Politics of knowledge use: epistemic governance in marine spatial planning

References

• Alasuutari, P. (2018). Authority as epistemic capital. Journal of Political Power, 11(2), 165–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/2158379X.2018.1468151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2014). Epistemic governance: An approach to the politics of policy-making. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 1(1), 67–84. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2014.887986
   Google Scholar
• Alasuutari, P., & Qadir, A. (2019). Epistemic governance. Social change in the modern world. Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Behagel, J., & Turnhout, E. (2011). Democratic legitimacy in the implementation of the water framework directive in the Netherlands: Towards participatory and deliberative norms? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 13(3), 297–316. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2011.607002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowell, R., & Lennon, M. (2014). The utilisation of environmental knowledge in land-use planning: Drawing lessons for an ecosystem services approach. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 263–282. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12289j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2006). Evidence-based planning: Rhetoric and reality. disP – The Planning Review, 42(165), 14–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556951
   Google Scholar
• Davoudi, S. (2015). Planning as practice of knowing. Planning Theory, 14(3), 316–331. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095215575919
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewulf, A., Klenk, N., Wyborn, C., & Lemos, M. C. (2020). Usable environmental knowledge from the perspective of decision-making: The logics of consequentiality, appropriateness, and meaningfulness. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 42, 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2019.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dryzek, J. S. (2001). Legitimacy and economy in deliberative democracy. Political Theory, 29(5), 651–669. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591701029005003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European MSP Platform. (n.d.). Region Kymenlaakso – Regional land use plan for the Sea (MSP equivalent). https://maritime-spatial-planning.ec.europa.eu/practices/region-kymenlaakso-regional-land-use-plan-sea-msp-equivalent
   Google Scholar
• Faludi, D. A., & Waterhout, B. (2006). Introducing evidence-based planning. disP – The Planning Review, 42(165), 4–13. https://doi.org/10.1080/02513625.2006.10556950
   Google Scholar
• Finland’s Environmental Administration. (2020). The Finnish inventory programme for underwater marine diversity – VELMU. https://www.environment.fi/en-US/VELMU
   Google Scholar
• Flyvbjerg, B. (1998). Rationality and power: Democracy in practice. The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. Pantheon Books.
   Google Scholar
• Galik, C. S., & Chelbi, L. (2021). Revisiting institutional stability: A systematic review and distillations of dominant modes. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2021(31), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1941
   Google Scholar
• Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hajer, M. A. (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (1997). Collaborative planning: Shaping places in fragmented societies. UBC Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, I. D., Redpath, S. M., Fischer, A., & Young, J. (2019). Who knows best? Understanding the use of research-based knowledge in conservation conflicts. Journal of Environmental Management, 231, 1065–1075. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.09.023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huxley, M., & Yiftachel, O. (2000). New paradigm or old Myopia? Unsettling the communicative turn in planning theory. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 19(4), 333–342. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739456X0001900402
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hyvärinen, E., Juslén, A., Kemppainen, E., Uddström, A., & Liukko, U.-M. (Eds.). (2019). The 2019 red list of Finnish species. Ympäristöministeriö & Suomen ympäristökeskus. 704 p.
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K., Forysth, A., & Slotterback, C. S. (2009). Is there a role for evidence-based practice in urban planning and policy? Planning Theory & Practice, 10(4), 459–478. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649350903417241
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2014). Presentation and persuasion: The meaning of evidence in Irish green infrastructure policy. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice, 10(2), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1332/174426414X13935916947767
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M. (2020). Planning as justification. Planning Theory & Practice, 21(5), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2020.1769918
   Google Scholar
• Lennon, M., & Scott, M. (2015). Contending expertise: An interpretive approach to (re)conceiving wind power’s ‘planning problem’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 17(5), 593–616. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.1003349
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, E., Posner, S., Tillmann, P., Bernhardt, J. R., Howard, K., & Rosenthal, A. (2014). Understanding the use of ecosystem service knowledge in decision making: Lessons from international experiences of spatial planning. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 32(2), 320–340. https://doi.org/10.1068/c12292j
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Qadir, A., & Syväterä, J. (2021). The moral authority of science: Evidence from parliamentary debates in seven countries. European Journal of Cultural and Political Sociology, 8(3), 1–29. https://doi.org/10.1080/23254823.2021.1885461
   Google Scholar
• Regional Council of Kymenlaakso. (2014). Kymenlaakso regional plan. Trade and marine areas. https://www.kymenlaakso.fi/images/Liitteet/MAAKUNTAKAAVA/Maakuntakaavakartat_ja_selosteet/Kauppa_ja_meri_kaavaselostus.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2007). Re-examining the role of knowledge within planning theory. Planning Theory, 6(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095207075161
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y. (2019). Silences, categories and black-boxes: Towards an analytics of the relations of power in planning regulation. Planning Theory, 19(22), 214–233. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095219870559
   Google Scholar
• Rydin, Y., Natarajan, L., Lee, M., & Lock, S. (2018). Black-boxing the evidence: Planning regulation and major renewable energy infrastructure projects in England and Wales. Planning Theory & Practice, 19(2), 218–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2018.1456080
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandercock, L. (1998). Making the invisible visible: A multicultural planning history. University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, V. A. (2012). Discursive institutionalism: Scope, dynamics, and philosophical underpinnings. In F. Fischer & H. Gottweis (Eds.), The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice (pp. 85–113). Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tennøy, A., Hansson, L., Lissandrello, E., & Næss, P. (2016). How planners’ use and non-use of expert knowledge affect the goal achievement potential of plans: Experiences from strategic land-use and transport planning processes in three Scandinavian cities. Progress in Planning, 109, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progress.2015.05.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tewdwr-Jones, M., & Allmendinger, P. (1998). Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 30(11), 1975–1989. https://doi.org/10.1068/a301975
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Throgmorton, J. A. (1993). Planning as a rhetorical activity: Survey research as a trope in arguments about electric power planning in Chicago. Journal of the American Planning Association, 59(3), 334–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944369308975884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnhout, E., Behagel, J., Ferranti, F., & Beunen, R. (2015). The construction of legitimacy in European nature policy: Expertise and participation in the service of cost-effectiveness. Environmental Politics, 24(3), 461–480. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2015.1008260
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UNESCO. (n.d.). Marine spatial planning. https://ioc.unesco.org/our-work/marine-spatial-planning
   Google Scholar