References
- Baker, L., & Phillips, J. (2019). Tensions in the transition: The politics of electricity distribution in South Africa. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 37(1), 177–196. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654418778590
- Barragan-Contreras, S. J. (2021). Procedural injustices in large-scale solar energy: A case study in the Mayan region of Yucatan. Mexico. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2000378
- Bridge, G., & Gailing, L. (2020). New energy spaces: Towards a geographical political economy of energy transition. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1037–1050. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X20939570
- Bridge, G., Özkaynak, B., & Turhan, E. (2018). Energy infrastructure and the fate of the nation: Introduction to special issue. Energy Research & Social Science, 41, 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.029
- Brisbois, M. C. (2020). Shifting political power in an era of electricity decentralization: Rescaling, reorganization and battles for influence. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 36, 49–69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2020.04.007
- Britton, J., Woodmanm, B., & Webb, J. (2022). Ideational bricolage as a route to transforming local institutions for heat decarbonisation: Heat networks and local government in England. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning.
- Calvert, K. 2016. From ‘energy geography' to ‘energy geographies’. Progress in Human Geography, 40(1), 105–125.
- Chilvers, J., & Longhurst, N. (2016). Participation in transition(s): Reconceiving public engagements in energy transitions as co-produced. Emergent and diverse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 18(5), 585–607. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1110483
- Cowell, R., Ellis, G., Sherry-Brennan, F., Strachan, P. A., & Toke, D. (2017). Energy transitions, sub-national government and regime flexibility: How has devolution in the United Kingdom affected renewable energy development? Energy Research & Social Science, 23, 169–181. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2016.10.006
- Creamer, E., Eadson, W., Van Veelen, B., Pinker, A., Tingey, M., Braunholtz-Speight, T., Markantoni, M., Foden, M., & Lacey-Barnacle, M. (2018). Community energy: Entanglements of community, state, and private sector. Geography Compass, 12(7), e12378. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12378
- Crouch, M. 2021. COP26 is crunch time for net-zero infrastructure. Mott Macdonald.
- De Laurentis, C., & Cowell, R. (2021). Reconfiguring energy flows: Energy grid-lock and the role of regions in shaping electricity infrastructure networks. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2008235
- De Laurentis, C., & Pearson, P. J. G. (2018). Understanding the material dimensions of the uneven deployment of renewable energy in two Italian regions. Energy Research & Social Science, 36, 106–119. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2017.11.009
- Feindt, P. H., & Cowell, R. (2010). The recession, environmental policy and ecological modernization – What’s new about the green new deal? International Planning Studies, 15(3), 191–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2010.509474
- Goldthau, A. (2014). Rethinking the governance of energy infrastructure: Scale, decentralization and polycentrism. Energy Research & Social Science, 1, 134–140. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2014.02.009
- Graham, S., & Marvin, S. (2001). Splintering Urbanism: networked infrastructures, technological mobilities and the urban condition. Routledge.
- Hvelplund, F., & Djørup, S. (2017). Multilevel policies for radical transition: Governance for a 100% renewable energy system. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(7), 1218–1241. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654417710024
- IPCC. (2022). Climate change 2022: Impacts, adaptation and vulnerability: Summary for policymakers. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change.
- Johnson, B. (2020). Prime minister economy speech, June 30, 2020. Dudley.
- Lockwood, M., Mitchell, C., Hoggett, R., & Kuzemko, C. (2017). The governance of industry rules and energy system innovation: The case of codes in Great Britain. Utilities Policy, 47, 41–49. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2017.06.008
- Longhurst, N., & Chilvers, J. (2019). Mapping diverse visions of energy transitions: Co-producing sociotechnical imaginaries. Sustainability Science, 14(4), 973–990. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00702-y
- Lovins, A. (1977). Soft energy paths: Toward a durable peace. Penguin.
- Meadowcroft, J. (2016). Let’s Get this transition moving!. Canadian Public Policy, 42(S1), S10–S17. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3138/cpp.2015-028
- Moles-Grueso, S., & Stojilovska, A. (2021). Towards spatializing consumer energy sustainability. Empirical findings about the policy and practice of energy conservation and poverty in Barcelona and North Macedonia. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–14. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2008234
- Muinzer, T., & Ellis, G. (2017). Subnational governance for the low carbon energy transition: Mapping the UK’s ‘energy constitution’. Environment and Planning C, 35(7), 1176–1197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2399654416687999
- Nash, N., Whitmarsh, L., Capstick, S., Hargreaves, T., Poortinga, W., Thomas, G., Sautkina, E., & Xenias, D. (2017). Climate-relevant behavioral spillover and the potential contribution of social practice theory. WIREs Climate Change, 8(6), e481. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.481
- Nathan, H. S. K., Das, S. D., & Ps, A. P. (2022). Rural microgrids – ‘Tragedy of commons’ or ‘community collective action’. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–16. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2021.2022466
- O’Sullivan, K., Golubchikov, O., & Mehmood, A. (2020). Uneven energy transitions: Understanding continued energy peripheralization in rural communities. Energy Policy, 138, Article 111288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111288
- Oteman, M., Wiering, M., & Helderman, J.-K. (2014). The institutional space of community initiatives for renewable energy: A comparative case study of the Netherlands, Germany and Denmark. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 4(1), 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/2192-0567-4-11
- Palm, J. (2021). Exploring limited capacity in the grid: Actors. Problems, and Solutions. Frontiers in Energy Research, 9, 1–13. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fenrg.2021.663769
- Partzsch, L. (2017). ‘Power with’ and ‘power to’ in environmental politics and the transition to sustainability. Environmental Politics, 26(2), 193–211. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2016.1256961
- Perreault, T., & Valdivia, G. (2010). Hydrocarbons, popular protest and national imaginaries: Ecuador and Bolivia in comparative context. Geoforum: Journal of Physical, Human, and Regional Geosciences, 41(5), 689–699. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2010.04.004
- Rudek, T. J. (2022). Capturing the invisible. Sociotechnical imaginaries of energy. The critical overview. Science and Public Policy, 49(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scab076
- Silver, J. (2021). Decaying infrastructures in the post-industrial city: An urban political ecology of the US pipeline crisis. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 4(3), 756–777. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/2514848619890513
- Sovacool, B.K, & Cooper, C.J. (2013). The governance of energy megaprojects. Edward Elgar Publishing.
- Sovacool, B. K., Hess, D. J., Amir, S., Geels, F. W., Hirsh, R., Rodriguez Medina, L., Miller, C., Alvial Palavicino, C., Phadke, R., Ryghaug, M., Schot, J., Silvast, A., Stephens, J., Stirling, A., Turnheim, B., Van Der Vleuten, E., Van Lente, H., & Yearley, S. (2020). Sociotechnical agendas: Reviewing future directions for energy and climate research. Energy Research & Social Science, 70 , 1–35 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101617.
- Svensson, O. (2021). The matter of energy emerges: Bridging the divide between conflicting conceptions of energy resources. Energy Research & Social Science, 72, 1–11 https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101895.
- Tesfamichael, M. (2022). Caught between hope and reality: How citizens reconcile ambitious dominant energy imaginaries with everyday service shortfalls. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 1–12. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2022.2042675
- Wesche, J. P., Negro, S. O., Dütschke, E., Raven, R. P. J. M., & Hekkert, M. P. (2019). Configurational innovation systems – Explaining the slow German heat transition. Energy Research & Social Science, 52, 99–113. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.12.015
- While, A., & Eadson, W. (2019). Households in place: Socio-spatial (dis)advantage in energy-carbon restructuring. European Planning Studies, 27(8), 1626–1645. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1595533
- Wiig, A., Karvonen, A., Mcfarlane, C., & Rutherford, J. (2022). From the guest editors splintering urbanism at 20: Mapping trajectories of research on urban infrastructures. Journal of Urban Technology, 29(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2021.2005930
- Windemer, R. (2019). Considering time in land use planning: An assessment of end-of-life decision making for commercially managed onshore wind schemes. Land Use Policy, 87, Article 104024. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104024