Is bioeconomy policy a policy field? A conceptual framework and findings on the European Union and Germany

References

• The Guardian (2020). China moves to phase out single-use plastics. 19.1.2020. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2020/jan/19/china-moves-to-phase-out-single-use-plastics
   Google Scholar
• Aktionsforum Bioökonomie. (2018). denkhausbremen startet Bioökonomie-Projekt. https://denkhausbremen.de/denkhausbremen-startet-biooekonomie-projekt/
   Google Scholar
• Aktionsforum Bioökonomie. (2020). Bioökonomie-Strategie der Bundesregierung: Ökologie als Worthülse? Gemeinsame Pressemitteilung deutscher Umwelt- und Entwicklungsorganisationen. https://denkhausbremen.de/biooekonomie-strategie-der-bundesregierung-oekologie-als-worthuelse/
   Google Scholar
• Backhouse, M., Lorenzen, K., Lühmann, M., Puder, J., Rodríguez, F., & Tittor, A. (2017). Bioökonomie-Strategien im Vergleich. Gemeinsamkeiten, Widersprüche und Leerstellen. Bioeconomy & Inequalities Working Paper No. 1. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena.
   Google Scholar
• Balint, P. J., Stewart, R. E., Desai, A., & Walters, L. C. (2011). Wicked environmental problems. Managing uncertainty and conflict. Island Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beer, K., Böcher, M., Bollmann, A., Töller, A. E., & Vogelpohl, T. (2018). Politische Prozesse der Bioökonomie zwischen Ökonomie und Ökologie: Bio-Ökopoli-Arbeitsbericht 1: Fallauswahl und Übersichtsanalysen. FernUniversität in Hagen.
   Google Scholar
• Besi, M. d., & McCormick, K. (2015). Towards a bioeconomy in Europe: National, Regional and industrial strategies. Sustainability, 7(8), 10461–10478. https://doi.org/10.3390/su70810461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K. (2016). Emergent imaginaries and fragmented policy Frameworks in the Canadian Bio-economy. Sustainability, 8(10), 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8101007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birch, K. (2019). Neoliberal Bio-economies? The Co-Construction of markets and natures. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2010). Sustainable capital? The neoliberalization of Nature and Knowledge in the European “Knowledge-based Bio-economy”. Sustainability, 2(9), 2898–2918. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2092898
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., Levidow, L., & Papaioannou, T. (2014). Self-fulfilling prophecies of the European knowledge-based bio-economy: The discursive shaping of institutional and policy frameworks in the bio-pharmaceuticals sector. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-012-0117-4
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K., & Tyfield, D. (2013). Theorizing the bioeconomy: Biovalue, biocapital, bioeconomics or. What? Science, Technology & Human Values, 38(3), 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912442398
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (2005). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (2nd ed.). M.E. Sharpe.
   Google Scholar
• BMBF. (2010). Nationale Forschungsstrategie BioÖkonomie 2030: Unser Weg zu einer bio-basierten Wirtschaft. Federal Ministry of Education and Research.
   Google Scholar
• BMBF/BMEL. (2020). Nationale Bioökonomiestrategie: Kabinettversion. Federal Ministry of Education and Research/Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• BMEL. (2014). National Policy Strategy on Bioeconomy: Renewable resources and biotechnological processes as a basis for food, industry and energy. Federal Ministry of Food and Agriculture.
   Google Scholar
• Böcher, M., Töller, A. E., Perbandt, D., Beer, K., & Vogelpohl, T. (2020). Research trends: Bioeconomy politics and governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bugge, M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What Is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burgstaller, M., Potrykus, A., Weißenbacher, J., Kabasci, S., Merrettig-Bruns, U., & Sayder, B. (2018). Gutachten zur Behandlung biologisch abbaubarer Kunststoffe (UBA-Texte 57/2018). Umweltbundesamt.
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, D., Droste, N., Allen, B., Kettunen, M., Lähtinen, K., Korhonen, J., Leskinen, P., Matthies, B. D., & Toppinen, A. (2017). Green, circular, bio economy: A comparative analysis of sustainability avenues. Journal of Cleaner Production, 168, 716–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.09.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devaney, L., Henchion, M., & Regan, Á. (2017). Good governance in the bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 16(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12141
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J., & von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A Global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döhler, M. (2015). Das Politikfeld als analytische kategorie. Dms - Der Moderne Staat, 8(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v8i1.19110
   Google Scholar
• European Bioeconomy Stakeholders Panel. (2017). European Bioeconomy Stakeholders Manifesto. https://ec.europa.eu/research/bioeconomy/pdf/european_bioeconomy_stakeholders_manifesto.pdf
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2012). Innovating for sustainable growth: a bioeconomy for Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018a). A European strategy for plastics in a circular economy. COM(2018) 28 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2018b). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment: Updated bioeconomy strategy. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Environment Agency. (2018). The circular economy and the bioeconomy: Partners in sustainability. EEA report: No 2018,8. Publications Office of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• European Union. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/904 of the European parliament and of the Council of 5 June 2019 on the reduction of the impact of certain plastic products on the environment. OJ L, 155, 1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Fachverband Biogas. (2020). Fakten statt Vorurteile. Infopapier.
   Google Scholar
• Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., & Hawthorne, P. (2008). Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science, 319(5867), 1235–1238. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1152747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feindt, P. H. (2010). Policy-learning and environmental policy integration in the common agricultural policy, 1973–2003. Public Administration, 88(2), 296–314. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01833.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FNR. (2007). Symposium Energiepflanzen: 24./25. Oktober 2007 in Berlin. Schriftenreihe nachwachsende Rohstoffe: Vol. 31. Fachagentur Nachwachsende Rohstoffe.
   Google Scholar
• Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., & Hagemann, N. (2018). A governance framework for a sustainable bioeconomy: Insights from the case of the German wood-based bioeconomy. In W. Leal Filho, D. M. Pociovălișteanu, P. R. Borges de Brito, & I. Borges de Lima (Eds.), Towards a sustainable bioeconomy: Principles, challenges and perspectives (pp. 517–537). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• German Bioeconomy Council. (2018). Bioeconomy Policy (Part III) – Update Report of National Strategies around the World: A report from the German Bioeconomy Council. German Bioeconomy Council.
   Google Scholar
• Giurca, A. (2020). Unpacking the network discourse: Actors and storylines in Germany’s wood-based bioeconomy. Forest Policy and Economics, 110, 101574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2018.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giurca, A., & Metz, T. (2018). A social network analysis of Germany’s wood-based bioeconomy: Social capital and shared beliefs. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 26, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.09.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goven, J., & Pavone, V. (2015). The bioeconomy as political project: A polanyian analysis. Science, Technology & Human Values, 40(3), 302–337. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243914552133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hagemann, N., Gawel, E., Purkus, A., Pannicke, N., & Hauck, J. (2016). Possible futures towards a wood-based bioeconomy: A scenario analysis for Germany. Sustainability, 8(1), 98. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8010098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hausknost, D., Schriefl, E., Lauk, C., & Kalt, G. (2017). A transition to which bioeconomy? An exploration of diverging techno-political choices. Sustainability, 9(4), 669. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9040669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellsmark, H., & Hansen, T. (2020). A new Dawn for (oil) incumbents within the bioeconomy? Trade-offs and lessons for policy. Energy Policy, 145, 111763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heydemann, F. (2011). Agrargasanlagen und Maisanbau. Eine kritische Umweltbilanz. NABU Schleswig-Holstein.
   Google Scholar
• Hodge, D., Brukas, V., & Giurca, A. [. (2017). Forests in a bioeconomy: Bridge, boundary or divide? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 32(7), 582–587. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2017.1315833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hösl, M., & Kniep, R. (2019). Auf den Spuren eines Politikfeldes: Die Institutionalisierung von Internetpolitik in der Ministerialverwaltung. Berliner Journal Für Soziologie, 29(3-4), 207–235. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11609-020-00397-4
   Google Scholar
• Jambeck, J. R., Geyer, R., Wilcox, C., Siegler, T. R., Perryman, M., Andrady, A., Narayan, R., & Law, K. L. (2015). Marine pollution. Plastic waste inputs from land into the ocean. Science, 347(6223), 768–771. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1260352
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Juerges, N., & Hansjürgens, B. (2018). Soil governance in the transition towards a sustainable bioeconomy – A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 170, 1628–1639. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.10.143
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaup, F., & Selbmann, K. (2013). The seesaw of Germany’s biofuel policy – Tracing the evolvement to its current state. Energy Policy, 62, 513–521. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.08.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kehoe, L., Romero-Muñoz, A., Polaina, E., Estes, L., Kreft, H., & Kuemmerle, T. (2017). Biodiversity at risk under future cropland expansion and intensification. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 1(8), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0234-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kleinschmit, D., Arts, B., Giurca, A., Mustalahti, I., Sergent, A., & Pülzl, H. (2017). Environmental concerns in political bioeconomy discourses. International Forestry Review, 19(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/10.1505/146554817822407420
   Google Scholar
• Klitkou, A., Fevolden, A. M., & Capasso, M. (eds.). (2019). From waste to value: Valorisation pathways for organic waste streams in circular bioeconomies. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Knierim, A., Laschewski, L., & Boyarintseva, O. (2018). Inter- and transdisciplinarity in bioeconomy. In I. Lewandowski (Ed.), Bioeconomy: Shaping the transition to a sustainable, biobased economy (pp. 39–72). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Kuchler, M., & Linnér, B.-O. (2012). Challenging the food vs. Fuel dilemma: Genealogical analysis of the biofuel discourse pursued by international organizations. Food Policy, 37(5), 581–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.06.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leipold, S., & Petit-Boix, A. (2018). The circular economy and the bio-based sector - Perspectives of European and German stakeholders. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 1125–1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, L., Birch, K., & Papaioannou, T. (2012). EU agri-innovation policy: Two contending visions of the bio-economy. Critical Policy Studies, 6(1), 40–65. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2012.659881
   Google Scholar
• Loer, K., Reiter, R., & Töller, A. E. (2015). Was ist ein Politikfeld und warum entsteht es? Der Moderne Staat – Zeitschrift Für Public Policy, Recht Und Management, 8(1), 7–28. https://doi.org/10.3224/dms.v8i1.19108
   Google Scholar
• Lühmann, M. (2020). Whose European bioeconomy? Relations of forces in the shaping of an updated EU bioeconomy strategy. Environmental Development, 35, 100547. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envdev.2020.100547
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maes, D., & van Passel, S. (2019). Effective bioeconomy policies for the uptake of innovative technologies under resource constraints. Biomass and Bioenergy, 120, 91–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2018.11.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, E., & Huitema, D. (2013). The emergence of climate change adaptation as a policy field: The case of England. Regional Environmental Change, 13(2), 341–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-012-0341-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, E., & Huitema, D. (2016). The emergence of climate change adaptation as a new field of public policy in Europe. Regional Environmental Change, 16(2), 553–564. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-015-0771-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, P. J., Sapotichne, J., & Workman, S. (2006). Policy coherence and policy domains. Policy Studies Journal, 34(3), 381–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-0072.2006.00178.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, K., & Kautto, N. (2013). The bioeconomy in Europe: An overview. Sustainability, 5(6), 2589–2608. https://doi.org/10.3390/su5062589
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, R. (2017). Bioeconomy strategies: Contexts, visions, guiding implementation Principles and resulting debates. Sustainability, 9(6), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mitchell, D. (2008). A note on rising food prices: Policy research working paper 4682. The World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Mukhtarov, F., Gerlak, A., & Pierce, R. (2017). Away from fossil-fuels and toward a bioeconomy: Knowledge versatility for public policy? Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(6), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263774X16676273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ober, S. (2010). Technikfreunde. Gen-Ethischer Informationsdienst - GID, 200, 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). The bioeconomy to 2030: Designing a policy agenda. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD).
   Google Scholar
• Pannicke, N., Gawel, E., Hagemann, N., Purkus, A., & Strunz, S. (2015). The political economy of fostering a wood-based bioeconomy in Germany. German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64(4), 224–243. https://doi.org/10.22004/ag.econ.270182
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, J. (2015). Balancing the bioeconomy: Supporting biofuels and bio-based materials in public policy. Energy & Environmental Science, 8(11), 3063–3068. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5EE01864A
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Philp, J., & Winickoff, D. E. (2017). Clusters in Industrial Biotechnology and bioeconomy: The roles of the public sector. Trends in Biotechnology, 35(8), 682–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibtech.2017.04.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pülzl, H. [., Kleinschmit, D. [., & Arts, B. [. (2014). Bioeconomy – an emerging meta-discourse affecting forest discourses? Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 29(4), 386–393. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827581.2014.920044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkus, A., Gawel, E., & Thrän, D. (2017). Addressing uncertainty in decarbonisation policy mixes – Lessons learned from German and European bioenergy policy. Energy Research & Social Science, 33, 82–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.09.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puttkammer, J., & Grethe, H. (2018). Who with whom in biofuel policy? Coalitions in the media discourse on liquid biofuels in Germany. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 27(2), 235–244. https://doi.org/10.14512/gaia.27.2.11
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramcilovic-Suominen, S., & Pülzl, H. [. (2018). Sustainable development – A ‘selling point’ of the emerging EU bioeconomy policy framework? Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 4170–4180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.12.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, B. (2012). From a fossil-fuel to a biobased economy: The politics of industrial biotechnology. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(2), 282–296. https://doi.org/10.1068/c10209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4(2), 155–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01405730
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, F. (2020). Germany’s new bioeconomy strategy criticised for overlooking agriculture, food production. https://www.euractiv.com/section/agriculture-food/news/germanys-new-bioeconomy-strategy-could-hinder-sustainable-food-production/
   Google Scholar
• Scordato, L., Bugge, M., & Fevolden, A. (2017). Directionality across diversity: Governing contending policy rationales in the transition towards the bioeconomy. Sustainability, 9(2), 206. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9020206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R. A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., Tokgoz, S., Hayes, D., & Yu, T-H. (2008). Use of U.S. Croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science, 319(5867), 1238–1240. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1151861
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skogstad, G. (2017). Policy feedback and self-reinforcing and self-undermining processes in EU biofuels policy. Journal of European Public Policy, 24(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2015.1132752
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Termeer, C., & Metze, T. (2019). More than peanuts: Transformation towards a circular economy through a small-wins governance framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 240, 118272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118272
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vivien, F.-D, Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelpohl, T., Beer, K., Ewert, B., Perbandt, D., Töller, A. E., & Böcher, M. (2019). Patterns of European bioeconomy policy. Wicked, weak, fragmented and soft? Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, University of Wrocław, September 4-7, 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Williams, A. T., & Rangel-Buitrago, N. (2019). Marine litter: Solutions for a major environmental problem. Journal of Coastal Research, 35(3), 648–663. https://doi.org/10.2112/JCOASTRES-D-18-00096.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Windhoff-Héritier, A. (1987). Policy-Analyse. Eine Einführung. Campus.
   Google Scholar