. R., & Valencia, P. T. (2014). Transparency of sustainability information in local governments: English-speaking and Nordic cross-country analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 495–504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goff, S. H., Waring, T. M., & Noblet, C. L. (2017). Does pricing nature reduce monetary support for conservation: Evidence from donation behaviour in an online experiment. Ecological Economics, 141, 119–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.05.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481–510. https://doi.org/10.1086/228311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grilli, G., & Notaro, S. (2019). Exploring the influence of an extended theory of planned behaviour on preferences and willingness to pay for participatory natural resources management. Journal of Environmental Management, 232, 902–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.11.103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grimmelikhuijsen, S., Porumbescu, G., Hong, B., & Im, T. (2013). The effect of transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 575–586. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, A., & Mason, M. (2014). Transparency and international environmental politics. In M. Betsill, K. Hochstetler, & D. Stevis (Eds.), Advances in international environmental politics (pp. 356–380). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Haklay, M. (2017). The three eras of environmental information: The roles of experts and the public. In V. Loreto, M. Haklay, A. Hotho, V. D. P. Servedio, G. Stumme, J. Theunis, & F. Tria (Eds.), Participatory sensing, opinions and collective awareness (pp. 163–179). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Hardin, R. (1993). The street-level epistemology of trust. Politics & Society, 21(4), 505–529. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032329293021004006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilton, I. (2013). The return of Chinese civil society. In S. Geall (Ed.), China and the environment: The green revolution (pp. 1–14). Zed Books.
   Google Scholar
• Hoyos, D. (2010). The state of the art of environmental valuation with discrete choice experiments. Ecological Economics, 69(8), 1595–1603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.04.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoyos, D., Mariel, P., & Hess, S. (2015). Incorporating environmental attitudes in discrete choice models: An exploration of the utility of the awareness of consequences scale. Science of the Total Environment, 505, 1100–1111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.10.066
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, R., & Chen, D. (2015). Does environmental information disclosure benefit waste discharge reduction? Evidence from China. Journal of Business Ethics, 129(3), 535–552. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-014-2173-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPE (Institute of Public and Environmental Affairs), and NRDC (Natural Resources Defense Council). (2017). Moving towards normalization: 2017-2018 annual assessment of environmental transparency index (PITI) for 120 cities. 32 p.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, S. C., & Matti, S. (2010). Ecological citizens: Identifying values and beliefs that support individual environmental responsibility among Swedes. Sustainability, 2(4), 1055–1079. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2041055
   Google Scholar
• Johnson, T. (2015). Environmental information disclosure and civil society innovation. In A. Fulda (Ed.), Civil society contributions to policy innovation in the PR China (pp. 77–102). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Khan, I., & Zhao, M. (2019). Water resource management and public preferences for water ecosystem services: A choice experiment approach for inland river basin management. Science of the Total Environment, 646, 821–831. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.07.339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostka, G., & Mol, A. P. J. (2013). Implementation and participation in China’s local environmental politics: Challenges and innovations. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 15(1), 3–16. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.763629
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, L. (2013). The EU, access to environmental information and the open society. ERA Forum, 14(4), 463–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-013-0319-7
   Google Scholar
• Lanz, B., & Provins, A. (2015). Using discrete choice experiments to regulate the provision of water services: Do status quo choices reflect preferences? Journal of Regulatory Economics, 47(3), 300–324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-015-9272-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W. (2011). Self-motivated versus forced disclosure of environmental information in China a comparative case study of the pilot disclosure programmes. The China Quarterly, 206, 331–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305741011000294
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., & de Jong, M. (2017). Citizen participation in China’s eco-city development: Will ‘new-type urbanization’ generate a breakthrough in realizing it? Journal of Cleaner Production, 162, 1085–1094. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.06.121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, W., Liu, J., & Li, D. (2012). Getting their voices heard: Three cases of public participation in environmental protection in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 98, 65–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2011.12.019
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X., & Tilt, B. (2019). Public engagements with smog in urban China: Knowledge, trust, and action. Environmental Science and Policy, 92, 220–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2018.12.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, F., Xiong, B., & Xu, B. (2008). Improving public access to environmental information in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 88(4), 1649–1656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2007.08.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, J., Wang, J., Xiao, T., Bao, Z., Lippold, H., Luo, X., Yin, M., Ren, J., Chen, Y., & Linghu, W. (2018). Geochemical dispersal of thallium and accompanying metals in sediment profiles from a smelter-impacted area in south China. Applied Geochemistry, 88, 239–246. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeochem.2017.05.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louviere, J. (2001). Choice experiments: An overview of concept and issues. In J. Bennet, & R. Blame (Eds.), The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation (pp. 13–36). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Luthe, T., & Schläpfer, F. (2011). Effects of third-party information on the demand for more sustainable consumption: A choice experiment on the transition of winter tourism. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 1(2), 234–254. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.10.002
   Google Scholar
• Mariel, P., Hoyos, D., Artabe, A., & Guevara, C. A. (2018). A multiple indicator solution approach to endogeneity in discrete-choice models for environmental valuation. Science of the Total Environment, 633, 967–980. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.03.254
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mariel, P., Meyerhoff, J., & Hess, S. (2015). Heterogeneous preferences toward landscape externalities of wind turbines-combining choices and attitudes in a hybrid model. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 41, 647–657. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.074
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, D. (1974). Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In P. Zarembka (Ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics (pp. 105–142). Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., & Liebe, U. (2008). Do protest responses to a contingent valuation question and a choice experiment differ? Environmental and Resource Economics, 39(4), 433–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-007-9134-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerhoff, J., & Liebe, U. (2009). Status quo effect in choice experiments: Empirical evidence on attitudes and choice task complexity. Land Economics, 85(3), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.3368/le.85.3.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S., Tait, P., & Saunders, C. (2015). Estimating indigenous cultural values of freshwater: A choice experiment approach to Māori values in New Zealand. Ecological Economics, 118, 207–214. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2015.07.031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Ministry of Environmental Protection. (2008). Measures on open environmental information. http://www.epa.gov/ogc/china/open_environmental.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Environmental Protection of the People’s Republic of China. (2017). Press conference records of ministry of environmental protection, the People’s Republic of China. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2006). Environmental governance in the information age: The emergence of information governance. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 24(4), 497–514. https://doi.org/10.1068/c0508j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2009). Environmental governance through information: China and Vietnam. Singapore Journal of Tropical Geography, 30(1), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9493.2008.00358.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2014). The lost innocence of transparency in environmental politics. In A. Gupta, & M. Mason (Eds.), Transparency in global environmental governance: Critical perspectives (pp. 39–59). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Muthusamy, S. K., & White, M. A. (2005). Learning and knowledge transfer in strategic alliances: A social exchange view. Organization Studies, 26(3), 415–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840605050874
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pakalniete, K., Aigars, J., Czajkowski, M., Strake, S., Zawojska, E., & Hanley, N. (2017). Understanding the distribution of economic benefits from improving costal and marine ecosystems. Science of the Total Environment, 584-585: 29–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedersen, L. B., Kjær, T., Kragstrup, J., & Gyrd-Hansen, D. (2011). Does the inclusion of a cost attribute in forced and unforced choices matter? Results from a web survey applying the discrete choice experiment. Journal of Choice Modelling, 4(3), 88–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1755-5345(13)70044-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, R. G., Covello, V. T., & McCallum, D. B. (1997). The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: An empirical study. Risk Analysis, 17(1), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1997.tb00842.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petts, J. (1999). Public participation and environmental impact assessment. In J. Petts (Ed.), Handbook of environmental impact assessment (pp. 145–177). Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Piyapong, J., Thidarat, B., Jaruwan, C., Siriphan, N., & Passanan, A. (2019). Enhancing citizens’ sense of personal responsibility and risk perception for promoting public participation in sustainable groundwater resource management in Rayong Groundwater Basin, Thailand. Groundwater for Sustainable Development, 9, 100252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gsd.2019.100252
   Google Scholar
• Qin, T., & Wang, H. (2012). Environmental e-governance in China: Insights from government-citizen interaction. In P. Martin, Z. Li, T. Qin, A. du Plessis, & Y. Le Bouthillier (Eds.), Environmental governance and sustainability (pp. 148–170). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Rabe, S.-E., Gantenbein, R., Richter, K.-F., & Grêt-Regamey, A. (2018). Increasing the credibility of expert-based models with preference surveys-mapping recreation in the riverine zone. Ecosystem Services, 31, 308–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.12.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rakotonarivo, O. S., Schaafsma, M., & Hockley, N. (2016). A systematic review of the reliability and validity of discrete choice experiments in valuing non-market environmental goods. Journal of Environmental Management, 183, 98–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.08.032
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roe, B., Levy, A. S., & Derby, B. M. (1999). The impact of health claims on consumer search and product evaluation outcomes: Results from FDA experimental data. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 18(1), 89–105. https://doi.org/10.1177/074391569901800110
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarpa, R., & Rose, J. M. (2008). Design efficiency for non-market valuation with choice modelling: How to measure it, what to report and why*. Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 52(3), 253–282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8489.2007.00436.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlæger, J., & Zhou, J. (2019). Digital environmental monitoring in urban China. In J. Delman, Y. Ren, O. Luova, A. Burell, & O. Almén (Eds.), Greening China’s urban governance. Tackling environmental and sustainability challenges (pp. 131–149). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Seligsohn, D., Liu, M., & Zhang, B. (2018). The sound of one hand clapping: Transparency without accountability. Environmental Politics, 27(50), 804–829. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2018.1452522
   Google Scholar
• Sever, I., & Verbič, M. (2018). Providing information to respondents in complex choice studies: A survey on recreational trail p-preferences in an urban nature park. Landscape and Urban Planning, 169, 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2017.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, M., Gao, M., Wang, P., Xie, K., & Zhang, H. (2014). Multivariate assessment of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in surface sediments of the Beijiang, a tributary of the Pearl River in southern China. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment, 186(2), 907–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10661-013-3423-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song, C., Liu, X., Song, Y., Liu, R., Gao, H., Han, L., & Peng, J. (2017). Key blackening and stinking pollutants in Dongsha River of Beijing: spatial distribution and source identification. Journal of Environmental Management, 200, 335–346. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.05.088
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan, M. (2002). Environmental information disclosure programs: They work, but why? Social Science Quarterly, 83(1), 190–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.00078
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Su, Z., Ye, Y., & Wang, P. (2019). Social change and generalized anomie: Why economic development has reduced social trust in China. International Sociology, 34(1), 58–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580918812281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sun, W., & Wang, X. (2012). Do government actions affect social trust? Cross-city evidence in China. The Social Science Journal, 49(4), 447–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soscij.2012.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, Y. (2014). Transparency without democracy: The unexpected effects of China’s environmental disclosure policy. Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions, 27(1), 37–62. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tian, X.-L., Guo, Q.-G., Han, C., & Ahmad, N. (2016). Different extent of environmental information disclosure across Chinese cities: Contributing factors and correlation with local pollution. Global Environmental Change, 39, 244–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2016.05.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tilt, B., & Xiao, Q. (2010). Media coverage of environmental pollution in the People’s Republic of China: Responsibility, cover-up and state control. Media, Culture & Society, 32(2), 225–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443709355608
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tu, Z., Hu, T., & Shen, R. (2019). Evaluating public participation impact on environmental protection and ecological efficiency in China: Evidence from PITI disclosure. China Economic Review, 55, 111–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2019.03.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, L. (2013). Research on the environmental information disclosure system in sudden environmental pollution incidents: Taking Zijin Mining pollution incident as an example. In X. Li, & J. Pan (Eds.), China green development index report 2011 (pp. 449–459). Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, P., Liu, Q., & Qi, Y. (2014). Factors influencing sustainable consumption behaviors: A survey of the rural residents in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 63, 152–165. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcoxon, F. (1945). Individual comparisons by ranking methods. Biometrics Bulletin, 1(6), 80–83. https://doi.org/10.2307/3001968
   Google Scholar
• Xue, M., Shen, H., & Zhao, J. (2018). Risk factors influencing environmental protest severity in China. International Journal of Conflict Management, 29(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCMA-06-2017-0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang, G., & Calhoun, C. (2007). Media, civil society, and the rise of a green public sphere in China. China Information, 21(2), 211–236. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X07079644
   Google Scholar
• Yoo, J., & Ready, R. C. (2014). Preference heterogeneity for renewable energy technology. Energy Economics, 42, 101–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2013.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zawojska, E., Bartczak, B., & Czajkowski, M. (2019). Disentangling the effects of policy and payment consequentiality and risk attitudes on stated preferences. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 93, 63–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2018.11.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeng, F. (2018). The impact of social capital and media use on the political participation of urban residents. East Asia, 35(1), 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12140-018-9284-7
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, B., Cao, C., Hughes, R. M., & Davis, W. S. (2017). China’s new environmental protection regulatory regime: Effects and gaps. Journal of Environmental Management, 187, 464–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., Mol, A. P. J., & He, G. (2016). Transparency and information disclosure in China’s environmental governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 18, 17–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2015.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhen, G., Li, Y., Tong, Y., Yang, L., Zhu, Y., & Zhang, W. (2016). Temporal variation and regional transfer of heavy metals in the Pearl (Zhujiang) River, China. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 23(9), 8410–8420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-6077-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhong, Y. (2018). Political culture and participation in urban China. Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, S., Luo, Y., Hu, J., Liu, H., He, Z., & Lian, Z. (2015). Heavy metal pollution survey and evaluation of Beijiang River in Shaoguan. Journal of Anhui Agricultural Science, 43(3), 277–279.
   Google Scholar