Mainstreaming passive houses: more gradual reconfiguration than transition

References

• Anshelm, J. (2012). Kampen om klimatet: miljöpolitiska strider i Sverige 2006–2009. Pärspektiv.
   Google Scholar
• Berker, T. (2010). Dealing with uncertainty in sustainable innovation: Mainstreaming and substitution. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 5(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2010.034558
   Google Scholar
• Berry, S., Davidson, K., & Saman, W. (2013). The impact of niche green developments in transforming the building sector: The case study of Lochiel Park. Energy Policy, 62, 646–655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Board of Housing. (2015, June). Förslag till svensk tillämpning av nära-nollenergibyggnader (Proposal for Swedish application of nearly-zero energy buildings). Report No. 2015:26.
   Google Scholar
• Coenen, L., Benneworth, P., & Truffer, B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy, 41(6), 968–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eek, H. (2016, October). Interview.
   Google Scholar
• Eksta. (2015, April). CEO of Eksta Bostadsbolag. Interview.
   Google Scholar
• Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber, A., & Hoppe, T. (2013). Co-constructing a sustainable built environment in the Netherlands—Dynamics and opportunities in an environmental sectoral innovation system. Energy Policy, 52, 628–638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fastenrath, S., & Braun, B. (2018). Sustainability transition pathways in the building sector: Energy-efficient building in Freiburg (Germany). Applied Geography, 90, 339–349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueiredo, A., Rebelo, F., Castanho, R. A., Oliveira, R. C., Lousada, S. A., Vicente, R., & Ferreira, V. M. (2020). Implementation and challenges of the passive house concept in Portugal: Lessons learnt from successful experience. Sustainability, 12(21), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12218761
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fossilfritt Sverige. (2018). Färdplan för fossilfri konkurrenskraft: Bygg- och anläggningssektorn.
   Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8–9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Fuchs, G., Hinderer, N., Kungl, G., Mylan, J., Neukirch, M., & Wassermann, S. (2016). The enactment of socio-technical transition pathways: A reformulated typology and a comparative multi-level analysis of the German and UK low-carbon electricity transitions (1990–2014). Research Policy, 45(4), 896–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2016.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W., & Schot, J. (2007). Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy, 36(3), 399–417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibbs, D., & O’Neill, K. (2015). Building a green economy? Sustainability transitions in the UK building sector. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 59, 133–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2014.12.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman, E. (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Government Offices. (2019). Det klimatpolitiska ramverket.
   Google Scholar
• Harryson, C. (2009, May 8). Småhus med rätt teknik spar 30% energi. Aktuella Byggen.
   Google Scholar
• Heiskanen, E., Nissilä, H., & Lovio, R. (2015). Demonstration buildings as protected spaces for clean energy solutions – the case of solar building integration in Finland. Journal of Cleaner Production, 109, 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.04.090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Energy Agency. (2017). Towards a zero-emission, efficient, and resilient buildings and construction sector.
   Google Scholar
• Killip, G. (2013). Transition management using a market transformation approach: Lessons for theory, research, and practice from the case of low-carbon housing refurbishment in the UK. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31(5), 876–892. https://doi.org/10.1068/c11336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiss, B., & Neij, L. (2011). The importance of learning when supporting emergent technologies for energy efficiency – a case study on policy intervention for learning for the development of energy efficient windows in Sweden. Energy Policy, 39(10), 6514–6524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2011.07.053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivimaa, P., & Martiskainen, M. (2018). Dynamics of policy change and intermediation: The arduous transition towards low-energy homes in the United Kingdom. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 83–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.032
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., Khan, J., & Hildingsson, R. (2019). Actor relations in climate policymaking: Governing decarbonisation in a corporatist green state. Environmental Policy and Governance, 29(6), 399–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsten, J. (2010, December 8). Biogasprogram. Borås Tidning.
   Google Scholar
• Lovell, H. (2007). The governance of innovation in socio-technical systems: The difficulties of strategic niche management in practice. Science and Public Policy, 34(1), 35–44. https://doi.org/10.3152/030234207X190540
   Google Scholar
• Markard, J., Raven, R., & Truffer, B. (2012). Sustainability transitions: An emerging field of research and its prospects. Research Policy, 41(6), 955–967. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2012.02.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mlecnik, E. (2014). Which factors determine the success of strategic niche developments? Reflections from the emergence of a passive house network. Construction Innovation, 14(1), 36–51. https://doi.org/10.1108/CI-01-2012-0007
   Google Scholar
• Müller, L., & Berker, T. (2013). Passive house at the crossroads: The past and the present of a voluntary standard that managed to bridge the energy efficiency gap. Energy Policy, 60, 586–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NCC. (2016, May). Energy calculation engineer at NCC. Interview.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, J. (2018). Mainstreaming passive houses: A study of energy efficient residential buildings in Sweden (PhD thesis). Linköping University Electronic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Niskanen, J., & Rohracher, H. (2020). Passive houses as affiliative objects: Investment calculations, energy modelling, and collaboration strategies of Swedish housing companies. Energy Research & Social Science, 70, 101643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101643
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nykamp, H. (2020). Policy mix for a transition to sustainability: Green buildings in Norway. Sustainability, 12(446), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12020446
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ornetzeder, M., & Rohracher, H. (2009). Passive houses in Austria: The role of intermediary organizations for the successful transformation of a socio-technical system. The Proceedings of ECEEE, 1531–1540.
   Google Scholar
• Östsam. (2014). Insatsprogram energi och klimat, 2014–2020.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, J. (2004). Makten över energin: Policyprocesser i två kommuner 1977–2001 [Doctoral dissertation]. LiU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Passipedia. (2019). What is a passive house? https://passipedia.org
   Google Scholar
• Pinch, T. J., & Bijker, W. E. (1984). The social construction of facts and artefacts: Or how the sociology of science and the sociology of technology might benefit each other. Social Studies of Science, 14(3), 399–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631284014003004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Programmet för byggnader med mycket låg energianvändning (LÅGAN). (2020). Marknadsöversikt.
   Google Scholar
• Quitzau, M. B., Hoffmann, B., & Elle, M. (2012). Local niche planning and its strategic implications for implementation of energy-efficient technology. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79(6), 1049–1058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2011.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rip, A., & Kemp, R. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choice and climate change: Resources and technology (pp. 327–399). Batelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, E. M. (2010/1962). Diffusion of innovations. Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H. (2001). Managing the technological transition to sustainable construction of buildings: A socio-technical perspective. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 13(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320120040491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H., & Späth, P. (2014). The interplay of urban energy policy and socio-technical transitions: The eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in retrospect. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scrase, I., & Smith, A. (2009). The (non-)politics of managing low carbon socio-technical transitions. Environmental Politics, 18(5), 707–726. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010903157008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smedby, N., & Quitzau, M. B. (2016). Municipal governance and sustainability: The role of local governments in promoting transitions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 26(5), 323–336. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1708
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A. (2007). Translating sustainabilities between green niches and socio-technical regimes. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 19(4), 427–450. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320701403334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, A., & Raven, R. (2012). What is protective space? Reconsidering niches in transitions to sustainability. Research Policy, 41(6), 1025–1036. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.12.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sørensen, K. H. (2015). From ‘alternative’ to ‘advanced': Mainstreaming of sustainable technologies. Science & Technology Studies, 28(1), 10–27. https://doi.org/10.23987/sts.55355
   Google Scholar
• Späth, P., & Rohracher, H. (2010). ‘Energy regions’: The transformative power of regional discourses on socio-technical futures. Research Policy, 39(4), 449–458. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stevenson, F., & Kwok, A. (2020). Mainstreaming zero carbon: Lessons for built-environment education and training. Buildings and Cities, 1(1), 687–696. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.84
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Energy Agency (SEA). (2020). Energiläget 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Truffer, B. (2008). Society, technology, and region: Contributions from the social study of technology to economic geography. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 40(4), 966–985. https://doi.org/10.1068/a39170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Grijp, N., van der Woerd, F., Gaiddon, B., Hummelshøj, R., Larsson, M., Osunmuyiwa, O., & Rooth, R. (2019). Demonstration projects of nearly zero energy buildings: Lessons from end-user experiences in Amsterdam, Helsingborg, and Lyon. Energy Research & Social Science, 49, 10–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar