Inside the black box of collaboration: a process-tracing study of collaborative flood risk governance in the Netherlands

References

• Agranoff, R. (2008). Collaboration for knowledge: Learning from public management networks. In R. O’Leary & L. B. Bingham (Eds.), Big ideas in collaborative public management. NYM.E. Sharpe (pp. 162–194).
   Google Scholar
• Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avoyan, E., Lagendijk, A., Meijerink, S., & Kaufman, M. (forthcoming). Output performance of collaborative governance: Examining necessary and sufficient conditions for achieving output performance of the Dutch flood protection program.
   Google Scholar
• Avoyan, E., & Meijerink, S. (2021). Cross-sector collaboration within Dutch flood risk governance: Historical analysis of external triggers. International Journal of Water Resources Development, 37(1), 24–47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2019.1707070
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avoyan, E., Tatenhove, J. V., & Toonen, H. (2017). The Performance of the black sea commission as a collaborative governance regime. Marine Policy, 81, 285–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. (2018). Process-Tracing methods. University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Biddle, J. C. (2017). Improving the effectiveness of collaborative governance regimes: Lessons from watershed partnerships. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 143(9). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2006). The design and implementation of cross-sector collaborations: Propositions from the literature. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 44–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00665.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryson, J. M., Crosby, B. C., & Stone, M. M. (2015). Designing and implementing cross-sector collaborations: Needed and challenging. Public Administration Review, 75(5), 647–663. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conley, A., & Moote, M. A. (2003). Evaluating collaborative natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources, 16(5), 371–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920309181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong, M., & Edelenbos, J. (2007). An insider’s look into policy transfer in transnational expert networks. European Planning Studies, 15(5), 687–706. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654310701213996
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, S., Berthod, O., Groenleer, M., & Nederhand, J. (2020). Pathways to collaborative performance: Examining the different combinations of conditions under which collaborations are successful. Policy and Society, 39(4), 1–21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1769275
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edelenbos, J., van Buuren, A., & Klijn, E. H. (2013). Connective capacities of network managers: A comparative study of management styles in eight regional governance networks. Public Management Review, 15(1), 131–159. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2012.691009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Gerlak, A. K., Barreteau, O., & ten Brink, M. B. (2009). A framework to assess collaborative governance: A New Look at four water resource management cases. Human dimensions of global environmental change conference Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015a). Collaborative governance regimes. Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., & Nabatchi, T. (2015b). Evaluating the productivity of collaborative governance regimes: A Performance matrix. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(4), 717–747. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson, K., Nabatchi, T., & Balogh, S. (2012). An integrative framework for collaborative governance. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(1), 1–29. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mur011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerlak, A. K., & Heikkila, T. (2011). Building a theory of learning in collaboratives: Evidence from the everglades restoration program. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 21(4), 619–644. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/muq089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. A. (2013). Tracing the progress of process tracing. European Political Science, 12, 20–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/eps.2012.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartmann, T., & Spit, T. (2016). Legitimizing differentiated flood protection levels - Consequences of the European flood risk management plan. Environmental Science and Policy, 55, 361–367.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heikkila, T., & Gerlak, A. K. (2016). Investigating collaborative processes over time: A 10-year study of the south Florida ecosystem restoration task force. The American Review of Public Administration, 46(2), 180–200. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074014544196
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imperial, M. T., Johnston, E., Pruett-Jones, M., Leong, K., & Thomsen, J. (2016). Sustaining the useful life of network governance: Life cycles and developmental challenges. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 14(3), 135–144. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.1249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2010). Planning with complexity: An introduction to collaborative rationality for public policy. Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, R., & Kraaij, E. (2016). Dutch flood protection policy and measures based on risk assessment. E3S Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, Vol. 7, p. 20016.
   Google Scholar
• Koontz, T. M., & Thomas, C. W. (2006). What do we know and need to know about the environmental outcomes of collaborative management? Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 111–121. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00671.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach, W. D., & Sabatier, P. A. (2005). To trust an adversary: Integrating rational and psychological models of collaborative policymaking. The American Political Science Review, 99(4), 491–503. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S000305540505183X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohr, R., & Ebbens, E. (2019). Omgevingsparticipatie verkenningsfase Gebiedsontwikkeling Grebbedijk: Van start Tot besluitvorming. LievenseCSO Milieu B.V. (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Mandarano, L. A. (2008). Evaluating collaborative environmental planning outputs and outcomes. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 27(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X08315888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandell, M., & Keast, R. (2007). Evaluating network arrangements: Toward revised performance measures. Public Performance & Management Review, 30(4), 574–597. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2753/PMR1530-9576300406
   Google Scholar
• Margerum, R. D. (2002). Evaluating collaborative planning: Implications from an empirical analysis of growth management. Journal of the American Planning Association, 68(2), 179–193. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01944360208976264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, M. (2006). Collaborative public management: Assessing what we know and how we know it. Public Administration Review, 66(Suppl. 1), 33–43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00664.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MIWM. (2020). Meerjarenprogramma Infrastructuur, Ruimte En Transport. (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Moravcsik, A. (2010). Active citation: A precondition for replicable qualitative research. In PS - Political Science and politics. (Vol. 43, pp. 29–35). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Newig, J., Challies, E. D., Jager, N. W., Kochskaemper, E., & Adzersen, A. (2018). The environmental performance of participatory and collaborative governance: A framework of causal mechanisms. Policy Studies Journal, 46(2), 269–297. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12209
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nooteboom, B. (2001). Learning and innovation in organizations and economies. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Provan, K. G., & Kenis, P. (2008). Modes of network governance: Structure, management, and effectiveness. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(2), 229–252. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, T. A., Ulibarri, N., & Scott, R. P. (2020). Stakeholder involvement in collaborative regulatory processes: Using automated coding to track attendance and actions. Regulation and Governance, 14(2), 219–237. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silvia, C. (2018). Evaluating collaboration: The solution to one problem often causes another. Public Administration Review, 78(3), 472–478. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stead, D., & Meijers, E. (2009). Spatial planning and policy integration: Concepts, facilitators and inhibitors. Planning Theory and Practice, 10(3), 317–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903229752
   Google Scholar
• Thomas, C. W., & Koontz, T. M. (2011). Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management on natural resource conservation. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research, 3(2), 97–111. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19390459.2011.557877
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., & Perry, J. L. (2006). Collaboration processes: Inside the black box. Public Administration Review, 66(SUPPL. 1), 20–32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2006.00663.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, A. M., Perry, J. L., & Miller, T. K. (2007). Conceptualizing and measuring collaboration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19(1), 23–56. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N. (2015). Collaboration in federal hydropower licensing: Impacts on process, outputs, and outcomes. Public Performance and Management Review, 38(4), 578–606. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/15309576.2015.1031004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ulibarri, N., Emerson, K., Imperial, M. T., Jager, N. W., Newig, J., & Weber, E. (2020). How does collaborative governance evolve? Insights from a medium-n case comparison. Policy and Society, 39(4), 617–637. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2020.1769288
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Boomen, T., Frijters, E., van Assen, S., & Broekman, M. (2017). Stedelijke Vraagstukken, Veerkrachtige Oplossingen - Ontwerpend Onderzoek Voor de Toekomst van Stedelijke Regios.TRANCITY*VALIZ.
   Google Scholar
• Vangen, S., & Huxham, C. (2003). Nurturing collaborative relations: Building trust in interorganizational collaboration. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 39(1), 5–31. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886303039001001
   Google Scholar
• VVWA. (2017). Plan of Approach: Dike Reinforcement of Grebbedijk Exploration Phase.
   Google Scholar
• VVWA. (2019). Grebbedijk Communicatieplan (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• VVWA. (2020). Nota Voorkeursalternatief Gebiedsontwikkeling Grebbedijk (in Dutch).
   Google Scholar
• Wouter, K. (2004). Nut En Noodzaak van de Slaperdijk Als Regionale Waterkerin.
   Google Scholar