Urban decarbonization policy as assembling process: heterogeneous elements, networks and (un)making of target groups in a Swedish municipality between serendipity and design

References

• Anderberg, S., & Clark, E. (2013). Green and sustainable Øresund region: Eco-branding Copenhagen and Malmö. In Igor Vojnovic (ed.), Urban sustainability: A global perspective (pp. 591–610). Michigan State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, B., & McFarlane, C. (2011). Assemblage and geography. Area, 43(2), 124–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01004.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersson, I., & James, L. (2018). Altruism or entrepreneurialism? The co-evolution of green place branding and policy tourism in Växjö, Sweden. Urban Studies, 55(15), 3437–3453. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098017749471
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkinson, M. M., & Coleman, W. D. (1992). Policy networks, policy communities and the problems of governance. Governance, 5(2), 154–180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0491.1992.tb00034.x
   Google Scholar
• Baker, T., & McGuirk, P. (2017). Assemblage thinking as methodology: Commitments and practices for critical policy research. Territory, Politics, Governance, 5(4), 425–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2016.1231631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birkland, T. A. (2015). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, N., Madden, D. J., & Wachsmuth, D. (2011). Assemblage urbanism and the challenges of critical urban theory. City, 15(2), 225–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/13604813.2011.568717
   Google Scholar
• Burch, S. (2010). Transforming barriers into enablers of action on climate change: Insights from three municipal case studies in British Columbia, Canada. Global Environmental Change, 20(2), 287–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2009.11.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candel, J. J., & Biesbroek, R. (2016). Toward a processual understanding of policy integration. Policy Sciences, 49(3), 211–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-016-9248-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’: Toward a 21st century fractal innovation ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3-4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cochrane, A. (2010). Exploring the regional politics of ‘sustainability’: Making up sustainable communities in the South-East of England. Environmental Policy and Governance, 20(6), 370–381. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. (2009). Policy. McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• Colebatch, H. K. (2014). Making sense of governance. Policy and Society, 33(4), 307–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polsoc.2014.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deleuze, G., & Guattari, F. (1987). A thouosand plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dierwechter, Y. (2010). Metropolitan geographies of US climate action: Cities, suburbs, and the local divide in global responsibilities. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 12(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239081003625960
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and ‘mode 2’ to a triple helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foxon, T., & Pearson, P. (2008). Overcoming barriers to innovation and diffusion of cleaner technologies: Some features of a sustainable innovation policy regime. Journal of Cleaner Production, 16(1), S148–S161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2007.10.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerston, L. N. (2014). Public policy making: Process and principles. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grandin, J., & Haarstad, H. (2021). Transformation as relational mobilisation: The networked geography of Addis Ababa’s sustainable transport interventions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 39(2), 289–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263775820963281
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H. (2016). Where are urban energy transitions governed? Conceptualizing the complex governance arrangements for low-carbon mobility in Europe. Cities, 54, 4–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2015.10.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haarstad, H. (2017). Constructing the sustainable city: Examining the role of sustainability in the ‘smart city’ discourse. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 19(4), 423–437. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2016.1245610
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, P. (2019). Why is innovation policy projectified?: Political causes in the case of Sweden. In D. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 35–55). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hawkins, C. V., Hu, Q., & Feiock, R. C. (2016). Self-organizing governance of local economic development: Informal policy networks and regional institutions. Journal of Urban Affairs, 38(5), 643–660. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1974). Modern social politics in Britain and Sweden. Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, M. (2005). The public policy process. Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Hodgson, D., Fred, M., Bailey, S., & Hall, P. (2019). Introduction. In D. Hodgson, M. Fred, S. Bailey, & P. Hall (Eds.), The projectification of the public sector (pp. 1–18). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Howlett, M. (2014). From the ‘old’ to the ‘new’ policy design: Design thinking beyond markets and collaborative governance. Policy Sciences, 47(3), 187–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-014-9199-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hultman, M. (2013). The making of an environmental hero: A history of ecomodern masculinity, fuel cells and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Environmental Humanities, 2(1), 79–99. https://doi.org/10.1215/22011919-3610360
   Google Scholar
• Humalisto, N. (2014). From fields towards wastes, residues and laboratories: The European Commission and the assembling of EU biofuel development. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 16(4), 479–495. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2013.865511
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hysing, E. (2009). Greening transport – Explaining urban transport policy change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080903056417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnsson, F., Karlsson, I., Rootzén, J., Ahlbäck, A., & Gustavsson, M. (2020). The framing of a sustainable development goals assessment in decarbonizing the construction industry – Avoiding ‘greenwashing’. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 131, 110029. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2020.110029
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassinis, G., Panayiotou, A., Dimou, A., & Katsifaraki, G. (2016). Gender and environmental sustainability: A longitudinal analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 23(6), 399–412. https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the social. An introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2004). After method: Mess in social science research. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Law, J. (2009). Seeing like a survey. Cultural Sociology, 3(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1177/1749975509105533
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, J., & Singleton, V. (2014). ANT, multiplicity and policy. Critical Policy Studies, 8(4), 379–396. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2014.957056
   Google Scholar
• Li, T. M. (2007). Practices of assemblage and community forest management. Economy and Society, 36(2), 263–293. https://doi.org/10.1080/03085140701254308
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundqvist, L. J., & Biel, A. (2013). From Kyoto to the town hall: Making international and national climate policy work at the local level. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lagendijk, A., & Ploegmakers, H. (2022). Bicycle highways as a ‘liquid' policy concept. The Proliferation of an ‘Active’ Mobility Policy Concept in the Netherlands, Active Travel Studies, 2(2), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.16997/ats.1067
   Google Scholar
• Mahzouni, A. (2015). The ‘policy mix’ for sustainable urban transition: The city district of Hammarby Sjöstad in Stockholm. Environmental Policy and Governance, 25(4), 288–302. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: Challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 803–815. https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dty034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCann, E. (2011). Veritable inventions: Cities, policies and assemblage. Area, 43(2), 143–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4762.2011.01011.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mol, A. (2002). The body multiple: Ontology in medical practice. Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ozaki, R., Shaw, I., & Dodgson, M. (2013). The coproduction of ‘sustainability’: negotiated practices and the Prius. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(4), 518–541. https://doi.org/10.1177/0162243912441029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, D. (2020). Promises and techno-politics: Renewable energy and Malmö’s vision of a climate-smart city. Science as Culture, 29(3), 388–409. https://doi.org/10.1080/09505431.2019.1705274
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parks, D., & Rohracher, H. (2019). From sustainable to smart: Re-branding or re-assembling urban energy infrastructure? Geoforum, 100, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2019.02.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, B. G. (2018). The challenge of policy coordination. Policy Design and Practice, 1(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/25741292.2018.1437946
   Google Scholar
• Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty-first century. Available at SSRN 666808.
   Google Scholar
• Rohracher, H., & Späth, P. (2014). The interplay of urban energy policy and socio-technical transitions: The eco-cities of Graz and Freiburg in retrospect. Urban Studies, 51(7), 1415–1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098013500360
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savage, G. C. (2020). What is policy assemblage? Territory, Politics, Governance, 8(3), 319–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/21622671.2018.1559760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, C., Wright, S., & Però, D. (2011). Conceptualising policy: Technologies of governance and the politics of visibility. In C. Shore, S. Wright, & D. Però (Eds.), Policy worlds: Anthropology and the analysis of contemporary power (Vol. 14, pp. 11–25). Berghahn Books.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, D. (2012). Transfer and translation of policy. Policy Studies, 33(6), 483–499. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2012.695933
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umeå Municipality. (2018). Comprehensive plan for Umeå municipality. Guide to the parts of the plan, its themes and relevance. Umeå Municipality.
   Google Scholar
• Ureta, S. (2015). Assembling policy: Transantiago, human devices, and the dream of a world-class society. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van Asselt, H., Gupta, J., & Biermann, F. (2005). Advancing the climate agenda: Exploiting material and institutional linkages to develop a menu of policy options. Review of European Community and International Environmental Law, 14(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2005.0440a.x
   Google Scholar
• Vogel, E. (2021). Enacting community health: Obesity prevention policies as situated caring. The Sociological Review, 69(5), 1072–1089. https://doi.org/10.1177/00380261211006327
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wedel, J. R., Shore, C., Feldman, G., & Lathrop, S. (2005). Toward an anthropology of public policy. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 600(1), 30–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716205276734
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolfram, M., Van der Heijden, J., Juhola, S., & Patterson, J. (2019). Learning in urban climate governance: Concepts, key issues and challenges. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2018.1558848
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar