Exploring city climate leadership in theory and practice: responding to the polycentric challenge

References

• Acuto, M., & Leffel, B. Understanding the global ecosystem of city networks. Urban Studies, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acuto, M., & Rayner, S. (2016). City networks: Breaking gridlocks or forging (new) lock-ins? International Affairs, 92(5), 1147–1166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12700
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, M. H., & Sun, P. Y. T. (2017). Reviewing leadership styles: Overlaps and the need for a new ‘full-range’ theory. International Journal of Management Reviews, 19(1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anguelovksi, I., & Carmin, J. (2011). Something borrowed, everything new: Innovation and institutionalization in urban climate governance. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 3(3), 169–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, A., & Gash, A. (2007). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. JPART, 18, 543–571.
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2018). Collaborative platforms as a governance strategy. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(1), 16–32. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mux030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Torfing, J. (2016). Introduction: Theories of governance. In C. Ansell & J. Torfing (Eds.), Handbook on theories of governance. Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Antonakis, J., & House, R. (2014). Instrumental leadership: Measurement and extension of transformational–transactional leadership theory. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(4), 746–771. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., Kuyper, J. W., Linnér, B., & Lövbrand, E. (2017). Non-state actors in global climate governance: From Copenhagen to Paris and beyond. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 561–579. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1327485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bass, B. M. (1998). Transformational leadership: Industry, military, and educational impact. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein, S., & Hoffmann, M. (2018). The politics of decarbonization and the catalytic impact of subnational climate experiments. Policy Sciences, 51(2), 189–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-018-9314-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brechin, S. (2016). Climate change mitigation and the collective action problem: Exploring country differences in greenhouse gas contributions. Sociological Forum, 31(S1),
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bryant, S. E. (2003). The role of transformational and transactional leadership in creating, sharing and exploiting organizational knowledge. The Journal of Leadership and Organizational Studies, 9(4), 32–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/107179190300900403
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H. (2013). Cities and climate change. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Castán Broto, V. (2013). Government by experiment? Global cities and the governing of climate change. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(3), 361–375. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00535.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., Marvin, S., Palgan, Y. V., McCormick, K., Breitfuss-Loidl, M., Mai, L., von Wirth, T., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2019). Urban living laboratories: Conducting the experimental city? European Urban and Regional Studies, 26(4), 317–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969776418787222
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bulkeley, H., & Newell, P. (2015). Governing climate change (2nd ed.). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• City Government. (2019). Plattform for byrådssamarbeid mellom Arbeiderpartiet, Miljøpartiet de Grønne og Sosialistisk Venstreparti i Oslo 2019-2023 [Political Platform].
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2017). Oslo kommunes anskaffelsesstrategi, byrådssak 1104/17 [Procurement Strategy].
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2018). Klimaetatens utkast til faggrunnlag for klimastrategi 2030 [proposal for Climate Strategy].
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2019a). Miljøkrav transport, version 2.0 [environmental requirements to transport].
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2019b). Climate and environmental requirements for the City of Oslo’s construction sites Version 1.0.
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2020a). En oppgradert by, https://www.klimaoslo.no/om-oss/, accessed October 2, 2020 [An upgraded city]
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2020b). Climate Budget. Chapter 2, Oslo City Government’s budget proposal 2020 with appendices.
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2020c). Tildelingsbrev 2020 for Klimaetaten [Expectations to the Climate Agency].
   Google Scholar
• City of Oslo. (2020d). Tildelingsbrev 2020 for plan- og bygningsetaten [Expectations to the Planning and Building Agency].
   Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. (2010). Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 211–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crosby, B. C., & Bryson, J. (2018). Why leadership of public leadership research matters: And what to do about it. Public Management Review, 20(9), 1265–1286. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2017.1348731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson, K., Coenen, L., & Gleeson, B. (2016). A decade of C40: Research insights and agendas for city networks. Global Policy, 10(4), https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.12740
   Google Scholar
• Day, D. V., & Antonakis, J. (2012). The nature of leadership (2nd ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• DNV-GL. (2019). Perspectives on Zero Emission Construction, Report No.: 2019-0535, Rev. 1, Høvik: DNV GL Energy.
   Google Scholar
• Eckersley, P. (2018). Who shapes local climate policy? Unpicking governance arrangements in English and German cities. Environmental Politics, 27(1), 139–160. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1380963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Göpfert, C., Wamsler, C., & Lang, W. (2019). A framework for the joint institutionalization of climate change mitigation and adaptation in city administrations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change, 24(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11027-018-9789-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. J. (2018). Global urban climate governance in three and a half parts: Experimentation, coordination, integration (and contestation). WIREs Clim Change, e546. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.546
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, D. J., & Johnson, C. A. (2017). The orchestration of global urban climate governance: Conducting power in the post-Paris climate regime. Environmental Politics, 26(4), 694–714. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2017.1320829
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hambleton, R. (2019). The new civic leadership: Place and the co-creation of public innovation. Public Money & Management,
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkinen, M., Ylä-Anttila, T., & Juhola, S. (2019). Incremental, reformistic or transformational: What kind of change do C40 cities advocate to deal with climate change? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), 90–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1473151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofstad, H., Vedeld, T., Hansen, K. B., Valencia, S., Taylor, A., Agger, A., Millstein, M., Tønnesen, A., & Torfing, J. (2020a). The evolution in approaches to climate governance in Cape Town, Copenhagen, Gothenburg and Oslo. In H. Hofstad & T. Vedeld (Eds.), Urban climate governance, NIBR-report 2020:8. Oslo Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstad, H., Vedeld, T., & Tønnesen, A. (2020b). Oslo: Narrow Co2 fixation – strong governance. In H. Hofstad & T. Vedeld (Eds.), Urban climate governance, NIBR-report 2020:8. Oslo Metropolitan University.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., McPhearson, T., & Loorbach, D. (2018). Tales of transforming cities: Transformative climate governance capacities in New York city, U.S.A and Rotterdam, Netherlands. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 843–857. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.10.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. (2017). The politics of urban climate change policy: Toward a research agenda. Urban Affairs Review, 53(2), 362–380. https://doi.org/10.1177/1078087416649756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., Chu, E. K., & Mason, S. G. (2018). Climate change in cities, innovations in multi-level governance. Springer Nature,.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan, A., Huitema, D., & Hildén, M. (2015). Emergence of polycentric climate governance and its future prospects. Nature Clim Change, 5(11), 977–982. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2725
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karvonen, A. (2018). The city of permanent experiments? In B. Turnheim, P. Kivimaa, & F. Burkhout (Eds.), Innovating climate governance: Moving beyond experiments (pp. 201–215). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kern, K. (2019). Cities as leaders in EU multilevel climate governance: Embedded upscaling of local experiments in Europe. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 125–145. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1521979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loorbach, D. (2007). Transition management. New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books.
   Google Scholar
• Moynihan, D. P., Pandey, S. K., & Wright, B. E. (2011). Setting the table: How transformational leadership fosters performance information use. JPART, 22, 143–164.
   Google Scholar
• Mumford, M. D., Antes, A. L., Caughron, J. J., & Friedrich, T. L. (2008). Charismatic, ideological, and pragmatic leadership: Multi-level influences on emergence and performance. The Leadership Quarterly, 19(2), 144–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, S. (2010). Integrative leadership for collaborative governance: Civic engagement in Seattle. The Leadership Quarterly, 21(2), 246–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. J-PART, 8(2), 223–243.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). The new governance: Governing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.1996.tb01747.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., Voß, J., & Grin, J. (2010). Innovation studies and sustainability transitions: The allure of the multi-level perspective and its challenges. Research Policy, 39(4), 435–448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2005). The democratic anchorage of governance networks. Scandinavian Political Studies, 28(3), 195–218. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2005.00129.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2018). The democratizing impact of governance networks: From pluralization, via democratic anchorage, to interactive political leadership. Public Administration, 96(2), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Torfing, J. (2019). Designing institutional platforms and arenas for interactive political leadership. Public Management Review, 21(10), 1443–1463. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2018.1559342
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, E., & Triantafillou, P. (2009). Chapter 1. The politics of self-governance: An introduction. In E. Sørensen & P. Triantafillou (Eds.), The politics of self-governance. Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Stoker, G. (2019). Can the governance paradigm survive the rise of populism? Policy and Politics, 47(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557318X15333033030897
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Sørensen, E., & Røiseland, A. (2016). Transforming the public sector into an arena for co-creation: Barriers, drivers, benefits and ways forward. Administration & Society, 1–31.
   Google Scholar
• Torney, D. (2019). Follow the leader? Conceptualising the relationship between leaders and followers in polycentric climate governance. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1522029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tucker, R. (1995). Politics as leadership. University of Missouri Press.
   Google Scholar
• Valgresultat. (2019). Kommunestyrevalg Oslo, https://valgresultat.no/oslo/oslo?type=ko&year=2019, accessed October 2, 2020 [Local election results 2019]
   Google Scholar
• Vallance, S., Perkins, H. C., & Dixon, J. E. (2011). What is social sustainability? A clarification of concepts. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 42(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2011.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, J. (2015). How to get beyond the leadership delusion. The voluntary program series 8, The Fifth, URL: https://www.thefifthestate.com.au
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, J. (2018). City and subnational governance high ambitions, innovative instrumetns and polycentric collaborations? In A. Jordan, D. Huitema, H. van Asselt, & J. Forster (Eds.), Governing climate change: The promise and limits of polycentric governance. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• van der Heijden, J. (2019). Studying urban climate governance: Were to begin, what to look for, and how to make a meaningful contribution to scholarship and practice. Earth System Governance, 1, 100005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esg.2019.100005
   Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. (2013a). Lessons from leadership theory and the contemporary challenges of leaders. Public Administration Review, 73(4), 553–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12069
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Wart, M. (2013b). Administrative leadership theory: An assessment after 10 years. Public Administration, 91(3), 521–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vedeld, T., Hofstad, H., Solli, H., & Hanssen, G. S. (forthcoming). Cities and climate governance: Creating synergies between integration and & interaction. Journal of Environmental Policy and Governance.
   Google Scholar
• Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. (2018). A framework for analysing and practicing integrative governance: The case of global animal and conservation governance. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(8), 1391–1414. https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418788565
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Van Wart, M., & Lebredo, N. (2014). Sustainability leadership in a local government context. Public Performance & Management Review, 37(3), 339–364. https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576370301
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., van der Heijden, J., Juhola, S., & Patterson, J. (2019). Learning in urban climate governance: Concepts, key issues and challenges. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1558848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurzel, R. K. W., Moulton, J. F. G., Osthorst, W., Mederake, L., Deutz, P., & Jonas, A. E. G. (2019). Climate pioneership and leadership in structurally disadvantaged maritime port cities. Environmental Politics, 28(1), 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2019.1522039
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar