2,185
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Contentious governance of wind energy planning: strategic dilemmas in collaborative resistance by local governments and citizen action groups

, , &
Pages 653-666 | Received 23 Apr 2021, Accepted 20 Dec 2021, Published online: 07 Jan 2022

References

  • Agentschap, N. L. (2011). Kennisgeving Inspraak Voornemen Windpark N33. Staatscourant https://zoek.officielebekendmakingen.nl/stcrt-2011-18303.html (Accessed: February 12, 2020).
  • Ansell, C., & Gash, A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18(4), 543–571. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mum032
  • BMC. (2018). Gemeenten hebben hoge ambities met de energietransitie. Available at: https://www.bmc.nl/binaries/content/assets/bmcnl/pdfs/bmc-onderzoek-energietransitie-2018.pdf (Accessed: 1 March 2020).
  • Breukers, S., & Wolsink, M. (2007). Wind power implementation in changing institutional landscapes: An international comparison. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2737–2750. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.004
  • Bureau Energieprojecten. (2016). Reactiebundel: Reacties op ‘Ontwerpbesluiten ‘WINDPARK N33’. Available at: https://www.rvo.nl/onderwerpen/bureau-energieprojecten/lopende-projecten/windparken/windpark-n33/fase-1 (Accessed: 8 November 2017).
  • Cuppen, E. (2018). The value of social conflicts. Critiquing invited participation in energy projects. Energy Research & Social Science, 38, 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.01.016
  • Cuppen, E., Ejderyan, O., Pesch, U., Spruit, S., van de Grift, E., Correljé, A., & Taebi, B. (2020). When controversies cascade: Analysing the dynamics of public engagement and conflict in the Netherlands and Switzerland through “controversy spillover”. Energy Research & Social Science, 68, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101593
  • Cuppen, E., & Pesch, U. (2021). How to assess what society wants? The need for a renewed social conflict research agenda. In S. Batel, & D. Rudolph (Eds.), A critical approach to the social acceptance of renewable energy infrastructures: Going beyond Green growth and sustainability (pp. 161–178). Palgrave MacMillan.
  • Gerritsen, M., Mateman, E., Van Gastel, V., Van Wijk, B., & Ritzen, A. (2014). Verdiepend onderzoek naar zesde variant Windpark N33. Tauw and Ecofys.
  • Griggs, S., Norval, A. J., & Wagenaar, H. (2014). Practices of freedom. Decentred governance, conflict and democratic participation. Cambridge University Press.
  • Hilgartner, S., & Bosk, C. L. (1988). The rise and fall of Social problems: A public arenas model. American Journal of Sociology, 94(1), 53–78. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2781022 https://doi.org/10.1086/228951
  • Jabola-Carolus, I., Elliott-Negri, L., Jasper, J. M., Mahlbacher, J., Weisskircher, M., & Zhelnina, A. (2018). Strategic interaction sequences: The institutionalization of participatory budgetting in New York city. Social Movement Studies, 19(5-6), 640–656. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2018.1505488.
  • Janhunen, S., Hujala, M., & Pätäri, S. (2018). The acceptability of wind farms: The impact of public participation. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 20(2), 214–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1398638
  • Jasper, J. M. (2006). Getting your way. Strategic dilemmas in the real world. The University of Chicago Press.
  • Jasper, J. M. (2011). Introduction. From political opportunity structures to strategic interaction. In J. Goodwin, & J. M. Jasper (Eds.), Contention in context. Political opportunities and the emergence of protest (pp. 1–33). Stanford University Press.
  • Jasper, J. M. (2015). Introduction. Playing the game. In J. M. Jasper, & J. W. Duyvendak (Eds.), Players and arenas. The interactive dynamics of protest (pp. 9–32). Amsterdam University Press.
  • Klimaat, M. v. E. Z. (2019). Klimaatakkoord. Ministerie van Economische Zaken en Klimaat.
  • Meijerman, A., & Wassink, J. B. (2005). Windpark N 33 - Startnotitie MER. Veendam. Available at: http://www.blaaswind.nl/pdf/raad_veendam.pdf (accessed: 15 November 2017).
  • Menterwolde.info. (2014). Menterwolde stelt 10.000 euro beschikbaar voor actiegroepen. Available at: https://www.menterwolde.info/nieuws/meeden/menterwolde-steunt-storm-meeden-en-tegenwind-n33-met-10.000-euro/ (accessed: 15 November 2017).
  • Metze, T. (2010). Innovation Ltd. Boundary work in deliberative governance in land use planning [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Amsterdam. https://dare.uva.nl/search?identifier=fcb7e1a8-b977-4c3e-8f7a-5a7d7ad6dbd2
  • Metze, T. (2018). Fuel to the fire: Risk governance and framing of shale gas in the Netherlands. The Extractive Industries and Society, 5(4), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2018.09.016
  • Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2020). Governance, politics and the state (2nd edition). Red Globe Press.
  • Rand, J., & Hoen, B. (2017). Thirty years of north American wind energy acceptance research: What have we learned? Energy Research & Social Science, 29, 135–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.05.019
  • Rubin, J. Z., Pruitt, D. G., & Kim, S. H. (1994). Social conflict. Escalation, stalemate and settlement, 2nd edition. McGraw Hill.
  • RVO. (n.d.). Rijkscoördinatieregeling. Bureau Energieprojecten – Rijksvoorlichtingsdienst.
  • Scheuten, W. M., Groen, M. W., Van Rijn, R., & Bosche, G. (2015). Windpark N33 Veendam/Menterwolde: Startnotitie m.e.r. Grontmij.
  • Schön, D. A., & Rein, M. (1994). Frame reflection. Toward the resolution of intractable policy controversies. Basic Books.
  • Sociaal-Economische Raad. (2013). Energieakkoord voor duurzame groei.
  • Tilly, C., & Tarrow, S. (2015). Contentious politics, second edition. Paradigm.
  • Toke, D. (2005). Explaining wind power planning outcomes. Some findings from a study in england and wales. Energy Policy, 33(12), 1527–1539. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2004.01.009
  • Veendam, G. (2005). Windpark N33 – Startnotitie MER. Number: 519, Gemeente Veendam, directorate: SO.
  • Verhoeven, I. (2020). Contentious governance around climate change measures in the Netherlands. Environmental Politics, 30(3), 376–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2020.1787056.
  • Verhoeven, I., & Duyvendak, J. W. (2017). Understanding governmental activism. Social Movement Studies, 16(5), 564–577. https://doi.org/10.1080/14742837.2017.1338942
  • Weible, C. M., & Heikkila, T. (2017). Policy conflict framework. Policy Sciences, 50(1), 23–40. doi:10.1007/s11077-017-9280-6
  • Wolsink, M. (1996). Dutch wind power policy: Stagnating implementation of renewables. Energy Policy, 24(12), 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)80002-5
  • Wüstenhagen, R., Wolsink, M., & Bürer, M. J. (2007). Social acceptance of renewable energy innovation: An introduction to the concept. Energy Policy, 35(5), 2683–2691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2006.12.001
  • Zandvoort, G. (2013). Motie windmolenparken near shore, Gemeente Zandvoort.