Transformative capacity for climate mitigation in strategic transport planning – principles and practices in cross-sectoral collaboration

References

• Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castán Broto, V., Trencher, G., Iwaszuk, E., & Westman, L. (2019). Transformative capacity and local action for urban sustainability. Ambio, 48(5), 449–462. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1086-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis, C. (2008). Planning for sustainable accessibility: The implementation challenge. Transport Policy, 15(2), 104–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donmoyer, R. (2000). Generalizability and the single-case study. In R. Gomm, M. Hammersley, & P. Foster (Eds.), Case study method: Key issues, key texts (pp. 45–68). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Driscoll, P. A. (2014). Breaking carbon lock-in: Path dependencies in large-scale transportation infrastructure projects. Planning Practice and Research, 29(3), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/02697459.2014.929847
   Google Scholar
• ESV. (2020). Swedish public administration. Retrieved November 12, 2020, from https://www.esv.se/english/financial-management/swedish-public-administration/
   Google Scholar
• ESV (The Swedish National Financial Management Authority). (2016). Vägledning: Verksamhetslogik. ESV 2016:31.
   Google Scholar
• Finnveden, G., & Åkerman, J. (2014). Not planning a sustainable transport system. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 46, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2014.02.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaas, E., Hjerpe, M., Storbjörk, S., Neset, T. S., Bohman, A., Muthumanickam, P., & Johansson, J. (2019). Developing transformative capacity through systematic assessments and visualization of urban climate transitions. Ambio, 48(5), 515–528. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-018-1109-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Versteeg, W. (2005). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 7(3), 175–184. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080500339646
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Henriksson, M. (2019). The ‘I’ in sustainable planning: Constructions of users within municipal planning for sustainable mobility. In C. L. Scholten, & T. Joelsson (Eds.), Integrating gender into transport planning (pp. 177–197). Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K. (2019). Transforming urban climate governance: Capacities for transformative climate governance [Doctoral dissertation]. Eramus University.
   Google Scholar
• Hölscher, K., Frantzeskaki, N., & Loorbach, D. (2019). Steering transformations under climate change: Capacities for transformative climate governance and the case of Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Regional Environmental Change, 19(3), 791–805. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-018-1329-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R., Hjerpe, M., & Storbjörk, S. (2015). Creating transformative force? The role of spatial planning in climate change transitions towards sustainable transportation. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 17(5), 617–635. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003535
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hrelja, R., Isaksson, K., & Richardson, T. (2013). Choosing conflict on the road to sustainable mobility: A risky strategy for breaking path dependency in urban policy making. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hull, A. (2008). Policy integration: What will it take to achieve more sustainable transport solutions in cities? Transport Policy, 15(2), 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imran, M., & Pearce, J. (2015). Discursive barriers to sustainable transport in New Zealand cities. Urban Policy and Research, 33(4), 392–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.980400
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Innes, J. E., & Booher, D. E. (2003). The impact of collaborative planning on governance capacity. Working Paper 2003/03. Institute of Urban and Regional Development, University of California.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K. (2020). Politics of a paradigm shift: A story from Stockholm. In C. Curtis (Ed.), Handbook of sustainable transport. Research handbooks in transport studies series (pp. 416–424). Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Isaksson, K., Antonson, H., & Eriksson, L. (2017). Layering and parallel policy making –complementary concepts for understanding implementation challenges related to sustainable mobility. Transport Policy, 53, 50–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.08.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kronsell, A., Smidfelt Rosqvist, L., & Winslott Hiselius, L. (2016). Achieving climate objectives in transport policy by including women and challenging gender norms: The Swedish case. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(8), 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2015.1129653
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legacy, C. (2016). Transforming transport planning in the postpolitical era. Urban Studies, 53(14), 3108–3124. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015602649
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, G., & Marsden, G. (2019). Opening out and closing down: the treatment of uncertainty in transport planning’s forecasting paradigm. Transportation, (2), 595–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-019-10067-x
   Google Scholar
• Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordström, M., & Wales, M. (2019). Enhancing urban transformative capacity through children’s participation in planning. Ambio, 48(5), 507–514. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01146-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss, P. (2006). Cost-benefit analyses of transportation investments: Neither critical nor realistic. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 32–60. https://doi.org/10.1558/jocr.v5i1.32
   Google Scholar
• Öberg, S. A., & Wockelberg, H. (2021). Agency control or autonomy? Government steering of Swedish government agencies 2003–2017. International Public Management Journal, 24(3), 330–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, K. (2012). Global environmental change II: From adaptation to deliberate transformation. Progress in Human Geography, 36(5), 667–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132511425767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Owens, S. (1995). From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’?: Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy, 2(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(95)93245-T
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research & evaluation methods: Integrating theory and practice. Sage publications.
   Google Scholar
• Pettersson, F. (2014). Swedish infrastructure policy and planning: Conditions for sustainability [Doctoral dissertation]. Environmental and Energy System Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Schwanen, T., Banister, D., & Anable, J. (2011). Scientific research about climate change mitigation in transport: A critical review. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(10), 993–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.09.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SEA. (2017a). Strategisk plan för omställning av transportsektorn till fossilfrihet. ER 2017:7.
   Google Scholar
• SEA. (2017b). Plan för uppföljning och utvärdering av omställning av transportsektorn till fossilfrihet. ER 2017:11.
   Google Scholar
• SEA. (2017c). Redovisning av effektkedjor. ER 2017:13.
   Google Scholar
• SEA. (2020a). Kontrollstation för Strategisk plan för omställning av transportsektorn till fossilfrihet. ER 2020:3.
   Google Scholar
• SEA. (2020b). Underlagsrapport till Kontrollstation för Strategisk plan för omställning av transportsektorn till fossilfrihet. ER 2020:4.
   Google Scholar
• SEA. (2020c). Samordningsuppdrag för omställning av transportsektorn till fossilfrihet – slutrapport. ER 2020:17.
   Google Scholar
• SEA (Swedish Energy Agency). (2016). Nulägesrapport inom samordningsuppdraget fossilfri transportsektor. ER 2016:25.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2013). Fossilfrihet på väg. SOU 2013:84.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2015). Regleringsbrev för budgetåret 2016 avseende Statens energimyndighet. (M2015/04253/S).
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2016). En klimat- och luftvårdsstrategi för Sverige. SOU 2016:47.
   Google Scholar
• Swedish Government. (2019). Prop. 2019/20:65. En samlad politik för klimatet – klimatpolitisk handlingsplan.
   Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A. (2010). Why we fail to reduce urban road traffic volumes: Does it matter how planners frame the problem? Transport Policy, 17(4), 216–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2010.01.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torrens, J. (2019). The formation of favourable environments for urban experimentation: Contextual dynamics and transformative capacities in Bristol and Medellín [Doctoral dissertation]. University of Sussex.
   Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2017). The four knowledges of transport planning. Enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making. Transport Policy, 58, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witzell, J. (2020). Assessment tensions: How climate mitigation futures are marginalized in long-term transport planning. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 87, 102503. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102503
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M. (2016). Conceptualizing urban transformative capacity: A framework for research and policy. Cities, 51, 121–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., Borgström, S., & Farrelly, M. (2019). Urban transformative capacity: From concept to practice. Ambio, 48(5), 437–448. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-019-01169-y
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar