1,449
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

It’s not all about the money—landowner motivation and high voltage grid development

ORCID Icon, &
Pages 211-224 | Received 15 Dec 2021, Accepted 19 Jun 2022, Published online: 26 Jun 2022

References

  • Aitken, M., Haggett, C., & Rudolph, D. (2016). Practices and rationales of community engagement with wind farms: Awareness raising, consultation, empowerment. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(4), 557–576. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2016.1218919
  • Bailey, E., Devine-Wright, P., & Batel, S. (2016). Using a narrative approach to understand place attachments and responses to power line proposals: The importance of life-place trajectories. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 48, 200–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.10.006
  • Baka, J. (2017). Making space for energy: Wasteland development, enclosures, and energy dispossessions. Antipode, 49(4), 977–996. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12219
  • Batel, S. (2018). A critical discussion of research on the social acceptance of renewable energy generation and associated infrastructures and an agenda for the future. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 20(3), 356–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2017.1417120
  • Batel, S. (2020). Research on the social acceptance of renewable energy technologies: Past, present, and future. Energy Research and Social Science, 68, 101544. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101544
  • Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2017). Energy colonialism and the role of the global in local responses to new energy infrastructures in the UK: A critical and exploratory empirical analysis. Antipode, 49(1), 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12261
  • Batel, S., & Devine-Wright, P. (2020). Using NIMBY rhetoric as a political resource to negotiate responses to local energy infrastructure: A power line case study. Local Environment, 25(5), 338–350. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2020.1747413
  • Bidwell, D. (2013). The role of values in public beliefs and attitudes towards commercial wind energy. Energy Policy, 58, 189–199. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.03.010
  • Billé, R. (2008). Integrated coastal zone management: Four entrenched illusions. SAPI EN. S. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating Environment and Society, 1(2), 75–86. https://doi.org/10.5194/sapiens-1-75-2008
  • Borch, K., Munk, A. K., & Dahlgaard, V. (2020). Mapping wind-power controversies on social media: Facebook as a powerful mobilizer of local resistance. Energy Policy, 138, 111223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111223
  • Braunholtz, S. (2003). Public attitudes to windfarms. Scottish Executive, Social Research.
  • Bridge, G., Bouzarovski, S., Bradshaw, M., & Eyre, N. (2013). Geographies of energy transition: Space, place, and the low-carbon economy. Energy Policy, 53, 331–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2012.10.066
  • Burningham, K. (2000). Using the language of NIMBY: A topic for research, not an activity for researchers. Local Environment, 5(1), 55–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/135498300113264
  • Burningham, K., Barnett, J., & Thrush, D. (2006). The limitations of the NIMBY concept for understanding public engagement with renewable energy technologies: A literature. Retrieved March 3, 2021, from https://researchportal.bath.ac.uk/en/publications/the-limitations-of-the-nimby-concept-for-understanding-public-eng
  • Carley, S., Konisky, D. M., Atiq, Z., & Land, N. (2020). Energy infrastructure, NIMBYism, and public opinion: A systematic literature review of three decades of empirical survey literature. Environmental Research Letters, 15(9), 093007. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab875d
  • Ciupuliga, A. R., & Cuppen, E. (2013). The role of dialogue in fostering acceptance of transmission lines: The case of a France–Spain interconnection project. Energy Policy, 60, 224–233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.028
  • Cohen, J., Moeltner, K., Reichl, J., & Schmidthaler, M. (2016). An empirical analysis of local opposition to new transmission lines across the EU-27. The Energy Journal, 37(3). https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.37.3.jcoh
  • Cotton, M., & Devine-Wright, P. (2010). Nimbyism and community consultation in electricity transmission network planning. Renewable Energy and the Public: From NIMBY to Participation, 115–128. https://doi-org.proxy.library.uu.nl/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2012.00568_2.x
  • Cotton, M., & Devine-Wright, P. (2012). Making electricity networks “visible”: Industry actor representations of “publics” and public engagement in infrastructure planning. Public Understanding of Science, 21(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963662510362658
  • Cowell, R., Bristow, G., & Munday, M. (2011). Acceptance, acceptability, and environmental justice: The role of community benefits in wind energy development. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54(4), 539–557. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640568.2010.521047
  • Dake, K. (1991). Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: An analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 22(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022191221006
  • Davy, B. (1996). Fairness as compassion: Towards a less unfair facility siting policy. Risk, 7(2), 99.
  • Davy, B. (1997). Essential injustice: When legal institutions cannot resolve environmental and land use disputes. Springer.
  • Davy, B. (2004). Die Neunte Stadt –Wilde Grenzen und Städteregion Ruhr2030. Müller + Bussmann.
  • Davy, B. (2012). Land policy: Planning and the spatial consequences of property. Ashgate.
  • Devine-Wright, P. (2005). Beyond NIMBYism: Towards an integrated framework for understanding public perceptions of wind energy. Wind Energy: An International Journal for Progress and Applications in Wind Power Conversion Technology, 8(2), 125–139. https://doi.org/10.1002/we.124
  • Devine-Wright, P. (2007). Reconsidering public attitudes and public acceptance of renewable energy technologies: A critical review. Working Paper No. 15, Beyond Nimbyism: A Multidisciplinary Investigation of Public Engagement with Renewable Energy Technologies. https://geography.exeter.ac.uk/beyond_nimbyism/deliverables/bn_wp1_4.pdf
  • Devine-Wright, P. (2011). Public engagement with large-scale renewable energy technologies: Breaking the cycle of NIMBYism. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(1), 19–26. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.89
  • Devine-Wright, P., & Sherry-Brennan, F. (2019). Where do you draw the line? Legitimacy and fairness in constructing community benefit fund boundaries for energy infrastructure projects. Energy Research & Social Science, 54, 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2019.04.002
  • Douglas, M. (1978). Cultural bias (No. 35). Royal Anthropological Institute.
  • Douglas, M. (1999). Four cultures: The evolution of a parsimonious model. GeoJournal, 47(3), 411–415. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1007008025151
  • Douglas, M., & Wildavsky, A. (1982). How can we know the risks we face? Why risk selection is a social process1. Risk Analysis, 2(2), 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1982.tb01365.x
  • Ellis, G., Barry, J., & Robinson, C. (2007). Many ways to say ‘no’, different ways to say ‘yes’: Applying Q-methodology to understand public acceptance of wind farm proposals. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 50(4), 517–551. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560701402075
  • Fischer, F. (1995). Hazardous waste policy, community movements and the politics of Nimby: Participatory risk assessment in the USA and Canada. In Greening environmental policy (pp. 165–182). Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Gailing, L., Bues, A., Kern, K., & Röhring, A. (2020). Socio-spatial dimensions in energy transitions: Applying the TPSN framework to case studies in Germany. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 52(6), 1112–1130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19845142
  • Haakana, J., Haapaniemi, J., Lassila, J., Partanen, J., Niska, H., & Rautiainen, A. (2018, June). Effects of electric vehicles and heat pumps on long-term electricity consumption scenarios for rural areas in the nordic environment. In 2018 15th international conference on the European energy market (EEM) (pp. 1–5). IEEE.
  • Hartmann, T. (2011). Clumsy Floodplains: Responsive Land Policy for Extreme Floods. Farnham, Surrey: Ashgate.
  • Hartmann, T. (2012). Wicked problems and clumsy solutions: Planning as expectation management. Planning Theory, 11(3), 242–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1473095212440427
  • Hartmann, T. (2016). Clumsy floodplains: Responsive land policy for extreme floods. Routledge.
  • Healey, P. (2003). Collaborative planning in perspective. Planning Theory, 2(2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/14730952030022002
  • Koecklin, M. T., Longoria, G., Fitiwi, D. Z., DeCarolis, J. F., & Curtis, J. (2021). Public acceptance of renewable electricity generation and transmission network developments: Insights from Ireland. Energy Policy, 151, 112185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112185
  • Lienert, P., Suetterlin, B., & Siegrist, M. (2015). Public acceptance of the expansion and modification of high-voltage power lines in the context of the energy transition. Energy Policy, 87, 573–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.09.023
  • Marres, N. (2016). Material participation: Technology, the environment, and everyday publics. Springer.
  • Marshall, N., Adger, N., Attwood, S., Brown, K., Crissman, C., Cvitanovic, C., De Young, C., Gooch, M., James, C., Jessen, S., Johnson, D., Marshall, P., Park, S., Wachenfeld, D., & Wrigley, D. (2017). Empirically derived guidance for social scientists to influence environmental policy. PLoS One, 12(3), e0171950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0171950
  • Mikellidou, C. V., Shakou, L. M., Boustras, G., & Dimopoulos, C. (2018). Energy critical infrastructures at risk from climate change: A state of the art review. Safety Science, 110, 110–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2017.12.022
  • Nelson, H. T., Swanson, B., & Cain, N. L. (2018). Close and connected: The effects of proximity and social ties on citizen opposition to electricity transmission lines. Environment and Behavior, 50(5), 567–596. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916517708598
  • Paterson, J. (2007) Sustainable development, sustainable decisions and the precautionary principle. Natural Hazards, 42(3), 515–528.
  • Peterson, M., & Hansson, S. O. (2004). On the application of rights-based moral theories to siting controversies. Journal of Risk Research, 7(2), 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1080/1366987042000171933
  • Priestley, T., & Evans, G. W. (1996). Resident perceptions of a nearby electric transmission line. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(1), 65–74. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0006
  • Soini, K., Pouta, E., Salmiovirta, M., Uusitalo, M., & Kivinen, T. (2011). Local residents’ perceptions of energy landscape: The case of transmission lines. Land Use Policy, 28(1), 294–305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2010.06.009
  • Sorensen, A. D., & Day, R. A. (1981). Libertarian planning. Town Planning Review, 52(4), 390–402. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.52.4.t851976n42252x10
  • Swyngedouw, E. (2010). Apocalypse forever? Theory, Culture & Society, 27(2-3), 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276409358728
  • Tenforde, T. S. (1992). Biological interactions and potential health effects of extremely-low-frequency magnetic fields from power lines and other common sources. Annual Review of Public Health, 13(1), 173–196. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pu.13.050192.001133
  • TenneT. (2019). Kop van Noord-Holland. Retrieved April 7, 2021, from https://www.tennet.eu/nl/ons-hoogspanningsnet/onshore-projecten-nederland/kop-van-noord-holland/
  • Thompson, M., Ellis, R. J., & Wildavsky, A. B. (1990). Cultural Theory. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  • van Zalk, J., & Behrens, P. (2018). The spatial extent of renewable and non-renewable power generation: A review and meta-analysis of power densities and their application in the US. Energy Policy, 123, 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.08.023
  • Verkasalo, P. K., Pukkala, E., Hongisto, M. Y., Valjus, J. E., Järvinen, P. J., Heikkilä, K. V., & Koskenvuo, M. (1993). Risk of cancer in Finnish children living close to power lines. British Medical Journal, 307(6909), 895–899. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.307.6909.895
  • Warren, C. R., Lumsden, C., O'Dowd, S., & Birnie, R. V. (2005). ‘Green on green’: Public perceptions of wind power in Scotland and Ireland. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 48(6), 853–875. https://doi.org/10.1080/09640560500294376
  • Wildavsky, A., & Dake, K. (1990). Theories of risk perception: Who fears what and why? Daedalus, 41–60. http://www.jstor.org/stable/20025337
  • Winn, R. (2014). Landowner compensation in transmission siting for renewable energy facilities. The Electricity Journal, 27(5), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tej.2014.05.010
  • Wolsink, M. (1996). Dutch wind power policy: Stagnating implementation of renewables. Energy Policy, 24(12), 1079–1088. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-4215(97)80002-5
  • Wolsink, M. (2018). Social acceptance revisited: Gaps, questionable trends, and an auspicious perspective. Energy Research & Social Science, 46, 287–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.07.034
  • Zoellner, J., Schweizer-Ries, P., & Wemheuer, C. (2008). Public acceptance of renewable energies: Results from case studies in Germany. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4136–4141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2008.06.026