Energy transition with biomass residues and waste: regional-scale potential and conflicts. A case study from North Hesse, Germany

References

• AEBIOM. (2017). AEBIOM Statistical Report 2016. European bioenergy outlook. http://achbiom.cl/wp-content/uploads/2017/08/aebiom-key-findings-report-2016.pdf/
   Google Scholar
• AEE. (2018). Energiepflanzen. Vielfältiges Potenzial vom Feld. [Energy plants. Diverse potential from the field]. Renews Special 85. https://www.unendlich-viel-energie.de/media/file/3001.85_Renews_Spezial_Energiepflanzen_Nov18.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Agora Energiewende. (2019). Die Energiewende im Stromsektor: Stand der Dinge 2018. Rückblick auf die wesentlichen Entwicklungen sowie Ausblick auf 2019. [The energy transition in the electricity sector: State of the art 2018. Review of the key developments and outlook for 2019]. https://www.agora-energiewende.de/fileadmin2/Projekte/2018/Jahresauswertung_2018/125_Agora-JAW-2018_WEB.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Baasch, S. (2016). A local energy transition success story. In J. Hoff, & Q. Gausset (Eds.), Community governance and citizen-driven initiatives in climate change mitigation (pp. 130–149). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bäckstrand, K., & Lövbrand, E. (2007). Climate governance beyond 2012: Competing discourses of green governmentality, ecological modernization and civic environmentalism. In M. E. Pettenger (Ed.), The social construction of climate change: Power, knowledge, norms, discourses (pp. 123–148). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, I., Gouldson, A., & Newell, P. (2011). Ecological modernisation and the governance of carbon: A critical analysis. Antipode, 43(3), 682–703. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.2011.00880.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauriedl, S. (2016). Formen lokaler Governance für eine dezentrale Energiewende [Forms of local governance for a decentralized energy transition]. Geographische Zeitschrift, 104(2), 72–91.
   Google Scholar
• Beveridge, R., & Kern, K. (2013). The Energiewende in Germany: Background, developments and future challenges. Renewable Energy Law and Policy Review, 4(1), 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• BMEL. (2014). Nationale Politikstrategie Bioökonomie. Nachwachsende Ressourcen und biotechnische Verfahren als Basis für Ernährung, Industrie und Energie. [National Policy Strategy Bioeconomy. Renewable resources and biotechnical processes as a basis for nutrition, industry and energy]. https://www.bmbf.de/files/BioOekonomiestrategie.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Brand, K. W. (2014). Ökologische oder reflexive Modernisierung? Modernisierungstheoretische Implikationen eines ökologischen Reformprogramms [Ecological or reflexive modernisation? Modernization-theoretical implications of an ecological reform program]. In R. von Detten, B. Metzger, & M. Bemmann (Eds.), Ökologische Modernisierung: Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzepts in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 67–95). Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brand, U. (2010). Sustainable development and ecological modernization – the limits to a hegemonic policy knowledge. Innovation – The European Journal of Social Science Research, 23(2), 135–152. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2010.522403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, U., & Wissen, M. (2014). Ökologische Modernisierung zu Beginn des 21. Jahrhunderts: Green Economy und Konturen eines grünen Kapitalismus [Ecological modernization at the beginning of the 21st century: Green conomy and contours of a green capitalism]. In R. von Detten, B. Metzger, & M. Bemmann (Eds.), Ökologische Modernisierung: Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzeptes in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 135–159). Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Brosowski, A., Krause, T., Mantau, U., Mahro, B., Noke, A., Richter, F., Raussen, T., Bischof, R., Hering, T., Blanke, C., Müller, P., & Thrän, D. (2019). How to measure the impact of biogenic residues, wastes and by-products: Development of a national resource monitoring based on the example of Germany. Biomass and Bioenergy, 127, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2019.105275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BUND. (2010). Energetische Nutzung von Biomasse. Positionspapier [Energetic use of biomass. Position paper]. https://www.bund.net/fileadmin/user_upload_bund/publikationen/bund/position/bund_energetische_nutzung_biomasse_position.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DBFZ. (2011). Global and regional spatial distribution of biomass potentials - Status quo and options for specification. DBFZ Report No. 7. https://www.dbfz.de/fileadmin/user_upload/Referenzen/DBFZ_Reports/DBFZ_Report_7.pdf
   Google Scholar
• DBFZ. (2015). Meilensteine 2030: Elemente und Meilensteine für die Entwicklung einer tragfähigen und nachhaltigen Bioenergiestrategie [Milestones 2030: Elements and milestones for the development of a viable and sustainalbe bioenergy strategy]. https://www.energetische-biomassenutzung.de/fileadmin/Steckbriefe/dokumente/03KB065_Endbericht_MS2030_final.pdf
   Google Scholar
• FNR. (2017). Basisdaten Bioenergie Deutschland 2017 [Basic data Bioenergy Germany 2017]. http://www.fnr.de/fileadmin/allgemein/pdf/broschueren/Basisdaten_Bioenergie_2018.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, G., & Hinderer, N. (2014). Situative governance and energy transitions in a spatial context: Case studies from Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4(16), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-014-0016-6
   Google Scholar
• Gailing, L. & Moss, T. (Eds.). (2016). Conceptualizing Germany’s energy transition - Institutions, Materiality, Power, Space. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N. (2019). A path transition towards a bioeconomy – The crucial role of sustainability. Sustainability, 11(3005), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113005
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2006). Experteninterviews und qualitative Inhaltsanalyse [Expert interviews and qualitative content analysis]. VS Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Gläser, J., & Laudel, G. (2009). On interviewing “Good” and “Bad” experts. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing Experts (pp. 117–137). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (1995). The Politics of environmental discourse: Ecological modernization and the policy process. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hartmann, N., Thomsen, J., & Wanapinit, N. (2018). Using demand side management and CHP in renewable dominated decentral energy systems: A case study. Computer Science – Research and Development, 33(1-2), 193–198. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00450-017-0358-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hauser, E., & Wern, B. (2016). The role of bioenergy in the German “Energiewende”—whose demands can be satisfied by bioenergy? Energy, Sustainability and Society, 6(35), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-016-0101-0
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrand, R. (2013). Climate protection, energy security, and Germany’s policy of ecological modernization. Environmental Politics, 22(4), 664–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.806627
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jänicke, M. (2008). Ecological modernisation: New perspectives. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(5), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.02.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klagge, B., & T. Meister (2018). Energy cooperatives in Germany – an example of successful alternative economies? Local Environment, 23(7), 697–716. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2018.1436045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, T. (2016). Ökologische Modernisierung [ecological modernization]. In S. Bauriedl (Ed.), Wörterbuch Klimadebatte (pp. 225–231). transcript.
   Google Scholar
• Lago, C., Herrera, I., Caldés, N., & Lechón, Y. (2019). The role of bioenergy in the emerging bioeconomy. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-813056-8.00001-7
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2014). Qualitative content analysis: theoretical foundation, basic procedures and software solution. URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-395173
   Google Scholar
• Mayring, P. (2015). Qualitative Inhaltsanalyse. Grundlagen und Techniken [Qualitative content analysis. Basics and techniques]. Beltz.
   Google Scholar
• Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009a). Das Experteninterview - konzeptionelle Grundlagen und methodische Anlage [The expert interview - conceptual foundations and methodological approach]. In S. Pickel, G. Pickel, H. J. Lauth, & D. Jahn (Eds.), Methoden der vergleichenden Politik- und Sozialwissenschaft (pp. 465–480). VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.
   Google Scholar
• Meuser, M., & Nagel, U. (2009b). The expert interview and changes in knowledge production. In A. Bogner, B. Littig, & W. Menz (Eds.), Interviewing Experts (pp. 17–39). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J. (2010). Ecological modernization as a social theory of environmental reform. In M. R. Redclift, & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international Handbook of environmental sociology, second Edition (pp. 63–76). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Mol, A. P. J., Spaargaren, G., & Sonnenfeld, D. A. (2014). Ecological modernisation theory: Where do we Stand? In R. von Detten, B. Metzger, & M. Bemmann (Eds.), Ökologische Modernisierung: Zur Geschichte und Gegenwart eines Konzeptes in Umweltpolitik und Sozialwissenschaften (pp. 35–66). Campus Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Moss, T., Becker, S., & Naumann, M. (2015). Whose energy transition is it, anyway? Organisation of the Energiewende in villages, cities and regions. Local Environment, 20(12), 1547–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.915799
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, A., & Gouldson, J. (2000). Environmental policy and industrial innovation: Integrating environment and economy through ecological modernisation. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 31(1), 33–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-7185(99)00042-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD / IEA – International Energy Agency. (2017). Technology roadmap: Delivering sustainable bioenergy. https://www.ieabioenergy.com/blog/publications/technology-roadmap-delivering-sustainable-bioenergy/
   Google Scholar
• Pehlken, A., Madena, K., Aden, C., & Klenke, T. (2016). Forming stakeholder alliances to unlock alternative and unused biomass potentials in bioenergy regions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 110, 66–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.05.052
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeiffer, D., & Thrän, D. (2018). One century of bioenergy in Germany: Wildcard and advanced technology. Chemie Ingenieur Technik, 90(11), 1676–1698. https://doi.org/10.1002/cite.201800154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkus, A., Gawel, E., Szarka, N., Lauer, M., Lenz, V., Ortwein, A., Tafarte, P., Eichhorn, M., & Thrän, D. (2018). Contributions of flexible power generation from biomass to a secure and cost-effective electricity supply: A review of potentials, incentives and obstacles in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 8(18), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-018-0157-0
   Google Scholar
• Quitzow, R., & Thielges, S. (2020). The German energy transition as soft power. Review of International Political Economy, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2020.1813190
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, K., & Schultmann, F. (2017). Local acceptance of biogas plants: A comparative study in the trinational Upper Rhine region. Waste Biomass Valor, 8(7), 2393–2412. doi:10.1007/s12649-016-9802-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steubing, M., Dotzauer, M., Zakaluk, T., Wern, B., Noll, F., & Thraen, D. (2020). Bioenergy plantś potential for contributing to heat generation in Germany. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(14), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00246-5
   Google Scholar
• Strzalka, R., Schneider, D., & Eicker, U. (2017). Current status of bioenergy technologies in Germany. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 72, 801–820. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.01.091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UBA. (2012). Globale Landflächen und Biomasse nachhaltig und ressourcenschonend nutzen [Using global land and biomass in a sustainable and resource-efficient manner]. https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/globale-landflaechen-biomasse
   Google Scholar
• York, R., Rosa, E. A., & Dietz, T. (2010). Ecological modernization theory: Theoretical and empirical challenges. In M. R. Redclift, & G. Woodgate (Eds.), The international handbook of environmental sociology, second Edition (pp. 77–90). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Zahoransky R. A. (2004). Energetische Verwertung von Biomasse [Energetic utilization of biomass]. Vieweg+Teubner Verlag.
   Google Scholar