Material dependencies: hidden underpinnings of sustainability transitions

References

• Abrahamsson, S., Bertoni, F., Mol, A., & Martín, R. I. (2015). Living with omega-3: New materialism and enduring concerns. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 33(1), 4–19. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/d14086p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail. The origins of power, prosperity and poverty. Crown Business.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & Wylie, J. (2009). On geography and materiality. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(2), 318–335. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a3940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armitage, D. R. (2010). Adaptive capacity and environmental governance. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Avid, A. P. (2007). Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica, 1(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-006-0005-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University press.
   Google Scholar
• Barba Lata, I., & Duineveld, M. (2019). A harbour on land: De Ceuvel’s topologies of creative reuse. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 51(8), 1758–1774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19860540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barba Latta, I. I. V. (2017). Dis-locating innovation: Amphibious geographies of creative reuse and alternative value production. http://edepot.wur.nl/396514C1 – NN08202,6574
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, C. I. (1968). The functions of the executive (Vol. 11). Harvard university press.
   Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1957). Mythologies. Éditions du Seuil.
   Google Scholar
• Bennett, J. (2013). Vibrant matter. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822391623
   Google Scholar
• Benson, M. H. (2019). New materialism: An ontology for the anthropocene. Natural Re-Sources Journal, 59(2), 251–280. https://ssrn.cohttps://ssrn.com/abstract=3447625m/abstract=3447625
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergthaller, H. (2014). On the limits of agency: Notes on the material turn from a systems-theoretical perspective. In S. Iovino & S. Oppermann (Eds.), Material ecocriticism (pp. 1–18). Indiana UP.
   Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2000). Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecological Applications, 10(5), 1251–1262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1890/1051-0761(2000)010[1251:ROTEKA]2.0.CO;2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkes, F., Colding, J., & Folke, C. (2008). Navigating social-ecological systems: Building resilience for complexity and change. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bettini, Y., Brown, R. R., & de Haan, F. J. (2015). Exploring institutional adaptive capacity in practice: Examining water governance adaptation in Australia. Ecology and Society, 20(1), 47. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-07291-200147
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beunen, R., van Assche, K., & Duineveld, M.. (2015). Evolutionary governance theory: Theory and applications. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Birch, K. (2016). Materiality and sustainability transitions: Integrating climate change in transport infrastructure in Ontario, Canada. Prometheus, 34(3–4), 191–206. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08109028.2017.1331612
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Björkman, L., & Harris, A. (2018). Engineering cities: Mediating materialities, infrastructural imaginaries and shifting regimes of urban expertise. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 42(2), 244–262. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2427.12528
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borup, M., Brown, N., Konrad, K., & Van Lente, H. (2006). The sociology of expectations in science and technology. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 18(3–4), 285–298. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320600777002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce, J. K. (2001). From natural resources to natural assets. NEW SOLUTIONS: A Journal of Environmental and Occupational Health Policy, 11(3), 267–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2190/5QPY-TPE0-JP5W-5FJE
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Braidotti, R.. (2006). Transpositions: On nomadic ethics. Polity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bryant, R., & Knight, D. M. (2019). The anthropology of the future. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchanan, I., & Lambert, G. (2005). Deleuze and space. University of Toronto Press.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. (2009). Governance as a conceptual development in the analysis of policy. Critical Policy Studies, 3(1), 58–67. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19460170903158107
   Google Scholar
• Commons, J. R. (2005). Institutional economics: Its place in political economy (Vol 1). Transactiuon Publish-ers. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203788462
   Google Scholar
• Coole, D., & Frost, S. (2010). New materialisms ontology, agency, and politics. Duke University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119188230.saseas0409
   Google Scholar
• Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• De Berg, H. (2001). Luhmann’s systems theory and its applications in literary studies: A bibliography. European Journal of English Studies, 5(3), 385–436. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1076/ejes.5.3.385.7296
   Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1989). A thousand plateaus: Capitalism and schizophrenia. Journal of Interdisciplinary History, 19(4) Continuum. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/203963
   Google Scholar
• Demuth, B. (2019). Floating coast: An environmental history of the Bering Strait. WW Nor-ton & Company.
   Google Scholar
• Dominković, D., Bačeković, I., Pedersen, A. S., & Krajačić, G. (2018). The future of transportation in sustainable energy systems: Opportunities and barriers in a clean energy transition. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 82(2), 1823–1838. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.06.117
   Google Scholar
• Duineveld, M., Van Assche, K., & Beunen, R. (2013). Making things irreversible. Object stabilization in urban planning and design. Geoforum; Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 46, 16–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2012.11.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duineveld, M., Van Assche, K., & Beunen, R. (2017). Re-conceptualising political land-scapes after the material turn: A typology of material events. Landscape Research, 42(4), 375–384. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/01426397.2017.1290791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunne, A., & Raby, F. (2013). Speculative everything. Design, fiction and social dreaming. In Artifact (Vol. 28). Cambridge: MIT Press books. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/jdh/epv001
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, J. (2021). The materialism of historical materialism. In Coole, D. & Frost, S (eds.) New materialisms (pp. 281–298). Duke University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv11cw2wk.16
   Google Scholar
• Elden, S., & Crampton, J. W. (2007). Space, knowledge and power: Foucault and geography. Ashgate Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Eyers, T. (2012). Lacan and the concept of the real. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Farías, I. (2014). Virtual attractors, actual assemblages: How Luhmann’s theory of communication complements actor-network theory. European Journal of Social Theory, 17(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431013484003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felder, M., Duineveld, M., & Assche, K. V. K. (2015). Absence/presence and the ontological politics of heritage: The case of barrack 57. International Journal of Heritage Studies, 21(5), 460–475. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13527258.2014.948483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B.. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in pratice. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30(1), 441–473. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.energy.30.050504.144511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster, J. B. (2000). Marx’s ecology: Materialism and nature. NYU Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M.. (1978a). Discipline and Punish. Penguin Books.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1978b). The history of sexuality. In An introduction (Vol. 84, 3). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/1904618
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1984). Truth and power. In The Foucault reader. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (2008). The Birth of biopolitics. Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230594180
   Google Scholar
• Fuchs, S. (2001). Against essentialism. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garud, R., Kumaraswamy, A., & Karnøe, P. (2010). Path dependence or path creation? Journal of Management Studies, 47(4), 760–774. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00914.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. W. (2005). Technological transitions and system innovations: A co-evolutionary and socio-technical analysis. Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845424596
   Google Scholar
• Gregson, N., & Crang, M. (2010). Materiality and waste: Inorganic vitality in a networked world. SAGE Publications Sage UK.
   Google Scholar
• Gunder, M., & Hillier, J. (2016). Planning in ten words or less: A Lacanian entanglement with spatial planning. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315246697
   Google Scholar
• Hansen, T., & Coenen, L. (2015). The geography of sustainability transitions: Review, synthesis and reflections on an emergent research field. Environmental Innovation and Socie-tal Transitions, 17, 92–109. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2014.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P., Cars, G., Madanipour, A., & De Magalhaes, C. (2017). Transforming governance, institutionalist analysis and institutional capacity. In P. Healy C. Car & A. Madanipour C. De Magalhães (Eds.), Urban governance, institutional capacity and social milieux (pp. 6–28). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hernes, T. (2007). Understanding organization as process: Theory for a tangled world. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934524
   Google Scholar
• Hook, D. (2017). Six moments in Lacan: Communication and identification in psychology and psychoanalysis. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hornborg, A. (1996). Ecology as semiotics: Outlines of a contextualist paradigm for human ecology. In P. Descola & G. Palsson (Eds.), Nature and society: Anthropological perspectives (pp. 45–62). Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
   Google Scholar
• Houston, D., Hillier, J., MacCallum, D., Steele, W., & Byrne, J. (2018). Make kin, not cities! Multispecies entanglements and ‘becoming-world’in planning theory. Planning Theory, 17(2), 190–212. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095216688042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howarth, D. R., & Torfing, J. (2005). Discourse theory in European politics : Identity, policy and governance. Palgrave Macmillan. http://www.loc.gov/catdir/bios/hol053/2004051403.html
   Google Scholar
• Huijbens, E. H. (2021). Developing earthly attachments in the anthropocene. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003098782
   Google Scholar
• Hunt, J. (2019). Anticipating future system states. Journal of Futures Studies, 23(3), 119–128. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.6531/JFS.201903_23(3).0011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, J., & Van Assche, K. (2014). Understanding empirical boundaries: A systems-theoretical avenue in border studies. Geopolitics, 19(1), 182–205. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/14650045.2013.830106
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston, A. (2020). Fear of science. In R. Sbriglia & S. Žižek (Eds.), Subject lessons (pp. 125–141). Northwestern University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvw1d5dk.9
   Google Scholar
• Kay, A. (2005). A critical of the use path dependency in policy studies. Public Administration, 83(3), 553–571. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0033-3298.2005.00462.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, F., Rogge, K. S., & Howlett, M. (2019). Policy mixes for sustainability transitions: New approaches and insights through bridging innovation and policy studies. Research Policy, 48(10), 103832. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.103832
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, E., & Mouffe, C. (1987). Post-Marxism without apologies. New Left Review, 166, 79–106. http://sites.google.com/site/sgboehm/laclau-mouffe-nlr.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Latham, A., & McCormack, D. P. (2004). Moving cities: Rethinking the materialities of urban geographies. Progress in Human Geography, 28(6), 701–724. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph515oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2006). Reassembling the social. Comparative Sociology, 7), https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1163/156913308X336453
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B., & Woolgar, S. (1986). Laboratory life. The construction of scientific facts. (Vol. 79, 1) Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203481141
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Actor network theory and material semiotics. In B. S. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell companion to social theory (pp. 141–158). Blackwell. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444304992.ch7
   Google Scholar
• Leonardi, P. M., Nardi, B. A., & Kallinikos, J. (2012). Materiality and organizing: Social interaction in a technological world. Oxford university press on demand.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1987). Soziale Systeme: Grundriss einer allgemeinen Theorie. Suhrkamp.
   Google Scholar
• Luhmann, N. (1989). Ecological communication. University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Magris, C. (2016). Danube. Random House.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney, J. (2000). Path dependence in historical sociology. Theory and Society, 29(4), 507–548. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007113830879
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massey, D. B. (2005). For space. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• McFarlane, C. (2011). One assemblage and critical urbanism. City, 15(2), 204–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568715
   Google Scholar
• Meijerink, S., & Huitema, D. (2010). Policy entrepreneurs and change strategies: Lessons from sixteen case studies of water transitions around the globe. Ecology and Society, 15(2), 21. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-03509-150221
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, M. F. (2019). Preparing for the unknown … unknowns:‘doomsday’prepping and disaster risk anxiety in the United States. Journal of Risk Research, 22(10), 1267–1279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2018.1466825
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H. (1987). The strategy concept I: Five Ps for strategy. California Management Review, 30(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/41165263
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A.. (2002). Science and cultural theory. Duke University Press
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, A. (2018). Future north, nurture forth: Design fiction, anticipation and Arctic futures. In J. Kampevold-Larson P. Hemmersam (Ed.), Future north (pp. 119–141). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Mosse, D. (2004). Is good policy unimplementable? Reflections on the ethnography of aid policy and practice. Development and Change, 35(4), 639–671. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0012-155X.2004.00374.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, G. A. (2017). Disposable cities: Garbage, governance and sustainable development in urban Africa. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315257624
   Google Scholar
• Nayak, A., Chia, R., & Canales, J. I. (2020). Noncognitive microfoundations: Understanding dynamic capabilities as idiosyncractically refined sensitivities and predispositions. Academy of Management Review, 45(2), 280–303. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2016.0253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsson, P., Gunderson, L. H., Carpenter, S. R., Ryan, P., Lebel, L., Folke, C., & Holling, C. S. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 1. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-01595-110118
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (2009). A general framework for analyzing sustainability of social-ecological systems. Science, 325(5939), 419–422. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1172133
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patterson, J., Schulz, K., Vervoort, J., Adler, C., Hurlbert, M., van der Hel, S., Schmidt, A., Barau, A., Obani, P., & Sethi, M. (2015). Transformations towards sustainability’ emerging approaches, critical reflections and a research agenda. Earth System Governance Working Paper, 34.
   Google Scholar
• Pellizzoni, L. (2014). Metaphors and problematizations notes for a research programme on new materialism. Scenarios TECNOSCIENZA Italian Journal of Science & Technology Studies, 5(2), 73–91. www.tecnoscienza.net
   Google Scholar
• Pereira, L. M., Karpouzoglou, T., Frantzeskaki, N., & Olsson, P. (2018). Designing trans-formative spaces for sustainability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 23(4), 32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10607-230432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(02), 251–267. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2586011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope, J., Bond, A., Huge, J., & Morrison-Saunders, A. (2017). Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 62, 205–215. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eiar.2016.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottage, A. (1998). Power as an art of contingency: Luhmann, Deleuze, Foucault. Economy and Society, 27(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/03085149800000001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pottage, A. (2012). The materiality of what? Journal of Law and Society, 39(1), 167–183. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6478.2012.00576.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ren, C. (2011). Non-human agency, radical ontology and tourism realities. Annals of Tourism Research, 38(3), 858–881. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2010.12.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, L. (2011). Black-boxing sustainability. Journal of Sustainable Development, 4(4), 32. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5539/jsd.v4n4p32
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T. (2016). Where the water sheds: Disputed deposits at the ends of the Danube. In M. Bozovic M.D. Miller (Ed.), Watersheds (pp. 307–336). Academic Studies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson, T., & Weszkalnys, G. (2014). Introduction: Resource materialities. Anthropological Quarterly, 87(1), 5–30. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2014.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaltegger, S., & Burritt, R. (2017). Contemporary environmental accounting: Issues, concepts and practice. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Scheffer, M., Carpenter, S. R., Lenton, T. M., Bascompte, J., Brock, W., Dakos, V., Van de Koppel, J., Van de Leemput, I. A., Levin, S. A., & Van Nes, E. H. (2012). Anticipating critical transitions. Science, 338(6105), 344–348. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1225244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2011). Speaking of change: Why discourse is key to the dynamics of policy transformation. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 106–126. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2011.576520
   Google Scholar
• Seidl, D. (2016). Organisational identity and self-transformation: An autopoietic perspective. Routledge. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315247564
   Google Scholar
• Shove, E., & Walker, G. (2010). Governing transitions in the sustainability of everyday life. Research Policy, 39(4), 471–476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2010.01.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thelen, K. (2012). How institutions evolve: Insights from comparative historical analysis. In Mahoney, J & Rueschemeyer, (eds.) Comparative Historical Analysis in the Social Sciences, 208–240. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511803963.007
   Google Scholar
• Turnheim, B., & Nykvist, B. (2019). Opening up the feasibility of sustainability transitions pathways (STPs): representations, potentials, and conditions. Research Policy, 48(3), 775–788. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). The ‘system’of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4-5), 25–39. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentinov, V. (2014). The complexity-sustainability trade-off in Niklas Luhmann’s social systems theory. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 31(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentinov, V. (2017). Materiality in natural resource management: A systems theory view. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(3), 323–326. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1341305
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., & Duineveld, M. (2013). Evolutionary governance theory: An introduction. Springer, https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00984-1
   Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Beunen, R., Duineveld, M., & Gruezmacher, M. (2017). Power/knowledge and natural resource management: Foucaultian foundations in the analysis of adaptive governance. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(3), 308–322. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1338560
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., & Beunen, R. (2014). Power and contingency in planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 46(10), 2385–2400. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1068/a130080p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Duineveld, M., Gruezmacher, M., & Beunen, R. (2021). Steering as path creation: Leadership and the art of managing dependencies and reality effects. Politics and Governance, 9(2), 369–380. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v9i2.4027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K, Hornidge, A K, Schlüter, A, & Vaidianu, N. (2020). Governance and the coastal condition: Towards new modes of observation, adaptation and integration. Marine Policy, 112, 103413. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2019.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Assche, K., Verschraegen, G., Valentinov, V., & Gruezmacher, M. (2019). The social, the ecological, and the adaptive. Von Bertalanffy’s general systems theory and the adap-tive governance of social-ecological systems. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 36(3), 308–321. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2587
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Tuin, I., & Dolphijn, R.. (2012). New materialism: Interviews & cartographies. Michigan: Open Humanities Press.
   Google Scholar
• von Bertalanffy, L. (1968). General system theory: Foundations, development, applications. George Braziller.
   Google Scholar
• Voß, J.-P., & Bornemann, B. (2011). The politics of reflexive governance: Challenges for Designing adaptive management and transition management. Ecology and Society, 16(2), 9. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04051-160209
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whatmore, S. (2006). Materialist returns: Practising cultural geography in and for a more-than-human world. Cultural Geographies, 13(4), 600–609. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1191/1474474006cgj377oa
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wieczorek, A. J. (2018). Sustainability transitions in developing countries: Major insights and their implications for research and policy. Environmental Science & Policy, 84, 204–216. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2017.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, S., & Robinson, J. (2020). Measuring sustainability: An evaluation framework for sustainability transition experiments. Environmental Science & Policy, 103, 58–66. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zizek, S. (2008). The sublime object of ideology. Verso.
   Google Scholar