2,574
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

A comparative analysis of bioeconomy visions and pathways based on stakeholder dialogues in Colombia, Rwanda, Sweden, and Thailand

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon, & show all
Pages 680-700 | Received 13 Sep 2020, Accepted 28 Jan 2022, Published online: 18 Feb 2022

References

  • Aung, M. T., Nguyen, H., & Denduang, B. (2020). Power and influence in the development of Thailand’s Bioeconomy. SEI Discussion Brief. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/power-influence-thailands-bioeconomy/
  • Bailis, R. (2019). Examining wood-energy systems with integrated assessment and landscape models. SEI Working paper. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/examining-wood-energy-systems-with-integrated-assessment-and-landscape-models/
  • Bailis, R., Drigo, R., Ghilardi, A., & Masera, O. (2015). The carbon footprint of traditional woodfuels. Nature Climate Change, 5(3), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2491
  • Bailis, R., & Ogeya, M. (2020). Envisioning alternative pathways: A case study from Rwanda. SEI report. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/envisaging-alternative-bioeconomy-pathways-a-case-study-from-rwanda/
  • Bauer, F. (2018). Narratives of biorefinery innovation for the bioeconomy: Conflict, consensus, or confusion? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 28, 96–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2018.01.005
  • Befort, N. (2020). Going beyond definitions to understand tensions within the bioeconomy: The contribution of sociotechnical regimes to contested fields. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 153, 119923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.11992
  • Bennich, T., & Belyazid, S. (2017). The route to sustainability—Prospects and challenges of the bio-based economy. Sustainability, 9(6), 887. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9060887
  • Bezama, A., Ingrao, C., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2019). Resources, collaborators, and neighbors: The three-pronged challenge in the implementation of bioeconomy regions. Sustainability, 11(24), 7235. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11247235
  • Biber-Freudenberger, L., & Börner, J. (2017, September 20–22). The global bioeconomy landscape: What determines national strategic choices? Tropentag Conference, Bonn, Germany.
  • Biber-Freudenberger, L., Ergeneman, C., Förster, J. J., Dietz, T., & Börner, J. (2020). Bioeconomy futures: Expectation patterns of scientists and practitioners on the sustainability of bio-based transformation. Sustainable Development, 28(5), 1220–1235. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2072
  • Böcher, M., Töller, A. E., Perbandt, D., Beer, K., & Vogelpohl, T. (2020). Research trends: Bioeconomy politics and governance. Forest Policy and Economics, 118, 102219. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102219
  • Boone, C., & Özcan, S. (2014). Why do cooperatives emerge in a world dominated by corporations? The diffusion of cooperatives in the U.S. bio-ethanol industry, 1978–2013. Academy of Management Journal, 57(4), 990–1012. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0194
  • Bößner, S., Johnson, F. X., & Shawoo, Z. (2021). Governing the bioeconomy: What role for international institutions? Sustainability, 13(1), 286. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13010286
  • Bugge, M., Hansen, T., & Klitkou, A. (2016). What is the bioeconomy? A review of the literature. Sustainability, 8(7), 691. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8070691
  • Canales, N., Gladkykh, G., Bessonova, E., Fielding, M., Johnson, F. X., & Peterson, K. (2020a). Policy dialogue on a bioeconomy for sustainable development in the Baltic Sea Region. SEI report. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/policy-dialogue-bioeconomy-sustainable-development-baltic/
  • Canales, N., & Gomez, J. G. (2020). Policy dialogue on a bioeconomy for sustainable development in Colombia. SEI report. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/policy-dialogue-bioeconomy-sustainable-development-colombia/
  • Canales, N., Gomez, J. G., Fielding, M., & Dugarte, M. (2020b). The potential of quinoa in Bolivia’s bioeconomy. SEI Working paper. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/potential-quinoa-bolivias-bioeconomy/
  • Consejo Nacional de Política Económica y Social. (2018). Política de Crecimiento Verde. CONPES 3934. https://www.dnp.gov.co/CrecimientoVerde/Documents/Pol%C3%ADtica%20CONPES%203934/CONPES%203934%20-%20Pol%C3%ADtica%20de%20Crecimiento%20Verde.pdf
  • D’Amato, D., Bartkowski, B., & Droste, N. (2020). Reviewing the interface of bioeconomy and ecosystem service research. Ambio, 49(12), 1878–1896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-020-01374-0
  • Darnhofer, I. (2015). Socio-technical transitions in farming: Key concepts. In L. Sutherland, I. Darnhofer, G. Wilson, & L. Zagata (Eds.), Transition pathways towards sustainability in agriculture: Case studies from Europe (pp. 17–31). CABI.
  • Devaney, L., Henchion, M., & Regan, Á. (2017). Good governance in the bioeconomy. EuroChoices, 16(2), 41–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/1746-692X.12141
  • Devaney, L., & Iles, A. (2019). Scales of progress, power and potential in the US bioeconomy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 233, 379–389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.393
  • Diaz-Chavez, R., Mortenson, S., & Wikman, A. (2020). Bioeconomy: Tapping natural and human resources to achieve sustainability. SEI Working paper. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/bioeconomy-natural-human-resources-sustainability/
  • Diaz-Chavez, R., Stichnothe, H., & Johnson, K. (2016). Sustainability considerations for the future bioeconomy. In P. Lamers, E. Searcy, J. R. Hess, & H. Stichnothe (Eds.), Developing the global bioeconomy: Technical, market, and environmental lessons from bioenergy (pp. 69–90). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-805165-8.00004-5.
  • Dietz, T., Börner, J., Förster, J., & von Braun, J. (2018). Governance of the bioeconomy: A global comparative study of national bioeconomy strategies. Sustainability, 10(9), 3190. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10093190
  • Drigo, R., Munyehirwe, A., Nzabanita, V., & Munyampundu, A. (2013). Update and upgrade of WISDOM Rwanda and woodfuels value chain analysis. Final Report, Agriconsulting S.p.A. http://rnra.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/Final_Report_SMP_Rwanda.pdf
  • Drigo, R., & Nzabanita, V. (2011). WISDOM Rwanda: Spatial analysis of woodfuel production and consumption in rwanda applying the Woodfuels Integrated Supply/Demand Overview Mapping (WISDOM) Methodology. FAO Forestry Department – Wood energy. FAO Project TCP/RWA/3103.
  • Dubois, O., & Juan, M. G. S. (2016). How sustainability is addressed in official bioeconomy strategies at international, national and regional levels—An overview; Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations: Rome, Italy. https://www.fao.org/3/i5998e/i5998e.pdf
  • El-Chichakli, B., von Braun, J., Lang, C., Barben, D., & Philp, J. (2016). Policy: Five cornerstones of a global bioeconomy. Nature, 535(7611), 221–223. https://doi.org/10.1038/535221a
  • European Commission (EC). (2018). A sustainable bioeconomy for Europe: Strengthening the connection between economy, society and the environment. Updated Bioeconomy Strategy. https://doi.org/10.2777/478385
  • Fielding, M., Davis, M., Weitz, N., Cummings-John, I., Hickey, A., Johnson, F. X., Senyagwa, J., Martinez, L., & Sun, M. (2015). Agricultural investment and rural transformation: A case study of the Makeni bioenergy project in Sierra Leone. Project report 2015-09. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/agricultural-investment-and-rural-transformation-a-case-study-of-the-makeni-bioenergy-project-in-sierra-leone/
  • Fund, C., El-Chichakli, B., & Dieckhoff, P. (2015). Bioeconomy Policy (Part II). Synopsis of national strategies around the world; A report from the German bioeconomy Council. http://biooekonomierat.de/fileadmin/Publikationen/berichte/Bioeconomy-Policy_Part-II.pdf
  • Gamborg, C., Anker, H. T., & Sandøe, P. (2014). Ethical and legal challenges in bioenergy governance: Coping with value disagreement and regulatory complexity. Energy Policy, 69, 326–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.02.013
  • Gasparatos, A., Von Maltitz, G. P., Johnson, F. X., Romeu-Dalmau, C., Jumbe, C. B., Ochieng, C., Mudombi, S., Balde, B. S., Luhanga, D., Lopes, P., & Nyambane, A. (2018). Survey of local impacts of biofuel crop production and adoption of ethanol stoves in Southern Africa. Scientific Data, 5(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2018.186
  • GBS. (2018). Global Bioeconomy Summit (GBS) conference report. Global Bioeconomy Council. http://gbs2018.com/fileadmin/gbs2018/GBS_2018_Report_web.pdf
  • Geels, F. W. (2002). Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: A multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy, 31(8/9), 1257–1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8
  • Georgescu-Roegen, N. (1971). The entropy law and the economic process. Harvard University Press.
  • Gladkykh, G., Thazin Aung, M., Takama, T., Johnson, F. X., & Fielding, M. (2020). Policy dialogue on a bioeconomy for sustainable development in Thailand. SEI report. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/dialogue-bioeconomy-sustainable-development-thailand/
  • Government of Thailand. (2012). Thailand National Biotechnology Framework, 2012–2021. Ministry of Science and Technology. http://www.biotec.or.th/en/images/document/1.pdf
  • Heimann, T. (2019). Bioeconomy and SDGs: Does the bioeconomy support the achievement of the SDGs? Earth's Future, 7(1), 43–57. https://doi.org/10.1029/2018EF001014
  • Henry, G., Hodson, E., Aramendis, R., Trigo, E., & Rankin, S. (2017). Bioeconomy: An engine for integral development of Colombia. CIRAD, CA, Colombia. https://cgspace.cgiar.org/bitstream/handle/10568/92082/Bioeconomy_An_engine_for_the_integral_development_of_Colombia.pdf?sequence=3&isAllowed=y
  • Hoff, H., Johnson, F. X., Allen, B., Biber-Freudenberger, L., & Förster, J. J. (2018). Sustainable bio-resource pathways towards a fossil-free world: The European bioeconomy in a global development context. Policy Paper, IEEP Think2030 conference. https://www.sei.org/publications/euro-bioeconomy-global-development/
  • Johnson, F. X. (2017). Biofuels, bioenergy and the bioeconomy in north and south. Industrial Biotechnology, 13(6), 289–291. https://doi.org/10.1089/ind.2017.29106.fxj
  • Johnson, F. X., Batidzirai, B., Iiyama, M., Ochieng, C. A., Olsson, O., & Gasparatos, A. (2020). Enabling sustainable bioenergy transitions in sub-Saharan Africa: Strategic issues for achieving climate-compatible developments. In A. Gasparatos, A. Ahmed, M. Naidoo, A. Karanja, K. Fukushi, O. Saito, & K. Takeuchi (Eds.), Sustainability challenges in sub-Saharan Africa I: Continental perspectives and insights from Western and Central Africa (pp. 51–80). Springer.
  • Johnson, F. X., Nyambane, A., von Maltitz, G., Luhanga, D., Jarzebski, M., Balde, B. S., & Gasparatos, A. (2018). Impacts of biofuel production in Southern Africa. Policy/Practice brief, Ecosystems Services & Poverty Alleviation Programme. https://www.espa.ac.uk/publications/impacts-biofuel-production-southern-africa
  • Johnson, F. X., & Silveira, S. (2014). Pioneer countries in the transition to alternative transport fuels: Comparison of ethanol programmes and policies in Brazil, Malawi, and Sweden. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 11, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2013.08.001
  • Johnson, F. X., & Virgin, I. (2010). Future trends in markets for food, feed, fibre, and fuel. In F. Rosillo-Calle & F. X. Johnson (Eds.), Food vs. fuel: An informed introduction (pp. 164–190). ZED.
  • Johnson, T. G., & Altman, I. (2014). Rural development opportunities in the bioeconomy. Biomass and Bioenergy, 63, 341–344. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.028
  • Kircher, M. (2012). The transition to a bio-economy: National perspectives. Biofuels, Bioproducts and Biorefining, 6, 240–245. https://doi.org/10.1002/bbb.1341
  • Knierim, A., Laschewski, L., & Boyarintseva, O. (2018). Inter- and transdisciplinarity in bioeconomy. In I. Lewandowski (Ed.), Bioeconomy (pp. 39–72). Springer.
  • Lakapunrat, N., & Thapa, G. B. (2017). Policies, socioeconomic, institutional and biophysical factors influencing the change from rice to sugarcane in Nong Bua Lamphu Province, Thailand. Environmental Management, 59(6), 924–938. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-017-0843-2
  • Leach, M. (2013). Pathways to sustainability: building political strategies. In Worldwatch Institute (Ed.). State of the World 2013: is sustainability still possible? (pp. 234–243). Washington, D.C., USA: Island Press. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-458-1_22
  • Lier, M., Kärkkäinen, L., Korhonen, K. T., & Packalen, T. (2019). Understanding the regional bioeconomy settings and competencies in 29 EU regions in 11 EU countries. Natural Resources Institute Finland.
  • López Hernández, V., & Schanz, H. (2019). Agency in actor networks: Who is governing transitions towards a bioeconomy? The case of Colombia. Journal of Cleaner Production, 225, 728–742. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.03.306
  • Majer, S., Wurster, S., Moosmann, D., Ladu, L., Sumfleth, B., & Thrän, D. (2018). Gaps and research demand for sustainability certification and standardisation in a sustainable bio-based economy in the EU. Sustainability, 10(7), 2455. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10072455
  • Mbow, C., Neely, C., & Dobie, P. (2015). How can an integrated landscape approach contribute to the implementation of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and advance climate-smart objectives? In P. A. Minang, M. van Noordwijk, O. E. Freeman, C. Mbow, J. de Leeuw, & D. Catacutan (Eds.), Climate-smart landscapes: Multifunctionality in practice (pp. 103–117). World Agroforestry Centre.
  • Meyer, R. (2017). Bioeconomy strategies: Contexts, visions, guiding implementation principles and resulting debates. Sustainability, 9(6), 1031. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9061031
  • MININFRA. (2018). Energy sector strategic plan 2018/19-2023/24. Government of Rwanda. http://www.mininfra.gov.rw/fileadmin/user_upload/infos/Final_ESSP.pdf
  • Mudombi, S., Ochieng, C., Johnson, F. X., von Maltitz, G., Luhanga, D., Dompreh, E. B., Romeu-Dalmau, C., & Gasparatos, A. (2021). Fuelling rural development? The impact of biofuel feedstock production in Southern Africa on household income and expenditures. Energy Research & Social Science, 76, 102053. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2021.102053
  • Mudombi, S., Von Maltitz, G. P., Gasparatos, A., Romeu-Dalmau, C., Johnson, F. X., Jumbe, C., Ochieng, C., Luhanga, D., Lopes, P., Balde, B. S., & Willis, K. J. (2018). Multi-dimensional poverty effects around operational biofuel projects in Malawi, Mozambique, and Swaziland. Biomass and Bioenergy, 114, 41–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.09.003
  • Müller, A., Weigelt, J., Götz, A., Schmidt, O., Lobos Alva, I., Matuschke, I., Ehling, U., & Beringer, T. (2015). The role of biomass in the sustainable development goals: A reality check and governance implications. Working Paper, Institute for Advanced Sustainability Studies (IASS). https://doi.org/10.2312/iass.2015.010
  • Olsson, O. (2016). Commoditization of biomass markets. In P. Lamers, E. Searcy, J. R. Hess, & H. Stichnothe (Eds.), Developing the global bioeconomy: Lessons from bioenergy (pp. 139–163). Academic Press.
  • Olsson, O., Ostwald, M., & Östergren, K. (2020). Realizing the vision of a circular food system - A policy dialogue on a sustainable bioeconomy in the Öresund Region. SEI report. Stockholm Environment Institute. https://www.sei.org/publications/circular-food-policy-dialogue-bioeconomy-oresund/
  • Olsson, O., Roos, A., Guisson, R., Bruce, L., Lamers, P., Hektor, B., & Hildebrandt, J. (2018). Time to tear down the pyramids? A critique of cascading hierarchies as a policy tool. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Energy and Environment, 7(2), e279. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.279
  • Pfau, S. F., Hagens, J. E., Dankbaar, B., & Smits, A. J. M. (2014). Visions of sustainability in bioeconomy research. Sustainability, 6(3), 1222–1249. https://doi.org/10.3390/su6031222
  • Philp, J. (2018). The bioeconomy, the challenge of the century for policy makers. New Biotechnology, 40, 11–19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.004
  • Porter, M. (2000). Location, competition and economic development: Local clusters in a global economy. Economic Development Quarterly, 14(1), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124240001400105
  • Priefer, C., Jörissen, J., & Frör, O. (2017). Pathways to shape the bioeconomy. Resources, 6(1), 10. https://doi.org/10.3390/resources6010010
  • Purkus, A. (2016). Concepts and instruments for a rational bioenergy policy. Springer International Publishing.
  • Riahi, K, Van Vuuren, D P, Kriegler, E, Edmonds, J, O’neill, B C, Fujimori, S, Bauer, N, Calvin, K, Dellink, R, Fricko, O, Lutz, W, Popp, A, Cuaresma, J C, Kc, S, Leimbach, M, Jiang, L, Kram, T, Rao, S, Emmerling, J, … Tavoni, M. (2017). The shared Socioeconomic Pathways and their energy, land use, and greenhouse gas emissions implications: an overview. Global Environmental Change Part, 42, 153–168.
  • Ronzon, T., & Sanjuán, A. I. (2020). Friends or foes? A compatibility assessment of bioeconomy-related Sustainable Development Goals for European policy coherence. Journal of Cleaner Production, 254, 119832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119832
  • Rosillo-Calle, F., & Johnson, F. X. (2010). Food versus fuel: An informed introduction to biofuels. ZED Books.
  • Schütte, G. (2018). What kind of innovation policy does the bioeconomy need? New Biotechnology, 40, 82–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbt.2017.04.003
  • SEI. (2020). SEI initiative on governing bioeconomy pathways. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI). https://www.sei.org/projects-and-tools/projects/sei-initiative-bioeconomy/
  • Siebert, A., Bezama, A., O’Keeffe, S., & Thrän, D. (2018). Social life cycle assessment: In pursuit of a framework for assessing wood-based products from bioeconomy regions in Germany. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 23(3), 651–662. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11367-016-1066-0
  • Skånberg, K., Olsson, O., & Hallding, K. (2016). Den Svenska Bioekonomin: Definitioner, Nulägesanalys och Möjliga Framtider. SEI report. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI). https://www.sei-international.org/publications?pid=2979
  • Statistics Sweden. (2018). Bioekonomi-utveckling av ny regional statistik. MMIR 2018:3. https://www.scb.se/contentassets/c42ded21253f484ab8ce1b27054488bb/mi1301_2016a01_br_mi71br1803.pdf
  • Turnheim, B., Berkhout, F., Geels, F., Hof, A., McMeekin, A., Nykvist, B., & van Vuuren, D. (2015). Evaluating sustainability transitions pathways: Bridging analytical approaches to address governance challenges. Global Environmental Change, 35, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.08.010
  • UNDP. (2018). ABS is genetic resources for development. Global Environment Facility (GEF) & United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) report. https://www.undp.org/content/undp/en/home/librarypage/poverty-reduction/abs-is-genetic-resources-for-sustainable-development.html
  • UNESCO. (2016). Concept of governance. International Bureau of Education. http://www.ibe.unesco.org/en/geqaf/technical-notes/concept-governance
  • Urmetzer, S., Lask, J., Vargas-Carpintero, R., & Pyka, A. (2020). Learning to change: Transformative knowledge for building a sustainable bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 167, 106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106435
  • Van de Ven, D. J., Sampedro, J., Johnson, F. X., Bailis, R., Forouli, A., Nikas, A., Yu, S., Pardo, G., de Jalón, S. G., Wise, M., & Doukas, H. (2019). Integrated policy assessment and optimisation over multiple sustainable development goals in Eastern Africa. Environmental Research Letters, 14(9), 094001. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab375d
  • Van Lancker, J., Wauters, E., & Van Huylenbroeck, G. (2016). Managing innovation in the bioeconomy: An open innovation perspective. Biomass and Bioenergy, 90, 60–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2016.03.017
  • Virchow, D., Beuchelt, T. D., Kuhn, A., & Denich, M. (2016). Biomass-based value webs: A novel perspective for emerging bioeconomies in Sub-Saharan Africa. In F. W. Gatzweiler & J. von Braun (Eds.), Technological and institutional innovations for marginalized smallholders in agricultural development (pp. 225–238). Springer International Publishing.
  • Virgin, I., Ecuru, J., Nilsson, M., Komen, J., Alemu, A., Chuwa, P., Gasingirwa, C., Karembu, M., Nyange, N., Opati, L., Omari, J., Ozor, N., & Teklehaimanot, H. (2016). Supporting bioscience innovation in Eastern Africa: An assessment of key processes in four bio-innovate technology systems, SEI Working Paper 2016-06. https://www.sei.org/publications/bioscience-innovation-e-africa-2/
  • Virgin, I., & Morris, J. (Eds.). (2016). Creating sustainable bioeconomies: The bioscience revolution in Europe and Africa. Routledge.
  • Vivien, F. D., Nieddu, M., Befort, N., Debref, R., & Giampietro, M. (2019). The hijacking of the bioeconomy. Ecological Economics, 159, 189–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.01.027
  • Vogelpohl, T. (2021). Transnational sustainability certification for the bioeconomy? Patterns and discourse coalitions of resistance and alternatives in biomass exporting regions. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 11(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-021-00278-5
  • von Braun, J., & Birner, R. (2017). Designing global governance for agricultural development and food and nutrition security. Review of Development Economics, 21(2), 265–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/rode.12261
  • Wesseler, J., Spielman, D. J., & Demont, M. (2011). The future of governance in the global bioeconomy: Policy, regulation, and investment challenges. AgBioForum, 13(4), 288–290. https://library.wur.nl/WebQuery/wurpubs/fulltext/215845
  • Wohlfahrt, J., Ferchaud, F., Gabrielle, B., Godard, C., Kurek, B., Loyce, C., & Therond, O. (2019). Characteristics of bioeconomy systems and sustainability issues at the territorial scale. A review. Journal of Cleaner Production, 232, 898–909. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.05.385
  • World Bank. (2017). Rwanda - Beyond connections: Energy access diagnostic report based on multi-tier framework. World Bank Energy Sector Management Assistance Program (ESMAP), Final report. https://www.esmap.org/node/170493
  • Zeug, W., Bezama, A., Moesenfechtel, U., Jähkel, A., & Thrän, D. (2019). Stakeholders’ interests and perceptions of bioeconomy monitoring using a sustainable development goal framework. Sustainability, 11(6), 1511. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061511